Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Value Health ; 19(5): 623-30, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27565279

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Neuropathic pain (NP) is a consequence of many chronic conditions. This study aimed to develop an unidimensional NP scale with scores that represent levels of NP and distinguish between individuals with NP and non-NP conditions. METHODS: A candidate item pool of 42 pain quality descriptors was administered to participants with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetic neuropathy, and cancer chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. A subset of pain quality descriptors (items) that best distinguished between participants with and those without NP conditions were identified. Dimensionality of pain descriptors was evaluated in a development sample and cross-validated in a holdout sample. Item responses were calibrated using an item response theory model, and scores were generated on a T-score metric. NP scale scores were evaluated in terms of the reliability, validity, and ability to distinguish between participants with and without conditions typically associated with NP. RESULTS: Of the 42 initial items, 5 were identified for the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Neuropathic Pain Quality Scale. T scores exhibited good discriminatory ability on the basis of receiver-operator characteristic analysis. Score thresholds that optimize sensitivity and specificity were identified. Construct, criterion, and discriminant validity, and reliability of scale scores were supported. CONCLUSIONS: The five-item Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS PQ-Neuro) Neuropathic Pain Quality Scale is a short and practical measure that can be used to identify patients more likely to have NP and to distinguish levels of NP. The data collected will support future research that targets other unidimensional pain quality domains (e.g., nociceptive pain).


Asunto(s)
Neuralgia , Dimensión del Dolor/instrumentación , Autoinforme/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Med Care ; 53(2): 153-9, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25588135

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are gaining recognition as key measures for improving the quality of patient care in clinical care settings. Three factors have made the implementation of PROs in clinical care more feasible: increased use of modern measurement methods in PRO design and validation, rapid progression of technology (eg, touchscreen tablets, Internet accessibility, and electronic health records), and greater demand for measurement and monitoring of PROs by regulators, payers, accreditors, and professional organizations. As electronic PRO collection and reporting capabilities have improved, the challenges of collecting PRO data have changed. OBJECTIVES: To update information on PRO adoption considerations in clinical care, highlighting electronic and technical advances with respect to measure selection, clinical workflow, data infrastructure, and outcomes reporting. METHODS: Five practical case studies across diverse health care settings and patient populations are used to explore how implementation barriers were addressed to promote the successful integration of PRO collection into the clinical workflow. The case studies address selecting and reporting of relevant content, workflow integration, previsit screening, effective evaluation, and electronic health record integration. CONCLUSIONS: These case studies exemplify elements of well-designed electronic systems, including response automation, tailoring of item selection and reporting algorithms, flexibility of collection location, and integration with patient health care data elements. They also highlight emerging logistical barriers in this area, such as the need for specialized technological and methodological expertise, and design limitations of current electronic data capture systems.


Asunto(s)
Recolección de Datos/métodos , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Autoinforme , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Humanos , Internet , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estados Unidos
3.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 188(1): 182-6, 2007 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17179362

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to retrospectively review an injection technique, to develop a grading system for evaluation of imaging findings, and to report preliminary outcome related to percutaneous CT-guided steroid injection into the temporomandibular joints of children with inflammatory arthropathy. CONCLUSION: CT-guided steroid injection into the temporomandibular joint of children with inflammatory arthropathy results in clinical and imaging improvement in a substantial proportion of children treated.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Juvenil/diagnóstico por imagen , Artritis Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Inyecciones Subcutáneas/métodos , Esteroides/administración & dosificación , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/tratamiento farmacológico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adolescente , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 11(1): 21-33, 2005 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16357693

RESUMEN

Treatment of children with rheumatic diseases has advanced with novel therapeutics and the use of early aggressive treatment to achieve better long-term functional outcome. Many of the current treatments in pediatric rheumatology are based on studies in adults on medications without U.S. Food and Drug Administration labeling for pediatric use. This is not ideal because the pharmacokinetics (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination) of many medications when used in children vary according to age, somatic growth, sexual maturity, and ontogeny of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Special dosing, administration considerations, and toxicity screening are reviewed for the more commonly used medications. Vaccinations for children on antirheumatic drugs are also discussed. Continued study of the long-term impact of medications and biologic treatments on children is necessary, but given the paucity of children with rheumatic diseases, this will require multicentered trials and collaborations. Lastly, this article reviews recent regulatory and legislative action on pediatric drug testing. Passage of the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003, which requires testing of pharmaceuticals in children, will facilitate more rational use of drugs in pediatric rheumatic diseases in the future.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Niño , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Cooperación del Paciente , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Vacunación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA