Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Scand J Prim Health Care ; 41(1): 91-97, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36880344

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare rapid antigen detection test (RADT) and throat culture for group A streptococci (GAS) among patients recently treated with penicillin V for GAS pharyngotonsillitis. DESIGN AND SETTING: The study was a secondary analysis within a randomized controlled trial comparing 5 versus 10 days of penicillin V for GAS pharyngotonsillitis. Patients were recruited at 17 primary health care centres in Sweden. SUBJECTS: We included 316 patients ≥ 6 years of age, having 3-4 Centor criteria, a positive RADT and a positive throat culture for GAS at inclusion, and also having a RADT and throat culture for GAS taken at a follow-up visit within 21 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: RADT and conventional throat culture for GAS. RESULTS: This prospective study showed 91% agreement between RADT and culture at follow-up within 21 days. Only 3/316 participants had negative RADT with a positive throat culture for GAS at follow-up, and 27/316 patients with positive RADT had a negative culture for GAS. Log rank test did not reveal any difference in the decline over time of positive tests between RADT and throat culture (p = 0.24). Agreement between RADT and throat culture for GAS at the follow-up was not associated with treatment duration, number of days from inclusion until follow-up, throat symptoms at follow-up, gender, or age. CONCLUSION: RADT and culture for GAS agreed to a high extent also after recent penicillin V treatment. RADT for GAS means a low risk for missing the presence of GAS.KEY POINTSTesting for group A streptococci (GAS) before antibiotic treatment can reduce antibiotic prescription for pharyngotonsillitis. It has been proposed that rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) for group A streptococci after recent penicillin V treatment may be falsely positive due to possible persisting antigens from non-viable bacteria.The decline of the presence of GAS was similar between RADT and conventional throat culture in patients who had recently completed penicillin V treatment for GAS pharyngotonsillitisRADT for GAS is useful in identifying the presence of GAS after recent penicillin V treatment.


Asunto(s)
Faringitis , Infecciones Estreptocócicas , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Penicilina V , Faringitis/diagnóstico , Faringitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Faringitis/microbiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/microbiología , Streptococcus pyogenes , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Atención Primaria de Salud
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 840, 2022 Nov 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36368940

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sore throat is a common reason for prescribing antibiotics in primary care, and 10 days of treatment is recommended for patients with pharyngotonsillitis with group A streptococcus (GAS). Our group recently showed that penicillin V (PcV) four times daily for 5 days was non-inferior in clinical outcome to PcV three times daily for 10 days. This study compares duration, intensity of symptoms, and side effects in patients with a Centor Score (CS) of 3 or 4 respectively, after treatment with PcV for 5 or 10 days and evaluates whether all patients with pharyngotonsillitis with a CS of 3 or 4 should be treated for 5 days or if severity of symptoms or CS suggest a longer treatment period. METHOD: Data on symptoms and recovery from patient diaries from 433 patients included in a RCT comparing PcV 800 mg × 4 for 5 days or PcV 1 g × 3 for 10 days was used. Patients six years and older with CS-3 or CS-4 and positive rapid antigen detection test for GAS-infection were grouped based on CS and randomized treatment. Comparisons for categorical variables were made with Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Patients with CS-3 as well as patients with CS-4 who received PcV 800 mg × 4 for 5 days self-reported that they recovered earlier compared to patients with CS-3 or CS-4 who received treatment with PcV 1 g × 3 for 10 days. In addition, the throat pain as single symptom was relieved 1 day earlier in patients with CS-4 and 5 days of treatment compared to patients with CS-4 and 10 days of treatment. No differences in side effects between the groups were found. CONCLUSION: Intense treatment with PcV four times a day for 5 days seems clinically beneficial and strengthens the suggestion that the 4-dose regimen with 800 mg PcV for 5 days may be the future treatment strategy for GAS positive pharyngotonsillitis irrespectively of CS-3 or CS-4. Trail registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02712307 (3 April 2016).


Asunto(s)
Faringitis , Infecciones Estreptocócicas , Tonsilitis , Humanos , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Faringitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Streptococcus pyogenes , Tonsilitis/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
BMC Infect Dis ; 16: 484, 2016 09 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27618925

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2014 the Swedish government assigned to The Public Health Agency of Sweden to conduct studies to evaluate optimal use of existing antibiotic agents. The aim is to optimize drug use and dosing regimens to improve the clinical efficacy. The present study was selected following a structured prioritizing process by independent experts. METHODS: This phase IV study is a randomized, open-label, multicenter study with non-inferiority design regarding the therapeutic use of penicillin V with two parallel groups. The overall aim is to study if the total exposure with penicillin V can be reduced from 1000 mg three times daily for 10 days to 800 mg four times daily for 5 days when treating Streptococcus pyogenes (Lancefield group A) pharyngotonsillitis. Patients will be recruited from 17 primary health care centers in Sweden. Adult men and women, youth and children ≥6 years of age who consult for sore throat and is judged to have a pharyngotonsillitis, with 3-4 Centor criteria and a positive rapid test for group A streptococci, will be included in the study. The primary outcome is clinical cure 5-7 days after discontinuation of antibiotic treatment. Follow-up controls will be done by telephone after 1 and 3 months. Throat symptoms, potential relapses and complications will be monitored, as well as adverse events. Patients (n = 432) will be included during 2 years. DISCUSSION: In the era of increasing antimicrobial resistance and the shortage of new antimicrobial agents it is necessary to revisit optimal usage of old antibiotics. Old antimicrobial drugs are often associated with inadequate knowledge on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and lack of optimized dosing regimens based on randomized controlled clinical trials. If a shorter and more potent treatment regimen is shown to be equivalent with the normal 10 day regimen this can imply great advantages for both patients (adherence, adverse events, resistance) and the community (resistance, drug costs). TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number 2015-001752-30 . Protocol FoHM/Tonsillit2015 date 22 June 2015, version 2. Approved by MPA of Sweden 3 July 2015, Approved by Regional Ethical Review Board in Lund, 25 June 2015.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Penicilina V/uso terapéutico , Faringitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Streptococcus pyogenes , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Niño , Protocolos Clínicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Penicilina V/administración & dosificación , Faringitis/microbiología , Proyectos de Investigación , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/microbiología , Suecia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
4.
Scand J Infect Dis ; 45(3): 161-75, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23270477

RESUMEN

The Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics (SRGA) has carried out a risk-benefit analysis of aminoglycoside treatment based on clinical efficacy, antibacterial spectrum, and synergistic effect with beta-lactam antibiotics, endotoxin release, toxicity, and side effects. In addition, SRGA has considered optimal dosage schedules and advice on serum concentration monitoring, with respect to variability in volume of drug distribution and renal clearance. SRGA recommends that aminoglycoside therapy should be considered in the following situations: (1) progressive severe sepsis and septic shock, in combination with broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics, (2) sepsis without shock, in combination with broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics if the infection is suspected to be caused by multi-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, (3) pyelonephritis, in combination with a beta-lactam or quinolone until culture and susceptibility results are obtained, or as monotherapy if a serious allergy to beta-lactam or quinolone antibiotics exists, (4) serious infections caused by multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteria when other alternatives are lacking, and (5) endocarditis caused by difficult-to-treat pathogens when monotherapy with beta-lactam antibiotics is not sufficient. Amikacin is generally more active against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli than other aminoglycosides, making it a better option in cases of suspected infection caused by multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Based on their resistance data, local drug committees should decide on the choice of first-line aminoglycoside. Unfortunately, aminoglycoside use is rarely followed up with audiometry, and in Sweden we currently have no systematic surveillance of adverse events after aminoglycoside treatment. We recommend routine assessment of adverse effects, including hearing loss and impairment of renal function, if possible at the start and after treatment with aminoglycosides, and that these data should be included in hospital patient safety surveillance and national quality registries.


Asunto(s)
Aminoglicósidos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Suecia
5.
JAC Antimicrob Resist ; 5(1): dlad006, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36816747

RESUMEN

Background: The intestinal microbiota functions as a reservoir of antibiotic resistance. Objectives: To evaluate penicillin V (phenoxymethylpenicillin) effects on the faecal microbiota with focus on beta-lactam resistance. Methods: We included 31 primary care patients with group A streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis treated with penicillin V for 5 (800 mg × 4) or 10 days (1000 mg × 3). Twenty-nine patients contributed with three faecal swab samples each. The faecal specimens were collected at the start of penicillin V treatment, after the last dose and at follow-up 7-9 days after completed treatment. Samples were inoculated semiquantitatively on selective screening agar plates to study beta-lactam resistance, species shifts among Enterobacterales and enterococci, and colonization with Candida spp. and Clostridioides difficile. Representative colonies were identified using MALDI-TOF. Results were analysed by non-parametric statistical methods. Results: An increase in the proportion of patients colonized with ampicillin-resistant Enterobacterales, from 52% to 86% (P = 0.007), and Enterobacterales with decreased susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins, from 32% to 52% (P = 0.034), was observed between the first and second samples. This increase was no longer significant at follow-up. New colonization with ampicillin-resistant Enterobacterales species and non-Enterobacterales Gram-negative species was observed, and persisted at follow-up. Conclusions: Following treatment with penicillin V, we observed decreased susceptibility to ampicillin and third-generation cephalosporins, and prolonged colonization with non-Escherichia coli Gram-negative species. These findings challenge the perception that penicillin V has limited ecological effect on the intestinal microbiota, and emphasizes the importance of avoiding even narrow-spectrum antimicrobials when possible.

6.
Drug Resist Updat ; 14(2): 70-6, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21440487

RESUMEN

To highlight the global need for effective antibiotics and explore possible concerted actions for change, cross-cutting plenary sessions served to frame the program of the conference. These sessions contained presentations on the present state of antibacterial resistance and the availability, the use and misuse of antibiotics. A number of possible actions were discussed, such as rational use of and access to antibiotics from various perspectives. The roles of vaccines and diagnostics were touched upon and followed by in depth discussions on supply-side bottlenecks with their scientific, regulatory and financial challenges. The value chain for research and development (R&D) of antibiotics has to be reengineered if we are to realize the development of much needed new antibiotics. This challenge will require a multitude of actions, some of which are related to changing the financial realities of antibiotics and interventions by global and regional institutions.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Vacunas Bacterianas/uso terapéutico , Pandemias/prevención & control , Antibacterianos/síntesis química , Bacterias/patogenicidad , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Vacunas Bacterianas/síntesis química , Congresos como Asunto , Países en Desarrollo , Descubrimiento de Drogas , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Control de Medicamentos y Narcóticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Internacionalidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Suecia
7.
Health Policy ; 126(8): 725-730, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35637052

RESUMEN

Due to the meagre development of new antibiotics, optimising the use of currently available antibiotics is important to reduce resistance pressures and to safeguard existing treatment options. The Public Health Agency of Sweden (PHAS) was tasked in 2014 to (1) develop a model for identifying and prioritising research gaps and (2) initiate studies to improve knowledge on how to optimise the use of existing antibiotics. A survey addressing knowledge-gaps and suggesting studies needed was distributed to a broad network of Swedish and European clinicians and experts. An independent reference group prioritised the proposals, applying predefined criteria focusing on public health relevance. The PHAS sponsored and led two multi-centre RCTs in cooperation with clinical researchers and took part in additional studies. A second survey and prioritization exercise following the same model was performed in 2019. The Swedish case study described in this paper provides an example of the role that the public sector can play in order to support the improved use of existing antibiotics. National and international institutions are well suited to perform systematic reviews of research priorities with a focus on public health concerns. The ultimate success of the model depends on political engagement, a close dialogue with healthcare professionals, collaboration between international sister-authorities responsible for public health in other countries, the availability of research funding, harmonisation of regulatory issues and regular revisions of clinical guidelines. The experience from the Swedish model illustrates opportunities for meeting clinical needs and filling knowledge gaps on existing off-patent antibiotics.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Salud Pública , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia
8.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 20(6): 835-843, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35989360

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance has been listed as one of the biggest threats to global health today. A recent study has shown that treating febrile urinary tract infections with temocillin instead of cefotaxime leads to a reduced selection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. However, a potential challenge with prioritizing temocillin over cefotaxime is the cost consequences. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the cost effectiveness of using temocillin compared to cefotaxime in treating febrile urinary tract infections in a model that takes the emergence of antibiotic resistance into account. METHODS: We used a Markov cohort model to estimate the costs and health effects of temocillin and cefotaxime treatment in febrile urinary tract infections in a Swedish setting. Health effects were assessed in terms of quality-adjusted life-years, and the primary outcome was the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained with temocillin compared to cefotaxime. We used a 5-year time horizon. RESULTS: The model results showed that temocillin treatment led to better health outcomes at a higher total cost. The cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained was approximately 38,400 EUR. Results from the sensitivity analysis suggested a 63% probability of temocillin being cost effective at a threshold of 50,000 EUR. Furthermore, results showed that the cost effectiveness of temocillin in febrile urinary tract infections is highly dependent on the drug cost. CONCLUSIONS: As antibiotic consumption is a driving force of resistance, it is essential to consider the development of resistance when studying the health economic consequences of antibiotic treatments. In doing so, this study found temocillin to be cost effective for febrile urinary tract infections.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Urinarias , Humanos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefotaxima/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana
9.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 22(3): 390-400, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34756180

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Use of third-generation cephalosporins, such as cefotaxime, is associated with an increased risk of selection for antimicrobial resistance, so alternative antibiotics need to be considered. The aim of the present study was to evaluate intestinal colonisation with third-generation cephalosporin-resistant pathogens following use of temocillin-an alternative antibiotic to cefotaxime that is potentially less prone to disturbing the intestinal microbiota-in empirical treatment of febrile urinary tract infection (UTI). METHODS: We did a randomised, multicentre, superiority, open-label phase 4 trial in patients who had been admitted to inpatient care in 12 Swedish hospitals with suspected or diagnosed febrile UTI (complicated or uncomplicated). To meet inclusion criteria, a patient was required to have at least one sign or symptom of pyelonephritis (ie, flank pain; costovertebral angle tenderness; and changes to urinary frequency or urgency or dysuria), a fever of 38·0°C or higher, and a positive urine dipstick (for nitrites, white blood cells, or both). Participants were also required to have an indication for intravenous antibiotic treatment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 2 g temocillin or 1-2 g cefotaxime, by local investigators opening consecutive sealed randomisation envelopes that were generated centrally in advance. Both drugs were administered intravenously every 8 h. The trial was open label for investigators and patients, but those doing the microbiological analyses were masked to the groups. Participants were treated with antibiotics for 7-10 days (or up to 14 days if they had bacteraemia), at least 3 days of which were on the study drug; at day 4 and later, participants who were showing improvement could be given an oral antibiotic (ciprofloxacin, ceftibuten, cefixime, or co-trimoxazole). Patients not showing improvement were regarded as having treatment failures. Rectal swabs were collected at three timepoints: at baseline (before the first dose), after the last dose of study drug, and 7-10 days after treatment stopped. The composite primary outcome was colonisation with Enterobacterales with reduced susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins, or colonisation with toxin-producing Clostridioides difficile, or both, to evaluate disturbance of the intestinal microbiota. The study is registered in the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2015-003898-15). FINDINGS: Between May 20, 2016, and July 31, 2019, 207 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 55 patients were excluded. 152 participants were randomly assigned to groups: 77 (51%) patients received temocillin, 75 (49%) patients received cefotaxime. The composite primary endpoint was met by 18 (26%) of 68 participants receiving temocillin versus 30 (48%) of 62 patients receiving cefotaxime (risk difference -22% [95% CI -42% to -3%]), showing superiority of temocillin versus cefotaxime (ie, less disturbance of the intestinal microbiota). 43 adverse events were reported in 40 (52%) of 77 patients in the temocillin group, versus 46 adverse events in 34 (45%) of 75 patients in the cefotaxime group. Most events were of mild to moderate severity. 21 (27%) patients in the temocillin and 17 (23%) patients in the cefotaxime group had an adverse event that was considered to be associated with the study drug. INTERPRETATION: Temocillin was found to be less selective than cefotaxime of Enterobacterales with reduced susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins, and it could therefore be a favourable alternative in the empirical treatment of febrile UTI. Use of this antibiotic could reduce hospital transmission and health-care-associated infections by these pathogens. FUNDING: Public Health Agency of Sweden.


Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Infecciones Urinarias , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefotaxima/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Penicilinas , Suecia , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 50 Suppl 1: S16-23, 2010 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20067388

RESUMEN

Metronidazole has been used for the treatment of infections for >45 years and is still successfully used for the treatment of trichomoniasis, amoebiasis, and giardiasis. Anaerobic bacterial infections caused by Bacteroides species, fusobacteria, and clostridia respond favorably to metronidazole therapy. Good clinical results in the treatment of vaginosis due to Gardnerella vaginalis have also been reported. Rates of resistance to metronidazole are still generally low; however, several studies have reported decreased susceptibility among Bacteroides species, as well as different mechanisms of resistance. Metronidazole-resistant Helicobacter pylori strains have been described, but combination therapy (eg, metronidazole, amoxicillin, or clarithromycin plus omeprazole) is still recommended for eradication of this pathogen in patients with gastroduodenal ulcers. Metronidazole is considered to be a cost-effective drug because of its low cost, good activity against pathogenic anaerobic bacteria, favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, and minor adverse effects. Metronidazole is still the criterion standard for therapy of anaerobic infections, as was described by Tally and colleagues 35 years ago.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiprotozoarios/uso terapéutico , Bacterias Anaerobias/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Protozoos/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antiprotozoarios/farmacocinética , Antiprotozoarios/farmacología , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Metronidazol/farmacocinética , Metronidazol/farmacología , Infecciones por Protozoos/parasitología
11.
Microbiology (Reading) ; 156(Pt 11): 3216-3223, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20705661

RESUMEN

Although it is known that antibiotics have short-term impacts on the human microbiome, recent evidence demonstrates that the impacts of some antibiotics remain for extended periods of time. In addition, antibiotic-resistant strains can persist in the human host environment in the absence of selective pressure. Both molecular- and cultivation-based approaches have revealed ecological disturbances in the microbiota after antibiotic administration, in particular for specific members of the bacterial community that are susceptible or alternatively resistant to the antibiotic in question. A disturbing consequence of antibiotic treatment has been the long-term persistence of antibiotic resistance genes, for example in the human gut. These data warrant use of prudence in the administration of antibiotics that could aggravate the growing battle with emerging antibiotic-resistant pathogenic strains.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Intestinos/microbiología , Metagenoma , Bacterias/crecimiento & desarrollo , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo
13.
BMJ ; 367: l5337, 2019 10 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31585944

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether total exposure to penicillin V can be reduced while maintaining adequate clinical efficacy when treating pharyngotonsillitis caused by group A streptococci. DESIGN: Open label, randomised controlled non-inferiority study. SETTING: 17 primary healthcare centres in Sweden between September 2015 and February 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 6 years and over with pharyngotonsillitis caused by group A streptococci and three or four Centor criteria (fever ≥38.5°C, tender lymph nodes, coatings of the tonsils, and absence of cough). INTERVENTIONS: Penicillin V 800 mg four times daily for five days (total 16 g) compared with the current recommended dose of 1000 mg three times daily for 10 days (total 30 g). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was clinical cure five to seven days after the end of antibiotic treatment. The non-inferiority margin was prespecified to 10 percentage points. Secondary outcomes were bacteriological eradication, time to relief of symptoms, frequency of relapses, complications and new tonsillitis, and patterns of adverse events. RESULTS: Patients (n=433) were randomly allocated to the five day (n=215) or 10 day (n=218) regimen. Clinical cure in the per protocol population was 89.6% (n=181/202) in the five day group and 93.3% (n=182/195) in the 10 day group (95% confidence interval -9.7 to 2.2). Bacteriological eradication was 80.4% (n=156/194) in the five day group and 90.7% (n=165/182) in the 10 day group. Eight and seven patients had relapses, no patients and four patients had complications, and six and 13 patients had new tonsillitis in the five day and 10 day groups, respectively. Time to relief of symptoms was shorter in the five day group. Adverse events were mainly diarrhoea, nausea, and vulvovaginal disorders; the 10 day group had higher incidence and longer duration of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Penicillin V four times daily for five days was non-inferior in clinical outcome to penicillin V three times daily for 10 days in patients with pharyngotonsillitis caused by group A streptococci. The number of relapses and complications did not differ between the two intervention groups. Five day treatment with penicillin V four times daily might be an alternative to the currently recommended 10 day regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2015-001752-30; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02712307.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Penicilina V/administración & dosificación , Faringitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Streptococcus pyogenes/efectos de los fármacos , Tonsilitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Niño , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Penicilina V/efectos adversos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 35(Suppl 1): S47-53, 2002 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12173108

RESUMEN

The beta-lactam antibiotics are the most widely used of all the groups of antimicrobials, but beta-lactam resistance is increasingly common among members of the Bacteroides fragilis group. Three major mechanisms are involved in beta-lactam resistance, and they act together in certain instances. In the present study, 2 resistant mutants (238m and 1186m) of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, obtained from clinical isolates (238 and 1186) by selection with increasing concentrations of cefoxitin, showed decreased susceptibilities to cefoxitin and other beta-lactam antibiotics. Alterations in both penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) and outer-membrane proteins (OMPs) were observed in the mutants in comparison with their parent strains. The similar alteration in OMPs was also observed in clinical isolates. In conclusion, the beta-lactam-resistant mutants of B. thetaiotaomicron with deficiency in both PBPs and OMPs can be selected for by exposure to cefoxitin, and several mechanisms are involved in the beta-lactam resistance in the strains investigated.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas , Bacteroides/fisiología , Cefoxitina/farmacología , Cefamicinas/farmacología , Hexosiltransferasas , Peptidil Transferasas , Resistencia betalactámica/fisiología , Proteínas de la Membrana Bacteriana Externa/metabolismo , Bacteroides/efectos de los fármacos , Bacteroides/genética , Bacteroides/metabolismo , Proteínas Portadoras/metabolismo , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Muramoilpentapéptido Carboxipeptidasa/metabolismo , Mutación , Proteínas de Unión a las Penicilinas
16.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 19(5): 361-70, 2002 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12007843

RESUMEN

Beta-lactam antibiotics and 5-nitroimidazoles have been extensively used against anaerobic bacteria. However, antibiotic resistance is increasingly common among anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli. The classical mechanisms of resistance to beta-lactams are, (1) production of beta-lactamases; (2) alteration of penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs); and (3) changes in outer membrane permeability to beta-lactams. The 5-nitroimidazole molecule is a prodrug whose activation depends upon reduction of the nitro group in the absence of oxygen. Decreased uptake and altered reduction are believed to be responsible for metronidazole resistance. Five nim genes (A, B, C, D and E) have been identified in Bacteroides fragilis group spp. that confer resistance to 5-nitroimidazole antibiotics. Knowledge of the status and the mechanisms of resistance is critical for both the selection of antimicrobial therapy and the design of new antimicrobial agents. The purpose of this article is to review the mechanisms for and the prevalence of beta-lactam and metronidazole resistance in strains belonging to the B. fragilis group.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacteroides fragilis/efectos de los fármacos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Metronidazol/farmacología , Infecciones por Bacteroides/microbiología , Bacteroides fragilis/citología , Bacteroides fragilis/enzimología , Bacteroides fragilis/genética , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , beta-Lactamas
17.
Crit Care ; 8(1): R42-7, 2004 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14975054

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The intensive care unit is burdened with a high frequency of nosocomial infections often caused by multiresistant nosocomial pathogens. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are reported to be the third causative agent of nosocomial infections and the most frequent cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections. CoNS are a part of the normal microflora of skin but can also colonize the nasal mucosa, the lower airways and invasive devices. The main aim of the present study was to investigate colonization and the rate of cross-transmissions of CoNS between intubated patients in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients, ventilated for at least 3 days, were included. Samples were collected from the upper and lower airways. All samples were cultured quantitatively and CoNS were identified by morphology and biochemical tests. A total of 199 CoNS isolates from 17 patients were genetically fingerprinted by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in order to identify clones and to monitor dissemination within and between patients. RESULTS: An unexpected high number of transmission events were detected. Five genotypes were each isolated from two or more patients, and 14/20 patients were involved in at least one and up to eight probable transmission events. CONCLUSIONS: A frequent transmission of CoNS was found between patients in the intensive care unit. Although transmission of bacteria does not necessarily lead to infection, it is nevertheless an indication that infection control measures can be improved.


Asunto(s)
Coagulasa/metabolismo , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/transmisión , Staphylococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Investigación Biomédica , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Femenino , Tracto Gastrointestinal/microbiología , Genotipo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema Respiratorio/microbiología , Staphylococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus/enzimología , Staphylococcus/genética
18.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 77(1-2): 109-15, 2002 Jul 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12076027

RESUMEN

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate if an ingested probiotic, containing viable Enterococcus faecium could survive gastrointestinal transit and if so, correlate the amount of the recovered probiotic strain with the host's own enterococci. The second aim was to investigate if simultaneous vancomycin intake influenced the survival and persistence of the probiotic strain and the stability of endogenous enterococci strains. Twenty healthy volunteers were given the probiotic product once daily for 10 days. Half of the subjects were simultaneously given vancomycin. Isolates of E. faecium strains were genotypically or phenotypically analysed with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and the PhenePlate system, respectively. In eight of the ten volunteers given only the probiotic, the ingested E. faecium could be detected on day 10, while in none on day 31. From subjects given both probiotic and vancomycin no ingested E. faecium could be detected on day 10 or day 31. The estimated amount of ingested E. faecium recovered from faeces on day 10 ranged from 1.2 x 10(3) to 4.2 x 10(6) colony forming units per gram faeces, which in several cases were a substantial part of the total amount of E. faecium. The E. faecium isolated before probiotic plus vancomycin administration showed no close relationship to the ones isolated 3 weeks after ceased intake in any subjects. In conclusion, the ingested E. faecium strain can survive gastrointestinal transit. After intake, the E. faecium probiotic strain might become a large part of the total E. faecium population. The occurrence of the probiotic strain in the human gut seems to be transient after intake stop. Re-colonization of E. faecium after simultaneous probiotic plus vancomycin intake occurs mainly with strains without close genetic relationship to the strains harboured before treatment or to the ingested E. faecium strain.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Enterococcus faecium/crecimiento & desarrollo , Tránsito Gastrointestinal , Probióticos/administración & dosificación , Vancomicina/farmacología , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Método Doble Ciego , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Enterococcus faecium/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus faecium/fisiología , Heces/microbiología , Genotipo , Humanos , Fenotipo , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
19.
Protein Pept Lett ; 9(6): 533-43, 2002 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12553862

RESUMEN

Temporin A, 18 analogs, and a cecropin A-temporin A hybrid peptide were tested with antibiotic sensitive and resistant bacteria, fungi, human erythrocytes, and in clotting assays. Several peptides were active in these assays, and some analogs (D-TA, W1-TA, and Con-L4,G10) may be useful lead compounds for further antibiotics development. The activity of temporin A was found to be dependent upon several of its structural features, including amino acid composition and sequence, chirality, helicity, and positive charge.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Péptidos Catiónicos Antimicrobianos/farmacología , Proteínas/farmacología , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/farmacología , Antibacterianos/química , Antifúngicos/química , Péptidos Catiónicos Antimicrobianos/química , Bioensayo , Hemólisis/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Péptidos/química , Proteínas/química , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/química , Relación Estructura-Actividad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA