Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Anaesthesist ; 70(6): 486-496, 2021 06.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33315142

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The final year of medical training in Germany is one of the least structured and standardized years of medical school. Medical students often complain about a lack of guidance, supervision and feedback. They are mostly asked to perform delegable nonmedical tasks even though student experiences in this period critically determine future decisions for certain medical specialties. Consequently, right from the beginning many young professionals feel overburdened especially by the time pressure of everyday clinical practice. The planned amendment of the medical licensing regulations will make competence-based training even more important. This article therefore aims to examine the extent to which a mentoring-based curriculum with workplace-based examinations during the final year of medical studies can make a valuable contribution to this. METHODS: After a needs assessment (structured literature search, results evaluation and focus groups with both students and medical specialists), a mentoring-based curriculum for final year medical students was developed following the Kern cycle. In 2 work sessions 10 discipline-specific competencies for the fields of anesthesiology, critical care, emergency and pain medicine were established and prioritized, which had to be mastered by every student independently at the end of the training period. Assessment of these competencies was performed on a regular basis by trained mentors in the form of workplace-based assessments (mini-clinical evaluation exercise, mini-CEX, direct observation of procedural skills, DOPS). Multiperspective evaluation was and is the foundation of continuous program development. By September 2019 a total of 40 students had completed the modified curriculum and were subsequently interviewed online about various aspects of the tertial. RESULTS: The response rate to the survey was 80% (n = 32). The gender ratio was balanced (male = 50%, female = 50%). Prioritization and assessment of 10 competencies by trained mentors enabled a focused, demand-driven and high-quality training of final year medical students. Surveyed students found the section mentoring and feedback to be very positive and it supported their learning success (grade 1.5). Despite firmly established feedback structures, in retrospect almost half (51.6%) wanted more structured feedback. Workplace-based assessments were mostly previously unknown (64.6%) but were experienced as helpful and meaningful (76.7%). Students felt confident and prepared for the final state examination (81.3%) and their career start (71.0%) after being part of the program. These findings were accompanied by a high level of satisfaction (grade 1.7) as well as a high recommendation rate for this institution (as a training program for final year medical students and as a career start for residents, both with 93.7%). Thus, the good evaluation results of the department before the start of the project could again be slightly improved. CONCLUSION: A demand-driven, mentoring-based curriculum with integrated workplace-based assessments not only led to high overall student satisfaction but also promoted the quality of teaching in an effective and resource-saving way. Mentoring promotes learning success mainly through feedback and individual learning support and also supports the communicative and social skills of students and mentors alike.


Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Tutoría , Estudiantes de Medicina , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Evaluación Educacional , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mentores , Satisfacción Personal , Lugar de Trabajo
2.
Anaesthesist ; 63(11): 852-64, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25227879

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The recommendations still have to be implemented 3 years after publication of the S3 guidelines on the treatment of patients with severe and multiple injuries. AIM: This article reiterates some of the essential core statements of the S3 guidelines and also gives an overview of new scientific studies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a selective literature search new studies on airway management, traumatic cardiac arrest, shock classification, coagulation therapy, whole-body computed tomography, air rescue and trauma centers were identified and are discussed in the light of the S3 guideline recommendations. RESULTS: The recommendations on airway management are up to date; however, recommendations on difficult airway evaluation tools, e.g. the LEMON law, should be included. The first pass success (i.e. intubation success at the first attempt) must be considered as a quality marker in the future. Video laryngoscopy is identified as a leading airway procedure in order to reach this aim. Recently estimated learning curves for endotracheal intubation and supraglottic airway devices should be implemented in qualification statements. Life-saving emergency interventions have to be performed in the prehospital setting as they do not prolong the complete treatment period for severely injured patients up to discharge from the resuscitation room. The outcome of patients suffering from traumatic cardiac arrest is better than expected. Recently developed algorithms for trauma patients have to be implemented. The prehospital trauma life support (PHTLS) and advanced trauma life support (ATLS) shock classification does not reflect the clinical reality; therefore, lactate, lactate clearance and base deficit should be used for evaluating the shock state in the resuscitation room. Concerning coagulation therapy, tranexamic acid is easy to administer, safe and effective as an antifibrinolytic therapy and should not be restricted to the most severely injured patients. Numerous studies have shown the positive effect of whole-body computed tomography on treatment time and outcome; however, clear indications for the use of whole-body computed tomography are lacking. Further investigations supported the positive effects of air rescue on the treatment outcome of trauma patients. CONCLUSION: The recommendations on interdisciplinary trauma management contained in the S3 guidelines on the treatment of patients with severe and multiple injuries should be implemented into the clinical routine. Additionally, the knowledge gained from more recent scientific studies is necessary for anesthetists and emergency physicians to be able to adequately implement the core statements of the S3 guidelines for the treatment of patients with severe and multiple injuries.


Asunto(s)
Guías como Asunto , Traumatismo Múltiple/terapia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Atención de Apoyo Vital Avanzado en Trauma , Manejo de la Vía Aérea , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Transporte de Pacientes , Centros Traumatológicos/organización & administración
4.
Anaesthesist ; 58(4): 410-4, 2009 Apr.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19326053

RESUMEN

Basic therapy of acute lung injury (ALI) covers a pressure-limited lung protective mechanical ventilation with low tidal volumes (6-8 ml/kg ideal body weight), adequate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) combined with early recruitment maneuvers and a restrictive fluid management (in hypoproteinemic patients preferably with albumin and diuretics). These measures aim at providing sufficient oxygenation while simultaneously minimizing airway pressure, atelectasis and edema formation. The main hemodynamic effects are a decrease in cardiac output and in systemic arterial pressure potentially reducing organ perfusion. However, successful therapy reduces hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and hypercapnia, thus lowering pulmonary artery pressure, unloading the right ventricle, and stabilising hemodynamics.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/terapia , Fluidoterapia , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar/fisiología , Respiración Artificial , Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/fisiopatología , Volumen Sanguíneo/fisiología , Humanos , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Mecánica Respiratoria/fisiología
5.
Transplant Proc ; 37(1): 210-1, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15808596

RESUMEN

Steatotic liver grafts are associated with a high incidence of primary nonfunction and initial poor function. Due to the increasing number of liver transplant candidates, centers are inclined to accept marginal donors more frequently. For a lack of a reliable fatty liver model, preservation concepts for fatty livers have hardly been evaluated. Moreover, there is an ongoing debate on the relevance and impact of micro- versus macrovesicular steatotic organs. We therefore intended to establish a steatotic liver model in pigs comprising both micro- and macrovesicular steatotic livers. Five groups of pigs received daily 1 to 6 g ethanol/kg body weight and/or a protein-deficient diet for up to 72 days. Liver biopsy was carried out at days 24, 48, and 72. With an increasing amount and duration of ethanol intake, higher levels of microvesicular steatosis were induced. Ethanol and protein deficient diet resulted in more than 60% microvesicular steatosis after 72 days. Exclusively protein-deficient diet without ethanol induced macrovesicular steatosis of more than 70% after 72 days. For the first time, we established a porcine model of hepatic steatosis that comprises both histologic types of fatty liver: micro- and macrovesicular steatosis induced by ethanol and a protein-deficient diet. We would like to conclude that our model is particularly qualified to study new concepts of preservation for steatotic livers to improve on the posttransplant outcome.


Asunto(s)
Hígado Graso Alcohólico/cirugía , Trasplante de Hígado/fisiología , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Femenino , Hepatocitos/patología , Deficiencia de Proteína , Porcinos
6.
Intensive Care Med ; 27(12): 1937-48, 2001 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11797031

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of a high dose partial liquid ventilation (PLV) approximating the amount of the functional residual capacity (FRC) with low levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared to a lung-protective strategy with volume-controlled mechanical ventilation (vcMV) with a PEEP level above the lower inflection point (LIP) on pulmonary gas exchange, haemodynamics, respiratory mechanics and lung injury in an experimental model of acute lung injury (ALI). DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, controlled study. METHODS: Twenty-four anaesthetised, tracheotomised and mechanically ventilated (FIO(2) 1.0) pigs underwent induction of ALI by repeated saline wash-out of surfactant. Animals were randomly assigned to receive either PLV ( PLV, n=8) with 30 ml/kg of perfluorocarbons (PF 5080, 3 M, Germany) and a PEEP level of 5 cmH(2)O, to receive vcMV with a PEEP level of 1 cmH(2)O above the LIP ( (ideal) PEEP, n=8), or to receive vcMV with a PEEP level of 5 cmH(2)O ( Controls, n=8). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Measurements of pulmonary gas exchange, respiratory mechanics and haemodynamics were performed hourly for a 6 h period. In the (ideal) PEEP group, intra-pulmonary shunt (Qs/Qt) decreased from 55+/-5% after induction of ALI to 10+/-3% ( p<0.05 versus Controls and versus PLV) and PaO(2) increased from 52+/-4 to 566+/-19 mmHg after 6 h of treatment ( p<0.05 versus Controls and versus PLV). In the PLV group, Qs/Qt decreased from 50+/-5% after induction of ALI to 24+/-3% ( p<0.05 versus Controls) and PaO(2) increased from 59+/-5 to 306+/-35 mmHg after 6 h of treatment ( p<0.05 versus Controls). In the PLV group and in Controls, mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) was significantly increased from 27+/-2 to 38+/-2 mmHg and from 29+/-1 to 40+/-1 mmHg, respectively, 6 h after induction of ALI ( p<0.05 versus (ideal) PEEP), while in the (ideal) PEEP group, MPAP was maintained between 26+/-1 and 31+/-2 mmHg for 6 h after ALI. Cardiac output (CO) decreased significantly in the (ideal) PEEP group compared to Controls ( p<0.05), while CO did not change in the PLV group and in Controls. The compliance of the respiratory system (C(RS)) increased in the (ideal) PEEP group after induction of ALI from 11+/-2 to 22+/-5 ml/mbar ( p<0.05 versus Controls and versus PLV) and in the PLV group from 10+/-2 to 13+/-3 ml/mbar after 6 h of treatment ( p<0.05 versus Controls). On histological examination, the highest total injury scores were found in animals of the PLV group ( p<0.05 versus Controls and versus (ideal) PEEP), while the lowest total lung injury score was found in the dependent lung regions of the (ideal) PEEP group ( p<0.05 versus Controls). CONCLUSION: In this porcine model of ALI, vcMV with a PEEP level of 1 cmH(2)O above the LIP was superior to high dose PLV with a PEEP of 5 cmH(2)O in improving gas exchange and lung mechanics. In terms of lung damage, the treatment in the (ideal) PEEP group resulted in the lowest total lung injury scores.


Asunto(s)
Ventilación Liquida , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Análisis de Varianza , Animales , Hemodinámica , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar , Distribución Aleatoria , Mecánica Respiratoria , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Análisis de Supervivencia , Porcinos
7.
Anaesthesist ; 53(3): 291-303, 2004 Mar.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15074320

RESUMEN

The pharmacokinetics of opioids are impaired in patients with liver and renal failure. Fentanyl, sufentanil, and alfentanil are metabolized in the liver. The extrahepatic metabolism by renal enzymes is gaining more importance in patients with severe liver disease. Pharmacokinetic effects of single doses of fentanyl and sufentanil are not affected in liver and renal failure; however, continuous infusion of fentanyl may result in accumulation and prolonged opioid effects. Plasma clearance and elimination of alfentanil are reduced in patients with liver failure and its clinical use can therefore not be recommended. A reduction in alfentanil dosing is not necessary in patients with renal failure. Remifentanil is the opioid of choice in patients with liver and renal failure. The clearance of morphine is reduced in liver failure. In renal failure an accumulation of morphine metabolites has been demonstrated, and thus, application of morphine is not recommended in patients with liver and renal failure. A reduction in piritramide dosing is necessary in patients with liver failure.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/farmacocinética , Anestesia , Fallo Hepático/metabolismo , Insuficiencia Renal/metabolismo , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Hepática
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA