'I know you shouldn't compare to other people, but I can't do anything most people can': Age, family and occupation categorisations in men's reasoning about their anxiety in an online discussion forum.

Despite its prevalence, men's anxiety is arguably under-researched and poorly understood. The present study explores the reasoning provided by male posters to an online discussion forum about the source of their anxiety. Posts were collected from an Australian anxiety online discussion forum. This study utilises discursive psychology, informed by principles of membership categorisation analysis, to describe how age, occupation and family-related identities can be invoked within common sense reasoning about the source of male anxiety. References to various identity categories were routinely employed by male forum posters in their representations of themselves, in order to describe the source of their anxiety in terms of a contrast between how they are, and how they should be. In examining accounts of anxiety and responses to those accounts, we can trace cultural knowledge about issues regarding men, masculinity and anxiety that those accounts make relevant. Findings illustrate how men's descriptions of the source of their anxiety should be understood as culturally bound and related to expectations and obligations associated with their social context and category memberships. By enhancing understandings of how men describe the source of their anxiety, this study offers insight into improving the identification and engagement of men experiencing anxiety in health services.

"I Feel Abused by My Own Mind": Themes of Control in Men's Online Accounts of Living With Anxiety.

Men's experiences with anxiety are under-researched and poorly understood. Existing research gives little indication of how men talk about anxiety in situ, and little is known about how men describe their experiences of anxiety. Online discussion forums provide an opportunity to conduct naturalistic observations of how men describe their experiences with anxiety without the influence of a researcher. Thematic analysis, informed by principles of discursive psychology, was used to examine 130 opening posts to an online anxiety discussion forum. One superordinate theme, where anxiety is constructed as a loss of control, was identified. Analysis of this overarching theme generated three themes relating to how posters described a loss of control: (a) anxiety as an immobilizing force, (b) anxiety as an independent entity, and (c) anxiety as a dualist construction of the self. Our analysis has clear implications for developing and improving interventions for men experiencing anxiety.

Health behaviours of Australian men and the likelihood of attending a dedicated men's health service.

BACKGROUND: Redesigning primary health services may enhance timely and effective uptake by men. The primary aim of this study was to assess the likelihood of Australian men attending a dedicated men's health service (DMHS). The further aims were to better understand the reasons for their preferences and determine how health behaviours influence likelihood. METHODS: A survey on health service use and preferences, health help-seeking behaviours, and the likelihood of attending a DMHS was administered by telephone to 1506 randomly selected men (median age 56 years, range 19-95). Likelihood of attending a DMHS was rated using a single item Likert scale where 0 was not at all likely and 10 highly likely. Respondents were classified by age (< or > = 65 years) and health status. Principal component analyses were used to define health behaviours, specifically help-seeking and delay/avoidance regarding visiting a doctor. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were used to examine predictors of likelihood of attending a DMHS. RESULTS: The mean likelihood of attending a DMHS was 5.8 (SD 3.3, median 6, moderate likelihood) and 21%, 26% and 23% of men rated likelihood as moderate, high and very high respectively. Being happy with their existing doctor was the most common reason (52%) for being less likely to attend a DMHS. In unadjusted analyses, younger men reported being more likely to attend a DMHS (p < 0.001) with older-sick men reporting being least likely (p < 0.001). Younger men were more likely than older men to score higher on delay/avoidance and were more likely to self-monitor. In the full model, men with current health concerns (p ≤ 0.01), who scored higher on delay/avoidance (p ≤ 0.0006), who were more likely to be information-seekers (p < 0.0001) and/or were motivated to change their health (p ≤ 0.0001) reported a higher likelihood of attending a DMHS irrespective of age and health status. CONCLUSIONS: Seventy percent of men reported a moderate or higher likelihood of attending a DMHS. As young healthy men are more likely than older men to display health behaviours that are associated with a higher likelihood of attending a DHMS, such as delay/avoidance, marketing a DMHS to such men may be of value.

Are nurses recognised, prepared and supported to teach nursing students: Mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: The requirement for clinical teaching and supervision of undergraduate nursing students is a continual high volume, high impact essential requirement of registered nursing staff. Nurses are integral in facilitating the learning of nursing students in the practice environment to deliver quality safe care. However nurses engaged in teaching and supervising nursing students have unique challenges. OBJECTIVE: To understand how well recognised, prepared, and supported nurses perceive they are to teach and supervise undergraduate nursing students in the practice environment? METHODS: Nurses from 12 different wards of two hospitals were invited to participate in the study. A sequential mixed methods approach comprising hard-copy questionnaires, completed by 59 nurses, and six focus groups. Four feedback sessions verified findings. RESULTS: A low level of recognition and support for the amount of time available to nurses to teach and supervise was reported from both survey and focus group data. Four themes emerged from focus groups. Nurses recognised their role to teach and supervise students; The role in teaching and supervision was not recognised at a system level; Nurses could be more prepared to teach and supervise students; and Nurses required more support for their role in teaching and supervising students. A major challenge was the low level of support nurses perceived from the education sector in preparing students for placements. The nurses reported a disconnection of components of the student placement system, which was difficult to negotiate when undertaking this teaching and supervision role. CONCLUSION: The complex practice environment, where nursing student numbers are increasing and nurses have to navigate an often disconnected student placement system, requires a rethink of the precentorship or buddy one-to-one model of clinical placement. Addressing these challenges will be an essential step in protecting the interests of the public, nurses and nursing profession.