Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 51(8): 711-7, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22826503

RESUMEN

Simulation provides a means to educate, monitor, evaluate, and potentially document the competency of emergency physicians. The evolution of high-fidelity simulators has led to a surge of enhanced medical applications that fit nicely into the core of emergency medicine training. Simulation can facilitate training in resuscitation, procedures, CRM, and mass casualty management. Although improved outcomes from simulation are not well established, there is a general consensus regarding the added value over current training. And finally, simulation provides the ability to construct training to match the current educational efforts related to individual physicians or system-level improvements in communication and patient safety.


Asunto(s)
Simulación por Computador/tendencias , Curriculum/tendencias , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Maniquíes , Pediatría/educación , Resucitación/educación , Competencia Clínica/normas , Curriculum/normas , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Internado y Residencia/normas , Resucitación/métodos , Interfaz Usuario-Computador
2.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 18(4): 265-7, 2002 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12187131

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy (pneumothorax resolution and hospitalization days), pain (narcotic usage), and safety (need for repositioning or replacement) associated with placement of large-bore chest tubes versus pigtail catheters in children with pneumothoraces. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients with pneumothoraces seen in the emergency department (ED) over a 6.5-year period who received treatment by a pediatric emergency physician with either a large-bore chest tube or a pigtail catheter. We excluded patients who had catheters placed by other specialists and patients who were endotracheally intubated. We collected the following data: complications, hospital days to discharge, and narcotic pain medications taken. RESULTS: Eleven pigtail catheters and 16 large-bore chest tubes were placed. All pneumothoraces were effectively evacuated. Three of the 11 pigtail catheters required repositioning, and one was replaced. Two of the 16 large-bore chest tubes were repositioned, and one was replaced; additionally, a pigtail catheter was added to one patient with a large-bore chest tube to facilitate evacuation of the air. Average hospital stay was similar between groups (6.2 d for pigtail catheters vs 6.8 d for large-bore chest tubes, = 0.74). Children with pigtail catheters required less narcotic pain medications than those who had large-bore chest tubes, but the differences were not significant. CONCLUSION: Pigtail catheters offer a safe and effective alternative to large-bore chest tubes for patients receiving treatment for pneumothoraces in the ED.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo/instrumentación , Tubos Torácicos , Neumotórax/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA