Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of the novel C-X-C chemokine receptor 3 antagonist ACT-777991: Results from the first-in-human study in healthy adults.

AIMS: The C-X-C chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) axis is highly upregulated in the tissue of patients with type 1 diabetes. Antagonizing CXCR3 may reduce the migration of CXCR3-expressing cells to the pancreas. The pharmacokinetics (PKs), target engagement (TE) (inhibition of CXCR3 internalization) and safety of single- and multiple-ascending doses (SADs and MADs) of ACT-777991, a novel orally available potent CXCR3 antagonist, were assessed in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 1 study. METHODS: Doses up to 100 mg (SAD part) and 40 mg twice daily (MAD part) were investigated in a total of 70 male and female healthy participants. Food effect was integrated as an SAD subpart. PK, TE, safety and tolerability data were collected up to 4 days after (last) dosing. RESULTS: In both SAD and MAD parts, ACT-777991 was rapidly absorbed with a time to reach maximum concentration between 0.5 and 1.5 h post dose, followed by a biphasic disposition with a terminal half-life between 9.7 and 10.3 h. Increase in exposure and maximum concentration of ACT-777991 were dose-proportional. Steady state was reached after 48 h with minimal accumulation. The rate but not the extent of absorption was modified by food intake. A dose-dependent TE was demonstrated in both SAD and MAD parts. ACT-777991 was well tolerated. Neither a treatment-related pattern nor a dose-response relationship was determined for adverse events or any safety variable. No QT prolongation liability of regulatory concern was detected. CONCLUSIONS: In this first-in-human study, ACT-777991 showed good tolerability for all doses tested and a PK and TE profile suitable for further clinical development.

Population pharmacokinetics of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan in subjects with or without essential or resistant hypertension.

Aprocitentan is a novel, potent, dual endothelin receptor antagonist that recently demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of difficult-to-treat (resistant) hypertension. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model describing aprocitentan plasma concentration over time, to investigate relationships between subject-specific factors (covariates) and model parameters, and to quantify the influence of the identified covariates on the exposure to aprocitentan via model-based simulations, enabling judgment about the clinical relevance of the covariates.PK data from 902 subjects in ten Phase 1, one Phase 2, and one Phase 3 study were pooled to develop a joint population PK model. The concentration-time course of aprocitentan was described by a two-compartment model with absorption lag time, first-order absorption and elimination, and reduced relative bioavailability following very high doses of 300 and 600 mg.The population PK model described the observed data well. Volume and clearance parameters were associated with body weight. Renal function as reflected by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), hepatic impairment, and sex were identified as relevant covariates on clearance.The subject-specific characteristics of body weight, eGFR, hepatic impairment, and sex were shown to influence exposure parameters area under the concentration-time curve and maximum concentration in steady state to a limited extent, i.e., not more than 25% different from a reference subject, and therefore do not warrant dose adjustments.

The orexin story and orexin receptor antagonists for the treatment of insomnia.

Insomnia is present in up to one third of the adult population worldwide, and it can present independently or with other medical conditions such as mental, metabolic, or cardiovascular diseases, which highlights the importance of treating this multifaceted disorder. Insomnia is associated with an abnormal state of hyperarousal (increased somatic, cognitive, and cortical activation) and orexin has been identified as a key promotor of arousal and vigilance. The current standards of care for the treatment of insomnia recommend non-pharmacological interventions (cognitive behavioural therapy) as first-line treatment and, if behavioural interventions are not effective or available, pharmacotherapy. In contrast to most sleep medications used for decades (benzodiazepines and 'Z-drugs'), the new orexin receptor antagonists do not modulate the activity of γ-aminobutyric acid receptors, the main inhibitory mechanism of the central nervous system. Instead, they temporarily block the orexin pathway, causing a different pattern of effects, e.g., less morning or next-day effects, motor dyscoordination, and cognitive impairment. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of these drugs are the basis of the different characteristics explained in the package inserts, including the recommended starting dose. Orexin receptor antagonists seem to be devoid of any dependence and tolerance-inducing effects, rendering them a viable option for longer-term treatment. Safety studies did not show exacerbation of existing respiratory problems, but more real-world safety and pharmacovigilance experience is needed. This review provides an overview of the orexin history, the mechanism of action, the relation to insomnia, and key features of available drugs mediating orexin signalling.

Multiple-ascending doses of ACT-1014-6470, an oral complement factor 5a receptor 1 (C5a1 receptor) antagonist: Tolerability, pharmacokinetics and target engagement.

AIMS: Targeting the complement factor 5a receptor 1 (C5a1 receptor) offers potential to treat various autoimmune diseases. The C5a1 receptor antagonist ACT-1014-6470 was well tolerated in a single-ascending dose study in healthy subjects. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study aimed to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and target engagement of multiple-ascending doses of ACT-1014-6470. METHODS: Per dose level, 10 healthy male and female subjects of nonchildbearing potential (1:1 sex ratio) were enrolled to assess 30, 60 and 120 mg ACT-1014-6470 administered twice daily for 4.5 days under fed conditions. Adverse events, clinical laboratory data, vital signs, electrocardiogram and PK blood samples were collected up to 120 h post last dose and ex vivo stimulated matrix metalloproteinase 9 was quantified as target engagement biomarker. At the 60-mg dose level, PK samples were collected until 8 weeks post last dose. RESULTS: The total adverse event number was 57 and no treatment-related safety pattern was apparent. At steady state, ACT-1014-6470 reached maximum plasma concentrations after 2-3 h and the half-life estimated up to Day 10 was 115-146 h across dose levels. Exposure parameters increased dose-proportionally, steady state was attained between Day 3-5, and ACT-1014-6470 accumulated 2-fold. At the 60-mg dose level, ACT-1014-6470 was quantifiable until 8 weeks after the last dose. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 release was suppressed to endogenous background concentrations up to the last sampling time point, confirming sustained target engagement of ACT-1014-6470. CONCLUSION: The compound was generally safe and well tolerated at all dose levels, warranting further clinical investigations.

Effect of gastric pH and of a moderate CYP3A4 inducer on the pharmacokinetics of daridorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist.

AIMS: Daridorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist developed for the treatment of insomnia. The solubility of daridorexant is pH-dependent and daridorexant has been shown to be a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate when co-administered with moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of an increased gastric pH on daridorexant pharmacokinetics (PK) and the extent of interaction when daridorexant is co-administered with a moderate CYP3A4 inducer. METHODS: In this prospective, single-centre, randomized, open-label study, 24 male subjects consecutively received four treatments, i.e., daridorexant 50 mg single dose; famotidine 40 mg single dose + daridorexant 50 mg single dose; efavirenz 600 mg once a day (o.d.) for 10 days; and daridorexant 50 mg single dose + efavirenz 600 mg o.d. for 2 days. Plasma PK parameters of daridorexant were derived by noncompartmental analysis. Standard safety and tolerability evaluations were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: When daridorexant administration was preceded by administration of famotidine, daridorexant Cmax decreased by 39%, geometric means ratio (GMR) (90% confidence interval [90% CI]): 0.61 (0.50, 0.73). AUC0-∞ remained unchanged. In the presence of steady-state efavirenz, daridorexant Cmax , AUC0-∞ and t½ decreased by approximately 35% (GMR [90% CI]): 0.65 (0.54, 0.78), 61% (0.39 (0.348, 0.44), and 35% (0.65 (0.58, 0.73), respectively. tmax remained unaffected. All treatments containing daridorexant were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Daridorexant 50 mg can be administered concomitantly with gastric pH modifiers or with moderate CYP3A4 inducers without dose adaptation based on efficacy observed at lower doses in Phase 3 studies.

Lack of Effect of Cenerimod, a Selective S1P1 Receptor Modulator, on the Pharmacokinetics of a Combined Oral Contraceptive.

Cenerimod, a sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 receptor modulator, is in development for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, a disease mainly affecting women of childbearing potential. The effect of cenerimod on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a combined oral contraceptive (COC, 100 µg levonorgestrel and 20 µg ethinylestradiol (EE)) was investigated. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was performed in 24 healthy male and female subjects. A single oral dose of COC was administered alone and after 35 days of once daily (o.d.) administration of cenerimod 0.5 (n = 10) or 4 (n = 14) mg. Exposure to EE alone or in combination with cenerimod was comparable as reflected by the geometric mean ratios and the respective 90% confidence intervals, while a slight increase in exposure (approximately 10-25%) to levonorgestrel was observed at clinically relevant concentrations of cenerimod. Overall, COC alone or in combination with cenerimod was safe and well tolerated. Two subjects reported one adverse event each (one headache after COC alone, and gastroenteritis in combination with cenerimod 4 mg). In conclusion, cenerimod does not affect the PK of levonorgestrel or EE to a clinically relevant extent. Therefore, COC can be selected as method of contraception during and after cenerimod therapy without the risk of interaction.

Effect of the novel dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant on night-time respiratory function and sleep in patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sleep is often fragmented while, conversely, the use of sleep medications is of concern in these patients due to potential impairment of nocturnal breathing. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the new dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant on night-time respiratory function and sleep in patients with moderate COPD. In each period, the highest Phase-III dose of 50 mg daridorexant or placebo was administered once daily in the evening for 5 consecutive days. The primary endpoint was peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2 ) during total sleep time (TST) after last dosing. Night-time respiratory function and sleep were further evaluated based on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), sleep duration, and objective sleep parameters. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability were also assessed. Primary endpoint analysis revealed no significant mean treatment difference (i.e. daridorexant - placebo) for SpO2 during TST as it was 0.18% (90% confidence interval: -0.21 to 0.57). There was also no difference from placebo for SpO2 during non-rapid eye movement (REM) and REM sleep at Night 5 and after first dosing. The AHI was slightly increased compared to placebo, but not to a clinically meaningful extent. In addition, daridorexant improved objective sleep parameters (i.e. prolonged TST, increased sleep efficiency, and decreased wake after sleep onset), reached expected plasma concentrations, and was safe and well tolerated. In conclusion, single and multiple doses of 50 mg daridorexant do not impair night-time respiratory function and improves sleep in patients with moderate COPD.

PK/PD modeling of a clazosentan thorough QT study with hysteresis in concentration-QT and RR-QT.

Clazosentan's potential QT liability was investigated in a thorough QT study in which clazosentan was administered intravenously as a continuous infusion of 20 mg/h immediately followed by 60 mg/h. Clazosentan prolonged the placebo-corrected change-from-baseline QT interval corrected for RR with Fridericia's formula (ΔΔQTcF) with the maximum QT effect occurring 4 h after the maximum drug concentration, apparently associated with vomiting. The delayed effect precluded the standard linear modeling approach. This analysis aimed at characterizing the concentration-QT relationship in consideration of RR-QT hysteresis, concentration-ΔΔQTcF hysteresis, and the influence of vomiting. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was applied to characterize pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, i.e., ΔΔQTcF. Simulations were used to predict ΔΔQTcF for expected therapeutic dose used in Phase 3 clinical development. Correction for RR-QT hysteresis did not influence ΔΔQTcF to a relevant extent. Pharmacokinetics of clazosentan were best described by a linear two-compartment model. The delayed QT prolongation was characterized by an indirect-response model with loglinear drug effect. Vomiting had no statistically significant influence on QT prolongation despite apparent differences between subjects vomiting and not vomiting, probably since vomiting occurred mostly after the main QT prolongation. Following a simulated 3-h infusion of 15 mg/h of clazosentan, the upper bound of the predicted 90% CI for mean ΔΔQTcF was expected to exceed the 10-ms regulatory threshold of concern with maximum effect 3.5 h after end of infusion. TRN: NCT03657446, 05 Sep 2018.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist Daridorexant in Japanese and Caucasian Subjects.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Daridorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist in development for the treatment of sleep disorders. Thus far, it has not yet been studied in Japanese subjects. Study objectives were to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of single- and multiple-dose administration of daridorexant in healthy Caucasian and Japanese subjects. METHODS/PROCEDURES: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Subjects received once-daily doses of daridorexant (25 or 50 mg) or placebo for 5 days. Pharmacokinetics and safety were investigated using standard assessments. To assess PD effects, a battery of tests (saccadic peak velocity, body sway, adaptive tracking performance, and visual analog scales for alertness, mood, and calmness), known to be sensitive to sleep-promoting drugs was used. FINDINGS/RESULTS: On day 1, PK variables were similar between Caucasian and Japanese subjects. On day 5, slight accumulation occurred in Japanese but not in Caucasian subjects, resulting in a higher maximum concentration (1403 vs 1006 ng/mL) and area under the curve (8256 vs 6306 ng·h/mL) at a dose of 50 mg, whereas values for time to maximum concentration and half-life were similar. Daridorexant dose-dependently reduced vigilance, attention, visuomotor coordination, and postural stability. Pharmacokinetic effects were detectable within 1 hour after drug administration and returned to baseline 4 to 8 hours postdose. Overall, Japanese showed slightly larger PD effects and reported more adverse events than Caucasians. The most frequently reported were somnolence, fatigue, and headache. Changes in other safety assessments were unremarkable. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: The PK, PD, and safety profile of daridorexant were similar in Japanese and Caucasian subjects.

Relevance of the CXCR4/CXCR7-CXCL12 axis and its effect in pathophysiological conditions.

The impact of the C-X-C receptor (CXCR) 7 and its close co-player CXCR4 in different physiological and pathophysiological processes has been extensively investigated within the last decades. Following activation by their shared ligand C-X-C ligand (CXCL) 12, both chemokine receptors can induce various routes of cell signaling and/or scavenge CXCL12 from the extracellular environment. This contributes to organ development and maintenance of homeostasis. Alterations of the CXCR4/CXCR7-CXCL12 axis have been detected in diseases such as cancer, central nervous system and cardiac disorders, and autoimmune diseases. These alterations include changes of the expression pattern, distribution, or downstream effects. The progression of the diseases can be regulated in preclinical models by the use of various modulators suggesting that this axis serves as a promising therapeutic target. It is therefore of great interest to investigate CXCR4/CXCR7/CXCL12 modulators in clinical development, with several CXCR4 and CXCL12 modulators such as plerixafor, ulocuplumab, balixafortide, and olaptesed pegol having already reached this stage. An overview is presented of the most important diseases whose outcomes can be positively or negatively regulated by the CXCR4/CXCR7-CXCL12 axis and summarizes preclinical and clinical data of modulators of that axis. Contrary to CXCR4 and CXCL12 modulators, CXCR7 modulators have, thus far, not been extensively studied. Therefore, more (pre)clinical investigations are needed.

First-in-human study with ACT-539313, a novel selective orexin-1 receptor antagonist.

AIMS: The orexin system is involved in anxiety behaviour and corresponding physiological reactions and constitutes a target for treatment of anxiety disorders. ACT-539313 is a potent, selective orexin-1 receptor antagonist being developed for the treatment of anxiety disorders. This first-in-human study investigated its single-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) including food effect, pharmacodynamics (PD), safety and tolerability. METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study included 40 healthy male subjects. Ascending oral doses of 10-400 mg ACT-539313 were investigated in 5 dose groups of 8 subjects (of whom 2 received placebo per dose group). At 100 mg, subjects received ACT-539313 in fasted and fed conditions in a fixed sequential design. PK, PD (objective and subjective measures of sedation and effects on central nervous system), safety and tolerability were assessed. RESULTS: In fasted conditions, ACT-539313 was rapidly absorbed (median time to maximum plasma concentration [Cmax ] 0.7-3.5 h) and cleared from plasma with a mean terminal half-life of 3.3-5.7 h across dose levels. A 1.63-fold (90% confidence interval: 1.26-2.11) increase in Cmax and no change in area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity was observed under fed compared to fasted conditions. No relevant PD signals were detected except for a trend of reduced saccadic peak velocity around time to Cmax . The most commonly reported adverse events were somnolence and headache. All adverse events were transient and of mild or moderate intensity. No treatment-related effects on vital signs, clinical laboratory or 12-lead electrocardiogram were observed. CONCLUSIONS: ACT-539313 exhibits good safety and tolerability at single doses of up to and including 400 mg that warrant further investigations.

Modelling pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the selective S1P1 receptor modulator cenerimod in healthy subjects and systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

AIMS: Assessment of time to attain steady state as well as drug accumulation following long-term treatment with the selective sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 receptor modulator cenerimod and prediction of the incidence of low total lymphocyte (LY) counts. Differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics based on demographic characteristics and between healthy subjects and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients were to be identified. METHODS: Data from 4 Phase I studies and 1 Phase II study were pooled to develop a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model describing cenerimod concentration and its effect on LY count. Simulations addressed the objectives. RESULTS: Simulations of 365 days of treatment indicated a time to steady state of 49 days and changes in exposure of 15% beyond 35 days. For a dose of 2 mg, the predicted incidences of LY counts below 0.5 and 0.2 × 109 cells/L were 18.2 and 0.6% for healthy subjects and 25.9 and 1.0% for SLE patients, respectively. Incidence increased with higher dose and lower baseline LY counts. For body weights of 50 and 100 kg compared to 75 kg, exposure was predicted to change by +37% and -20%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Long-term cenerimod administration is not expected to result in exposure and LY count reduction substantially different from results of completed studies. Low LY counts are predicted to occur more frequently in SLE patients compared to healthy subjects. Dose individualization based on the model is not considered necessary. Model-based simulations enable benefit-risk evaluations, supporting planning of late-phase clinical studies and scientific exchange with health authorities.

Impact of the organic cation transporter 2 inhibitor cimetidine on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of the glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor lucerastat in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: Lucerastat is an orally available glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor with a potential to provide substrate reduction therapy for Fabry patients independent of their α-galactosidase A genotype. In humans, lucerastat is mainly eliminated as unchanged parent compound through renal excretion both by active secretion and passive filtration. In vitro studies indicated that lucerastat is a substrate of human organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) mainly expressed in the kidney. METHODS: Therefore, this clinical study, conducted in 14 healthy male subjects, investigated the effect of 800 mg twice-daily oral administration of the OCT2 inhibitor cimetidine at steady state on the single-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of 500 mg lucerastat. The safety and tolerability of lucerastat administered alone and concomitantly with cimetidine were also evaluated. RESULTS: Exposure to lucerastat was slightly higher upon co-administration of cimetidine indicated by geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) ratio of 1.22 (90% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-1.28). Cimetidine delayed the time to reach maximum lucerastat concentrations (tmax) by 1 h but did not affect its elimination half-life (t½) or maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) as geometric mean ratios were 1.00 (0.91-1.10) and 1.04 (0.92-1.17), respectively, at cimetidine steady state. Lucerastat was safe and well tolerated when given alone and in combination with cimetidine. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the single-dose PK of lucerastat are not changed to a clinically relevant extent by cimetidine-mediated OCT2 inhibition, allowing the concomitant use of OCT2 inhibitors with lucerastat without any need for dose adjustment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2017-003725-14; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03380455.

The dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant does not affect the pharmacokinetics of the BCRP substrate rosuvastatin.

Daridorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist in clinical development for the treatment of insomnia. Breast-cancer resistant protein (BCRP) is an efflux pump expressed in intestinal epithelium and hepatocytes, contributing to the absorption, distribution, and elimination of drugs and endogenous compounds. In vitro, daridorexant inhibits BCRP with an IC50 of 3.0 µmol/L. The BCRP substrate rosuvastatin is a cholesterol-lowering drug, recommended for clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies. In order to exclude an inhibitory effect of daridorexant on BCRP, this single-centre, open-label, two-treatment Phase 1 study investigated the effect of daridorexant at steady state on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of single-dose rosuvastatin in 20 healthy male subjects. In addition, safety and tolerability were assessed. A single oral dose of 10 mg rosuvastatin on Day 1 was followed by 96 hours observation. Thereafter, 25 mg daridorexant was administered once daily (o.d.) on Days 5-8 and in combination with 10 mg rosuvastatin on Day 8. On Days 9-12, subjects received 25 mg daridorexant alone. PK sampling was performed up to 120 hours after treatment administration. The results showed that concomitant administration of 25 mg daridorexant o.d. at steady state did not affect the exposure parameters of rosuvastatin in a relevant way, as indicated by the ratios of geometric means (GMRs) ([rosuvastatin + daridorexant]/[rosuvastatin alone]) of 0.93 for both Cmax and AUC0-∞ . Administration of a single dose of 10 mg rosuvastatin, multiple doses of 25 mg daridorexant alone or in combination were well tolerated. Taken together, daridorexant and BCRP substrates can be safely co-administered.

Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of cenerimod, a selective S1P1 receptor modulator in healthy subjects.

Cenerimod is a sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 receptor modulator under development for treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus.This single-centre, open-label, single-dose study investigated the mass balance and excretion routes and aimed at identifying and quantifying cenerimod metabolites in plasma, urine, and faeces after oral administration of 2 mg/100 µCi (3.7 MBq) of 14C-cenerimod.Total mean cumulative recovery was 84% of the administered dose (58-100% in faeces and 4.6-12% in urine). In a 0-504 h cross-subject area under the curve plasma pool, cenerimod and two metabolites were detected accounting for 78, 6.0, and 4.9% of total radioactivity, respectively, i.e. no major metabolite was identified in plasma. Cenerimod was only detected in faeces and accounted for 17% of the radioactivity excreted in this matrix. The metabolite M32 was detected in both urine and faeces and represented 23% and 66% of radioactivity excreted in these matrices, respectively. Other metabolites of unknown structure were detected in small amounts. Overall, M32 and cenerimod accounted for 52% and 13%, respectively, of the total radioactivity recovered.Among the excreted metabolites, only the non-enzymatically formed M32 represented more than 25% of total drug-related material. Therefore, no pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction studies are foreseen.

Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of the P2Y12 receptor antagonist selatogrel after subcutaneous administration in healthy subjects.

The P2Y12 receptor antagonist selatogrel which exhibits rapid inhibition of platelet aggregation following subcutaneous administration is in development for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.This human ADME study was performed in six healthy male subjects to determine the routes of elimination and to identify/quantify the metabolites of selatogrel at a therapeutically relevant dose of 16 mg [14C]-radiolabelled selatogrel.The median tmax and t1/2 of selatogrel was 0.75 h and 4.7 h, respectively. It was safe and well tolerated based on adverse event, ECG, vital sign and laboratory data.Geometric mean total recovery of [14C]-radioactivity was 94.9% of which 92.5% was recovered in faeces and 2.4% in urine.Selatogrel was the most abundant entity in each matrix. In plasma, no major metabolite was identified. In excreta, the glucuronide M21 (14.7% of radioactivity) and the mono-oxidized A1 (6.2%) were the most abundant metabolites in urine and faeces, respectively.Overall, none of the metabolic pathways contributed to a relevant extent to the overall elimination of selatogrel, i.e. by more than 25% as defined per regulatory guidance. Hence, no pharmacokinetic interaction studies with inhibitors or inducers of drug-metabolizing enzymes are warranted for clinical development of selatogrel.

First-in-man study of ACT-709478, a novel selective triple T-type calcium channel blocker.

OBJECTIVE: Increased activity of T-type Ca2+ channels is linked to idiopathic generalized epilepsies, thus blocking these channels may be a new treatment option. ACT-709478 is an orally available triple T-type Ca2+ channel blocker. The aim of this first-in-man study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, tolerability, and safety of single doses of ACT-709478 in healthy subjects. METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study included 65 healthy male subjects. Ascending single oral doses of 1-400 mg ACT-709478 or placebo were administered to sequential groups of eight subjects (6 on active, 2 on placebo). Effect of food was tested in a crossover part at 60 mg. Blood and saliva sampling for pharmacokinetic evaluations and safety assessments was performed regularly. Effects on the central nervous system were assessed with a battery of pharmacodynamic tests. RESULTS: The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) was reached within 3 to 4 hours (≤60 mg) and within 20 to 28 hours (>60 mg), and across all dose levels the terminal half-life (95% confidence interval) ranged from 36 (29-45) to 43 (22-86) hours. Multiple peaks were observed and Cmax and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC)0-∞ increased in a less than dose-proportional manner. A 1.6-fold increase in Cmax and no change in AUC0-∞ was observed in fed compared to fasted conditions. A significant correlation (P < 0.0001) between plasma and saliva concentrations was established using linear regression. All adverse events were transient and of mild or moderate intensity. No treatment-related effects on vital signs, clinical laboratory, telemetry, or electrocardiography were detected. The results of pharmacodynamic tests did not show relevant mean changes compared to baseline or placebo. SIGNIFICANCE: ACT-709478 exhibits good tolerability and safety after single-dose administration and its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties warrant further investigations.

Target-Mediated Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists.

PURPOSE: Bosentan, clazosentan, and tezosentan are three small-molecule endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), displacing endothelin-1 (ET-1) from its binding site. A target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) pharmacokinetic (PK) model described the non-linearity in the PK of bosentan caused by its high receptor binding affinity with time-dependent varying receptor expression or reappearance. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the presence of TMDD for clazosentan and tezosentan and to corroborate the hypothesis of a diurnal receptor synthesis. METHODS: PK data from healthy subjects after intravenous (i.v.) administration of single ascending doses of bosentan, clazosentan, and tezosentan were analyzed. Frequent blood samples for PK measurements were collected. Population analyses, simulations, and evaluations were performed using a non-linear mixed-effects modeling approach. RESULTS: Two-compartment TMDD models were successfully developed describing the PK of all three ERAs with different receptor-complex internalization properties. The observed multiple peaks in the concentration-time profiles were captured with cosine functions on the receptor synthesis rate mimicking a diurnal receptor expression or reappearance. The results strongly suggest that TMDD is a class effect of ERAs. CONCLUSION: The developed TMDD PK models are a next step towards understanding the complex PK of ERAs and further support the hypothesis that TMDD is a class effect of ERAs.

Interaction potential of the dual orexin receptor antagonist ACT-541468 with CYP3A4 and food: results from two interaction studies.

PURPOSE: ACT-541468 is a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) under development for the treatment of insomnia. In vitro studies suggested a significant role of CYP3A4 in ACT-541468 metabolism and an impact on CYP3A4 activity. METHODS: Subsequently, two clinical cross-over studies investigated the victim (n = 14 healthy subjects) and perpetrator (n = 20) potential of 25 mg ACT-541468 with respect to CYP3A4. The effect of food intake on the pharmacokinetics of ACT-541468 was also investigated. RESULTS: Moderate CYP3A4 inhibition by diltiazem (240 mg/day) increased the Cmax and AUC0-∞ of ACT-541468 by 1.4-fold (90% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-1.6) and 2.4-fold (90% CI: 2.0-2.8), respectively, and prolonged t½ by 80% (90% CI: 60-90) without affecting tmax. Single- and multiple-dose administration of 25 mg ACT-541468 had no impact on the pharmacokinetics of the sensitive substrate midazolam and its main metabolite 1-hydroxy midazolam indicated by 90% CI of the geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC within bioequivalence criteria and by an unchanged tmax. After a high-fat high-calorie breakfast, the pharmacokinetic profile of 25 mg ACT-541468 showed a decrease of Cmax by 24% (90% CI: 17-31) and a delay of tmax by approximately 2 h (90% CI: 1.4-2.4), whereas t½ and AUC0-24 remained essentially unchanged. ACT-541468 given alone or in combination with diltiazem, midazolam, or food was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, ACT-541468 has been determined as CYP3A4 substrate but without any perpetrator drug-drug interaction potential regarding CYP3A4 in humans. Food affected ACT-541468 absorption without modifying overall exposure.

Cardiodynamic Interactions between Two S1P1 Receptor Modulators in an Experimental Clinical Setting: Different Pharmacokinetic Properties as an Opportunity to Mitigate First-Dose Heart Rate Effects.

A decrease in heart rate (HR) is a well-established first-dose effect of sphingosine-1-phosphate subtype 1 receptor (S1P1R) modulators. For compounds with a short half-life (t1/2), this can be mitigated by gradual up-titration to therapeutic doses, whereas this is not required for compounds with a long t1/2 due to the less pronounced first-dose-related negative chronotropic effects. Based on this conceptual framework, this mechanistic study investigated whether first-dose HR effects of ponesimod (t1/2 ~32 h) can be mitigated by prior administration of cenerimod (t1/2 ~415 h). Healthy subjects (n = 12) were randomly assigned to active or placebo (2:1 ratio). Active treatment consisted of a single dose of 10 mg ponesimod on Day 1, 18, and 37 and multiple-dose administration of 2 mg once daily cenerimod (Day 9-36). Placebos of cenerimod and ponesimod were used as reference treatment. Cardiodynamic parameters were derived from 24 h Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) assessments on Day 1, 9, 10, 18, 36, and 37. Ponesimod (10 mg) alone triggered a transient mean decrease from baseline in hourly mean HR of 17 bpm. In contrast, decreases of 5.0 and 4.8 bpm were observed when ponesimod was given at near half steady-state (Day 18) or steady-state (Day 37) cenerimod, respectively. Hourly mean HR decreased after first administration of cenerimod and placebo was 7.4 and 4.0 bpm, respectively. Treatment with ponesimod and cenerimod alone or in combination was safe and tolerated. First-dose-related negative chronotropic effects of ponesimod were less pronounced when administered after initiation of cenerimod suggesting mitigation of this class-related liability.