Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Surg Endosc ; 37(7): 5472-5481, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37043006

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The identification of metastatic lymph nodes is one of the most important prognostic factors in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging has been successfully used in GI tumors to detect the lymphatic pathway and the sentinel lymph node (SLN), facilitating fluorescence image-guided surgery (FIGS) with the purpose to achieve a correct nodal staging. The aim of this study was to analyze the current results of NIRF SLN navigation and lymphography through data collected in the EURO-FIGS registry. METHODS: Prospectively collected data regarding patients and ICG-guided lymphadenectomies were analyzed. Additional analyses were performed to identify predictors of metastatic SLN and determinants of fluorescence positivity and nodal metastases outside the boundaries of standard lymphadenectomies. RESULTS: Overall, 188 patients were included by 18 surgeons from 10 different centers. Colorectal cancer was the most reported pathology (77.7%), followed by gastric (19.1%) and esophageal tumors (3.2%). ICG was injected with higher doses (p < 0.001) via extraparietal side (63.3%), and with higher volumes (p < 0.001) via endoluminal side (36.7%). Overall, NIRF SLN navigation was positive in 75.5% of all cases and 95.5% of positive SLNs were retrieved, with a metastatic rate of 14.7%. NIRF identification of lymph nodes outside standard lymphatic stations occurred in 52.1% of all cases, 43.8% of which were positive for metastatic involvement. Positive NIRF SLN identification was an independent predictor of metastasis outside standard lymphatic stations (OR = 4.392, p = 0.029), while BMI independently predicted metastasis in retrieved SLNs (OR = 1.187, p = 0.013). Lower doses of ICG were protective against NIRF identification outside standard of care lymphadenectomy (OR = 0.596, p = 0.006), while higher volumes of ICG were predictive of metastatic involvement outside standard of care lymphadenectomy (OR = 1.597, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SLN mapping helps identifying potentially metastatic lymph nodes outside the boundaries of standard lymphadenectomies. The EURO-FIGS registry is a valuable tool to share and analyze European surgeons' practices.


Asunto(s)
Ficus , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Linfadenopatía , Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Cirugía Asistida por Computador , Humanos , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/patología , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/métodos , Linfografía , Metástasis Linfática/diagnóstico por imagen , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Verde de Indocianina , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/patología , Linfadenopatía/patología , Sistema de Registros
2.
Int Surg ; 99(3): 258-63, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24833149

RESUMEN

Because pancreaticocystostomy is a method of exocrine secretion management in pancreas transplantation, a legitimate question is whether a pure pancreatic fistula could be shunted into the bladder. After duodenopancreatectomy for cancer, a pancreaticojejunostomy leakage was treated by pancreas-saving anastomosis disconnection. The resulting pure pancreaticocutaneous fistula was later diverted into the bladder using a Denver valved-pump device. Technical problems necessitated redoing the shunt using a modified technique and device. Although the system did work, catheter displacement outside the bladder finally caused device takedown and external fistula restoration. Our attempt did not succeed mostly because of our inexperience in dealing with an altogether novel issue without appropriate technology. Supposing its feasibility, a pancreatic-bladder shunt might have a role in treating pure pancreatic fistulas or creating an external fistula whenever the pancreatic remnant is unreliable for an anastomosis, or when a leaked anastomosis' disconnection is preferable to completion pancreatectomy.


Asunto(s)
Fístula Cutánea/cirugía , Fístula Pancreática/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Fuga Anastomótica/cirugía , Fístula Cutánea/etiología , Humanos , Fístula Pancreática/etiología , Reoperación , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA