Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 99
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 40(5): 835-840, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37442765

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar plaque psoriasis is a frequent clinical subtype of childhood psoriasis. This study evaluated the effectiveness of biologic therapies in children with palmoplantar plaque psoriasis using data from the two Biological treatments for Pediatric Psoriasis (BiPe) cohorts. METHODS: Data for all 170 patients included in the BiPe cohorts were analyzed. Data on the effectiveness (PGA, PASI between baseline and 3 months of treatment) of biologic therapies were then compared between children with palmoplantar plaque psoriasis (n = 20) and those with generalized plaque psoriasis (n = 136). Clinical and demographic data were also analyzed. RESULTS: Children in the palmoplantar group were more likely to be male (p = .04), with an earlier age of psoriasis onset (p < .001), and more frequent nail involvement (p < .001). After 3 months of biologic treatment, mean PGA scores were higher in the palmoplantar group than in the generalized plaque psoriasis group (p = .004). In the palmoplantar group, continuation rates were higher for adalimumab than for etanercept or ustekinumab (p = .01). Primary inefficacy was a more frequent reason for stopping biologic therapies in the palmoplantar group (p = .01), and disease remission was less frequent (p = .05). Combined systemic and biologic therapies were more frequently used in palmoplantar plaque psoriasis (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the treatment-resistant nature of palmoplantar plaque psoriasis and indicated that adalimumab could be the most effective biologic treatment. Larger studies are needed to allow therapeutic algorithms for palmoplantar plaque psoriasis to be proposed in pediatric psoriasis management guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , Psoriasis , Humanos , Masculino , Niño , Femenino , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico , Terapia Biológica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
3.
J Cutan Med Surg ; 27(2): 126-132, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36995351

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: IL-23 inhibitors are the latest class of biologic drugs approved for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: to investigate real-life safety and efficacy of tildrakizumab. METHODS: demographic data, medical history, psoriasis disease history, PASI, DLQI, BSA, NAPSI were recorded at weeks 0, 12, 24, 36. RESULTS: PASI, BSA, DLQI and NAPSI all decreased rapidly during the 36 week follow-up period. PASI score reduced from 12.28 to 4.65 by week 12, followed by a further decrease to 1.18 at week 36 Multiple logistic regression showed that smoking, BMI ≥30, ≥3 comorbidities, previous systemic traditional or biologic drugs, psoriatic arthritis nor difficult-to-treat areas influenced the reduction of PASI and NAPSI scores during treatment with tildrakizumab (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: we assessed a good performance of tildrakizumab in patients with multiple comorbidities, multi-failure, elderly patients, and in subjects with psoriatic arthritis.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Psoriásica , Psoriasis , Humanos , Anciano , Artritis Psoriásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Italia/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
4.
Dermatol Ther ; 35(11): e15828, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36107157

RESUMEN

Combined therapies involve the use of multiple drugs to increase efficacy and reduce the toxicity of individual treatments. We evaluated the use of combinations of conventional systemic therapies and biologics in children with psoriasis in daily practice. This two-part study used data from the 170 children in the Franco-Italian BiPe cohorts to evaluate the use, efficacy, and safety of combined conventional systemic-biologic therapies, and from a survey carried out among French and Italian dermatologists to better understand the reasons for using or avoiding these combinations. In total, 33 children (19.4%) from 13 dermatology centers received 48 combined conventional systemic-biologic therapies (cumulative duration: 43.6 years), including three triple combination therapies (acitretin-methotrexate, with a TNF-alpha inhibitor). A total of 14 different combinations were used, most frequently etanercept-acitretin (n = 10), adalimumab-acitretin (n = 7), adalimumab-methotrexate (n = 5), and ustekinumab-methotrexate (n = 5). The combined therapies were started at biologic initiation in 41 cases (85.4%), and after a period of biologic monotherapy in the remaining 7 cases. Mean PGA and PASI scores decreased between baseline and M3 with all the combinations used. Four serious adverse events were reported, all with favorable outcomes. The survey was completed by 61 dermatologists: 39 (63.9%) had previously used or planned to use the combined therapies, most commonly TNF-alpha inhibitors with acitretin or methotrexate. The main reason for using these treatments was to improve the outcome of biologic therapies in cases of partial efficacy or loss of efficacy. Combined therapies have been used frequently in the treatment of childhood psoriasis, in a range of clinical situations and in variable drug combinations, without significant toxicity. Although the use of these combined therapies needs to be clarified in future management guidelines, these combined therapies should be considered for the treatment of children with severe psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and recalcitrant disease.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Psoriasis , Niño , Humanos , Acitretina/efectos adversos , Acitretina/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/efectos adversos , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Dermatólogos , Etanercept/efectos adversos , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/efectos adversos , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico
5.
Dermatol Ther ; 34(5): e15066, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34291547

RESUMEN

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a fumaric acid esters derivate approved for plaque psoriasis as first-line systemic therapy. It has been available in Italy since 2017 and an increasing number of patients are treated with this drug. To evaluate DMF effectiveness, side effects and drug survival in a dermatological real-life setting. We performed a retrospective multi-center study in five dermatologic clinics in Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy, which included all consecutive patients affected by moderate-severe psoriasis treated with DMF. We assessed effectiveness (in terms of PASI50 and PASI75 in an intention to treat observation) and safety (occurrence of side effects) of DMF and their association with demographic and disease characteristics, mean daily dose taken and treatment discontinuation. We included 103 patients, 78 (75.72%) had at least one comorbidity including 19 (18.44%) with a history of cancer; the mean treatment duration was 23.61 ± 17.99 weeks (min 4, max 130) and the mean daily dose was 262.13 ± 190.94 mg. Twenty-four patients (23.30%) reached PASI75 at week 12, while a further 18 patients (17.47%) reached it at week 26. Side effects occurred in 63 patients (61.16%), the most frequent were diarrhea, epigastric discomfort, nausea, and flushing. Sixteen patients (15.53%) showed an alteration of laboratory tests. In some cases side effects were transitory, while in 53 patients (51.45%) they led to cessation of therapy. The median daily dose showed a direct association with PASI50 achievement and an indirect association with treatment discontinuation. Our study shows the peculiarities of DMF in a real-world setting: effectiveness is often reached after 12 weeks of treatment and side effects could limit the continuation of the therapy but, at the same time, DMF has no major contraindications and, due to the wide range of dosage, it can allow both to manage side effects and to personalize the prescription for each patient.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Dermatológicos , Psoriasis , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Dimetilfumarato/efectos adversos , Fumaratos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Dermatol Ther ; 33(4): e13560, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32396259

RESUMEN

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) mainly affects the anterior hairline and eyebrows and its etiology and associated factors remain obscure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the allergic contact dermatitis with patch test in patients with FFA. In this prospective study, 20 patients with FFA and 24 age and sex-matched healthy individuals were evaluated with patch testing. Diagnosis was made histologically, clinically and based on dermoscopic findings. Demographic data, age of onset, disease duration and FFA severity index are evaluated in all patients. Positive patch test reaction to one or more allergen was observed in 65% of patients while it was 37.5% in control group (P = .003). There was a significant difference between age (P = .006) and positive patch test results. No statistical significant difference was observed in the results of patch testing and disease duration (P = .519), menopausal status (P = .085), and FFA severity index (P = .573). Our findings suggest an association between FFA and allergic contact dermatitis. The utility of patch testing in FFA patients can explore the role of allergic etiology and may have an enormous impact on the diagnostic potential and quality of life of these patients.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Liquen Plano , Alopecia/diagnóstico , Alopecia/epidemiología , Alopecia/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida
7.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 19(5): 560-561, 2020 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32484616

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pityriasis lichenoides chronica, a papulosquamous disorder often considered a subtype of pityriasis lichenoides. It is considered a clonal T-cell disorder, which may be associated with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma that may develops in response to foreign antigens. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a 38-year-old male patient with ankylosing spondylitis who was on treatment with etanercept. After 8 weeks of treatment, the patient presented with scaly erythematous papules, on the back and arms. He was diagnosed clinically with pityriasis lichenoides chronica. CONCLUSION: Pityriasis lichenoides chronica should be included among the broad clinical spectrum of chronic inflammatory skin diseases which may occur during treatment with TNF-alpha antagonists. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(5): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.2191.


Asunto(s)
Etanercept/efectos adversos , Pitiriasis Liquenoide/inducido químicamente , Espondilitis Anquilosante/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/efectos adversos , Administración Cutánea , Adulto , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Pitiriasis Liquenoide/diagnóstico , Pitiriasis Liquenoide/inmunología , Espondilitis Anquilosante/inmunología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/inmunología
10.
Dermatol Ther ; 32(6): e13091, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31579972

RESUMEN

The objective of this study is to determine drug effectiveness and safety of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocker monoclonal antibody adalimumab in a real-life cohort of 54 children and/or adolescents with severe plaque psoriasis. Retrospective, multicenter analysis over a 52-week period is discussed in this study. Efficacy was determined by the percentage of patients achieving Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI 75) and PASI 90 at weeks 16, 24, and 52 and the response in biologic-naïve versus non-naïve patients. Safety was assessed by the number of patients experiencing at least one adverse event. At week 16, 29.6% of patients achieved a 90% PASI score reduction (PASI 90), while 55.5% of patients achieved a 75% PASI score reduction (PASI 75). Effectiveness was sustained through week 24, since PASI 90 response increased to 55.5% and PASI 75 response increased to 74.0% of patients. The PASI response rates did not differ between biologic-naïve and non-naïve patients. The drug was well tolerated and no serious infections were observed. Adalimumab was effective and safe in this cohort of children with severe plaque psoriasis in a 52-week observation. Effectiveness did not differ between biologic-naïve and non-naïve patients.


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adalimumab/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Antiinflamatorios/efectos adversos , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Psoriasis/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Eur J Pediatr ; 176(10): 1339-1354, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28836064

RESUMEN

This article provides comprehensive recommendations for the systemic treatment of severe pediatric psoriasis based on evidence obtained from a systematic review of the literature and the consensus opinion of expert dermatologists and pediatricians. For each systemic treatment, the grade of recommendation (A, B, C) based on the treatment's approval by the European Medicines Agency for childhood psoriasis and the experts' opinions is discussed. The grade of recommendation for narrow-band-ultraviolet B phototherapy, cyclosporine, and retinoids is C, while that for methotrexate is C/B. The use of adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab has a grade A recommendation. No conventional systemic treatments are approved for pediatric psoriasis. Adalimumab is approved by the European Medicines Agency as a first-line treatment for severe chronic plaque psoriasis in children (≥ 4 years old) and adolescents. Etanercept and ustekinumab are approved as second-line therapy in children ≥ 6 and ≥ 12 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: A treatment algorithm as well as practical tools (i.e., tabular summaries of differential diagnoses, treatment mechanism of actions, dosing regimens, control parameters) are provided to assist in therapeutic reasoning and decision-making for individual patients. These treatment recommendations are endorsed by major Italian Pediatric and Dermatology Societies. What is Known: • Guidelines for the treatment of severe pediatric psoriasis are lacking and most traditional systemic treatments are not approved for use in young patients. Although there has been decades of experience with some of the traditional agents such as phototherapy, acitretin, and cyclosporine in children, there are no RCTs on their pediatric use while RCTs investigating new biologic agents have been performed. What is New: • In this manuscript, an Italian multidisciplinary team of experts focused on treatment recommendations for severe forms of psoriasis in children based on an up-to-date review of the literature and experts' opinions.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Fototerapia/métodos , Psoriasis/terapia , Niño , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Italia , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Psoriasis/genética , Psoriasis/psicología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
15.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 33(5): 530-5, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27443789

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acitretin is licensed for and is most commonly used to treat psoriasis. Little information exists about its efficacy and safety in childhood and adolescent psoriasis. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a group of children and adolescents (<17 years of age) with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis treated with acitretin between 2010 and 2014 at Italian dermatology clinics. Patients were identified through databases or registries. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 18 patients with a median age of 9.5 years at the start of therapy. The median maintenance dosage per day was 0.41 mg/kg. Eight patients (44.4%) achieved complete clearance or good improvement of their psoriasis, defined as improvement from baseline of 75% or more on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at week 16. Three had three or more courses of treatment with short disease-free intervals. In three patients, acitretin treatment was ongoing at the time of data collection. The mean total duration of treatment in responders was 22.7 months. One patient discontinued treatment because of arthralgia. The remaining nine patients (50%) discontinued treatment because it was ineffective. Mucocutaneous adverse effects occurred in all patients, but did not affect therapy maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective case series, acitretin was a moderately effective, well-tolerated treatment in children with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Given the small number of patients, statements about long-term safety are not possible.


Asunto(s)
Acitretina/uso terapéutico , Queratolíticos/uso terapéutico , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Acitretina/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Queratolíticos/efectos adversos , Masculino , Seguridad del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 79(7): 986-988, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32467245
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA