Directive clinique no 410 : Anomalies du tube neural : Prévention, dépistage, diagnostic et prise en charge de la grossesse.

OBJECTIF: La présente directive clinique révisée vise à fournir une mise à jour sur les aspects génétiques, la prévention, le dépistage, le diagnostic et la prise en charge des anomalies du tube neural. POPULATION CIBLE: Les femmes enceintes ou qui pourraient le devenir. Il convient d'offrir le dépistage des anomalies du tube neural à toutes les femmes enceintes. OPTIONS: Pour la prévention : un régime alimentaire riche en acide folique et des suppléments d'acide folique et de vitamine B12 selon une posologie d'après le niveau de risque. Pour le dépistage : l'échographie obstétricale du deuxième trimestre, le dépistage échographique du premier trimestre, le dosage de l'alphafœtoprotéine sérique maternelle et l'imagerie par résonance magnétique prénatale. Pour les tests génétiques : l'amniocentèse diagnostique avec analyse chromosomique sur micropuce et le dosage de l'alphafœtoprotéine et de l'acétylcholinestérase dans le liquide amniotique et le séquençage de l'exome fœtal. Pour la prise en charge de la grossesse : la réparation chirurgicale prénatale, la réparation chirurgicale postnatale et l'interruption de grossesse avec autopsie. Pour les grossesses subséquentes : les options de prévention et de dépistage et les conseils. RéSULTATS: La recherche et la mise en œuvre du traitement chirurgical fœtal en cas de diagnostic prénatal de myéloméningocèle ont ajouté une option thérapeutique fœtale importante aux options précédentes (réparation postnatale ou interruption de grossesse), mais cette nouvelle option comporte un risque accru de morbidité maternelle. La prévention, le dépistage, le diagnostic et le traitement des anomalies du tube neural se révèlent entraîner des améliorations importantes à la mère et au nourrisson en matière de santé et de qualité de vie. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: Le type et l'ampleur des bénéfices, risques et coûts attendus pour les patientes grâce à la mise en œuvre de la présente directive clinique par un établissement de soins de santé intègrent un canal maternel préconception et prénatal adéquat comprenant l'accès des patientes aux soins, les conseils, les analyses et examens, l'imagerie, le diagnostic et l'interprétation. Les bénéfices relatifs à l'autonomie de la patiente et au processus décisionnel sont énoncés dans la présente directive clinique. Les risques comprennent un diagnostic fœtal inattendu et les décisions de prise en charge subséquentes. Le fait que la patiente refuse les échographies habituelles et le retard du conseil ou d'accès aux soins en cas d'anomalie du tube neural comportent également des risques. L'analyse des coûts (personnels, familiaux, santé publique) ne fait pas partie de la portée de la présente directive clinique. DONNéES PROBANTES: Afin de mettre à jour et réviser la présente directive, une revue de la littérature ciblée et dirigée a été effectuée à l'aide des termes de recherche suivants : spina bifida, neural tube defect, myelomeningocele, prenatal diagnosis, fetal surgery, neural tube defect prevention, neural tube defect screening, neural tube defect diagnosis et neural tube defect management. Un processus d'examen par les pairs a été utilisé pour la validation et la clarté du contenu, avec des considérations appropriées d'ordre éthique. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant l'approche d'évaluation, de développement et d'évaluation (GRADE). Consulter l'annexe A en ligne (le tableau A1 pour les définitions et le tableau A2 pour les interprétations des recommandations fortes et faibles). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Professionnels des soins de maternité qui offrent des soins préconception, prénataux, obstétricaux ou néonataux. La présente directive clinique convient également aux fins d'éducation des patientes. RECOMMANDATIONS (CLASSEMENT GRADE ENTRE PARENTHèSES).

Guideline No. 410: Prevention, Screening, Diagnosis, and Pregnancy Management for Fetal Neural Tube Defects.

OBJECTIVE: This revised guideline is intended to provide an update on the genetic aspects, prevention, screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal neural tube defects. TARGET POPULATION: Women who are pregnant or may become pregnant. Neural tube defect screening should be offered to all pregnant women. OPTIONS: For prevention: a folate-rich diet, and folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation, with dosage depending on risk level. For screening: second-trimester anatomical sonography; first-trimester sonographic screening; maternal serum alpha fetoprotein; prenatal magnetic resonance imaging. For genetic testing: diagnostic amniocentesis with chromosomal microarray and amniotic fluid alpha fetoprotein and acetylcholinesterase; fetal exome sequencing. For pregnancy management: prenatal surgical repair; postnatal surgical repair; pregnancy termination with autopsy. For subsequent pregnancies: prevention and screening options and counselling. OUTCOMES: The research on and implementation of fetal surgery for prenatally diagnosed myelomeningocele has added a significant treatment option to the previous options (postnatal repair or pregnancy termination), but this new option carries an increased risk of maternal morbidity. Significant improvements in health and quality of life, both for the mother and the infant, have been shown to result from the prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment of fetal neural tube defects. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: The benefits for patient autonomy and decision-making are provided in the guideline. Harms include an unexpected fetal diagnosis and the subsequent management decisions. Harm can also result if the patient declines routine sonographic scans or if counselling and access to care for neural tube defects are delayed. Cost analysis (personal, family, health care) is not within the scope of this clinical practice guideline. EVIDENCE: A directed and focused literature review was conducted using the search terms spina bifida, neural tube defect, myelomeningocele, prenatal diagnosis, fetal surgery, neural tube defect prevention, neural tube defect screening, neural tube defect diagnosis, and neural tube defect management in order to update and revise this guideline. A peer review process was used for content validation and clarity, with appropriate ethical considerations. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: Maternity care professionals who provide any part of pre-conception, antenatal, delivery, and neonatal care. This guideline is also appropriate for patient education. RECOMMENDATIONS (GRADE RATINGS IN PARENTHESES).

Revisiting the Care Pathway for Trial of Labour After Cesarean: The Decision-to-Delivery Interval Is Key.

Centres providing maternity care and offering a trial of labour after cesarean must develop and use maternal educational and consent processes that emphasize choice and autonomy related to options for and decisions surrounding vaginal birth after cesarean and elective repeat cesarean delivery. These centres should have administrative systems and processes that take into account local resources for cesarean delivery services, including team-based complex maternity risk support and an urgency consensus on the fetal, maternal, and maternal-fetal indications for a surgical delivery to ensure an appropriate decision-to-delivery interval.

Fetal Exome Sequencing on the Horizon.

Prenatal whole exome sequencing has recently been introduced. It is evolving and although not currently ready for everyday clinical practice, it will likely become part of the diagnostic arsenal available to clinicians caring for couples carrying a pregnancy for which fetal anomalies have been identified. This commentary discusses what it is, its indications, its benefits, and its limitations.

Adjunct clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean rates: systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Rates of cesarean deliveries have been increasing, and contributes to the rising number of elective cesarean deliveries in subsequent pregnancies with associated maternal and neonatal risks. Multiple guidelines recommend that women be offered a trial of labor after a cesarean (TOLAC). The objective of the study is to systematically review the literature on adjunct clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) rates. METHODS: We searched Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Wiley Cochrane Library, CINAHL via EBSCOhost; and Ovid PsycINFO. Additional studies were identified by searching for clinical trial records, conference proceedings and dissertations. Limits were applied for language (English and French) and year of publication (1985 to present). Two reviewers independently screened comparative studies (randomized or non-randomized controlled trials, and observational designs) according to a priori eligibility criteria: women with prior cesarean sections; any adjunct clinical intervention or exposure intended to increase the VBAC rate; any comparator; and, outcomes reporting changes in TOLAC or VBAC rates. One reviewer extracted data and a second reviewer verified for accuracy. Two reviewers independently conducted methodological quality assessments using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). RESULTS: Twenty-three studies of overall moderate to good methodological quality examined adjunct clinical interventions affecting TOLAC and/or VBAC rates: system-level interventions (three studies), provider-level interventions (three studies), guidelines or information for providers (seven studies), provider characteristics (four studies), and patient-level interventions (six studies). Provider-level interventions (opinion leader education, laborist, and obstetrician second opinion for cesarean sections) and provider characteristics (midwifery antenatal care, physicians on night float call schedules, and deliveries by family physicians) were associated with increased rates of VBAC. Few studies employing heterogeneous designs, sample sizes, interventions and comparators limited confidence in the effects. Studies of system-level and patient-level interventions, and guidelines/information for providers reported mixed findings. CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence indicates some provider-level interventions and provider characteristics may increase rates of attempted and successful TOLACs and/or VBACs, whereas other adjunct clinical interventions such as system-level interventions, patient-level interventions, and guidelines/information for healthcare providers show mixed findings.

Genetic considerations for a woman's annual gynaecological examination.

OBJECTIVE: To provide the physician with an overview of common genetic conditions that should be considered during a women's annual gynaecological assessment to determine the patient's risk or to initiate specific testing or referral to another subspecialty service, depending on personal or family history. OPTIONS: This genetic information can be used for patient education and possible disease and/or mutation screening or diagnosis. OUTCOMES: The use of this genetic information may allow improved risk-benefit assessment and management at the annual gynaecological examination. EVIDENCE: Studies published in English up to and including May 2010 were retrieved through searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library, using appropriate controlled vocabulary (gynaecological diagnosis, genetic inheritance) and key words (genetic risk, genetic mutation, inheritance, family history, uterus, ovary, endometrial, vagina, colon, gastric, renal, breast, cardiac, thrombophilia, diabetes, epilepsy, leiomyomata uteri). Other literature sources were identified through searching the web sites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES: The levels of evidence are not adequate for evidence-based recommendations to be made. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: This committee opinion will enhance the use of new genetic knowledge and its application to the annual gynaecological care of women. Risk management and diagnostic opportunities for genetic gynaecological conditions will be improved. A more complete understanding of genetic conditions may increase anxiety and psychological stress for women and their families. SPONSORS: Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. RECOMMENDATIONS: The levels of evidence are not adequate for evidence-based recommendations to be made.

Genetic considerations for a woman's pre-conception evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To give health care providers information about the genetic information that can be used as part of health surveillance for women undergoing a pre-conception evaluation for genetic risk assessment and possible genetic screening or testing. OPTIONS: This genetic information can be used for patient education and possible prenatal testing. OUTCOMES: The use of this genetic information may allow improved risk-benefit assessment for pre-conception counselling for individual patients and their families. EVIDENCE: PubMed or Medline and the Cochrane Database were searched in November 2009, using appropriate key words (pre-conception, genetic disease, maternal, family history, genetic health risk, genetic health surveillance, prenatal screening, prenatal diagnosis, birth defects, and teratogen). Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, and national and international medical specialty societies. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: The benefits for the patient and her family include understanding of possible genetic risk and enhanced pregnancy outcomes. The harm includes increased anxiety or psychological stress associated with the possibility of identifying genetic risks. VALIDATION: The evidence obtained was reviewed by the Genetics Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUMMARY STATEMENTS: A review of the current literature does not provide enough information for this committee opinion to present evidence-based recommendations.

Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a Canadian consensus document on maternal screening for fetal aneuploidy (e.g., Down syndrome and trisomy 18) in singleton pregnancies. OPTIONS: Pregnancy screening for fetal aneuploidy started in the mid 1960s, using maternal age as the screening test. New developments in maternal serum and ultrasound screening have made it possible to offer all pregnant patients a non-invasive screening test to assess their risk of having a fetus with aneuploidy to determine whether invasive prenatal diagnostic testing is necessary. This document reviews the options available for non-invasive screening and makes recommendations for Canadian patients and health care workers. OUTCOMES: To offer non-invasive screening for fetal aneuploidy (trisomy 13, 18, 21) to all pregnant women. Invasive prenatal diagnosis would be offered to women who screen above a set risk cut-off level on non-invasive screening or to pregnant women whose personal, obstetrical, or family history places them at increased risk. Currently available non-invasive screening options include maternal age combined with one of the following: (1) first trimester screening (nuchal translucency, maternal age, and maternal serum biochemical markers), (2) second trimester serum screening (maternal age and maternal serum biochemical markers), or (3) 2-step integrated screening, which includes first and second trimester serum screening with or without nuchal translucency (integrated prenatal screen, serum integrated prenatal screening, contingent, and sequential). These options are reviewed, and recommendations are made. EVIDENCE: Studies published between 1982 and 2009 were retrieved through searches of PubMed or Medline and CINAHL and the Cochrane Library, using appropriate controlled vocabulary and key words (aneuploidy, Down syndrome, trisomy, prenatal screening, genetic health risk, genetic health surveillance, prenatal diagnosis). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and relevant observational studies. There were no language restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to August 2010. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. The previous Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada guidelines regarding prenatal screening were also reviewed in developing this clinical practice guideline. VALUES: The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: This guideline is intended to reduce the number of prenatal invasive procedures done when maternal age is the only indication. This will have the benefit of reducing the numbers of normal pregnancies lost because of complications of invasive procedures. Any screening test has an inherent false-positive rate, which may result in undue anxiety. It is not possible at this time to undertake a detailed cost-benefit analysis of the implementation of this guideline, since this would require health surveillance and research and health resources not presently available; however, these factors need to be evaluated in a prospective approach by provincial and territorial initiatives. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. All pregnant women in Canada, regardless of age, should be offered, through an informed counselling process, the option of a prenatal screening test for the most common clinically significant fetal aneuploidies in addition to a second trimester ultrasound for dating, assessment of fetal anatomy, and detection of multiples. (I-A) 2. Counselling must be non-directive and must respect a woman's right to accept or decline any or all of the testing or options offered at any point in the process. (III-A) 3. Maternal age alone is a poor minimum standard for prenatal screening for aneuploidy, and it should not be used a basis for recommending invasive testing when non-invasive prenatal screening for aneuploidy is available. (II-2A) 4. Invasive prenatal diagnosis for cytogenetic analysis should not be performed without multiple marker screening results except for women who are at increased risk of fetal aneuploidy (a) because of ultrasound findings, (b) because the pregnancy was conceived by in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection, or (c) because the woman or her partner has a history of a previous child or fetus with a chromosomal abnormality or is a carrier of a chromosome rearrangement that increases the risk of having a fetus with a chromosomal abnormality. (II-2E) 5. At minimum, any prenatal screen offered to Canadian women who present for care in the first trimester should have a detection rate of 75% with no more than a 3% false-positive rate. The performance of the screen should be substantiated by annual audit. (III-B) 6. The minimum standard for women presenting in the second trimester should be a screen that has a detection rate of 75% with no more than a 5% false-positive rate. The performance of the screen should be substantiated by annual audit. (III-B) 7. First trimester nuchal translucency should be interpreted for risk assessment only when measured by sonographers or sonologists trained and accredited for this service and when there is ongoing quality assurance (II-2A), and it should not be offered as a screen without biochemical markers in singleton pregnancies. (I-E) 8. Evaluation of the fetal nasal bone in the first trimester should not be incorporated as a screen unless it is performed by sonographers or sonologists trained and accredited for this service and there is ongoing quality assurance. (II-2E) 9. For women who undertake first trimester screening, second trimester serum alpha fetoprotein screening and/or ultrasound examination is recommended to screen for open neural tube defects. (II-1A) 10. Timely referral and access is critical for women and should be facilitated to ensure women are able to undergo the type of screening test they have chosen as first trimester screening. The first steps of integrated screening (with or without nuchal translucency), contingent, or sequential screening are performed in an early and relatively narrow time window. (II-1A) 11. Ultrasound dating should be performed if menstrual or conception dating is unreliable. For any abnormal serum screen calculated on the basis of menstrual dating, an ultrasound should be done to confirm gestational age. (II-1A) 12. The presence or absence of soft markers or anomalies in the 18- to 20-week ultrasound can be used to modify the a priori risk of aneuploidy established by age or prior screening. (II-2B) 13. Information such as gestational dating, maternal weight, ethnicity, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and use of assisted reproduction technologies should be provided to the laboratory to improve accuracy of testing. (II-2A) 14. Health care providers should be aware of the screening modalities available in their province or territory. (III-B) 15. A reliable system needs to be in place ensuring timely reporting of results. (III-C) 16. Screening programs should be implemented with resources that support audited screening and diagnostic laboratory services, ultrasound, genetic counselling services, patient and health care provider education, and high quality diagnostic testing, as well as resources for administration, annual clinical audit, and data management. In addition, there must be the flexibility and funding to adjust the program to new technology and protocols. (II-3B).

RETIRED: Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy.

This document has been archived because it contains outdated information. It should not be consulted for clinical use, but for historical research only. Please visit the journal website for the most recent guidelines.

Prenatal and postnatal management of omphalocele.

Omphalocele is one of the most common abdominal wall defects seen in the prenatal period. Once this diagnosis is confirmed, it is important to check the fetal karyotype and thoroughly assess the fetus for other malformations. Prenatal management involves serial assessment of fetal growth and prenatal testing to ensure fetal well-being. Closure of the abdominal wall and replacement of organs into the abdominal cavity can be done directly if the omphalocele is small or in a staged manner if the omphalocele is large. Successful outcomes for these neonates can be optimized with a multidisciplinary team approach to prenatal and postnatal management.