Validation of the Individualized Metabolic Surgery score in predicting long-term remission of diabetes after duodenal switch-type procedures.

AIM: To validate the Individualized Metabolic Surgery (IMS) score and assess long-term remission of type 2 diabetes (T2D) after duodenal switch (DS)-type procedures in patients with obesity. In addition, to help guide metabolic procedure selection for those patients categorized as having severe T2D. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective single cohort study of all patients with T2D and severe obesity, who underwent DS-type procedures at a single institution from December 2010 to December 2018. Study endpoints included validating the IMS score in our cohort and evaluating the impact of DS-type procedures on long-term (≥ 5 years) remission of T2D, especially in patients with severe disease. A receiver operator characteristic curve was used to assess the accuracy of the IMS score using the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: The study cohort included 30 patients with complete baseline and long-term glycaemic data after their index DS-type surgery. Twelve patients (40%) were classified with severe T2D, and the distribution of IMS-based severity groups was similar between our cohort and the original IMS study (P = .42). IMS scores predicted long-term T2D remission with AUC = 0.77. Patients with IMS-based severe diabetes achieved significantly higher long-term remission after DS-type procedures compared with gastric bypass and/or sleeve gastrectomy from the original IMS study (42% vs. 12%; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The IMS score properly classifies the severity of T2D in our study cohort and adequately predicts its long-term remission after DS-type procedures. While T2D remission decreases with more severe IMS scores, long-term remission remains high after DS-type procedures among patients with severe disease.

Ambulatory bariatric surgery: a prospective single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory bariatric surgery has recently gained interest especially as a potential way to improve access for eligible patients with severe obesity. Building on our previously published research, this follow-up study delves deeper in the evolving landscape of ambulatory bariatric surgery over a 3-year period, focusing on predictors of success/failure. METHODS: In a prospective single-center follow-up study, we conducted a descriptive assessment of all eligible patients as per our established protocol, who underwent a planned same-day discharge (SDD) primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) between 03/01/2021 and 02/29/2024. Trends in SDD surgeries over time were assessed over six discrete 6 month intervals. Primary endpoint was defined as a successful discharge on the day of surgery without emergency department visit or readmission within 24 h. Secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 811 primary SG and 325 RYGB procedures were performed during the study period. Among them, 30% (n = 244) were SDD-SGs and 6% (n = 21) were SDD-RYGBs, respectively. At baseline, median age of the entire SDD cohort was 43 years old, 81% were females, and body mass index (BMI) was 44.5 kg/m2. The planned SDD approach was successful in 89% after SG (n = 218/244) and in 90% after RYGB (n = 19/21). Nausea/vomiting was the main reason for a failed SDD approach after SG (46%). The 30-day readmission rate was 1.5% (n = 4) for the entire SDD cohort including only one readmission in the first 24 h. The percentage of SDD-SGs performed as a proportion of total SGs increased over the initial five consecutive six-month intervals (14%, 25%, 24%, 38%, and 49%). CONCLUSION: Our SDD protocol for bariatric surgery demonstrates a favorable safety profile, marked by high success rate and low postoperative morbidity. These outcomes have led to a continued increase in ambulatory procedures performed over time especially SG.

Ambulatory sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective feasibility and comparative study of early postoperative morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Given its short procedure time and low morbidity, there is enthusiasm to perform sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in an outpatient setting. However, most relevant studies include an overnight stay at a medical facility (≤ 24-h). Hence, we investigated the feasibility and safety of a same-day discharge (SDD) protocol for laparoscopic SG. METHODS: In a prospective pilot study (02/01/2021-02/28/2022), all patients planned for SG were screened for eligibility. Patients met the inclusion criteria if they were ≤ 65 years old, without major comorbidity, and lived close to the hospital. Postoperatively, patients who met discharge criteria were sent home directly from the recovery room. Patients were called the same night and the next morning. Feasibility was defined as discharge on the day of surgery without emergency department (ED) visit or readmission within 24-h. Secondary outcomes, including 90-day morbidity, were compared to patients who met inclusion criteria but chose a same-day admission (SDA) approach during the same study period. Descriptive statistics are displayed as count (percentage) and median (interquartile range). RESULTS: A total of 320 patients were planned for SG during the study period, 229 of whom met eligibility criteria and underwent SG with 56 agreeing to SDD-SG while 173 opted for SDA-SG. Baseline characteristics were all similar between both groups except for obstructive sleep apnea being more prevalent in SDA-SG group (38.2% vs. 16.1%; P < 0.001). Operative characteristics including procedure time were similar between both groups. Successful SDD-SG was achieved in 54(96%) of patients with a median of 6.0(1.0) hours of stay in the recovery room. Ninety-day morbidity was similar between SDD-SG and SDA-SG groups (1.8% vs. 6.9%, respectively; P = 0.196). CONCLUSION: A SDD protocol for laparoscopic SG was feasible and safe in selected patients. Larger studies that evaluate patient reported outcomes and include bypass-type procedures may be needed to guide safe use of ambulatory bariatric surgery.

Bowel stimulation before loop ileostomy closure to reduce postoperative ileus: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative bowel stimulation on the development of postoperative ileus (POI) after loop ileostomy closure. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (NCT025596350) including adult (≥ 18 years old) patients who underwent elective loop ileostomy closure at 7 participating hospitals. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using a centralized computer-generated sequence with block randomization to either preoperative bowel stimulation or no stimulation (control group). Bowel stimulation consisted of 10 outpatient sessions within the 3 weeks prior to ileostomy closure and was performed by trained Enterostomal Therapy nurses. The primary outcome was POI, defined as an intolerance to oral food in the absence of clinical or radiological signs of obstruction, on or after postoperative day 3, that either (a) required nasogastric tube insertion; or (b) was associated with two of the following: nausea/vomiting, abdominal distension, or the absence of flatus. RESULTS: Between January 2017 and November 2020, 101 patients were randomized, and 5 patients never underwent ileostomy closure; thus, 96 patients (47 stimulated vs. 49 control) were analyzed according to a modified intention-to-treat protocol. Baseline characteristics were well balanced in both groups. The incidence of POI was lower among patients randomized to stimulation (6.4% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.034; unadjusted RR: 0.26, 95% CI 0.078-0.87). Stimulated patients also had earlier median time to first flatus (2.0 days (1.0-2.0) vs. 2.0 days (2.0-3.0), p = 0.025), were more likely to pass flatus on postoperative day 1 (46.8% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.022), and had a shorter median postoperative hospital stay (3.0 days (2.0-3.5) vs. 4.0 days (2.0-6.0), p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative bowel stimulation via the efferent limb of the ileostomy reduced POI after elective loop ileostomy closure.

Impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on rates of emergency department utilization and hospital admission due to general surgery conditions.

BACKGROUND: Recent literature reports a decrease in healthcare-seeking behaviours by adults during the Covid-19 pandemic. Given that emergency general surgery (GS) conditions are often associated with high morbidity and mortality if left untreated, the objective of this study was to describe and quantify the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on rates of emergency department (ED) utilization and hospital admission due to GS conditions. METHODS: This cohort study involved the analysis of an institutional database and retrospective chart review. We identified adult patients presenting to the ED in a network of three teaching hospitals in Montreal, Canada during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic (March13-May13, 2020) and a control pre-pandemic period (March13-May13, 2019). Patients with GS conditions were included in the analysis. ED utilization rates, admission rates and 30-day outcomes were compared between the two periods using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: During the pandemic period, 258 patients presented to ED with a GS diagnosis compared to 351 patients pre-pandemically (adjusted rate ratio (aRR) 0.75; p < 0.001). Rate of hospital admission during the pandemic was also significantly lower (aRR = 0.77, p < 0.001). Patients had a significantly shorter ED stay during the pandemic (adjusted mean difference 5.0 h; p < 0.001). Rates of operative management during the pandemic were preserved compared to the pre-pandemic period. There were no differences in 30-day complications (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.46; p = 0.07), ED revisits (aOR 1.10; p = 0.66) and (re)admissions (aOR 1.42; p = 0.22) between the two periods. CONCLUSION: There was a decrease in rates of ED utilization and hospital admissions due to GS conditions during the first wave of the Covid -19 pandemic; however, rates of operative management, complications and healthcare reutilization were unchanged. Although our findings are not generalizable to patients who did not seek healthcare, it was possible to successfully uphold institutional standards of care once patients presented to the ED.

Patients' experiences of telenursing follow-up care after bariatric surgery.

AIM: To explore the postsurgical management experiences of bariatric patients after receiving telenursing follow-up care, using a telemonitoring platform for approximately 1 month. BACKGROUND: Obesity prevalence rates among adult Canadians are increasing, and as such the number of bariatric surgeries. Adapting to life following bariatric surgery is challenging, and patients are often experiencing difficulties to adhere to the postsurgical behavioural recommendations. The use of technology has been introduced in bariatric aftercare programmes, yet patients voiced a desire to communicate with a clinician between routine visits to improve continuity of care. To our knowledge, there is a lack of research on emerging practice of telenursing to provide monitoring, support and aftercare to bariatric patients remotely. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive design was used. METHODS: A total of 22 semi-structured interviews were thematically analysed. The SRQR checklist was used. RESULTS: Participants embraced the idea of integrating telenursing care in bariatric aftercare programmes, as they viewed this novel approach to care as a way to overcome the current challenges of accessing bariatric services. The most salient benefit reported by participants was the timely advice and care provided by the telenurse. The provision of tailored nursing care and the accessibility to a first-line professional empowered participants to exercise greater control over their recovery process, which promotes self-management and enhances feelings of security and reassurance. Lastly, participants voiced areas of improvement to better the system and to render it most accessible and user-friendly. CONCLUSION: Despite its novelty in bariatric aftercare, our findings indicated that patients are eager to integrate telenursing in mainstream services. Discussions are needed regarding patient adherence to telemonitoring, and the need to develop clinical follow-up protocols. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Results provide new insights into the importance of a telenurse in providing individualised care to bariatric patients.

Short-term outcomes of revisional surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: a comparative analysis of re-sleeve, Roux en-Y gastric bypass, duodenal switch (Roux en-Y and single-anastomosis).

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most common primary bariatric surgery. Long-term, up to 20% of patients may need revisional surgery. We aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of various revisional bariatric surgeries after a failed primary SG. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study of a prospectively collected database of obese patients who underwent revisional bariatric surgery during 2010-2018 for a failed previous SG. Failure was defined as inadequate weight loss (< 50% excess weight loss), ≥ 20% weight regain of the weight lost, and presence of refractory non-reflux obesity-related comorbidities ≥ 1 year after SG. Revisions included were re-sleeve, Roux en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS), and single-anastomosis duodenal switch (SADS). The primary outcome was weight loss after revision. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications. Due to varying follow-up rates, short-term outcomes (≥ 6 and ≤ 18 months) were assessed. Descriptive statistics are expressed as count(percentage) or median(interquartile range). RESULTS: Ninety-four patients met inclusion criteria. Forty-one underwent conversion to RYGB, 33 had BPD/DS, 7 had SADS, and 13 underwent re-sleeve surgery. Median interval between SG and revision was 31(27) months. At a median of 14(18) months, follow-up rate was 76% for the study cohort. Prior to revision, median BMI was 41.9(11.7) kg/m2 and 1 year after decreased by 6.3(5.1) kg/m2. BPD/DS resulted in the largest total weight loss of 21.8(10.9) kg followed by RYGB 13.2(11.3), SADS 12.2(6.1), and re-sleeve 12.0(11.9) kg; p = 0.023. Major 90-day and long-term complications occurred only after RYGB and BPD/DS and were similar (7.3% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.769 and 9.8% vs. 24.2%; p = 0.173, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: At 1 year, revisional procedures offer further weight loss after a failed primary SG. Bypass-type revisions are preferred over re-sleeve surgery. In the absence of refractory reflux symptoms, duodenal switch-type procedures are safe and effective options especially in patients with severe obesity before SG.

Safety and efficacy of the sleeve gastrectomy as a strategy towards kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Obese individuals suffering from advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) may be precluded from accessing kidney transplantation. Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for obesity and related conditions but its use in those with severe CKD remains limited due to morbidity concerns. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in patients with severe CKD as a bridging strategy towards kidney transplant candidacy. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study of a prospectively collected database of obese patients referred by the multi-organ transplant team for surgical weight loss, who underwent SG during 2013-2018. The primary outcome was 90-day major morbidity. Secondary outcomes included weight loss, and successful kidney transplantation. Descriptive statistics are expressed as count (percent) or median (interquartile range). RESULTS: 32 patients met inclusion criteria. 18 (56%) were male with a median age and BMI of 51 (11) years and 42.3 (5.2) kg/m2, respectively. 29 (91%) patients were on dialysis for a median duration of 28 months before SG. Diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were present in 15 (47%), 25 (78%), and 21 (66%) patients, respectively. At 90 days after SG, there were no leaks, reoperations, or mortality. The median length of stay was 2 (1.3) days. At 1 year, change in BMI and percent excess weight loss (EWL) were -9.8 (3.7) kg/m2 and 56% (27), respectively. In the year after SG, 20 (63%) patients were listed for transplant. 14 (44%) underwent successful kidney transplantation. One patient died while waiting for transplant. At time of transplant, median change in BMI and EWL were -9.0 (5.5) kg/m2 and 59% (30), respectively. After transplant, no patient required dialysis at a median follow-up of 17 (32) months. CONCLUSION: SG is safe and effective for weight loss and bridging to candidacy for kidney transplantation in patients with severe CKD. The acceptable safety and efficiency of SG in this high-risk population makes it an optimal choice as a bridging procedure.

Postoperative Recovery in Frail, Pre-frail, and Non-frail Elderly Patients Following Abdominal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to explore the association between frailty and surgical recovery over a 6-month period, in elderly patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery. METHODS: A total of 144 patients were categorized as frail, pre-frail, and non-frail based on five criteria: weight loss, exhaustion, weakness, slowness, and low activity. Recovery to preoperative functional status (activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL)), cognition, quality of life, and mental health was assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. A repeated measure logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of frailty on recovery over time. The effect of frailty on hospitalization outcomes was also evaluated. RESULTS: Mean age was 78 ± 5 years with 17.4% of patients categorized as frail, 60.4% pre-frail, and 22.2% non-frail. At 6 months, the percent of patients who had recovered to preoperative values were: ADL 90%; IADL 76%; cognition 75.5%; mental health 66%; and quality of life 70%. While more frail patients experienced adverse hospitalization outcomes and fewer had recovered to preoperative functional status, these differences were not found to be statistically significant. Overall, frailty status was not significantly associated with the trajectory of recovery or hospitalization outcomes. CONCLUSION: Strong, institutional commitment to quality surgical care, as well as appropriate strategies for older patients, may have mitigated the impact of frailty on recovery. Further research is needed to examine the role of frailty in the surgical recovery process.

The impact of postoperative complications on the recovery of elderly surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: While the negative impact of postoperative complications on hospital costs, survival, and cancer recurrence is well known, few studies have quantified the impact of postoperative complications on patient-centered outcomes such as functional status. The objective of this study was to estimate the impact of postoperative complications on recovery of functional status after elective abdominal surgery in elderly patients. METHODS: Elderly patients (70 years and older) undergoing elective abdominal surgery, with a planned length of stay >1 day, were prospectively enrolled between July 2012 and December 2014. The primary outcome was time to recovery to the preoperative functional status measured by the short physical performance battery (SPPB) preoperatively and at 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. The comprehensive complication index was calculated to grade the severity and number of postoperative complications. A Weibull survival model with interval censoring was performed, controlling for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index-CCI), frailty, presence of cancer, nutritional status, wound class, preoperative functional status, and surgical approach. RESULTS: Hundred and forty-nine patients (79 men and 70 women) were included in the analysis. Mean age was 77.7 ± 4.9 years, mean BMI was 27.2 ± 5.5 kg/m(2), and the median CCI was 3 (IQR 2-6). The mean preoperative SPPB score was 9.62 ± 2.33. A total of 52 patients (34.9 %) experienced one or more postoperative complications, including four mortalities, and a total of 72 complications. The mean comprehensive complication index score for these patients was 25.7 ± 23.8. In the presence of all other variables included in the model, a higher comprehensive complication index score was found to significantly decrease the hazard of recovery (HR 0.96, CI 0.94-0.98, p value = 0.0004) and hence increase the time to recovery. CONCLUSION: Following elective abdominal surgery, elderly patients who experience a greater number and more severe postoperative complications take longer to return to their preoperative functional status.

Simulation-based training improves the operative performance of totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has an important role to play in the care of patients with inguinal hernias, but the procedure is difficult to learn. This study aimed to assess whether training to proficiency using a novel laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) simulation curriculum improved operating room (OR) performance. METHODS: For this study, 17 surgical residents [postgraduate years (PGYs) 2-5] participated in a didactic LIHR course and then were randomized to a training (T) or a control (C, standard residency) group. Performance of totally extraperitoneal (TEP) LIHR in the OR at baseline and after the study was measured using the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills-Groin Hernia (GOALS-GH). RESULTS: Of the 17 residents, 14 (5 T and 9 C) completed their final evaluations. The two groups showed no differences in terms of LIHR experience. The baseline GOALS-GH scores in the OR were similar (T 14.8; range 12.8-16.8 vs. C 13.6; range 12.3-14.8; P = 0.20). The mean number of training sessions needed to achieve proficiency was 4.8 (range 4.4-5.2), and the mean total training time was 109 min (range 61.9-149.1 min). After training, OR performance improved in the T group by 3.4 points (range 2.0-4.8 points; P = 0.002), whereas no significant change was seen in the C group [1.2; (range -1.1 to 3.6; P = 0.27)]. The final total GOALS-GH scores showed a trend toward better performance in the T group than in the C group [18.2; (range 14.9-21.5) vs. 14.8; (range 12.4-17.1); P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the skills required for transfer of LIHR to the OR using a low-cost procedure-specific simulator. Residents who trained to proficiency on the McGill Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Simulator (MLIHS) showed greater skill improvement than their colleagues who did not. These results provide evidence supporting the use of simulation to teach and assess LIHR.

Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch versus Classic Duodenal Switch: Long-term Outcomes from a Prospective Comparative Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: The literature on long-term outcomes of duodenal switch (DS) compared to single anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S) procedures is lacking. We evaluated the long-term outcomes of SADI-S compared to those after the classic DS procedure. METHODS: This is a follow-up report from a single-institution prospective cohort study comparing long-term outcomes of SADI-S versus DS both as one- and two-stage procedures (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02792166). Data is depicted as count (percentage) or median (interquartile range). RESULTS: Forty-two patients underwent SADI-S, of whom 11 had it as a second-stage procedure (26%). Of 20 patients who underwent DS, twelve had it as a second-stage procedure (60%). Both groups were similar at baseline. Median follow-up times for one-stage SADI-S and DS were 57 (24) and 57 (9) months, respectively (p = 0.93). Similar BMI reductions were observed after one-stage SADI-S (16.5 kg/m2 [8.5]) and DS (18.9 kg/m2 [7.2]; p = 0.42). At median follow-up of 51 (21) and 60 (15) months after second-stage SADI-S and DS, respectively (p = 0.60), surgical procedures yielded reductions in BMI of 20.5 kg/m2 (14.0) and 24.0 kg/m2 (13.9), respectively (p = 0.52). Follow-up rates were similar for one-stage (≥ 88%; p = 0.29) and second-stage procedures (≥ 83%; p = 0.16). Similar diabetes and hypertension remissions were found (p = 0.77; P = 0.54, respectively). Despite fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies at baseline, after supplementation, they were either eliminated or less prevalent long-term after SADI-S. Daily bowel movements were also less frequent. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term weight and comorbidity outcomes after SADI-S are similar to those of DS both as one- and two-stage surgeries. SADI-S procedure may allow for similar beneficial outcomes with less burden from gastrointestinal symptoms and fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies.

Long-term Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Obesity, Diabetes and Hypertension: a Population-level Study.

BACKGROUND: The literature on long-term impact of bariatric/metabolic surgery on incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with obesity and metabolic syndrome is still lacking. We aimed to evaluate the long-term relationship between metabolic surgery and MACE in such patients. METHODS: In a population-based cohort study, we compared all patients with obesity, diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or hypertension (HTN), who underwent bariatric surgery in Quebec, Canada during 2007-2012, with matched controls with obesity. The incidence of a composite MACE outcome (coronary artery events, heart failure, cerebrovascular events, and all-cause mortality) after bariatric surgery was compared between both groups. Cox regression was used to evaluate the long-term impact of surgery on MACE outcomes. RESULTS: The study cohort included 3627 surgical patients, who were matched to 5420 controls with obesity. Baseline demographics were comparable between groups, but DM was more prevalent among the surgical group. Median follow-up time was 7.05 years for the study cohort (range: 5-11 years). There was a significant long-term difference in the incidence of MACE between the surgical group and controls (19.6% vs. 24.8%, respectively; p < 0.01). After accounting for confounders, bariatric surgery remained an independent protective predictor of long-term MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [95%CI, 0.78-0.89]). The 10-year absolute risk reduction (ARR) for the surgical group was 5.14% (95%CI, 3.41-6.87). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with obesity, DM and HTN, bariatric/metabolic surgery is associated with a sustained (≥ 10 years) decrease in the incidence of MACE. The results from this population-level observational study should be validated in randomized controlled trials.

Mastery versus the standard proficiency target for basic laparoscopic skill training: effect on skill transfer and retention.

BACKGROUND: Little evidence exists to guide educators in the best way to implement simulation within surgical skills curricula. This study investigated whether practicing a basic Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) simulator task [peg transfer (PT)] facilitates learning a more complex skill [intracorporeal suturing (ICS)] and compared the effect of PT training to mastery with training to the passing level on PT retention and on learning ICS. METHODS: For this study, 98 surgically naïve subjects were randomized to one of three PT training groups: control, standard training, and overtraining. All the participants then trained in ICS. The learning curves for ICS were analyzed by estimating the learning plateau and rate using nonlinear regression. Skill retention was assessed by retesting participants 1 month after training. The groups were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Effectiveness of skill transfer was calculated using the transfer effectiveness ratio (TER). Data are presented as mean±standard deviation (p<0.05). RESULTS: The study was completed by 77 participants (28 control, 26 standard, and 23 overtrained subjects). The ICS learning plateau rose with increasing PT training (452±10 vs. 459±10 vs. 467±10; p<0.01). Increased PT training was associated with a trend toward higher initial ICS scores (128±107 vs. 127±110 vs. 183±106; p=0.13) and faster learning rates (15±4 vs. 14±4 vs. 13±4 trials; p=0.10). At retention, there were no differences in PT scores (p=0.5). The PT training took 20±10 min for standard training and 39±20 min for overtraining (p<0.01). Overtrained participants saved 11±5 min in ICS training compared with the control subjects (p=0.04). However, TER was 0.165 for the overtraining group and 0.160 for the standard training group, suggesting that PT overtraining took longer than the time saved on ICS training. CONCLUSION: For surgically naïve subjects, part-task training with PT alone was associated with slight improvements in the learning curve for ICS. However, overtraining with PT did not improve skill retention, and peg training alone was not an efficient strategy for learning ICS.

Esophageal cancer after sleeve gastrectomy: a population-based comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most common bariatric surgery; however, this approach may induce gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Both obesity and GERD are independent risk factors for esophageal cancer, however the impact of SG on risk of esophageal cancer remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of esophageal cancer after reflux-prone bariatric surgery. SETTING: Population-level, provincial administrative healthcare database, Quebec, Canada. METHODS: We identified a population-based cohort of all patients with obesity who underwent reflux-prone surgery (SG and duodenal switch [DS]) or reflux-protective Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) during 01/2006-12/2012 in Quebec, Canada. For every surgical patient, 2-3 nonsurgical controls with obesity matched for age, sex, and geography were also identified. Crude incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for esophageal cancer were calculated using person-time analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) were obtained using multivariate cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 4121 patients had reflux-prone procedures and 852 underwent RYGB. At a mean follow-up of 7.6 years, 8 cases of esophageal cancer were identified after bariatric surgery. Compared with RYGB, IRR for esophageal cancer in reflux-prone group was 1.45 (95%CI: .19-65.5) and HR = .83 (95%CI: .10-7.27). The crude incidence rate of esophageal cancer in the reflux-prone group was higher than that of nonsurgical controls (n = 12,159; IRR = 3.46, 95%CI: 1.00-12.5), but after adjustment the difference disappeared (HR = 2.47, 95%CI: .82-7.45). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term incidence of esophageal cancer after reflux-prone bariatric surgery is not greater than RYGB. While crude incidence of esophageal cancer after reflux-prone surgery is higher than in nonsurgical patients with obesity, such difference disappears after accounting for confounders. Given the low incidence of esophageal cancer and slow progression of dysplastic Barrett esophagus, studies with longer follow-up are needed.

Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S): short-term outcomes from a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is a modification of the classic duodenal switch (DS). These modifications are intended to address concerns about DS, including malnutrition, longer operative times, and technical challenges, while preserving the benefits. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate safety and outcomes of SADI-S as it compares to classic DS procedure. SETTING: Bariatric Surgery Center of Excellence, University Hospital, Montreal, Canada. METHODS: In a single-institution prospective cohort study, we compared safety and outcomes of the SADI-S versus DS procedures (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02792166; registered: 06/2016). Data is depicted as count (percentage) or median (interquartile range). RESULTS: There were 42 patients who underwent SADI-S, of whom 11 had it as a second-stage procedure (26%). There were 20 patients who underwent DS, of whom 12 had it as second-stage procedures (60%). Both groups were similar at baseline. The median age was 45 (14) years, 39 (63%) were female, the median body mass index (BMI) was 48.2 (7.7) kg/m2, and 29 (47%) patients had diabetes. The operative time was shorter for 1-stage SADI-S versus DS surgery (211 [70] versus 250 [60] min, respectively; P = .05) but was similar for second-stage procedures (P = .06). The 90-day complication rates were 11.9% (N = 5/42) after SADI-S and 5.0% (N = 1/20) after DS surgery (P = .64). There were no mortalities. Median follow-ups for 1-stage SADI-S and DS were 17 (11) and 12 (24) months, respectively (P = .65). Similar BMI changes were observed after 1-stage SADI-S (17.9 kg/m2 [8.7]) and DS (17.5 kg/m2 [16]; P = .65). At median follow-ups of 10 (20) and 14 (16) months after second-stage SADI-S and DS, respectively (P = .53), surgical procedures yielded added 5.0 kg/m2 (5.8) and 6.5 kg/m2 (7.1) changes in BMI, respectively (P = .26). Complete remission rates for diabetes were 91% after SADI-S (n = 21/23) and 50% after DS (n = 3/6). Compared with the SADI-S procedure, DS surgery was associated with higher frequencies of deficiencies in some fat-soluble vitamins, especially vitamin D. CONCLUSIONS: The SADI-S procedure is safe, and its short-term outcomes, including weight loss and the resolution of co-morbidities, are similar to those of DS. SADI-S surgery also has promising potential as a second-stage procedure after sleeve gastrectomy.

Development and Validation of a Clinical Risk Score for Intensive Care Resource Utilization After Colon Cancer Surgery: a Practical Guide to the Selection of Patients During COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a prediction model and clinical risk score for Intensive Care Resource Utilization after colon cancer surgery. METHODS: Adult (≥ 18 years old) patients from the 2012 to 2018 ACS-NSQIP colectomy-targeted database who underwent elective colon cancer surgery were identified. A prediction model for 30-day postoperative Intensive Care Resource Utilization was developed and transformed into a clinical risk score based on the regression coefficients. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. The model was validated in a separate test set of similar patients. RESULTS: In total, 54,893 patients underwent an elective colon cancer resection, of which 1224 (2.2%) required postoperative Intensive Care Resource Utilization. The final prediction model retained six variables: age (≥ 70; OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.68-2.14), sex (male; OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.54-1.95), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (III/IV; OR 2.52, 95% CI 2.15-2.95), cardiorespiratory disease (yes; OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.94-2.53), functional status (dependent; OR 2.81, 95% CI 2.22-3.56), and operative approach (open surgery; OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.51-1.93). The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC = 0.73). A clinical risk score was developed, and the risk of requiring postoperative Intensive Care Resource Utilization ranged from 0.03 (0 points) to 19.0% (8 points). The model performed well on test set validation (AUC = 0.73). CONCLUSION: A prediction model and clinical risk score for postoperative Intensive Care Resource Utilization after colon cancer surgery was developed and validated.

Recommended timing for surveillance ultrasonography to diagnose portal splenic vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic portal or splenic vein thrombosis (PSVT) is a rare but potentially lethal complication of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS). While routine postoperative duplex ultrasound surveillance can be used for early detection, the optimal timing is unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence and progression of asymptomatic PSVT 1 week and 1 month after LS. METHODS: Consecutive patients scheduled for LS for hematologic disease participated in this study. Patients underwent surveillance for PSVT using duplex ultrasonography 1 week and 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: 43 of 48 patients planning to undergo LS in the study period were enrolled, with 3 subsequently excluded, leaving 40 for further analysis. The indications for LS were benign disease in 31 [19 had immune thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP)] and malignant disease in 9. A hand-assisted technique was used in 12 cases. PSVT was diagnosed in 9/40 patients (22.5%). Seven (77.8%) were diagnosed by 1 week with ultrasound, of whom one had mild symptoms (fever and diarrhea). After anticoagulation, subsequent ultrasounds showed resolution or improvement in all seven patients. Thirty-three patients had a normal ultrasound result at 1 week. One of these patients also had a computed tomography (CT) scan that found a PSVT not seen on ultrasound. Twenty-seven patients returned for follow-up after normal 1-week imaging: 26 patients had an ultrasound at 1 month, with no new PSVT found. One additional patient did not return for subsequent ultrasound until 2 months later, when a new distal SVT was found; ultrasound at 6 months showed complete resolution without treatment. CONCLUSION: The 1-week incidence of PSVT after LS was 8/40 (20%). The high incidence justifies ultrasonographic screening on postoperative day 7. If asymptomatic PSVT has not developed at this time, it is unlikely to develop by 1 month, and subsequent screening ultrasound at 1 month is not required.

Transoral incisionless fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease in an unselected patient population.

BACKGROUND: EsophyX is an endolumenal approach to the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This report describes one of the earliest and largest North American experiences with this device. METHODS: Prospective data were gathered on consecutive patients undergoing EsophyX fundoplication for a 1-year period between September 2007 and March 2009. During this time, the procedure evolved to the current technique. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The study enrolled 26 patients with a mean age of 45 years. The patients included 16 women (62%) with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 28 and an American Society Anesthesiology (ASA) classification of 2. These patients included 11 with associated small hiatal hernias, 3 with Barrett's esophagus, and 5 with esophageal dysmotility. The procedure time was 65 min (range, 29-137 min), and the length of hospital stay was 1 day (range, 0-6 days). The postoperative valve circumference was 217 degrees, and the valve length was 2.7 cm. Two complications of postoperative bleed occurred, requiring transfusion. The mean follow-up period was 10 months. Comparison of pre- and postoperative Anvari scores (34-17; P = 0.002) and Velanovich scores (22-10; P = 0.0007) showed significant decreases. Although 68% of the patients were still taking antireflux medications, 21% had reduced their dose by half. Three patients had persistent symptoms requiring Nissen fundoplication, and there was one late death unrelated to the procedure. CONCLUSION: This study represents an initial single-institution experience with EsophyX. According to the findings, 53% of the patients had either discontinued their antireflux medication (32%) or had decreased their dose by half (21%). Both symptoms and health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) scores significantly improved after treatment. Further follow-up evaluation and objective testing are required.

Pheochromocytoma does not increase risk in laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has become the standard approach to an adrenal mass. This technique provides for decreased convalescence, less postoperative pain, and improved cosmesis. The use of LA for pheochromocytoma (PHE) has been questioned due to concerns of increased morbidity and negative hemodynamic sequelae. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of LA for PHE with the results of LA for other adrenal pathologies. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for an 11-year period from July 1997 to December 2008. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and outcomes were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 16.0. Statistical significance was defined as a p value less than 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 102 LA procedures were completed for 95 patients. The data for 33 PHE cases were compared with the data for 69 non-PHE cases (26 adenomas, 14 aldosteronomas, 5 cortisol-secreting tumors, 5 multinodular hyperplasias, and 19 other disorders). Five LA procedures were converted to open surgery. Four of these conversions involved patients with PHE (p = 0.03). There was no difference in the mean estimated blood loss (p = 0.2) or operative time (p = 0.1) between the two groups. The frequency of intraoperative hypertension and hypotension did not differ between the PHE and non-PHE cohorts. The complication rate was 7.5% for the PHE group and 6.9% for the non-PHE group (p = 0.7). The patients with PHE had a longer postoperative hospital stay (3.6 vs 2.3 days; p < 0.001) and overall hospital stay (4.9 vs 2.6 days; p < 0.001). Time in the intensive care unit (1.1 vs 0.1 days; p < 0.001) and time until oral intake (1.5 vs 1.0 days; p = 0.02) also were increased in the PHE population. There was one death in the PHE group secondary to congestive heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: Concerns of increased morbidity related to a laparoscopic approach for patients with a diagnosis of PHE are unfounded. In this series, the only disparity in outcomes between the two groups was an increased conversion rate with PHE.