Angiotensin II enhances bacterial clearance via myeloid signaling in a murine sepsis model.

Sepsis, defined as organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host-response to infection, is characterized by immunosuppression. The vasopressor norepinephrine is widely used to treat low blood pressure in sepsis but exacerbates immunosuppression. An alternative vasopressor is angiotensin-II, a peptide hormone of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), which displays complex immunomodulatory properties that remain unexplored in severe infection. In a murine cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) model of sepsis, we found alterations in the surface levels of RAS proteins on innate leukocytes in peritoneum and spleen. Angiotensin-II treatment induced biphasic, angiotensin-II type 1 receptor (AT1R)-dependent modulation of the systemic inflammatory response and decreased bacterial counts in both the blood and peritoneal compartments, which did not occur with norepinephrine treatment. The effect of angiotensin-II was preserved when treatment was delivered remote from the primary site of infection. At an independent laboratory, angiotensin-II treatment was compared in LysM-Cre AT1aR-/- (Myeloid-AT1a-) mice, which selectively do not express AT1R on myeloid-derived leukocytes, and littermate controls (Myeloid-AT1a+). Angiotensin-II treatment significantly reduced post-CLP bacteremia in Myeloid-AT1a+ mice but not in Myeloid-AT1a- mice, indicating that the AT1R-dependent effect of angiotensin-II on bacterial clearance was mediated through myeloid-lineage cells. Ex vivo, angiotensin-II increased post-CLP monocyte phagocytosis and ROS production after lipopolysaccharide stimulation. These data identify a mechanism by which angiotensin-II enhances the myeloid innate immune response during severe systemic infection and highlight a potential role for angiotensin-II to augment immune responses in sepsis.

M1 cholinergic signaling in the brain modulates cytokine levels and splenic cell sub-phenotypes following cecal ligation and puncture.

BACKGROUND: The contribution of the central nervous system to sepsis pathobiology is incompletely understood. In previous studies, administration of endotoxin to mice decreased activity of the vagus anti-inflammatory reflex. Treatment with the centrally-acting M1 muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor (M1AChR) attenuated this endotoxin-mediated change. We hypothesize that decreased M1AChR-mediated activity contributes to inflammation following cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), a mouse model of sepsis. METHODS: In male C57Bl/6 mice, we quantified basal forebrain cholinergic activity (immunostaining), hippocampal neuronal activity, serum cytokine/chemokine levels (ELISA) and splenic cell subtypes (flow cytometry) at baseline, following CLP and following CLP in mice also treated with the M1AChR agonist xanomeline. RESULTS: At 48 h. post-CLP, activity in basal forebrain cells expressing choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) was half of that observed at baseline. Lower activity was also noted in the hippocampus, which contains projections from ChAT-expressing basal forebrain neurons. Serum levels of TNFα, IL-1ß, MIP-1α, IL-6, KC and G-CSF were higher post-CLP than at baseline. Post-CLP numbers of splenic macrophages and inflammatory monocytes, TNFα+ and ILß+ neutrophils and ILß+ monocytes were higher than baseline while numbers of central Dendritic Cells (cDCs), CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were lower. When, following CLP, mice were treated with xanomeline activity in basal forebrain ChAT-expressing neurons and in the hippocampus was significantly higher than in untreated animals. Post-CLP serum concentrations of TNFα, IL-1ß, and MIP-1α, but not of IL-6, KC and G-CSF, were significantly lower in xanomeline-treated mice than in untreated mice. Post-CLP numbers of splenic neutrophils, macrophages, inflammatory monocytes and TNFα+ neutrophils also were lower in xanomeline-treated mice than in untreated animals. Percentages of IL-1ß+ neutrophils, IL-1ß+ monocytes, cDCs, CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells were similar in xanomeline-treated and untreated post-CLP mice. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that M1AChR-mediated responses modulate CLP-induced alterations in serum levels of some, but not all, cytokines/chemokines and affected splenic immune response phenotypes.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Priorities 2023.

OBJECTIVES: To identify research priorities in the management, epidemiology, outcome, and pathophysiology of sepsis and septic shock. DESIGN: Shortly after publication of the most recent Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines, the Surviving Sepsis Research Committee, a multiprofessional group of 16 international experts representing the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Society of Critical Care Medicine, convened virtually and iteratively developed the article and recommendations, which represents an update from the 2018 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Priorities. METHODS: Each task force member submitted five research questions on any sepsis-related subject. Committee members then independently ranked their top three priorities from the list generated. The highest rated clinical and basic science questions were developed into the current article. RESULTS: A total of 81 questions were submitted. After merging similar questions, there were 34 clinical and ten basic science research questions submitted for voting. The five top clinical priorities were as follows: 1) what is the best strategy for screening and identification of patients with sepsis, and can predictive modeling assist in real-time recognition of sepsis? 2) what causes organ injury and dysfunction in sepsis, how should it be defined, and how can it be detected? 3) how should fluid resuscitation be individualized initially and beyond? 4) what is the best vasopressor approach for treating the different phases of septic shock? and 5) can a personalized/precision medicine approach identify optimal therapies to improve patient outcomes? The five top basic science priorities were as follows: 1) How can we improve animal models so that they more closely resemble sepsis in humans? 2) What outcome variables maximize correlations between human sepsis and animal models and are therefore most appropriate to use in both? 3) How does sepsis affect the brain, and how do sepsis-induced brain alterations contribute to organ dysfunction? How does sepsis affect interactions between neural, endocrine, and immune systems? 4) How does the microbiome affect sepsis pathobiology? 5) How do genetics and epigenetics influence the development of sepsis, the course of sepsis and the response to treatments for sepsis? CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge advances in multiple clinical domains have been incorporated in progressive iterations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, allowing for evidence-based recommendations for short- and long-term management of sepsis. However, the strength of existing evidence is modest with significant knowledge gaps and mortality from sepsis remains high. The priorities identified represent a roadmap for research in sepsis and septic shock.

Phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrates (IRS-1 and IRS-2) is attenuated following cecal ligation and puncture in mice.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is characterized as an insulin resistant state. However, the effects of sepsis on insulin's signal transduction pathway are unknown. The molecular activity driving insulin signaling is controlled by tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor ß-subunit (IRß) and of insulin receptor substrate molecules (IRS) -1 and IRS-2. HYPOTHESIS: Cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) attenuates IRß, IRS-1 and IRS-2 phosphorylation. METHODS: IACUC-approved studies conformed to ARRIVE guidelines. CLP was performed on C57BL/6 mice; separate cohorts received intraperitoneal insulin at baseline (T0) or at 23 or 47 h. post-CLP, 1 h before mice were euthanized. We measured levels of (1) glucose and insulin in serum, (2) IRß, IRS-1 and IRS-2 in skeletal muscle and liver homogenate and (3) phospho-Irß (pIRß) in liver and skeletal muscle, phospho-IRS-1 (pIRS-1) in skeletal muscle and pIRS-2 in liver. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA with Sidak's post-hoc correction. RESULTS: CLP did not affect the concentrations of IRß, IRS-1or IRS-2 in muscle or liver homogenate or of IRS-1 in liver. Muscle IRS-1 concentration at 48 h. post-CLP was higher than at T0. Post-CLP pIRS-1 levels in muscle and pIRß and pIRS-2 levels in liver were indistinguishable from T0 levels. At 48 h. post-CLP pIRß levels in muscle were higher than at T0. Following insulin administration, the relative abundance of pIRß in muscle and liver at T0 and at both post-CLP time points was significantly higher than abundance in untreated controls. In T0 controls, the relative abundance of pIRS-1 in muscle and of pIRS-2 in liver following insulin administration was higher than in untreated mice. However, at both post-CLP time points, the relative abundance of pIRS-1 in muscle and of pIRS-2 in liver following insulin administration was not distinguishable from the abundance in untreated mice at the same time point. Serum glucose concentration was significantly lower than T0 at 24 h., but not 48 h., post-CLP. Glucose concentration was lower following insulin administration to T0 mice but not in post-CLP animals. Serum insulin levels were significantly higher than baseline at both post-CLP time points. CONCLUSIONS: CLP impaired insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of both IRS-1 in muscle and IRS-2 in liver. These findings suggest that the molecular mechanism underlying CLP-induced insulin resistance involves impaired IRS-1/IRS-2 phosphorylation.

Sepsis: current dogma and new perspectives.

Sepsis, a clinical syndrome occurring in patients following infection or injury, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Current immunological mechanisms do not explain the basis of cellular dysfunction and organ failure, the ultimate cause of death. Here we review current dogma and argue that it is time to delineate novel immunometabolic and neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the altered cellular bioenergetics and failure of epithelial and endothelial barriers that produce organ dysfunction and death. These mechanisms might hold the key to future therapeutic strategies.

Impaired angiotensin II type 1 receptor signaling contributes to sepsis-induced acute kidney injury.

In sepsis-induced acute kidney injury, kidney blood flow may increase despite decreased glomerular filtration. Normally, angiotensin-II reduces kidney blood flow to maintain filtration. We hypothesized that sepsis reduces angiotensin type-1 receptor (AT1R) expression to account for this observation and tested this hypothesis in a patient case-control study and studies in mice. Seventy-three mice underwent cecal ligation and puncture (a sepsis model) or sham operation. Additionally, 94 septic mice received losartan (selective AT1R antagonist), angiotensin II without or with losartan, or vehicle. Cumulative urine output, kidney blood flow, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine were measured. AT1R expression was assessed using ELISA, qPCR, and immunofluorescence. A blinded pathologist evaluated tissue for ischemic injury. AT1R expression was compared in autopsy tissue from seven patients with sepsis to that of the non-involved portion of kidney from ten individuals with kidney cancer and three non-infected but critically ill patients. By six hours post ligation/puncture, kidney blood flow doubled, blood urea nitrogen rose, and urine output fell. Concurrently, AT1R expression significantly fell 2-fold in arterioles and the macula densa. Creatinine significantly rose by 24 hours and sham operation did not alter measurements. Losartan significantly exacerbated ligation/puncture-induced changes in kidney blood flow, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and urine output. There was no histologic evidence of cortical ischemia. Significantly, angiotensin II prevented changes in kidney blood flow, creatinine, and urine output compared to vehicle. Co-administering losartan with angiotensin-II reversed this protection. Relative to both controls, patients with sepsis had low AT1R expression in arterioles and macula densa. Thus, murine cecal ligation/puncture and clinical sepsis decrease renal AT1R expression. Angiotensin II prevents functional changes while AT1R-blockade exacerbates them independent of ischemia in mice.

Induction of diverse T cell memory through antibody-mediated activation in mice.

Recent studies have demonstrated that laboratory mice lack a robust repertoire of memory T cell. Administration of an anti-CD3ε activating antibody (clone 145-2C11) induces persistent CD4 and CD8 T cell memory in both lymphatic and solid organs while maintaining T cell responses and without increased anergy or altering innate immunity.

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Priorities for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Critical Illness.

OBJECTIVES: To identify research priorities in the management, pathophysiology, and host response of coronavirus disease 2019 in critically ill patients. DESIGN: The Surviving Sepsis Research Committee, a multiprofessional group of 17 international experts representing the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Society of Critical Care Medicine, was virtually convened during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The committee iteratively developed the recommendations and subsequent document. METHODS: Each committee member submitted a list of what they believed were the most important priorities for coronavirus disease 2019 research. The entire committee voted on 58 submitted questions to determine top priorities for coronavirus disease 2019 research. RESULTS: The Surviving Sepsis Research Committee provides 13 priorities for coronavirus disease 2019. Of these, the top six priorities were identified and include the following questions: 1) Should the approach to ventilator management differ from the standard approach in patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure?, 2) Can the host response be modulated for therapeutic benefit?, 3) What specific cells are directly targeted by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and how do these cells respond?, 4) Can early data be used to predict outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 and, by extension, to guide therapies?, 5) What is the role of prone positioning and noninvasive ventilation in nonventilated patients with coronavirus disease?, and 6) Which interventions are best to use for viral load modulation and when should they be given? CONCLUSIONS: Although knowledge of both biology and treatment has increased exponentially in the first year of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, significant knowledge gaps remain. The research priorities identified represent a roadmap for investigation in coronavirus disease 2019.

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Basic/Translational Science Research Priorities.

OBJECTIVES: Expound upon priorities for basic/translational science identified in a recent paper by a group of experts assigned by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. DATA SOURCES: Original paper, search of the literature. STUDY SELECTION: By several members of the original task force with specific expertise in basic/translational science. DATA EXTRACTION: None. DATA SYNTHESIS: None. CONCLUSIONS: In the first of a series of follow-up reports to the original paper, several members of the original task force with specific expertise provided a more in-depth analysis of the five identified priorities directly related to basic/translational science. This analysis expounds on what is known about the question and what was identified as priorities for ongoing research. It is hoped that this analysis will aid the development of future research initiatives.

Persistent Mitochondrial Dysfunction Linked to Prolonged Organ Dysfunction in Pediatric Sepsis.

OBJECTIVES: Limited data exist about the timing and significance of mitochondrial alterations in children with sepsis. We therefore sought to determine if alterations in mitochondrial respiration and content within circulating peripheral blood mononuclear cells were associated with organ dysfunction in pediatric sepsis. DESIGN: Prospective observational study SETTING:: Single academic PICU. PATIENTS: One-hundred sixty-seven children with sepsis/septic shock and 19 PICU controls without sepsis, infection, or organ dysfunction. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mitochondrial respiration and content were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells on days 1-2, 3-5, and 8-14 after sepsis recognition or once for controls. Severity and duration of organ dysfunction were determined using the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction score and organ failure-free days through day 28. Day 1-2 maximal uncoupled respiration (9.7 ± 7.7 vs 13.7 ± 4.1 pmol O2/s/10 cells; p = 0.02) and spare respiratory capacity (an index of bioenergetic reserve: 6.2 ± 4.3 vs 9.6 ± 3.1; p = 0.005) were lower in sepsis than controls. Mitochondrial content, measured by mitochondrial DNA/nuclear DNA, was higher in sepsis on day 1-2 than controls (p = 0.04) and increased in sepsis patients who had improving spare respiratory capacity over time (p = 0.005). Mitochondrial respiration and content were not associated with day 1-2 Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction score, but low spare respiratory capacity was associated with higher Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction score on day 3-5. Persistently low spare respiratory capacity was predictive of residual organ dysfunction on day 14 (area under the receiver operating characteristic, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.84) and trended toward fewer organ failure-free days although day 28 (ß coefficient, -0.64; 95% CI, -1.35 to 0.06; p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Mitochondrial respiration was acutely decreased in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in pediatric sepsis despite an increase in mitochondrial content. Over time, a rise in mitochondrial DNA tracked with improved respiration. Although initial mitochondrial alterations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were unrelated to organ dysfunction, persistently low respiration was associated with slower recovery from organ dysfunction.

Cecal Ligation and Puncture Alters Glucocorticoid Receptor Expression.

OBJECTIVES: Interventional trials on glucocorticoids in sepsis have yielded capricious results. Recent studies have identified multiple glucocorticoid receptor isoforms. The relative abundance of these isoforms in septic patients and following murine cecal ligation and puncture is unknown. The objective of this study is to determine the effects of cecal ligation and puncture on glucocorticoid receptor isoform abundance. DESIGN: Determination of effects of cecal ligation and puncture on glucocorticoid receptor isoform subtype abundance in C57BL/6 mice. Examination of glucocorticoid receptor isoform abundance in tissues harvested from patients immediately after death from sepsis or nonseptic critical illness. SETTING: Research laboratory. SUBJECTS: C57BL/6 mice and human tissue sections from recently deceased critically ill patients. INTERVENTIONS: C57BL/6 mice were subjected to cecal ligation and puncture or sham operation. Abundance of the activating glucocorticoid receptor α and the inactivating glucocorticoid receptor ß isoforms was determined in mouse and human tissue using immunoblotting. Cardiac output with or without stimulation with dexamethasone was assessed using echocardiography. The expression of the gene encoding the glucocorticoid-dependent enzyme glucose-6-phosphatase was identified using polymerase chain reaction. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was determined using analysis of variance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Results in baseline and sham operation mice were identical. At baseline, glucocorticoid receptor αA predominated in heart, lung, and skeletal muscle; abundance was decreased post cecal ligation and puncture. All glucocorticoid receptor α subtypes were identified in liver. Cecal ligation and puncture decreased the summed abundance of hepatic glucocorticoid receptor α subtypes and those of glucocorticoid receptors αA, B, and D. However, glucocorticoid receptor αC abundance was unchanged. Cecal ligation and puncture increased glucocorticoid receptor ß protein abundance in the heart and lung. Relative to T0, cecal ligation and puncture decreased cardiac output and attenuated the cardiac output response to dexamethasone. Cecal ligation and puncture also decreased expression of glucose-6-phosphatase. Compared with nonseptic patients, human sepsis decreased the abundance of glucocorticoid receptor α and increased the abundance of glucocorticoid receptor ß in heart and liver biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Cecal ligation and puncture altered glucocorticoid receptor α and glucocorticoid receptor ß isoform expression in tissues and decreased functional responses in heart and liver. Decreases in glucocorticoid receptor α and increases in glucocorticoid receptor ß might explain the diminished glucocorticoid responsiveness observed in sepsis.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Priorities for Sepsis and Septic Shock.

OBJECTIVE: To identify research priorities in the management, epidemiology, outcome and underlying causes of sepsis and septic shock. DESIGN: A consensus committee of 16 international experts representing the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Society of Critical Care Medicine was convened at the annual meetings of both societies. Subgroups had teleconference and electronic-based discussion. The entire committee iteratively developed the entire document and recommendations. METHODS: Each committee member independently gave their top five priorities for sepsis research. A total of 88 suggestions (Supplemental Table 1, Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/CCM/D636) were grouped into categories by the committee co-chairs, leading to the formation of seven subgroups: infection, fluids and vasoactive agents, adjunctive therapy, administration/epidemiology, scoring/identification, post-intensive care unit, and basic/translational science. Each subgroup had teleconferences to go over each priority followed by formal voting within each subgroup. The entire committee also voted on top priorities across all subgroups except for basic/translational science. RESULTS: The Surviving Sepsis Research Committee provides 26 priorities for sepsis and septic shock. Of these, the top six clinical priorities were identified and include the following questions: 1) can targeted/personalized/precision medicine approaches determine which therapies will work for which patients at which times?; 2) what are ideal endpoints for volume resuscitation and how should volume resuscitation be titrated?; 3) should rapid diagnostic tests be implemented in clinical practice?; 4) should empiric antibiotic combination therapy be used in sepsis or septic shock?; 5) what are the predictors of sepsis long-term morbidity and mortality?; and 6) what information identifies organ dysfunction? CONCLUSIONS: While the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines give multiple recommendations on the treatment of sepsis, significant knowledge gaps remain, both in bedside issues directly applicable to clinicians, as well as understanding the fundamental mechanisms underlying the development and progression of sepsis. The priorities identified represent a roadmap for research in sepsis and septic shock.

A Framework for the Development and Interpretation of Different Sepsis Definitions and Clinical Criteria.

Although sepsis was described more than 2,000 years ago, and clinicians still struggle to define it, there is no "gold standard," and multiple competing approaches and terms exist. Challenges include the ever-changing knowledge base that informs our understanding of sepsis, competing views on which aspects of any potential definition are most important, and the tendency of most potential criteria to be distributed in at-risk populations in such a way as to hinder separation into discrete sets of patients. We propose that the development and evaluation of any definition or diagnostic criteria should follow four steps: 1) define the epistemologic underpinning, 2) agree on all relevant terms used to frame the exercise, 3) state the intended purpose for any proposed set of criteria, and 4) adopt a scientific approach to inform on their usefulness with regard to the intended purpose. Usefulness can be measured across six domains: 1) reliability (stability of criteria during retesting, between raters, over time, and across settings), 2) content validity (similar to face validity), 3) construct validity (whether criteria measure what they purport to measure), 4) criterion validity (how new criteria fare compared to standards), 5) measurement burden (cost, safety, and complexity), and 6) timeliness (whether criteria are available concurrent with care decisions). The relative importance of these domains of usefulness depends on the intended purpose, of which there are four broad categories: 1) clinical care, 2) research, 3) surveillance, and 4) quality improvement and audit. This proposed methodologic framework is intended to aid understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches, provide a mechanism for explaining differences in epidemiologic estimates generated by different approaches, and guide the development of future definitions and diagnostic criteria.