Long-term value in open and endovascular repair of chronic mesenteric ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines recommend open revascularization (OR) over endovascular revascularization (ER) for the treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) for younger, healthier patients. However, little is known about the long-term costs of these recommendations with respect to patients' overall life expectancy. This study investigated whether 5-year value differs between these treatment modalities. METHODS: Patient data were extracted from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System, the New York statewide all-payor database containing demographics, diagnoses, treatments, and charges. The database was queried for patients with an International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, code for CMI, with the specific exclusion of acute ischemia cases. A propensity score match was performed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index, age, sex, race, renal status, and pulmonary disease for the final cohort of patients. Multiple linear regression and mixed effects linear regression were used to determine factors associated with 5-year value, calculated as life-years/$100k in charges. Charges were gathered from the index admission and subsequent admissions for acute or CMI, mesenteric angiography, or follow-up reintervention. Kaplan-Meier estimation was performed for survival and reintervention-free survival. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2014, 875 patients underwent intervention for CMI. Of those meeting inclusion criteria, 209 (28.1%) underwent OR and 535 (71.9%) ER. After propensity score matching (n = 209 in each group), the ER group showed higher value at 5 years after the procedure (8.04 ± 11.42 life-years/$100k charges vs 4.89 ± 5.28 life-years/$100k charges; P < .01). More patients underwent reintervention in the ER group (37 patients vs 17 patients; P < .01), with 55 reinterventions in the ER group and 19 in the OR group (P < .01). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that age, congestive heart failure, dysrhythmia, cancer, and days spent in the intensive care unit were negatively associated with value at 5 years, whereas ER was positively associated. Survival was 59.6 ± 3.76% vs 62.3% ± 3.49% at 5 years (P = .91), and reintervention-free survival was 43.7 ± 3.86% vs 58.1 ± 3.53% (P = .04), for ER and OR respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increased reinterventions and lower reintervention-free survival, the value for patients with CMI was higher in those who underwent ER in the largest propensity score-matched cohort to date looking at long-term value. Factors negatively associated with value were OR, age, days in intensive care, congestive heart failure, dysrhythmia, and cancer. In patients with amenable anatomy, ER is validated as the first-choice treatment for CMI based on the superior procedural value.

Decreasing prevalence of centers meeting the Society for Vascular Surgery abdominal aortic aneurysm guidelines in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Based on data supporting a volume-outcome relationship in elective aortic aneurysm repair, the Society of Vascular Surgery (SVS) guidelines recommend that endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) be localized to centers that perform ≥10 operations annually and have a perioperative mortality and conversion-to-open rate of ≤2% and that open aortic repair (OAR) be localized to centers that perform ≥10 open aortic operations annually and have a perioperative mortality ≤5%. However, the number and distribution of centers meeting the SVS criteria remains unclear. This study aimed to estimate the temporal trends and geographic distribution of Centers Meeting the SVS Aortic Guidelines (CMAG) in the United States. METHODS: The SVS Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for all OAR, aortic bypasses, and EVAR from 2011 to 2019. Annual OAR and EVAR volume, 30-day elective operative mortality for OAR or EVAR, and EVAR conversion-to-open rate for all centers were calculated. The SVS guidelines for OAR and EVAR, individually and combined, were applied to each institution leading to a CMAG designation. The proportion of CMAGs by region (West, Midwest, South, and Northeast) were compared by year using a χ2 test. Temporal trends were estimated using a multivariable logistic regression for CMAG, adjusting by region. RESULTS: Overall, 67,865 patients (49,264 EVAR; 11,010 OAR; 7591 aortic bypasses) at 336 institutions were examined. The proportion of EVAR CMAGs increased nationally by 1.7% annually from 51.6% (n = 33/64) in 2011 to 67.1% (n = 190/283) in 2019 (ß = .05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.09; P = .02). The proportion of EVAR CMAGs across regions ranged from 27.3% to 66.7% in 2011 to 63.9% to 72.9% in 2019. In contrast, the proportion of OAR CMAGs has decreased nationally by 1.8% annually from 32.8% (n = 21/64) in 2011 to 16.3% (n = 46/283) in 2019 (ß = -.14; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.10; P < .01). Combined EVAR and OAR CMAGs were even less frequent and decreased by 1.5% annually from 26.6% (n = 17/64) in 2011 to 13.1% (n = 37/283) in 2019 (ß = -.12; 95% CI, -0.17 to -0.07; P < .01). In 2019, there was no significant difference in regional variation of the proportion of combined EVAR and OAR CMAGs (P = .82). CONCLUSIONS: Although an increasing proportion of institutions nationally meet the SVS guidelines for EVAR, a smaller proportion meet them for OAR, with a concerning downward trend. These data question whether we can safely offer OAR at most institutions, have important implications about sufficient OAR exposure for trainees, and support regionalization of OAR.

Implementation of a Vascular Acute Care Surgery Model is Associated with Improved Surgeon Efficiency and Two-Year Mortality After Lower Extremity Intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgeons work long, unpredictable hours with repeated exposure to high-stress situations. Inspired by general surgery acute care surgery models, we sought to organize the care of vascular emergencies with the implementation of a vascular acute care surgery (VACS) model. Within this model, a surgeon is in-house without elective cases and assigned for consultations and urgent operative cases on a weekly basis. This study examined the impact of a VACS model on postoperative mortality and surgeon efficiency. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of institutional Vascular Quality Initiative data from July 2014 - July 2023. Patients undergoing lower extremity bypass, peripheral vascular intervention, or amputation were included. There was a washout period from January 2020 - January 2022 to account for COVID-19 pandemic practice abnormalities. Patients were separated into pre- or post-VACS groups. The primary clinical outcomes were 30-day and 2-year mortality. Secondary clinical outcomes included 30-day complications and 30-day and 1-year major adverse limb events (MALE). Separate analyses of operating room data from July 2017 - February 2024 and fiscal data from fiscal year 2019 - fiscal year 2024 were conducted. A washout period from January 2020 - January 2022 was applied. Efficiency outcomes included monthly relative value units (RVUs) per clinical fraction full-time equivalent (cFTE) and daytime (0730-1700, Monday-Friday) operating room minutes. Patient factors and operative efficiency were compared using appropriate statistical tests. Regression modeling was performed for the primary outcomes. RESULTS: There were 972 and 257 patients in the pre- and post-VACS groups, respectively. Pre-VACS patients were younger (66.8±12.0 vs 68.7±12.7 years, p=0.03) with higher rates of coronary artery disease (34.6% vs 14.8%, p<0.01), hypertension (88.4% vs 82.2%, p=0.01), and tobacco history (84.4% vs 78.2%, p=0.02). 30-day mortality (2.4% pre- vs 0.8% post-VACS, p=0.18) and Kaplan-Meier estimation of 2-year mortality remained stable after VACS (p=0.07). VACS implementation was not associated with 30-day mortality but was associated with lower 2-year mortality hazard on multivariable Cox regression (hazard ratio: 0.5, 95% confidence interval: 0.3-0.9, p=0.01). Operative efficiency improved post-VACS (850.0 [765.7, 916.3] vs 918.0 [881.0, 951.1] RVU/cFTE-month, median [inter-quartile range], p=0.03). Daytime operating minutes increased (469.1±287.5 vs 908.2±386.2 minutes, p<0.01), while non-daytime minutes (420.0 [266.0, 654.0] vs 469.5 [242.0, 738.3] minutes, p=0.40) and weekend minutes (129.0 [0.0, 298.0] vs 113.5 [0.0, 279.5] minutes, p=0.59) remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: A VACS model leads to improvement in surgeon operative efficiency while maintaining patient safety. The adoption of a vascular acute care model has a positive impact on the delivery of comprehensive vascular care.

Implementation of a vascular acute care surgery service model is associated with decreased surgeon burnout.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgeons have one of the highest rates of burnout among surgical specialties, often attributed to high patient acuity and clinical workload. Acute Care Surgery models are a potential solution used among general and trauma surgeons. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education survey results from faculty and residents before and after implementation of a vascular Acute Care Surgery (VACS) model. The VACS model assigns a weekly rotation of an attending surgeon with no elective cases or clinic responsibilities and a monthly rotating resident team. Residents and attendings are in-house to cover all urgent and emergent vascular daytime consultations and procedures, whereas nights and weekend coverage remain a typical rotating schedule. Survey question results were binned into domains consistent with the Maslach Burnout Inventory. RESULTS: Both residents and faculty reported an increase in median scores in Maslach Burnout Inventory domains of emotional exhaustion (Faculty: 2.9 vs 3.4; P < .001; Residents: 3.1 vs 3.6; P < .001) and faculty reported higher personal accomplishment scores (Faculty: 3.3 vs 3.8; P = .005) after the VACS model implementation. CONCLUSIONS: A VACS model is a tangible practice change that can address a major problem for current vascular surgeons, as it is associated with decreased burnout for faculty and residents through improvement in both emotional exhaustion and personal accomplishment. Improved longitudinal assessment of resident and faculty burnout is needed and future work should identify specific practice patterns related to decreased burnout.

Locoregional Anesthesia's Association With Reduced Intensive Care Unit Stay After Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Impact of Temporal Changes in Practice Patterns.

BACKGROUND: Elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) can be performed via local anesthetics and/or regional (epidural or spinal) anesthesia (locoregional [LR]), versus general anesthesia (GA), conferring reduced intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays. Current analyses fail to account for temporal changes in vascular practice. Therefore, this study aimed to confirm reductions in ICU and hospital stays among LR patients while accounting for changes in practice patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Society for Vascular Surgery's Vascular Quality Initiative, elective EVARs from August 2003 to June 2021 were grouped into LR or GA. Outcomes included ICU admission and prolonged hospital stay (>2 d). Procedures were stratified into groups of 2 y periods, and outcomes were analyzed within each time period. Univariable and multivariate analyses were used to assess outcomes. RESULTS: LR was associated with reduced ICU admissions (22.3% versus 32.1%, P < 0.001) and prolonged hospital stays (14.3% versus 7.9%, P < 0.001) overall. When stratified by year, LR maintained its association with reduced ICU admissions in 2014-2015 (21.8% versus 34.0%, P < 0.001), 2016-2017 (23.6% versus 31.6%, P < 0.001), 2018-2019 (18.5% versus 30.2%, P < 0.001), and 2020-2021 (15.8% versus 28.8%, P < 0.001), although this was highly facility dependent. LR was associated with fewer prolonged hospital stays in 2014-2015 (15.6% versus 20.4%, P = 0.001) and 2016-2017 (13.3% versus 16.6%, P = 0.006) but not after 2017. CONCLUSIONS: GA and LR have similar rates of prolonged hospital stays after 2017, while LR anesthesia was associated with reduced rates of ICU admissions, although this is facility-dependent, providing a potential avenue for resource preservation in patients suitable for LR.

Locoregional anesthesia is associated with reduced hospital stay and need for intensive care unit care of elective endovascular aneurysm repair patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: It has been shown local or regional anesthetic techniques are a feasible alternative to general anesthesia for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). However, studies to date have shown controversial findings with respect to the benefit of locoregional anesthesia (LR) in the elective setting. The objective of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes between LR and general anesthesia (GA) in the setting of elective EVAR, using a large, multicenter database. METHODS: Using the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative database, we retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent elective EVAR from August 2003 to June 2021. Patients were grouped by anesthetic type based on the level of consciousness afforded by the anesthetic: local or regional anesthesia (LR) vs GA. Primary outcomes were total postoperative hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and intensive care unit (ICU) LOS. Propensity score matching was used for risk adjustment and to analyze the primary outcomes with confirmatory analysis using logistic or linear regression, as appropriate, in single and multilevel models. Secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, 1-year mortality, postoperative outcomes, operative time, fluoroscopy time, and reoperation rate. These were analyzed following propensity score matching as well as using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression in single and multilevel models, as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 50,809 patients underwent elective EVAR from 2003 to 2021. Of these, 4302 repairs used LR (8.5%) and 46,507 (91.5%) were performed under GA. After employing propensity score matching, two groups of 3027 patients were produced. These showed no significant difference in 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 1.22; P = .53), 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.06; P = .62), or any postoperative outcomes. LR was found to be significantly associated with shorter hospital stays (≤2 days) (12.5% vs 14.8%; P = .01), decreased ICU utilization (19.3% vs 30.6%; P < .001), decreased operative time (110.8 vs 117.3 minutes; P < .001), decreased fluoroscopy time (21.0 vs 22.7 minutes; P < .001), and a slight reduction in reoperation rate (1.2% vs 1.9%; P = .02), which all remained significant following single-level and multilevel multivariate analyses accounting for hospital and physician random effects. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that LR anesthesia is safe and may offer advantages in reducing resource utilization for patients undergoing elective EVAR, primarily based on associations with reduced ICU care and reduced hospital stay. Given these findings, LR may prove an advantageous technique in appropriately selected patient populations.

Impact of calcified plaque volume on technical and 3-year outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to quantify the percent calcification within carotid artery plaques and assess its impact on percent residual stenosis and rate of restenosis in patients undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected institutional Vascular Quality Initiative data was performed to identify all patients undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization from December 2015 to June 2021 (n = 210). Patient and lesion characteristics were extracted. Using a semiautomated workflow, preoperative computed tomography head and neck angiograms were analyzed to determine the calcified plaque volume in distal common carotid artery and internal carotid artery plaques. Intraoperative digital subtraction angiograms were reviewed to calculate the percent residual stenosis post-intervention according to North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria. Peak systolic velocity and end-diastolic velocity were extracted from outpatient carotid duplex ultrasound examinations. Univariate logistic regression was performed to analyze the relationship of calcium volume percent and Vascular Quality Initiative lesion calcification to percent residual stenosis in completion angiograms. Kaplan-Meier analysis examined the relationship between calcium volume percent and in-stent stenosis over 36 months. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-seven carotid arteries were preliminarily examined. Predilation was performed in 87.4% of cases with a mean balloon diameter of 5.1 ± 0.7 mm and a mean stent diameter was 8.8 ± 1.1 mm. The mean calcium volume percent was 11.9 ± 12.4% and the mean percent residual stenosis was 16.1 ± 15.6%. Univariate logistic regression demonstrated a statistically significant difference between calcium volume percent and percent residual stenosis (odds ratio [OR], 1.324; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.005-1.746; P = .046). Stratified by quartile, only the top 25% of calcified plaques (>18.7% calcification) demonstrated a statistically significant association with higher percent residual stenosis (OR, 2.532; 95% CI, 1.049-6.115; P =.039). There was no statistical significance with lesion calcification (OR, 1.298; 95% C,: 0.980-1.718; P = .069). A Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the rate of in-stent stenosis during a 36-month follow-up for lesions containing >8.2% calcium volume (P = .0069). CONCLUSIONS: A calcium volume percent of >18.7% was associated with a higher percent residual stenosis, and a calcium volume percent of >8.2% was associated with higher in-stent stenosis at 36 months. There was one clinically diagnosed stroke during the follow-up period, demonstrating the overall safety of the procedure.

Guideline Compliant Minimum Asymptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Surgeon and Hospital Volume Cutoffs.

BACKGROUND: There is a known association between volume and outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). A recent analysis suggested rates of stroke and death do not significantly reduce after a surgeon volume cutoff of 20 CEAs per year. However, these results would severely limit access. The objective here is to identify a lower optimal cutpoint for surgeon and hospital volume for asymptomatic CEA. METHODS: We evaluated asymptomatic CEA patients using The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database from 2000-2014. The relationship of 3-year averaged volumes for surgeons and hospitals to 30-day stroke was assessed using multiple logistic regression and included both hospital and surgeon volume in all analyses. Optimized cut points were the lowest significant volume cutoff that minimized the adjusted odds ratio of stroke. RESULTS: We studied 32,549 CEAs performed by 271 surgeons in 136 centers by vascular surgeons. The median surgeon volume was 26.3 (interquartile range: 12.3-51.7) and the median hospital volume was 67 (interquartile range: 36.3-119.3). The surgeon volume cut point was 3 and the hospital volume cut point was 6 cases per year. There were 756 (2.3%) procedures performed by surgeons with a volume < 3 and 560 (1.7%) procedures performed by hospitals with a volume < 6. Perioperative stroke and death rates were 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-2.1) and 3.8% (95% CI: 2.6-5.5) for an average yearly surgeon volume ≥ 3 and < 3 (P = 0.070), respectively. The combined stroke and death rate was 2.0% (95% CI: 1.8-2.1) and 4.8% (95% CI: 3.2-7.0) for an average yearly center volume ≥ 6 and < 6 (P = 0.007), respectively. A combined surgeon and hospital volume variable also predicted outcomes and low-volume procedures did not meet previously proposed American Heart Association and Society for Vascular Surgery quality measures. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate an improvement in outcomes at a lower volume threshold than previously reported. These modest cutoff values should be used for asymptomatic CEA volume guideline formation and for future studies, after accounting for the impact of other important factors that may be driving volume-outcome relationships in asymptomatic CEA.

Use of Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa Inhibitors in Patients Undergoing Carotid Artery Stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapies with thromboxane inhibitors and adenosine 5'-diphosphate antagonists have been widely used following carotid artery stenting (CAS). However, these therapies may not apply to patients who are intolerant or present acutely. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) are a proposed alternative therapy in these patients; however, their use has been limited due to concerns of increased risk for intracranial bleeding. Thus, this study aims to assess the safety profile of GPI in patients undergoing CAS. METHODS: All patients undergoing CAS in the Society of Vascular Surgery - Vascular Quality Initiative database from 2012 to 2021 was included and grouped into GPI versus non-GPI therapy (control). The primary outcome was in-hospital stroke or death, and secondary outcomes included in-hospital stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), death, myocardial infarction, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)/seizure. Patients were stratified by surgical approach (Transcarotid artery revascularization using flow reversal (TCAR) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting), and stepwise backward logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate major primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 50,628 patients underwent carotid revascularization. Of these, 4.4% of the patients received GPI. Mean age was similar between control versus GPI (71.35(9.67) vs. 71.36(10.20) years). Compared to the control group, patients who receive GPI are less likely to be on optimal medical therapy, including aspirin (83.0% vs. 88.1%), P2Y12 inhibitor (73.0% vs. 82.7%), and statin (82.3% vs. 86.0%) (All P < 0.05). In addition, patients in the GPI group were more likely to undergo TCAR for carotid revascularization (52.2% vs. 48.4%) for emergent/urgent (29.4% vs. 16.8%) and symptomatic indications (55.5% vs. 49.7%) (All P < 0.001). After stratifying by surgical approach, if patients underwent TFCAS and received a GPI, they were at increased odds of developing stroke/death (1.77(1.25-2.51)), death (odds ratio (OR) (95% CI): 1.67(1.07-2.61)), stroke/TIA (OR (95% confidence interval (CI)): 1.65(1.09-2.51)), and ICH/seizure (OR (95% CI): 2.13(1.23-3.68)) (All P < 0.05). No difference was seen in outcomes between the 2 groups if undergoing TCAR. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who receive GPI were more likely to be symptomatic at presentation and less likely to be medically optimized before their carotid revascularization. Transfemoral access in patients receiving GPI was associated with increased odds of morbidity and mortality. However, this was not observed if undergoing TCAR. TCAR can be considered for its overall favorable results in high-risk patients who are not medically optimized.

Gender Differences in Aortic Anatomic Severity Grade and Long-Term Survival Following Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair at a Single Tertiary Center.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic severity grade (ASG) score is utilized to assess preoperative abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and provide a quantitative data on its anatomic complexity. The aim of this study is to determine the anatomical differences and long-term survival between male and female patients undergoing elective AAA repair. METHODS: All patients undergoing intact AAA repair from 2007 to 2014 were included. ASG scores were calculated based on preoperative anatomical characteristics including aortic neck, aneurysm, and iliac artery. Standard univariate analysis was used to evaluate patient and anatomical characteristics. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to evaluate long-term survival at 1 and 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 379 patients were identified, of which, majority of them were males (80%). Females were on average 3 years older (mean [SD]: 74.32 [8.63] vs. 71.92 [8.64] years) and were more likely to undergo open repair (29.7% vs. 17.5%) (both P < 0.05). Both groups had similar comorbidities. The mean long-term follow-up (S.D.) was 6.21 (3.81) years. No significant difference was seen between males versus females in long-term survival at both 1 year (86.3% vs. 92.8, P = 0.06) and 5 year (68.5% vs. 72.7%, P = 0.38). In regard to the anatomical characteristics, females had shorter aortic neck length (mean in mm [S.D.]: 17.67 [1.41] vs. 27.20 [15.76]), increased tortuosity index [mean (S.D.): 1.11 (0.07) vs. 1.09 (0.07)]) and higher calcification [mean % (S.D.): 17.12 (21.17) vs. 10.59 (16.82)] (All P < 0.05). In contrast, males had larger aortic neck (mean in mm (S.D.): 23.81 (4.17) vs. 22.41 (4.16)] and iliac artery [mean in mm (S.D.): 7.70 (1.91) vs. 6.28 (1.67)] diameter (both P < 0.05). The mean total ASG score was significantly higher among females versus males [mean (S.D.): 17.23 (4.01) vs. 15.67 (3.96), P = 0.003]. After stratifying by ASG score ≥15, females had significantly lower survival at 1 year compared to males (82.6% vs. 92.1%, P = 0.04). However, this difference disappeared at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrate that females present at an older age with more complex AAA anatomy than males. Based on anatomical complexities, females were more likely to undergo open repair, with a corresponding increase in 1-year mortality, but not at 5 year. The data suggest that care processes for optimization of aortic surgery in females are needed to improve 1-year survival.

Opioid-Sparing Effects of the Bupivacaine Pleural Catheter in Surgical Decompression of the Thoracic Outlet.

BACKGROUND: Rib resection in thoracic outlet decompression can result in significant postoperative pain requiring high levels of opioid medications. We evaluated the impact of a bupivacaine infusing pleural catheter on postoperative pain and opioid usage in patients undergoing rib resection for thoracic outlet syndrome. We hypothesized that delivery of local anesthetic via the pleural catheter would improve postoperative pain control compared to standard multimodal analgesia, and that the use of the catheter would decrease opioid use during the index hospitalization and prescriptions for opioid pain medications at discharge. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 26 patients who underwent rib resection for thoracic outlet decompression. Primary outcome was opioid consumption during the index hospitalization, measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes were MME prescribed at discharge and pain scores during the index hospitalization before and after the pleural drain and pleural catheter were removed. RESULTS: Patients in the bupivacaine infusion pleural catheter group (n = 11) had significantly lower MME usage during the index hospitalization (22.5 [1.9, 65.6] vs. 119.8 [76.5, 167.4]), and significantly lower MME prescribed at discharge (0 [0, 37.5] vs. 225 [183, 315]), compared to standard multimodal analgesia in controls (n = 15). Only 3 patients in the bupivacaine pleural catheter group were discharged with any opioid prescriptions (27%), compared to 14 patients in the control group (93%). There was no difference in postoperative pain scores between groups before or after removal of the pleural drain, which was placed in all cases (P = 0.31 and P = 0.76, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative placement of a bupivacaine infusion pleural catheter significantly reduced opioid use during the index hospitalization and opioid prescribing at discharge. Anesthetic infusion pleural catheters should be the treatment modality of choice for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing thoracic outlet decompression.

Survival, Reintervention, and Value of Open and Endovascular Repair for Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: There are limited analyses of survival and postoperative outcomes in chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) using data from large cohorts. Current guidelines recommend open repair (OR) for younger, healthier patients when long-term benefits outweigh increased perioperative risks or for poor endovascular repair (ER) candidates. This study investigates whether long-term survival, reintervention, and value differ between these treatment modalities. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on data extracted from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System, the New York statewide all-payer database containing demographics, diagnoses, treatments, and charges. Patients were selected for CMI and subsequent ER or OR using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Patients with peripheral arterial disease were excluded to account for ambiguity in the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision procedure code for angioplasty of noncoronary vessels, which includes angioplasty of upper and lower extremity vessels. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare 1-year and 5-year survival and reintervention between treatment modalities using a propensity-matched cohort. Cox proportional hazards testing was performed to find factors associated with 1-year and 5-year survival and reintervention. Analysis of procedural value was performed using linear regression. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2014, 744 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 209 (28.1%) underwent OR and 535 (71.9%) ER. No difference between propensity-matched groups was found in 1-year (P = 0.46) or 5-year (P = 0.91) survival. Congestive heart failure (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-4.4; P < 0.01), cancer (HR: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.3-5.8; P < 0.01), and dysrhythmia (HR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-2.8; P = 0.02) correlated with 1-year mortality. Cancer (HR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.6-5.5; P < 0.01), congestive heart failure (HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.5-3.2; P < 0.01), chronic pulmonary disease (HR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.0-2.0; P = 0.04), and age (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05; P < 0.01) correlated with 5-year mortality. Treatment modality was not associated with reintervention at 1 year on Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.29). However, ER showed increased instances of reintervention at 5 years (P < 0.01). Additionally, ER was associated with an increased 5-year value (0.7 ± 0.9 vs. 0.5 ± 0.5 life years/charges at index admission [$10k], P < 0.01; b coefficient: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.1-0.4, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest retrospective propensity-matched single-study cohort to analyze long-term survival outcomes after intervention for CMI. Long-term mortality was independent of treatment modality and rather was associated with patient comorbidities. Therefore, treatment selection should depend on anatomic considerations and long-term value. ER should be considered over OR in patients with amenable anatomy based on the superior procedural value.

Surgeon volume and established hospital perioperative mortality rate together predict for superior outcomes after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: In 2018, the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) published hospital volume guidelines for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, recommending that elective open surgical repair of AAAs should be performed at centers with an annual volume of ≥10 open aortic operations of any type and a documented perioperative mortality of ≤5%. Recent work has suggested a yearly surgeon volume of at least seven open aortic cases for improved outcomes. The objective of the present study was to assess the importance of hospital volume and surgeon volume at these cut points for predicting 1-year mortality after open surgical repair of AAAs. METHODS: We evaluated patients who had undergone elective open AAA repair using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database from 2003 to 2014. The effect of the SVS guidelines on postoperative mortality and complications was evaluated. Confounding between the hospital and surgeon volumes was identified using mixed effects multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. The effect of the interactions between hospital volume, established hospital perioperative survival, and surgeon volume on postoperative outcomes was also investigated. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 7594 elective open AAA repairs performed by 542 surgeons in 137 hospitals during the 12-year study period. Analysis of the 2018 guidelines using the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database revealed 1-year and 30-day mortality rates of 9.2% (range, 8.3%-10.1%) and 3.5% (range, 2.9%-4.1%) for centers that were within the SVS guidelines and 13.6% (range, 12.5%-14.7%) and 6.9% (range, 6.1%-7.8%) for those that were outside the guidelines, respectively (P < .001 for both). Multivariate survival analysis revealed a hazard ratio for a surgeon volume of ≥7, hospital volume of ≥10, and hospital 3-year perioperative mortality of ≤5% of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.93; P = .003), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.77-1.08; P = .298), and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.62-0.82; P < .001), respectively. Additionally, procedures performed by surgeons with a yearly average volume of open aortic operations of at least seven and at hospitals with an established elective open AAA repair perioperative mortality rate of ≤5% showed improved 1-year (33.2% relative risk reduction; P < .001) and 30-day (P = .001) all-cause survival and improved postoperative complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: These data have demonstrated that centers that meet the SVS AAA volume guidelines are associated with improved 1-year and 30-day all-cause survival. However, the results were confounded by surgeon volume. A surgeon open aortic volume of at least seven procedures and an established hospital perioperative mortality of ≤5% each independently predicted for 1-year survival after open AAA repair, with the hospital volume less important. These results indicate that surgeons with an annual volume of at least seven open aortic operations of any type should perform elective open AAA repair at centers with a documented perioperative mortality of ≤5%.

Long-term anticoagulation is associated with type II endoleaks and failure of sac regression after endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Within the context of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), the role of anticoagulation therapy on endoleak development and subsequent reintervention is unclear with conflicting data in the literature. The hypothesis of this study is that long-term anticoagulation is associated with persistent type II endoleaks and failure of sac regression in patients undergoing endoluminal repair of intact infrarenal aortic aneurysm. METHODS: Retrospective cohort abstracted from the Vascular Quality Initiative index hospitalization and long-term follow-up datasets for EVAR (2003-2017) were included in the analysis. Patients not taking aspirin preoperatively and postoperatively were excluded. Patients taking anticoagulation and aspirin concomitantly (treatment) after the index procedure were compared against patients taking aspirin alone (control). Anticoagulation included warfarin and novel oral anticoagulants, including factor Xa inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors. One-to-one greedy matching using propensity scores was implemented to match patients. The primary end points were failure of aneurysm sac regression, sac expansion, risk of endoleak, and reintervention rate for endoleak at follow-up. Sac regression was defined as a decrease of at least 5 mm and sac expansion was defined as an increase of at least 5 mm. RESULTS: There were 9004 patients who received ASA alone and 332 patients who received ASA and anticoagulation. Propensity scores were used to create 301 matching pairs to account for differences in baseline characteristics and comorbidities, including but not limited to age, sex, smoking, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease between the treatment and control groups. After adjusting for covariables anticoagulation use was independently associated with a significantly decreased abdominal aortic aneurysm sac regression (41.59% vs 58.41%; P = .001), but no statistically significant difference in sac expansion with long-term anticoagulation use (9.7% vs 4.9%; P = .056). There was increased risk of type II endoleaks (11.96% vs 6.31%; P = .023; relative risk, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.23; P = .016), but no significant differences in type I, III, or indeterminate endoleaks. There was no statistical difference in 2-year reintervention rates (4.32% vs 2.66%; hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-3.77; P = .461). There were no differences in any primary outcome between warfarin and novel oral anticoagulants. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that long-term aspirin plus anticoagulation use is associated with a lack of aortic sac reduction and persistent type II endoleak, but not an increased risk for subsequent reintervention. Because prior studies have demonstrated that sac regression is a correlate of survival, these findings associating regression failure suggest a potential therapeutic failure for patients undergoing EVAR who also require long-term anticoagulation therapy. Although not a contraindication, long-term anticoagulation should be considered when counseling patients with a surgical indication aortic aneurysm.

Left Subclavian Artery Coverage is Not Associated with Neurological Deficits in Trauma Patients Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Repair.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta (TEVAR) outcomes have been studied with an interest in complications related to left subclavian artery (LSA) coverage in patients with atherosclerotic pathologies; however, specific data on the management of the LSA in a trauma population are lacking. The objective of this study is to evaluate outcomes following TEVAR for traumatic aortic injury based on LSA coverage. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative thoracic endovascular aortic repair module (2010-2017) was analyzed. Patients were included if they had a traumatic aortic injury requiring TEVAR. Patients were placed in 2 groups based on coverage of the LSA. Patients were propensity score matched and the primary outcomes were cerebrovascular symptoms and spinal cord ischemia. Additional clinical and resource utilization outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty one patients were included in the analysis. There were 268 patients in the LSA not-covered group and 183 patients in the LSA covered group. The mean aortic injury grade was 2.88 ± 0.056 vs. 2.88 ± 0.049 in the covered versus not-covered group (P = 0.957). Glasgow coma scale and injury severity score were not different between the groups. There was no difference between groups for cerebrovascular symptoms or spinal cord ischemia, 1.4% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.684 and 0% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.247, after propensity score matching. Significant differences in access site complications and resource utilization were identified between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series to evaluate complications based on LSA coverage following TEVAR in trauma patients. Our data demonstrate that coverage of the LSA during TEVAR following blunt trauma is associated with no difference in central nervous system outcomes. As such, LSA revascularization strategies, while possible, are not directly supported by these data and should be individualized based on each patient's specific clinical scenario.

One-year patient survival correlates with surgeon volume after elective open abdominal aortic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Volume-outcome relationships in surgery have been well established. Studies have shown that high-volume surgeons provide improved outcomes in performing open abdominal aneurysm repairs. The hypothesis of this study was that high-volume surgeons provide superior short-term and midterm outcomes of elective open aortic operations compared with low-volume surgeons. METHODS: We evaluated patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, aortofemoral bypass, and aortomesenteric bypass by board-certified vascular surgeons using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database from 2002 to 2014. The Contal and O'Quigley technique was used to estimate a cut point objectively and provided an estimate of significance. A division using average yearly volumes (averaged during 3 years) of seven or more cases and fewer than seven cases per year returned the highest Q statistic, and this grouping was used to classify high-volume and low-volume provider groups. Rates of complications during index hospitalization, length of stay, 30-day survival, 90-day survival, 1-year survival, and cause of death were analyzed using mixed effect models. RESULTS: In 118 hospitals during the 13-year period, 266 board-certified vascular surgeons performed 244 aortomesenteric bypasses, 4202 aortofemoral bypasses, and 6126 abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. High-volume surgeons' rates of complications during index hospitalization, 30-day survival, 90-day survival, and 1-year survival were superior to those of low-volume surgeons. The Contal and O'Quigley technique returned an estimate of seven operations per year for optimal survival during 1 year. This cutoff is associated with an adjusted 1-year hazard ratio of 0.687 (P = .003), a 2.69% difference in 1-year all-cause survival (P = .003), and a 1.76-day reduction in the mean length of stay at index hospitalization (P < .001). Higher volume surgeons showed a 25.0%, 43.4%, 42.4%, 40.6%, and 45.0% reduction in postoperative rates of acute renal failure (P < .001), hemorrhage (P < .001), pulmonary failure (P < .001), sepsis (P < .001), and venous thromboembolism (P < .001), respectively. Abdominal abscess, acute renal failure, hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, and sepsis were associated with increased cardiovascular cause-specific mortality after open aortic operations (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that high-volume surgeons performing elective open aortic operations provide reduced complications and improved short-term and midterm survival compared with low-volume surgeons. Clinical and postoperative variables that are associated with increased cardiovascular cause-specific mortality are also identified. These data provide further evidence that elective open abdominal vascular surgery should be centralized to high-volume surgeons.

Association Between the Atherosclerotic Disease Risk Score and Carotid Artery Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is the most frequently detected treatable cause of ischemic stroke. However, there are no recommendations to screen asymptomatic patients. The atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score estimates individuals' 10-year risk for developing cardiovascular disease. The objective of this study is to identify a relationship between the ASCVD risk score and moderate/severe CAS based on ultrasound findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a single-institution retrospective review of patients who underwent a surveillance ultrasound for CAS between 2015 and 2018. We used Strandness velocity criteria to separate patients into two cohorts: none to mild CAS (<50%) and moderate/severe CAS (≥50%). We performed Student's t-test, multivariate analysis, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine a relationship between the ASCVD risk score and degree of CAS. We evaluated a new risk score model based on stepwise logistic regression of significant variables on univariate analysis. RESULTS: Two thousand eight hundred and fifty-six patients with carotid ultrasounds (1623 with none to mild, 1161 with moderate, and 72 with severe disease) were included in the study. The ASCVD risk score significantly predicted moderate/severe CAS in an adjusted multivariate analysis. Each 10% increase in the ASCVD risk score corresponded to an additional 11% likelihood of moderate/severe stenosis (OR: 1.11 [1.04-1.20], P = 0.004). The ROC area under the curve for predicting moderate/severe CAS based on the ASCVD risk score was 0.59 (Youden index (J) = 0.14); the optimized ASCVD cutoff point was 28.4%. Our new atherosclerotic disease model demonstrated increased odds of moderate/severe CAS with scores greater than zero (ROC area under the curve = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate an association between atherosclerotic disease risk factors as measured by the ASCVD risk score and moderate/severe CAS. However, this tool is not sensitive or specific for using the ASCVD risk score as a screening mechanism for moderate/severe CAS.

A Reappraisal of CT Angiography Derived Duplex Ultrasound Velocity Criteria With a Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography in Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, carotid duplex ultrasound (CDUS) velocity criteria have been derived from angiography. Recent studies support a shift toward computed tomography angiography (CTA) derived velocity criteria; however, they lack a comparison to angiography. The purposes of this study are to validate CTA derived measurements with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and to update our previous CTA-derived velocity criteria for 50% and 80% stenosis. METHODS: All patients between 2010 and 2019 who underwent CDUS and a neck CTA within 6 months were identified for a retrospective review. Vessel diameter and corresponding CDUS data were recorded. Additional DSA measurements were recorded for a subset of patients. Data from this cohort were added to a previously reported deidentified data set from patients between 2000 and 2009. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine optimal velocity thresholds. Spearman rank correlation was used to correlate measurements obtained by CTA to those obtained by DSA. RESULTS: A total of 1139 vessels from 636 patients were analyzed. ROC analysis to identify ≥ 50% stenosis resulted in optimized thresholds of 143 cm/sec, 46.2 cm/sec, and 2.15 for peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and PSV to common carotid artery PSV ratio (PSVR), respectively. ROC analysis to identify ≥ 80% stenosis resulted in optimized thresholds of 319 cm/sec, 87.2 cm/sec, and 3.49 for PSV, EDV, and PSVR, respectively. The degree of carotid artery stenosis for a subset of 124 vessels on CTA correlated well with that of DSA (ρ = 0.89, P< 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate a high correlation between measurements obtained on CTA and DSA while forming reliable CTA-derived CDUS velocity criteria.

Regional Variation in Usage of Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Access in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Access site complications are among the most common complications following peripheral vascular interventions. Previous studies have demonstrated a reduced rate of complications with ultrasound-guided vascular access (UGVA). The objective of this study is to evaluate the regional use of UGVA within the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI). METHODS: The VQI peripheral intervention module between 2010 and 2018 was evaluated. Regional ID was used to compare distribution of ultrasound usage. Regions were grouped into terciles based on the rate of ultrasound use. Patients were categorized based on type of access. Primary outcome was use of ultrasound across regions. Secondary outcomes were access site complications. RESULTS: Over 43,000 cases across the 18 VQI regions were evaluated. The average rate of ultrasound usage was 71% across the regions with a wide variation (range 38-97%). There is a significant difference in utilization among the top third (87%), middle third (79%), and bottom third (58%) (P < 0.001). Average sheath size was similar across all 3 groups. A higher use of ultrasound-guided access was associated with significantly fewer access site complications (top third 1.96% vs. bottom third 3.04%, P < 0.001), the most significant of which was a decreased rate of access site hematoma (top third 1.37% vs. bottom third 2.35%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate ultrasound-guided access across VQI regions. Our results demonstrate that despite strong evidence supporting the utilization of UGVA, there remains a wide variation in ultrasound usage across VQI regions. This is also the first study to show that the prevalence of ultrasound use in peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) is inversely related to access site complications. Given all of the data supporting the usage of UGVA across numerous specialties, our findings encourage the consideration of an ultrasound-first approach for vascular access in PVI and the implementation of targeted strategies and evidence-based guidelines to enhance UGVA utilization in PVI.

Evaluation of Opioid Prescription and Consumption Habits Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: There has been a dramatic rise in opioid-related deaths over the past decade. Most of the reduction strategies have focused on outpatient use; however, recent studies have demonstrated an association between inpatient opioid use and consumption following discharge across a variety of surgical procedures. The objective of this study is to evaluate the association of inpatient use of opioids as well as the consumption of opioids after discharge following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was reviewed for cases between 2015 and 2018. Patients were included in the study if they underwent an elective EVAR, had an intensive care unit stay less than 1 day and total length of stay less than 3 days. Patients were contacted to participate in a survey of opioid use if they received a prescription at discharge. The primary outcome was percent of prescribed opioids consumed following discharge. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictors of receiving an opioid prescription. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-one patients were included in the analysis; 95% patients were white and 85% male. 59% of patients responded to the survey. Seventy-one (42%) received an opioid prescription at discharge. Patients that received a discharge prescription tended to be younger (71 vs. 75 years, P = 0.005) and more likely to have received opioids while in the hospital (79% vs. 45%, P < 0.001). Additionally, patients who received opioids at discharge received a significantly greater amount of milligram oral morphine equivalents (OME) while in the hospital (27.76 ± 38.91 vs. 10.05 ±29.43, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated age, estimated blood loss (EBL), and OME per day to be significant inpatient predictors of requiring an outpatient opioid prescription. Open femoral access (27%) was not a predictor of opioid prescription at discharge. A total of 1185 pills were prescribed (29.6 ± 2.06 per patient), but only 208 pills consumed (5.2 ± 1.27 per patient). Around 82% of total pills prescribed were not consumed. CONCLUSIONS: This study evaluates inpatient opioid use and postdischarge consumption following EVAR. These data identify key factors associated with receiving an opioid prescription at discharge and demonstrate that patients consume far fewer opioids than prescribed. These findings provide insight as to which patients may not require an outpatient prescription following EVAR, leading to potential practice-changing opioid reduction strategies.