Restoring galactose metabolism without restoring GALT rescues both compromised survival in larvae and an adult climbing deficit in a GALT-null D. Melanogaster model of classic galactosemia.

Classic galactosemia (CG) is an autosomal recessive disorder that results from profound deficiency of galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase (GALT), the middle enzyme in the highly conserved Leloir pathway of galactose metabolism. That galactose metabolism is disrupted in patients with CG, and in GALT-null microbial, cell culture, and animal models of CG, has been known for many years. However, whether the long-term developmental complications of CG result from disrupted galactose metabolism alone, or from loss of some independent moonlighting function of GALT, in addition to disrupted galactose metabolism, has been posed but never resolved. Here, we addressed this question using a GALT-null Drosophila melanogaster model of CG engineered to express uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucose/galactose pyrophosphorylase (UGGP), a plant enzyme that effectively bypasses GALT in the Leloir pathway by converting substrates uridine triphosphate (UTP) plus galactose-1-phosphate (gal-1P) into products UDP-galactose plus pyrophosphate (PPi). While GALT and UGGP share one substrate (gal-1P) and one product (UDP-galactose), they are structurally and evolutionarily unrelated enzymes. It is therefore extremely unlikely that they would also share a moonlighting function. We found that GALT-null flies expressing UGGP showed not only partial rescue of metabolic abnormalities and acute larval sensitivity to dietary galactose, as expected, but also full rescue of an adult motor deficit otherwise seen in this model. By extension, these results may offer insights to the underlying bases of at least some acute and long-term complications experienced by patients with CG.

Long-term complications in classic galactosemia are not progressive.

Classic galactosemia (CG) is a potentially lethal genetic disorder that results from profound deficiency of galactose-1-P uridylyltransferase. Despite early detection and life-long dietary restriction of galactose, which is the current standard of care, many patients with CG grow to experience a range of long-term developmental complications that can include difficulties with speech/voice/language, cognitive, motor, and psychosocial outcomes, among other problems. That these complications are common in CG is well-documented, but whether they are also progressive has been a point of controversy for decades. Here, we addressed the question of whether long-term outcomes in CG are progressive by analyzing a robust data set in each of 4 ways. First, we compared cross-sectional Vineland-3 Adaptive Behavior Scales scores for 101 cases and 65 unaffected sibling controls and found no evidence of consistently declining scores with age. Second, we analyzed longitudinal Vineland-3 subdomain scores for 45 cases and 34 controls to see if individual participants demonstrated developmental gains (positive slope) or losses (negative slope) over time. The changes in most growth scale value (GSV) scores, which are not normed, were positive for both cases and controls <10y, and either positive or near zero for participants ≥10y. In contrast, the slopes of most v-Scale scores, which are normed, were negative for many cases <10y, indicating that these children, while gaining milestones, were gaining them at a slower pace than their counterparts in the reference population. Third, we analyzed medical records from 76 cases, assigning ordinal scores for complications and gathering the quantitative results of relevant formal assessments where available. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of both ordinal and formal assessment scores confirmed that outcomes were mostly stable, albeit with some ups and downs in isolated cases. Finally, we analyzed data collected via custom family-response surveys from 124 cases and 67 controls regarding each participant's perceived symptom severity over time. Among cases, the percentages of respondents reporting worsening symptoms over time for speech, cognitive, motor, and psychosocial outcomes were 0.8%, 6.6%, 5.2%, and 9.8%, respectively. Among controls, the corresponding percentages were 0.0%, 1.5%, 1.5%, and 6.5%, respectively. These results provide compelling evidence that long-term developmental complications are not progressive for a majority of patients with CG.

Grip strength in patients with galactosemia and in a galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase (GALT)-null rat model.

Classic galactosemia (CG) and clinical variant galactosemia (CVG) are allelic inborn errors of metabolism that result from profound deficiency, and near-profound deficiency, respectively, of galactose-1-P uridylyltransferase (GALT). Despite early detection and lifelong dietary restriction of galactose, which is the current standard of care, most patients with CG/CVG grow to experience a range of long-term developmental and other complications. One of the less well-understood complications of CG/CVG is decreased hand grip strength, as reported by Potter et al. (2013). Here, we confirm this phenotype in an independent cohort of 36 cases (4-18 years) and 19 controls (4-17 years), and further demonstrate that the grip strength deficit observed in cases may be secondary to growth delay. Specifically, we found that when grip strength of cases and controls in a new cohort recruited in 2022 was plotted by weight, rather than age, the difference between cases and controls for both sexes disappeared. Reanalyzing data from the original 2013 cohort, we found that differences in weight accounted for grip strength differences between cases and controls in girls and young women, but not in boys and young men. Finally, we tested whether a GALT-null rat model of CG also showed a grip strength deficit-it did-and again the difference between GALT-null and wild-type rats associated with differences in body mass. Combined, these results confirm that GALT deficiency is associated with a grip strength deficit in both young patients with CG/CVG and GALT-null rats, and further demonstrate that this phenotype may be secondary to growth delay, and therefore not evidence of a muscle abnormality.