RESUMEN
Urine cytology is a long-used technique for the detection of high grade neoplastic urothelial lesions. Since 2016, «The Paris System¼ classification has revolutionized this field by introducing a standardized terminology widely adopted by cytopathologists and urologists. In this article, we explain this classification and discuss its impact on the clinical management of patients with urothelial lesions, as well as its role in the secondary prevention of these lesions.
La cytologie urinaire est une technique utilisée depuis longtemps dans la détection des lésions urothéliales tumorales de haut grade. Depuis 2016, la classification «The Paris System¼ a révolutionné ce domaine en introduisant une terminologie standardisée largement adoptée par les cytopathologistes et les urologues. Dans cet article, nous expliquons cette classification et discutons de son impact sur la prise en charge clinique des lésions urothéliales, ainsi que son rôle dans la prévention secondaire de ces lésions.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Urológicas , Urotelio , Humanos , Urotelio/patología , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Neoplasias Urológicas/orina , Citodiagnóstico/métodos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/orina , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico , Orina/citología , Urinálisis/métodos , CitologíaRESUMEN
Importance: Recent data suggest a relatively low incidence of COVID-19 among children. The possible role that children attending primary school may play in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 remains poorly understood. Objective: To gain a better understanding of the possible role of children in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study was conducted from September 21 to December 31, 2020, in a primary school in Liège, Belgium, among a volunteer sample of 181 children, parents, and school employees. Exposures: Participants were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection once a week for 15 weeks through throat washing, performed with 5 mL of saline and collected in a sterile tube after approximately 30 seconds of gargling. Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was performed to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection. Main Outcomes and Measures: In case of test positivity, participants were asked to complete a questionnaire aimed at determining the timing of symptom onset and symptom duration. SARS-CoV-2 genetic sequencing was also performed. Confirmed cases were linked based on available information on known contacts and viral sequences. Results: A total of 181 individuals participated in this study, including 63 children (34 girls [54.0%]; mean [SD] age, 8.6 [1.9] years [range, 5-13 years]) and 118 adults (75 women [63.6%]; mean [SD] age, 42.5 [5.7] years [range, 30-59 years]). Forty-five individuals (24.9%) tested positive: 13 children (20.6%; 95% CI, 10.6%-30.6%) and 32 adults (27.1%; 95% CI, 19.1%-35.7%) (P = .34). Children were more often asymptomatic compared with adults (6 [46.2%; 95% CI, 19.1%-73.3%] vs 4 of 31 [12.9%; 95% CI, 1.3%-24.5%]; P = .04). The median duration of symptoms was shorter in children than in adults (0.00 days [IQR, 0.00-1.00 days] vs 15.00 days [IQR, 7.00-22.00 days]). A reconstruction of the outbreak revealed that most transmission events occurred between teachers and between children within the school. Of the observed household transmission events, most seemed to have originated from a child or teacher who acquired the infection at school. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite the implementation of several mitigation measures, the incidence of COVID-19 among children attending primary school in this study was comparable to that observed among teachers and parents. Transmission tree reconstruction suggests that most transmission events originated from within the school. Additional measures should be considered to reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 at school, including intensified testing.