RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Active surveillance for prostate cancer was initiated in the early 2000s. We assessed the long-term outcomes of active surveillance in Japan. METHODS: This multicenter prospective observational cohort study enrolled men aged 50-80 years with stage cT1cN0M0 prostate cancer in 2002 and 2003. The eligibility criteria included serum prostate-specific antigen level ≤ 20 ng/mL, ≤ 2 positive cores per 6-12 biopsy samples, Gleason score ≤ 6, and cancer involvement < 50% in the positive core. Patients were encouraged to undergo active surveillance. Prostate-specific antigen levels were measured bimonthly for 6 months and every 3 months thereafter. Triggers for recommending treatment were prostate-specific antigen doubling time of < 2 years and pathological progression on repeat biopsy. RESULTS: Among 134 patients, 118 underwent active surveillance. The median age, prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis, and maximum cancer occupancy were 70 years, 6.5 ng/mL, and 11.2%, respectively. Ninety-one patients had only one positive cancer core. The median observation period was 10.7 years. At 1 year, 65.7% underwent a repeat biopsy, and 37% of patients experienced pathological progression. The active surveillance continuation rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 28%, 9%, and 4%, respectively. One prostate cancer-related death occurred in a patient who refused treatment despite pathological progression at the one-year repeat biopsy. CONCLUSION: Active surveillance according to this study protocol was associated with conversion to the next treatment without delay, when indicated, despite the selection criteria and follow-up protocols being less rigorous than those recommended in current international guidelines.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare long-term outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) and low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) using propensity score-matched analysis in patients with clinically localized, intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: Between October 2003 and March 2014, our institution treated 1241 patients with intermediate-risk PCa (RP: n = 531; LDR-BT: n = 710). Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of 0.2 ng/ml or greater for RP, and as PSA nadir plus 2 ng/ml or higher (Phoenix definition) for LDR-BT. We calculated propensity scores by multivariate logistic regression based on covariates that included age, pretreatment PSA, biopsy Gleason grade, the percentage of positive biopsy cores (PPBC), and clinical T stage. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 108 months for RP and 99 months for LDR-BT. After propensity score adjustment, a total of 642 (321 each) patients remained for further analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.99). LDR-BT was associated with improved BCR-free survival and salvage therapy-free survival compared to RP (p < 0.001), and RP was associated with improved metastasis-free survival (MFS, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: BCR cannot be a surrogate for survival comparison, primarily due to differences between treatment modalities in how this term was defined post-therapy. Long-term follow-up showed that RP was associated with lower MFS in intermediate-risk PCa. However, this has not yet translated into superior OS.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Puntaje de Propensión , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical significance of repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) and surgical margin status after en bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) for pathological T1 (pT1) bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the record of 106 patients with pT1 high-grade bladder cancer who underwent ERBT between April 2013 and February 2021 at multiple institutions. All specimens were reviewed by a genitourinary pathologist. The primary outcome measures were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with and those without reTUR. We also analysed the predictive value of surgical margin on the likelihood of residual tumour on reTUR. RESULTS: A reTUR was performed in 50 of the 106 patients. The 2-year RFS and 3-year PFS were comparable between patients who underwent reTUR and those who did not (55.1% vs 59.9%, P = 0.6, 80.6% vs 82.6%, P = 0.6, respectively). No patient was upstaged to pT2 on reTUR. Regarding the surgical margin status, there were no recurrences at the original site in 51 patients with negative horizontal margins. Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that a positive vertical margin was an independent prognostic factor of worse PFS. On reTUR, six pTa/is residues were detected in patients with a positive horizontal margin, and three pT1 residues were detected in one patient with a positive vertical margin or other adverse pathological features. CONCLUSIONS: A reTUR after ERBT for pT1 bladder cancer appears not to improve either recurrence or progression. Surgical margin status affects prognosis and reTUR outcomes. A reTUR can be omitted after ERBT in patients with pT1 bladder cancer and negative margins; for those with positive horizontal or vertical margins, reTUR should remain the standard until proven otherwise.
Asunto(s)
Márgenes de Escisión , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of ureteric injuries, clinical value of prophylactic ureteric stenting and impact of intra- or postoperative detection of ureteric injuries in patients treated with gynaecological or colorectal surgery. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for articles published before September 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they evaluated the differences in the rate of ureteric injuries between laparoscopic and open surgery, prophylactic ureteric stenting or not, and those of final treatment success between intra- and postoperative detection in patients who underwent gynaecological or colorectal surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 46 studies were eligible for this meta-analysis. Compared to open surgery, laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a higher incidence of ureteric injuries (pooled odds ratio [OR] 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71-2.62), but there was no statistically significant difference in colectomy (pooled OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.03). Prophylactic ureteric stenting was associated with a lower incidence of ureteric injuries during gynaecological surgery (pooled OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96). The number needed to perform ureteric stenting to prevent one ureteric injury was 224 in gynaecological surgery. On the other hand, prophylactic ureteric stenting did not reduce the risk of ureteric injuries during colorectal surgery. Intraoperative detection of a ureteric injury was associated with a lower rate of complication management failure compared to postoperative detection (pooled OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hysterectomy seems to be associated with a higher rate of ureteric injuries compared to an open approach. Prophylactic ureteric stenting seems to reduce this risk during gynaecological surgery. Intraoperative detection of a ureteric injury during abdominal/pelvic surgery improves outcomes, suggesting the need for awareness and proactive problem identification. Further well-designed studies assessing the candidates who are more likely to benefit from prophylactic ureteric stenting including cost analysis are needed.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Uréter , Enfermedades Urológicas , Femenino , Humanos , Uréter/cirugía , Uréter/lesiones , Enfermedades Urológicas/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess the real-world clinical benefit of re-challenging chemotherapy after pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), as there have been several reports suggesting that programmed cell death protein-1/programmed death-ligand 1inhibitors can restore platinum sensitivity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 236 patients treated with pembrolizumab, we excluded 45 patients who did not experience progressive disease (PD) for pembrolizumab during the follow-up and 86 patients who discontinued pembrolizumab by the diagnosis of PD followed by the best supportive care. A total of 105 patients were identified for a logistic regression propensity score model to compare the survival outcomes between patients treated with continuing pembrolizumab (80) and re-challenging chemotherapy (25) after the diagnosis of PD for pembrolizumab. RESULTS: A median overall survival (OS) from PD for pembrolizumab was 11 months in 105 patients. Of 25 patients treated with re-challenging chemotherapy, platinum-including chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin; gemcitabine/cisplatin/paclitaxel [GCP]; methotrexate and vinblastine and adriamycin and cisplatin; and methotrexate and carboplatin and vinblastine MCAVI) was offered in 20 patients (80%). The objective response rate (ORR) for the first-line chemotherapy in the 105 patients was 30%, with a comparable ORR in 25 patients treated with re-challenging chemotherapy of 28%. GCP as a re-challenging regimen was offered in 12 of 25 (48%) patients. The ORR for the GCP regimen was 50%. Propensity score matching was performed using putative clinical factors, from which 34 patients were identified as pair-matched groups. The OS for patients treated with re-challenging chemotherapy was significantly longer than continuing pembrolizumab (a median of 13.9 and 5.8 months, respectively: P = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Re-challenging chemotherapy including platinum agents after PD with pembrolizumab offers clinical benefits in patients with mUC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Neoplasias Urológicas , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Vinblastina/uso terapéutico , Platino (Metal)/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Metotrexato , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Gemcitabina , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the prognostic value of sex for non-muscle-invasive/muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma (NMIBC/MIBC) treated with radical surgery. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched in November 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they involved the comparison of the overall, cancer-specific, progression, and recurrence-free survival of patients with NMIBC/MIBC. Formal sex-stratified meta-analyses of these outcomes were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-one studies, which included 32,525 patients with NMIBC, and 63 studies, which included 85,132 patients with MIBC, were eligible for review and meta-analysis. Female sex was associated with worse cancer-specific survival (pooled hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.31) and overall survival (pooled HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05) in patients with MIBC. In contrast, however, sex was not associated with cancer-specific survival (pooled HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.70-1.46), progression-free survival (pooled HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.88-1.24), and recurrence-free survival (pooled HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.98-1.16) in patients with NMIBC. CONCLUSIONS: Sex is associated with an increased risk of worse survival outcomes in patients with MIBC but not in those with NMIBC. Given the genetic and social differences between sexes, sex may represent a key factor in the clinical decision-making process.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos ProporcionalesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the oncologic efficacy of combining docetaxel with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) versus nonsteroidal antiandrogen (NSAA) with ADT in patients with high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) with focus on the effect of sequential therapy in a real-world clinical practice setting. METHODS: The records of 382 patients who harbored high-volume mHSPC, based on the CHAARTED criteria, and had received ADT with either docetaxel (n = 92) or NSAA (bicalutamide) (n = 290) were retrospectively analyzed. The cohorts were matched by one-to-one propensity scores based on patient demographics. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), including time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and time to second-line progression (PFS2) were compared. 2nd-line PFS defined as the time from CRPC diagnosis to progression after second-line therapy was also compared. RESULTS: After matching, a total of 170 patients were retained: 85 patients treated with docetaxel + ADT and 85 patients treated with NSAA + ADT. The median OS and CSS for docetaxel + ADT versus NSAA + ADT were not reached (NR) vs. 49 months (p = 0.02) and NR vs. 55 months (p = 0.02), respectively. Median time to CRPC and PFS2 in patients treated with docetaxel + ADT was significantly longer compared to those treated with NSAA (22 vs. 12 months; p = 0.003 and, NR vs. 28 months; p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in 2nd-line PFS between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggested that ADT with docetaxel significantly prolonged OS and CSS owing to a better time to CRPC and PFS2 in comparison to NSAA + ADT in high-volume mHSPC.
Asunto(s)
Antiandrógenos no Esteroides , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Antiandrógenos no Esteroides/uso terapéutico , Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Puntaje de Propensión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The effect of upfront intensive therapy on the prognosis of older patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) remains unclear. Thus, we assessed the impact of older age (≥75 years) on oncological outcomes in mCSPC patients with a high tumor burden. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 252 patients aged ≥75 years treated with either upfront or conventional therapy between 2014 and 2021. We compared castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)-free survival (FS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus upfront intensive therapy (docetaxel [DTX] or abiraterone acetate [ABI] plus prednisolone) and conventional therapy (ADT monotherapy or ADT combined with bicalutamide). We evaluated the effect of upfront intensive therapy on prognosis by multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The 231 patients enrolled in our study were classified in the conventional group (n = 148) or the upfront group (n = 104; DTX = 27 and ABI = 77). The upfront group had significantly prolonged CRPC-FS and OS compared with the conventional group, and this was also the case in the background-adjusted multivariable Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Patients aged ≥75 years who received upfront intensive therapy had significantly longer CRPC-FS and OS compared with similar age patients treated with conventional therapy in real-world practice. The oncological benefit may not diminish in this older population.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Anciano , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Castración , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carga TumoralRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Few studies have documented the long-term oncological outcomes of favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer patients treated via contemporary high-dose irradiation. We analyzed the ultimate clinical outcomes of such patients using the current risk sub-stratification schema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 693 patients with localized IR prostate cancer treated via low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) with or without external beam radiation (EBRT) and with or without androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in a single institution. Treatment outcomes (biochemical recurrence-free survival [BCRFS] and clinical progression-free survival [CPFS]) were compared according to the numbers of unfavorable findings. RESULTS: Out of the 693 IR patients, 292 (42.1%) exhibited favorable disease; the remaining 401 (57.9%) exhibited unfavorable disease. Compared with favorable IR status, unfavorable IR status was associated with shorter BCRFS and CPFS (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Patients with two to three unfavorable factors experienced the worst oncological outcomes (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Although patients with one or no unfavorable factors responded similarly to LDR-BT monotherapy, this treatment modality was insufficient for preventing biochemical and clinical progression in patients with multiple unfavorable findings. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment outcomes indicate that patients with IR disease scheduled for LDR-BT should undergo multimodal irradiation if they exhibit two or more unfavorable factors at diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Braquiterapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although prostate cancer is a very common form of malignancy in men, the clinical significance of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with abiraterone acetate versus the nonsteroidal antiandrogen bicalutamide has not yet been verified in patients with high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). The present study was designed to initiate this verification in real-world Japanese clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 312 patients with high-risk mHSPC based on LATITUDE criteria and had received ADT with bicalutamide (n = 212) or abiraterone acetate (n = 100) between September 2015 and December 2020. Bicalutamide was given at 80 mg daily and abiraterone was given at 1000 mg daily as four 250-mg tablets plus prednisolone (5-10 mg daily). Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) were compared. The prognostic factor for time to CRPC was analyzed by Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Patients in the bicalutamide group were older, and more of them had poor performance status (â§2), than in the abiraterone group. Impaired liver function was noted in 2% of the bicalutamide group and 16% of the abiraterone group (p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 22.5 months for bicalutamide and 17 months for abiraterone (p < 0.001). Two-year OS and CSS for bicalutamide versus abiraterone was 77.8% versus 79.5% (p = 0.793) and 81.1% versus 82.5% (p = 0.698), respectively. Median time to CRPC was significantly longer in the abiraterone group than in the bicalutamide group (NA vs. 13 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, Gleason score â§9, high alkaline phosphatase, high lactate dehydrogenase, liver metastasis, and bicalutamide were independent prognostic risk factors for time to CRPC. Abiraterone prolonged the time to CRPC in patients with each of these prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations regarding the time-dependent bias, ADT with abiraterone acetate significantly prolonged the time to CRPC compared to bicalutamide in patients with high-risk mHSPC. However, further study with longer follow-up is needed.
Asunto(s)
Acetato de Abiraterona , Anilidas , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Nitrilos , Prednisolona , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Compuestos de Tosilo , Acetato de Abiraterona/administración & dosificación , Acetato de Abiraterona/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/efectos adversos , Anilidas/administración & dosificación , Anilidas/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Pruebas de Función Hepática/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Nitrilos/administración & dosificación , Nitrilos/efectos adversos , Antiandrógenos no Esteroides/administración & dosificación , Antiandrógenos no Esteroides/efectos adversos , Prednisolona/administración & dosificación , Prednisolona/efectos adversos , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Compuestos de Tosilo/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Tosilo/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Docetaxel-related adverse events (AEs) such as neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN) can be life-threatening. A previous in vivo study raised the hypothesis that the castration status affects the rate of hematologic AEs. We aimed to investigate the impact of castration status on the incidence of docetaxel-related AE in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 265 mPCa patients treated with docetaxel, comprising 92 patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and 173 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) between January 2015 and December 2021. Common terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) was applied to evaluate AEs. We analyzed the differential incidences between mHSPC and mCRPC, and risk factors of hematologic and nonhematologic AEs using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: The rate of patients who received primary prophylaxis against neutropenia was higher in those with the mHSPC compared with those with the mCRPC (7.5% vs. 33%, p < 0.001). Among the patients without primary prophylaxis, incidence rates of severe neutropenia (CTCAE ≥ Grade3) and FN were 89% and 16% in patients with mCRPC compared to 81% and 18% in those with mHSPC. Logistic regression analysis revealed that age ≥ 75 years and failure to provide primary prophylaxis were independent risk factors of severe neutropenia (odds ratio [OR]: 2.39, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 1.10-5.18 and OR: 15.8, 95% CI: 7.23-34.6, respectively). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) ⧠1 was an independent risk factor of FN (OR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.13-4.54). Castration status (mHSPC vs. mCRPC) was not associated with the risks of severe neutropenia and FN. CONCLUSIONS: Castration status did not affect the risk of severe neutropenia or FN in mPCa patients treated with docetaxel regardless of the disease state. Failure to provide primary prophylaxis and advanced patient age are independent risk factors of severe neutropenia; while patients with poor PS are more likely to develop FN. These findings may help guide the clinical decision-making for proper candidate selection of docetaxel treatment.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neutropenia , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/epidemiología , Orquiectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There has been no clinical evidence to justify continued pembrolizumab therapy beyond progression in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study evaluating the clinical efficacy of continued use of pembrolizumab beyond progression in patients with metastatic UC. Data from 51 patients with metastatic UC, who developed progression during second-line pembrolizumab therapy, were analyzed. Progression was defined based on the Immunotherapy Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The outcome was overall survival (OS). The association between continued treatment, OS, and the risk of all-cause mortality was tested using log-rank test, conventional and time-dependent Cox regression models. RESULTS: No significant difference in patient characteristics was noted between patients continuing pembrolizumab beyond progression (N = 21) and those discontinuing pembrolizumab (N = 30). Median OS was significantly longer in the continuation group (17.8 vs. 8.8 months; P = 0.038). A multivariable conventional Cox regression model identified continued pembrolizumab administration as a significant independent prognostic factor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-0.90, P = 0.036), irrespective of the time from treatment initiation to progression and concurrent clinical progression. Further, longer duration of pembrolizumab treatment beyond progression was independently associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality in a multivariable time-dependent Cox regression model, when used as a time-dependent variable (HR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.45, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Continued pembrolizumab administration beyond progression might be beneficial in patients with metastatic UC who were clinically stable.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Urotelio/patología , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Criterios de Evaluación de Respuesta en Tumores Sólidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: En bloc resection for bladder tumors has been developed to overcome shortcomings of conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors with regard to safety, pathological evaluation and oncologic outcomes. However, the potential benefits and utility compared to conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors have not been conclusively demonstrated. We aimed to update the current evidence with focus on the pathological benefits of en bloc resection for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PubMed®, Web of Science™ and Scopus® databases were searched in August 2021 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared safety, and pathological and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent en bloc resection with conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors. RESULTS: Overall, 29 studies comprising 4,484 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. Among 13 randomized controlled trials, the pooled 12- and 24-month recurrence risk ratios were not statistically different between the 2 surgical techniques (0.96, 95% CI 0.74-1.23 and 0.83, 95% CI 0.55-1.23, respectively). The pooled risk ratio for bladder perforation was 0.13 (95% CI 0.05-0.34) in favor of en bloc resection. In randomized controlled trials, the differential rates of detrusor muscle presence (pooled RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.19-1.43) and of detectable muscularis mucosae (pooled RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.81-3.97) were more likely in patients receiving en bloc resection. Patients who underwent en bloc resection had a lower rate of residual tumor at repeat transurethral resection than those treated with conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors in 1 randomized controlled trial and 3 observational studies (pooled RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: En bloc resection for bladder tumors seems to be safer, and to yield superior histopathological information and performance compared to conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors. Despite the failure to improve the recurrence rate, the more accurate histopathological analysis is likely to improve clinical decision making and care delivery in nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Asunto(s)
Cistectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Cistectomía/métodos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Márgenes de Escisión , Membrana Mucosa/patología , Invasividad Neoplásica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasia Residual , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Factores de Riesgo , Vejiga Urinaria/lesiones , Cateterismo UrinarioRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Angiogenesis-related marker vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) has been shown to be elevated in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB), but its predictive/prognostic role has not been determined. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the predictive/prognostic role of VCAM-1 for patients who have UCB treated with radical cystectomy (RC). METHODS: The study enrolled 1036 patients with clinically non-metastatic advanced UCB who underwent RC, and plasma VCAM-1 was evaluated preoperatively. The correlation of plasma VCAM-1 with pathologic and survival outcomes was assessed using binominal logistic regression and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the curve and concordance indices. The clinical net benefit was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: Preoperative VCAM-1 was significantly elevated in patients with adverse pathologic features. Higher VCAM-1 levels were independently associated with increased risk of lymph-node-metastasis (LNM), ≥pT3 disease, and non-organ-confined disease (NOCD (p < 0.001 for each). Preoperative plasma VCAM-1 was independently associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) in pre- and postoperative multivariable models. Adding VCAM-1 to these predictive models improved their discriminatory ability to predict all outcomes by a significant margin. In the DCA, VCAM-1 addition to the reference models for prediction of LNM, NOCD, RFS, and CSS resulted in relevant improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated plasma VCAM-1 was associated with biologically and clinically aggressive UCB disease features. After validation, preoperative VCAM-1 may serve as a biomarker to help identify patients likely to benefit from intensified/multimodal therapy. In addition, VCAM-1 improved the discriminatory power of predictive/prognostic models and can be used to refine personalized clinical decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/cirugía , Cistectomía , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Molécula 1 de Adhesión Celular VascularRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of currently available treatments for the management of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), as there has been a paradigm shift with the use of next-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs) and docetaxel. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for articles published before May 2020 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis extension statement for network meta-analysis. Studies comparing overall/progression-free survival (OS/PFS) and/or adverse events (AEs) in patients with mHSPC were eligible. RESULTS: Nine studies (N = 9960) were selected, and formal network meta-analyses were conducted. Abiraterone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.76-0.90), docetaxel (HR 0.90, 95% CrI 0.82-0.98), and enzalutamide (HR 0.85, 95% CrI 0.73-0.99) were associated with significantly better OS than androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), and abiraterone emerged as the best option. Abiraterone (HR 0.71, 95% CrI 0.67-0.76), apalutamide (HR 0.73, 95% CrI 0.65-0.81), docetaxel (HR 0.84, 95% CrI 0.78-0.90), and enzalutamide (HR 0.67, 95% CrI 0.63-0.71) were associated with significantly better PFS than ADT, and enzalutamide emerged as the best option. Abiraterone (HR 0.85, 95% CrI 0.78-0.93), apalutamide (HR 0.87, 95% CrI 0.77-0.98), and enzalutamide (HR 0.80, 95% CrI 0.73-0.88) were significantly more effective than docetaxel. Regarding AEs, apalutamide was the likely best option among the three ARIs. In patients with low-volume mHSPC, enzalutamide was the best option in terms of OS and PFS. CONCLUSIONS: All three ARIs are effective therapies for mHSPC; apalutamide was the best tolerated. All three seemed more effective than docetaxel. These findings may facilitate individualised treatment strategies and inform future comparative trials.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Hormonas , Humanos , Masculino , Metaanálisis en Red , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study investigated the impact of treatment intensification with upfront docetaxel (DOC) or abiraterone (ABI) plus prednisolone on survival outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) by comparing it with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy or combined androgen blockade (CAB) using propensity score matching (PSM). METHODS: Outcomes from 278 CHAARTED high-volume patients receiving upfront DOC (92 patients) or upfront ABI (186 patients) were compared to those from 354 patients receiving ADT or CAB. PSM was conducted to assess castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CRPCFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: After PSM, patient distributions between the three groups were well balanced. After 1:1 PSM, patients receiving upfront ABI had significantly better CRPCFS than those receiving ADT/CAB or upfront DOC [hazard ratio (HR) 0.39; 95% CI 0.27-0.56 vs. HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.82, respectively]. No significant difference in CRPCFS was observed between the upfront DOC and ADT/CAB groups (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.50-1.12). Patients receiving upfront DOC and upfront ABI had significantly better OS than those receiving ADT/CAB (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.0.30-0.98 vs. HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29-0.84, respectively). However, no significant difference in OS was observed between upfront ABI and upfront DOC (hazard ratio 0.84; 95% CI 0.34-2.06). CONCLUSION: The comparison of real-world retrospective cohorts showed that treatment intensification with upfront DOC or upfront ABI promoted better OS compared to ADT alone or CAB in patients with high-volume mCSPC after PSM. However, no difference in OS was observed between upfront DOC and upfront ABI.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Androstenos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Castración , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Puntaje de Propensión , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We investigated the effects of locally administered human multilineage-differentiating stress enduring (Muse) cells, nontumorigenic pluripotent-like endogenous stem cells, on bladder tissues, function, and nociceptive behavior in a chemically induced Hunner-type interstitial cystitis (HIC)-like rat model without immunosuppressant. METHODS: Chemical cystitis was induced by intravesical instillation of 0.2 N hydrochloride (HCl) for 15 min in female F344 rats. SSEA-3+ Muse cells, SSEA-3- non-Muse cells or Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS; vehicle) were injected into the anterior and posterior bladder wall at each 1×104 cells/10 µl 6 h after HCl application. The sham group received HBSS without HCl instillation. Urinary frequency was assessed using metabolic cages, cystometrograms, nociceptive behavior, and histological analysis of the bladder and L6 spinal cord. RESULTS: Increases in urinary frequency and decreases in bladder capacity compared with the sham group were observed in the vehicle and non-Muse groups, but not in the Muse group, at 1 week. Significant increases in nociceptive behavior compared with the sham group and the expression of TNFα in the bladder and c-Fos in the bilateral dorsal horns of L6 spinal cord were also observed in the vehicle and non-Muse groups, whereas these changes were not seen in the Muse group at 1 week. Histological analysis exhibited a higher proportion of injected Muse cells remaining in the urothelial basal layer and lamina propria of the bladder than non-Muse cells until 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Muse cell therapy could be a promising modality for treating HIC.
Asunto(s)
Cistitis Intersticial , Cistitis , Alprostadil/efectos adversos , Animales , Femenino , Humanos , Nocicepción , Ratas , Ratas Endogámicas F344RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The effect of enzalutamide in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade, which represents a patient profile similar to real-world clinical practice in Japan, remains unknown. Therefore, we investigate the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide after combined androgen blockade for recurrence following radical treatment in Japanese patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHODS: We analyzed 66 patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade for recurrence following radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy who were prospectively enrolled from October 2015 to March 2018. They received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until the protocol treatment discontinuation criteria were met. The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival, defined as the time from enrollment to prostate-specific antigen-based progression or death from any cause. The secondary endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival, metastasis-free survival, time to prostate-specific antigen progression, prostate-specific antigen response rate, chemotherapy-free survival, and safety assessment. RESULTS: The median observation period was 27.3 months. The median prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival was 35.0 months (95% confidence interval, 17.5 to not reached). The median overall survival, median progression-free survival, median metastasis-free survival, and chemotherapy-free survival were not reached, with the corresponding 2-year rates being 91.6%, 67.1%, 72.4%, and 85.8%, respectively. The 50% prostate-specific antigen response rate was 88.9%, with the median time being 2.8 months. In total, 42.2% of the patients experienced adverse events, with malaise being the most common. CONCLUSIONS: Enzalutamide effectively manages non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade for recurrence following radical treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000018964, CRB6180007.
Asunto(s)
Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Andrógenos , Benzamidas , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Nitrilos , Feniltiohidantoína , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patologíaRESUMEN
The Urogenital Sub-committee and the Surveillance Committee of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, and the Japanese Society for Clinical Microbiology conducted the second nationwide surveillance of the antimicrobial susceptibility of Chlamydia trachomatis. In this second surveillance study, clinical urethral discharge specimens were collected from patients with urethritis in 26 hospitals and clinics from May 2016 to July 2017. Based on serial cultures, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) could be determined for 41 isolates; the MICs (MIC90) of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, tosufloxacin, sitafloxacin, doxycycline, minocycline, erythromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin and solithromycin were 2 µg/ml (2 µg/ml), 1 µg/ml (0.5 µg/ml), 0.25 µg/ml (0.25 µg/ml), 0.125 µg/ml (0.063 µg/ml), 0.125 µg/ml (0.125 µg/ml), 0.25 µg/ml (0.25 µg/ml), 0.031 µg/ml (0.031 µg/ml), 0.25 µg/ml (0.125 µg/ml), and 0.016 µg/ml (0.008 µg/ml), respectively. In summary, this surveillance project did not identify any strains resistant to fluoroquinolone, tetracycline, or macrolide agents in Japan. In addition, the MIC of solithromycin was favorable and lower than that of other antimicrobial agents. However, the MIC of azithromycin had a slightly higher value than that reported in the first surveillance report, though this might be within the acceptable margin of error. Therefore, the susceptibility of azithromycin, especially, should be monitored henceforth.
Asunto(s)
Chlamydia trachomatis , Uretritis , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Azitromicina/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Uretritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Uretritis/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) predicts the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and is a prognostic biomarker for renal cell carcinoma and melanoma; however, no study has evaluated its potential as a preoperative biomarker for patients with bladder cancer (BC). We investigated the LIPI as a preoperative prognostic biomarker in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of 105 patients with BC who underwent radical cystectomy from January 2013 to June 2019. The LIPI was evaluated based on the preoperatively derived neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and the lactate dehydrogenase levels. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to assess the disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) rates. RESULTS: The patients were classified into the good, intermediate, and poor LIPI groups [71 (67.6%), 28 (26.7%), and 6 (5.7%) patients, respectively]. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curve analyses showed that patients with intermediate to poor LIPI had worse DFS, CSS, and OS rates than those with good LIPI. The LIPI combined with pT3/4 and lymph node metastasis could better assess the prognosis of DFS at 24 months postoperatively by DCA. CONCLUSION: The preoperative LIPI can predict the prognosis of patients with BC undergoing radical cystectomy and has a better predictive ability when combined with pT3/4 and lymph node metastasis.