Perceptions of Health Care Professionals on the Effects of Residential Summer Camp in their Patients.

PURPOSE: A growing body of literature exists regarding medical specialty camps for children. However, very little of the research focuses on the perspectives of healthcare providers. This study explored perceptions of pediatric healthcare providers on a medical specialty camp for children. DESIGN AND METHODS: Interviews with five volunteer physicians and five nurses were conducted and analyzed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS: Results showed that healthcare providers perceived camp to be a positive influence on campers' normalization and healthcare ownership, and to strengthen patient-provider relationships. Providers contextualized their assertions by discussing the settings of camp and of patients. However, providers also identified multiple barriers perceived as limiting a camp experience's ability to create lasting changes in patients' attitudes or behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: While healthcare providers in this study perceived camp as being a positive opportunity for patients, the potential for long-lasting effects was seen to be hindered by factors external to the camp and changes in patients' attitudes or behaviors can be difficult to ascribe to the camp experience. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare providers can reinforce and extend positive health behavior messages from camp at follow-up appointments. Adding inquiries about camp attendance and experiences to patients' visits can provide healthcare providers with additional insights about patients. Health outcomes before and after camp could be measured to assess change. Camps can send home patient protocols on successes and challenges.

Palliative Care Needs Assessment for Pediatric Complex Care Providers.

CONTEXT: Children with medical complexity (CMC) are often cared for by both complex care and palliative care pediatric teams. No prior research has investigated the relationship between these two disciplines. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to investigate challenges that complex care programs face in caring for children with medical complexity (CMC), as well as to explore whether identified challenges could be met through collaboration with pediatric palliative care or additional training for complex care teams. METHODS: Medical providers who self-identified as providing clinical care to children with medical complexity were asked to complete an online anonymous survey. Subjects were recruited through a Complex Care listerv. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: 85 subjects completed the survey, of whom 87.1% (n=74) were physicians, and 12.0% (n=11) were nurse practitioners. Subjects reported several challenges in caring for CMC, including symptom management, establishing goals of care, advance care planning, and coordination of care. A majority of subjects reported benefitting from palliative care consultative assistance in each subject area. Most subjects described their relationship with palliative care as a close partnership with frequent overlap. CONCLUSIONS: The evolving field of pediatric complex care is associated with an array of challenges in caring for CMC. Many of these challenges include competency areas where palliative care providers receive concerted training. Our research suggests greater palliative care involvement in the CMC population can benefit complex care teams and patients, given the expertise palliative providers can bring to the population and the discipline of complex care.

Trainee-led Engagement of the Care Team Improves Application of an Institutional Blood Culture Clinical Decision Algorithm to Pediatric Oncology Inpatients: A Single-institution Quality Improvement Project.

Meaningful engagement in quality improvement (QI) projects by trainees is often challenging. A fellow-led QI project aimed to improve adherence to a blood culture clinical decision algorithm and reduce unnecessary cultures in pediatric oncology inpatients. Methods: We visualized preintervention rates of blood cultures drawn on pediatric oncology inpatients using a control chart. Following the introduction of the algorithm to our division, an Ishikawa fishbone diagram of cause-and-effect identified two areas for improvement: prescriber education on the algorithm and targeted feedback on its use. We developed two interventions to support algorithm awareness and use: (1) bundled educational interventions and (2) targeted chart review and feedback. Fellows reviewed >750 blood culture episodes and adjudicated each as "adherent" or "nonadherent" to the algorithm. In addition, fellows provided direct feedback to prescribers regarding nonadherent episodes and discussed strategies for algorithm adherence. Results: Blood culture rates in preintervention, intervention, and follow-up periods were 33.35, 25.24, and 22.67 cultures/100 patient-days, respectively. The proportion of nonadherent culture episodes decreased from 47.14% to 11.11%. The use of the algorithm did not prolong the time to cultures drawn on patients with new fever. Seventy-five percent of fellows provided feedback to inpatient teams on algorithm use. Following this project, trainees reported feeling more qualified to apply QI principles to patient care. Conclusions: Implementation of a clinical decision algorithm reduced the rate of cultures drawn on pediatric oncology inpatients. Fellow-led education of the care team decreased the proportion of nonadherent culture episodes and provided active engagement in QI.