Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cureus ; 16(8): e67832, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39323696

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatric cervical spinal injury (CSI) remains a significant concern following blunt trauma, with mortality rates as high as 48%. Current protocols involve cervical immobilization and clearance through multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scans, followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or clinical examination. However, prolonged collar use poses risks, necessitating timely clearance. This study assessed the efficacy of MDCT in pediatric CSI clearance. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study, spanning January 2019 to January 2023, included pediatric patients under 18 undergoing cervical CT scans. RESULTS: MDCT sensitivity was evaluated, with 13.8% positive scans, detecting clinically significant injuries. MRI identified no additional injuries, affirming MDCT reliability. The average clearance time was 24.9 hours, impacting hospitalization durations. Mortality unrelated to CSI was excluded. CONCLUSION: These results align with recent studies advocating cervical collar removal based on negative MDCT, emphasizing its potential to decrease the time that patients remain in C-collars and expedite hospital courses, including therapy and discharge. The study encourages consideration of MDCT-based protocols for timely pediatric CSI clearance, promoting patient care efficiency and informed medical decision-making.

2.
Cureus ; 16(8): e65957, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39221291

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The utilization of healthcare services in a growing population has raised concerns about its impact on clinical outcomes. Studies have shown that increased hospital census is associated with higher admission rates and unnecessary consults, tests, and procedures in various areas of healthcare. Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), a significant concern due to their potential for long-term disabilities, are commonly encountered in intensive care units (ICUs) and are a leading cause of patient mortality. Despite extensive research on various aspects of TBI, the effect of the patient census on TBI outcomes remains unexplored. This study aims to investigate the relationship between healthcare provider patient census and clinical outcomes in TBI patients at a level I trauma center. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted from 2017 to 2022. The mean number of patients per day in the trauma service was determined, with patients below this average considered to be present on low-census days and those above it on high-census days. Patient demographics, mechanisms of injury, vital signs, TBI severity, and associated injuries were analyzed. Adjusted regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Over the study period, 1,527 TBI patients were identified. Demographics were similar between patients admitted on high- and low-census days. Patients with moderate TBI were 30% less likely to be admitted to the ICU on high-census days, whereas there was no difference in ICU admission for patients with mild or severe TBI. Delirium was significantly higher in patients admitted on high-census days compared to those on low-census days. This was further identified to be predominantly driven by patients with mild TBI admitted on high-census days. CONCLUSION: While most outcomes remained consistent, significant rates of delirium were found in our mild TBI patients admitted on high-census days suggesting the need for additional factors in the evaluation of these patients on admission. This study also reveals potential under-triage in moderate TBI patients on high-census days as they had significantly lower rates of ICU admission. These findings emphasize the need for further investigations to optimize patient care strategies within the context of fluctuating healthcare system demands.

3.
Injury ; 55(9): 111613, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38763841

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic blunt adrenal injury (BAI) has been an area of debate, with conflicting data on its impact. BAI from blunt abdominal injury is challenging to diagnose early due to retroperitoneal gland location and minimal clinical signs. The incidence of BAI ranges from 0.03 % to 4.95 %, with an increasing trend attributed to advanced CT imaging. Conflicting data exists regarding BAI's implications on patient outcomes, necessitating a comprehensive evaluation. METHODS: A retrospective review of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB®) for 2017-2021 included a total of 352,654 patients with 337,628 polytrauma patients and 15,026 isolated abdominal trauma patients. Patients were categorized into those with and without adrenal injury. Demographic data and outcomes were compared using statistical tests, focusing on Injury Severity Scores (ISS), mortality, length of stay, and ventilation days. RESULTS: Polytrauma patients with BAI had increased mortality, longer ICU and hospital stays, and ventilation requirements when compared to polytrauma patients without BAI. However, when evaluating isolated abdominal trauma patients with BAI showed no significant differences when compared to isolated abdominal trauma without BAI in mortality or ICU LOS and a slight decrease in ICU admissions, hospital LOS, and ventilation requirement. DISCUSSION: The study indicates a significant association between BAI and increased trauma severity among polytrauma patients. Mortality, however, did not exhibit a consistent rise across all patients with adrenal injury, emphasizing that BAI may not independently influence outcomes. These findings align with the notion that adrenal injury is linked to the overall trauma burden rather than being a primary determinant of mortality.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Glándulas Suprarrenales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Abdominales/mortalidad , Traumatismos Abdominales/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Glándulas Suprarrenales/lesiones , Glándulas Suprarrenales/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismo Múltiple , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
Am J Surg ; 233: 90-93, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38413352

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of blunt abdominal injury (BAI) in the adult population has been estimated to be between 0.03% and 4.95%. However, the impact of BAI on the pediatric population remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of National Trauma Data Bank datasets for the years 2017-2019. We included patients under the age of 18 who experienced blunt trauma and had suffered a blunt abdominal injury with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) severity score of 2 or higher. RESULTS: Out of the 8064 pediatric patients with isolated abdominal trauma, 134 patients also suffered from BAI. We found no difference in the outcomes of patients with blunt adrenal injury in terms of mortality, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital, and the number of ventilator days. Within poly-trauma patients BAI was associated with worst patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that BAI has minimal clinical impact on patient outcomes in isolation. However it is associated with worst outcomes in poly trauma patients suggesting correlation with increased trauma burden. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Glándulas Suprarrenales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Heridas no Penetrantes/epidemiología , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Abdominales/mortalidad , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Glándulas Suprarrenales/lesiones , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Preescolar , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismo Múltiple/epidemiología , Traumatismo Múltiple/mortalidad , Escala Resumida de Traumatismos
5.
Crit Care Explor ; 5(9): e0963, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37649850

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of palliative care consultation if performed within 72 hours of admission on length of stay (LOS), mortality, and invasive procedures. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Single-center level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Trauma patients, admitted to ICU with palliative care consultation. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The ICU LOS was decreased in the early palliative care (EPC) group compared with the late palliative care (LPC) group, by 6 days versus 12 days, respectively. Similarly, the hospital LOS was also shorter in the EPC group by 8 days versus 17 days in the LPC group. In addition, the EPC group had lower rates of tracheostomy (4% vs 14%) and percutaneous gastrostomy tubes (4% vs 15%) compared with the LPC group. There was no difference in mortality or discharge disposition between patients in the EPC versus LPC groups. It is noteworthy that the patients who received EPC were slightly older, but there were no other significant differences in demographics. CONCLUSIONS: EPC is associated with fewer procedures and a shorter amount of time spent in the hospital, with no immediate effect on mortality. These outcomes are consistent with studies that show patients' preferences toward the end of life, which typically involve less time in the hospital and fewer invasive procedures.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA