Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 83: 64-68, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968852

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infections continue to increase in the United States. Advancement in technology with point-of-care (POC) testing can improve the overall treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STI) in the emergency department (ED) by shortening the time to test result and administration of accurate treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess if the POC test reduced the rate of overtreatment for CT and/or NG compared to the standard-of-care (SOC) test. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients tested for CT and NG at two urban EDs between August 2020 and October 2022. This cohort excluded hospital admissions, elopement, pregnancy, rectal and oral samples, victims of sexual assault, and diagnoses for which antimicrobial treatment overlapped that of CT/NG. The primary outcome assessed overtreatment, defined as receiving treatment in the ED or a prescription prior to discharge for patients who tested negative for CT and/or NG. Secondary outcomes included undertreatment rates, overtreatment rates in select populations, test turnaround time, and ED length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Of 327 patients screened, 97 patients were included in the SOC group and 100 in POC. Overtreatment for CT was provided in zero POC patients and 29 (29.9%) SOC patients (p < 0.001). NG was overtreated in 1 (1%) POC and 23 (23.7%) SOC (p < 0.001). POC was associated with undertreatment of CT and/or NG in two patients, compared to four patients tested with SOC. Overall, treatment was deemed inappropriate for 5 (5%) of those tested with POC, compared to 35 (36%) tested with SOC (p < 0.001). There was no difference in ED LOS (2.7 vs 3.01 h, p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: POC testing facilitated the return of results prior to patients being discharged from the ED. Compared to standard testing, POC improved appropriateness of CT and NG treatment by reducing the rates of overtreatment.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Chlamydia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Gonorrea , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención , Humanos , Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Gonorrea/diagnóstico , Gonorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Chlamydia trachomatis/aislamiento & purificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/aislamiento & purificación
2.
Antivir Ther ; 29(4): 13596535241264694, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39066463

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibody therapy (MAT) received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for mild to moderate COVID-19 treatment in adults at a high-risk for progression to severe disease in November 2020. This study assessed the impact of MAT on clinical outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study comparing 30-day COVID-19-related emergency department (ED) visits, admissions, and mortality in patients receiving MAT (bamlanivimab, bamlanivimab-etesevimab, or casirivimab-imdevimab) between 16 November 2020 and 19 June 2021, compared to a control group of high-risk adults diagnosed with mild to moderate COVID-19 prior to MAT availability between 16 May 2020 and 15 November 2020. Statistical analysis used logistic regression analysis with backward selection to determine the odds ratios and 95% confidence interval evaluating the relationship between clinical characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: 1187 patients who received MAT were compared to 1103 patients not treated with MAT. Multivariable regression model adjusted for possible confounders showed patients who received MAT had lower rates of ED visits (3.2% vs 7.4%, OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.31-0.70, p < .001) and hospital admissions (4.3% vs 7.8%, OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.29-0.62, p < .001) compared to the control group. After adjusting for confounders, MAT was associated with decreased mortality (OR = 0.36, p = .035). In the MAT group, those treated within 2 days of COVID-19 diagnosis had lower mortality than those treated more than 2 days post-diagnosis (unadjusted OR = 0.152, 95% CI = 0.031-0.734, p = .019). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals treated with MAT had lower rates of 30-day COVID-19-related ED visits and hospital admissions compared to those not receiving MAT. Early MAT resulted in lower 30-day mortality compared to receipt >2 days post COVID-19 diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anciano , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA