British Columbia's COVID-19 surveys on population experiences, action, and knowledge (SPEAK): methods and key findings from two large cross-sectional online surveys.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the methodology and key findings of British Columbia's (BC) COVID-19 SPEAK surveys, developed to understand the experiences, knowledge, and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on British Columbians. METHODS: Two province-wide, cross-sectional, web-based population health surveys were conducted one year apart (May 2020 and April/May 2021). Questions were drawn from validated sources grounded within the social determinants of health to assess COVID-19 testing and prevention; mental and physical health; risk and protective factors; and healthcare, social, and economic impacts during the pandemic. Quota-based non-probability sampling by geography was applied to recruit a representative sample aged 18 years and older. Recruitment included strategic outreach and longitudinal follow-up of a subgroup of respondents from round one to round two. Post-collection weighting using Census data by age, sex, education, ethnicity, and geography was conducted. RESULTS: Participants included 394,382 and 188,561 British Columbians for the first and second surveys, respectively, including a longitudinal subgroup of 141,728. Key findings showed that societal impacts, both early in the pandemic and one year later, were inequitably distributed. Families with children, young adults, and people from lower socioeconomic backgrounds have been most impacted. Significant negative impacts on mental health and stress and a deterioration in protective resiliency factors were found. CONCLUSION: These population health surveys consisting of two large cross-sectional samples provided valuable insight into the impacts and experiences of British Columbians early in the pandemic and one year later. Timely, actionable data informed several high-priority public health areas during BC's response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Décrire la méthode et les principaux constats des enquêtes SPEAK de la Colombie-Britannique sur la COVID-19, élaborées pour comprendre l'expérience des Britanno-Colombiens durant la pandémie, ainsi que leurs connaissances de la pandémie et les effets qu'elle a eus sur eux. MéTHODE: Deux enquêtes en ligne transversales sur la santé de la population ont été menées dans toute la province à un an d'intervalle (en mai 2020 et en avril-mai 2021). Les questions, qui provenaient de sources validées ancrées dans les déterminants sociaux de la santé, ont servi à évaluer le dépistage et la prévention de la COVID-19; la santé mentale et physique; les facteurs de risque et de protection; et les effets sociaux, économiques et sur les soins de santé ressentis durant la pandémie. Un échantillonnage contingentaire non probabiliste par lieu géographique a été appliqué pour recruter un échantillon représentatif de personnes de 18 ans et plus. Le recrutement a inclus une prise de contact stratégique et un suivi longitudinal auprès d'un sous-groupe de répondants entre les cycles un et deux. Après la collecte, les données ont été pondérées selon l'âge, le sexe, le niveau d'instruction, l'ethnicité et le lieu géographique à l'aide des données du Recensement. RéSULTATS: Les participants étaient 394 382 Britanno-Colombiens au cours du premier cycle de l'enquête et 188 561 au deuxième cycle, dont un sous-groupe longitudinal de 141 728 personnes. Selon les principaux constats, la répartition des effets sociétaux, tant au début de la pandémie qu'un an plus tard, a été inéquitable. Les familles avec enfants, les jeunes adultes et les personnes de statut socioéconomique plus faible ont été les plus touchés. D'importants effets nuisibles sur la santé mentale et le stress ont été constatés, ainsi qu'une détérioration des facteurs de résilience protecteurs. CONCLUSION: Ces enquêtes sur la santé de la population comprenant deux grands échantillons transversaux ont jeté un éclairage précieux sur les effets subis et les expériences vécues par les Britanno-Colombiens au début de la pandémie et un an plus tard. Ces données opportunes et exploitables ont éclairé plusieurs domaines hautement prioritaires de la santé publique durant la riposte de la Colombie-Britannique à la pandémie de COVID-19.

Chronic disease and where you live: Built and natural environment relationships with physical activity, obesity, and diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is among the most prevalent non-communicable diseases causing significant morbidity and mortality globally. The aetiology and disease development of diabetes are influenced by genetic, lifestyle, and environmental factors. Due to an increasing number of cases each year, it is imperative to improve the understanding of modifiable environmental risk and protective factors. In this study we aimed to analyse associations between built and natural environment features and diabetes prevalence; and two major risk factors: physical activity and obesity and their mediation effects. METHODS: We analysed relationships between walkability and park availability with physical activity, obesity, and diabetes, using self-reported data from a large cross-sectional survey in British Columbia, Canada (n = 22,418). We validated results with an independent cohort (n = 11,972) in a subset of the analyses. The outcome measures included walking, moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), body mass index (BMI), and diabetes. Built and natural environment features within a 1 km road network buffer around residential postal code centroids were assessed using validated indicators of walkability and park availability. We used general linear multivariable models (GLM) to examine the direct relationship between environmental features, physical activity, obesity, and diabetes respectively. Path models were developed to analyse mediation effects of physical activity and obesity on the association between environmental indicators and diabetes. The relative contribution of direct versus indirect effects was assessed. All models were adjusted for age, gender, income. ethnicity, years lived in neighbourhood and regional accessibility. RESULTS: Walkable neighbourhoods and areas with greater park availability were associated with lower rates of diabetes. There was a direct association of walkability and park availability on physical activity (highest vs. lowest quintile OR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.33 and OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.45 respectively), obesity (highest vs. lowest quintile OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.70 and OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.68 respectively) and diabetes (highest vs. lowest quintile OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.85, and OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.84 respectively). Results were similar in the independent cohort. The associations between diabetes and walkability and park availability respectively were partly mediated by obesity (41% of total association for walkability and 53% of total association for park availability). The mediating effect of physical activity was negligible. CONCLUSION: Results support investments in walkability through active transportation and transit infrastructure. Changes in zoning and subdivision regulations governing land use actions are required to enable compact mixed-use environments with access to parks and high quality transit service. Future studies including cost-benefit analyses of health-related economic impacts of such investments can contribute to evidence-based decisions for healthier cities.

Community design and hypertension: Walkability and park access relationships with cardiovascular health.

BACKGROUND: There is an increased literature focusing on the role of the built and natural environments in preventing hypertension. However, very few studies have quantitively analyzed specific pathways through which urban form affects blood pressure levels. OBJECTIVES: To examine how features of the built and natural environments relate to hypertension and the mediating role of transportation and leisure walking and body mass index in this relationship. METHODS: We examined the association between neighbourhood walkability and park availability with hypertension through generalized linear models in two independent population cohorts. One Cohort was 22,418 adults (My Health My Community) and the other cohort was 11,972 adults (BC Generations Project). We employed a path analysis modelling approach to explore the presence and significance of mediating factors that may contribute to any association between walkability or park availability and hypertension. This study intentionally employed walkability measures enforced through municipal zoning and subdivision regulations legally underpinned by health, safety, and welfare. All models were adjusted for socioeconomic and other characteristics where data were available. RESULTS: Our analysis of two population-based Canadian cohorts consistently found that higher levels of walkability and park accessibility were both associated with significantly lower odds of self-reported hypertension, especially for lower income individuals. Mediation analysis showed that obesity accounted for 50% and 52.9% of the total effect of walkability and park accessibility on hypertension, respectively. DISCUSSION: We suggest an integrated population health approach that considers multimorbidity as a result of exposure to car-dependent areas and the lack of green spaces. Longitudinal research is needed to document causal effects of built and natural environments on hypertension.