Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (PULSAR): 48-week results from a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg could improve treatment outcomes and provide sustained disease control in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), with extended dosing compared with aflibercept 2 mg. METHODS: PULSAR is a phase 3, randomised, three-group, double-masked, non-inferiority, 96-week trial conducted across 223 sites worldwide. Adults with nAMD were randomised 1:1:1 to aflibercept 8 mg every 12 weeks (8q12), aflibercept 8 mg every 16 weeks (8q16), or aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks (2q8), following three initial monthly doses in all groups. From week 16, patients in the aflibercept 8 mg groups had their dosing interval shortened if pre-specified dose regimen modification criteria denoting disease activity were met. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 48. All patients with at least one dose of study treatment were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04423718) and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Of 1011 patients randomised to aflibercept 8q12 (n=336), 8q16 (n=338), or 2q8 (n=337) between Aug 11, 2020, and July 30, 2021, 1009 patients received study treatment (aflibercept 8q12 n=335; aflibercept 8q16 n=338; and aflibercept 2q8 n=336). Aflibercept 8q12 and 8q16 showed non-inferior BCVA gains versus aflibercept 2q8 (mean BCVA change from baseline +6·7 [SD 12·6] and +6·2 [11·7] vs +7·6 [12·2] letters). The least squares mean differences between aflibercept 8q12 versus 2q8 and 8q16 versus 2q8, respectively, were -0·97 (95% CI -2·87 to 0·92) and -1·14 (-2·97 to 0·69) letters (non-inferiority margin at 4 letters). The incidence of ocular adverse events in the study eye was similar across groups (aflibercept 8q12 n=129 [39%]; aflibercept 8q16 n=127 [38%]; and aflibercept 2q8 n=130 [39%]). INTERPRETATION: Aflibercept 8 mg showed efficacy and safety with extended dosing intervals, which has the potential to improve the management of patients with nAMD. FUNDING: Bayer AG and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

Efficacy and safety of avacincaptad pegol in patients with geographic atrophy (GATHER2): 12-month results from a randomised, double-masked, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Geographic atrophy is an advanced form of dry age-related macular degeneration that can lead to irreversible vision loss and high burden of disease. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of avacincaptad pegol 2 mg in reducing geographic atrophy lesion growth. METHODS: GATHER2 is a randomised, double-masked, sham-controlled, 24-month, phase 3 trial across 205 retina clinics, research hospitals, and academic institutions globally. To be eligible, patients had to be aged 50 years or older with non-centrepoint-involving geographic atrophy and best corrected visual acuity between 20/25 and 20/320 in the study eye. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to monthly avacincaptad pegol 2 mg administered as a 100 µL intravitreal injection or sham for the first 12 months. Randomisation was performed using an interactive response technology system with stratification by factors known to be of prognostic importance in age-related macular degeneration. Patients, investigators, study centre staff, sponsor personnel, and data analysts were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was geographic atrophy lesion size measured by fundus autofluorescence at baseline, month 6, and month 12. Efficacy and safety analyses were done in the modified intention-to-treat and safety populations, respectively. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04435366. FINDINGS: Between June 22, 2020, and July 23, 2021, 1422 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 448 were enrolled and randomly assigned to avacincaptad pegol 2 mg (n=225) or sham (n=223). One patient in the sham group did not receive study treatment and was excluded from analyses. There were 154 (68%) female patients and 71 (32%) male patients in the avacincaptad pegol 2 mg group, and 156 (70%) female patients and 66 (30%) male patients in the sham group. From baseline to month 12, the mean rate of square-root-transformed geographic atrophy area growth was 0·336 mm/year (SE 0·032) with avacincaptad pegol 2 mg and 0·392 mm/year (0·033) with sham, a difference in growth of 0·056 mm/year (95% CI 0·016-0·096; p=0·0064), representing a 14% difference between the avacincaptad pegol 2 mg group and the sham group. Ocular treatment-emergent adverse events in the study eye occurred in 110 (49%) patients in the avacincaptad pegol 2 mg group and 83 (37%) in the sham group. There were no endophthalmitis, intraocular inflammation, or ischaemic optic neuropathy events over 12 months. To month 12, macular neovascularisation in the study eye occurred in 15 (7%) patients in the avacincaptad pegol 2 mg group and nine (4%) in the sham group, with exudative macular neovascularisation occurring in 11 (5%) in the avacincaptad pegol 2 mg group and seven (3%) in the sham group. INTERPRETATION: Monthly avacincaptad pegol 2 mg was well tolerated and showed significantly slower geographic atrophy growth over 12 months than sham treatment, suggesting that avacincaptad pegol might slow disease progression and potentially change the trajectory of disease for patients with geographic atrophy. FUNDING: Iveric Bio, An Astellas Company.

Geographic atrophy: current and future therapeutic agents and practical considerations for retinal specialists.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Geographic atrophy (GA) from age-related macular degeneration (AMD) remains a leading cause of vision loss. The purpose of this review is to summarize currently available intravitreal therapeutics, and discuss pipeline therapeutics that are currently in clinical trials. RECENT FINDINGS: The FDA approval of pegcetacoplan and avacincaptad pegol, both approved in 2023, represent the first therapeutics to treat GA. These are delivered via intravitreal injections, and have been shown to slow progression of GA. Both drugs have a risk of new onset neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Initial indications seem to be that pegcetacoplan therapy has higher risks of inflammation, vasculitis, and nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) as compared to avacincaptad pegol, but more real-world data will help to clarify this further. Pipeline therapeutics that we discuss include intravitreal gene therapy, oral anticomplement therapy, and intravitreal injections of a novel glycoprotein. SUMMARY: Both pegcetacoplan and avacincaptad pegol are FDA approved to treat GA. The decision to treat patients is still complex and nuanced, but the approval of two treatments for GA is a tremendous advance in our field. Future therapeutics may further refine our ability to treat patients more effectively and safely.

Efficacy, durability, and safety of intravitreal faricimab with extended dosing up to every 16 weeks in patients with diabetic macular oedema (YOSEMITE and RHINE): two randomised, double-masked, phase 3 trials.

BACKGROUND: To reduce treatment burden and optimise patient outcomes in diabetic macular oedema, we present 1-year results from two phase 3 trials of faricimab, a novel angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A bispecific antibody. METHODS: YOSEMITE and RHINE were randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority trials across 353 sites worldwide. Adults with vision loss due to centre-involving diabetic macular oedema were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to intravitreal faricimab 6·0 mg every 8 weeks, faricimab 6·0 mg per personalised treatment interval (PTI), or aflibercept 2·0 mg every 8 weeks up to week 100. PTI dosing intervals were extended, maintained, or reduced (every 4 weeks up to every 16 weeks) based on disease activity at active dosing visits. The primary endpoint was mean change in best-corrected visual acuity at 1 year, averaged over weeks 48, 52, and 56. Efficacy analyses included the intention-to-treat population (non-inferiority margin 4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters); safety analyses included patients with at least one dose of study treatment. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (YOSEMITE NCT03622580 and RHINE NCT03622593). FINDINGS: 3247 patients were screened for eligibility in YOSEMITE (n=1532) and RHINE (n=1715). After exclusions, 940 patients were enrolled into YOSEMITE between Sept 5, 2018, and Sept 19, 2019, and 951 patients were enrolled into RHINE between Oct 9, 2018, and Sept 20, 2019. These 1891 patients were randomly assigned to faricimab every 8 weeks (YOSEMITE n=315, RHINE n=317), faricimab PTI (n=313, n=319), or aflibercept every 8 weeks (n=312, n=315). Non-inferiority for the primary endpoint was achieved with faricimab every 8 weeks (adjusted mean vs aflibercept every 8 weeks in YOSEMITE 10·7 ETDRS letters [97·52% CI 9·4 to 12·0] vs 10·9 ETDRS letters [9·6 to 12·2], difference -0·2 ETDRS letters [-2·0 to 1·6]; RHINE 11·8 ETDRS letters [10·6 to 13·0] vs 10·3 ETDRS letters [9·1 to 11·4] letters, difference 1·5 ETDRS letters [-0·1 to 3·2]) and faricimab PTI (YOSEMITE 11·6 ETDRS letters [10·3 to 12·9], difference 0·7 ETDRS letters [-1·1 to 2·5]; RHINE 10·8 ETDRS letters [9·6 to 11·9], difference 0·5 ETDRS letters [-1·1 to 2·1]). Incidence of ocular adverse events was comparable between faricimab every 8 weeks (YOSEMITE n=98 [31%], RHINE n=137 [43%]), faricimab PTI (n=106 [34%], n=119 [37%]), and aflibercept every 8 weeks (n=102 [33%], n=113 [36%]). INTERPRETATION: Robust vision gains and anatomical improvements with faricimab were achieved with adjustable dosing up to every 16 weeks, demonstrating the potential for faricimab to extend the durability of treatment for patients with diabetic macular oedema. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

IMPACT OF RETINAL FLUID-FREE MONTHS ON OUTCOMES IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Treatment Agnostic Analysis of the HAWK and HARRIER Studies.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of the total number of fluid-free months after loading on visual and anatomical outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. METHODS: This post hoc analysis pooled patient-level data from the brolucizumab 6 mg (n = 718) and aflibercept 2 mg (n = 715) arms of the HAWK and HARRIER randomized clinical trials. Based on data from Weeks 12 to 96, patients were assigned to one of five categories based on fluid-free visits (FFVs; the total number of monthly visits at which they were observed to be without retinal fluid). Three definitions of "fluid-free" were explored based on the location of the fluid observed. RESULTS: Patients allocated to Categories 4 (15-21 FFV) and 5 (22 FFV, always dry) consistently had the best visual and anatomical outcomes at Week 96, whereas patients allocated to Categories 1 (0 FFV, never dry) and 2 (1-7 FFV) consistently had the worst visual and anatomical outcomes. Variability in retinal thickness over time was lowest in Categories 4 and 5. CONCLUSION: Absence of retinal fluid at more visits after loading has a positive association with visual and anatomic outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients, regardless of fluid type.

OPTIMAL MANAGEMENT OF PIGMENT EPITHELIAL DETACHMENTS IN EYES WITH NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION.

PURPOSE: This review aimed to determine the optimal management of retinal pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) based on review of available evidence in the literature. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review evaluates previous retrospective and prospective studies that assessed the treatment of PEDs in nAMD. RESULTS: Studies illustrated that anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy can be effective in eyes with PED secondary to nAMD. Similar visual outcomes are associated with different anti-VEGF treatments. Higher anti-VEGF doses may improve anatomical response, without correlation with vision improvement. Fibrovascular PEDs may be difficult to treat, but even these eyes can gain vision with anti-VEGF therapy. A retinal pigment epithelial tear may develop in 15% to 20% of eyes with PEDs after anti-VEGF therapy, especially in PEDs greater than 500 µm to 600 µm in height; however, vision may stabilize with continued therapy. Atrophy may complicate eyes with PED and nAMD after anti-VEGF therapy, especially in association with complete PED resolution. CONCLUSION: Available literature suggests that anti-VEGF therapy is safe and efficacious for PED and nAMD. Treatment should focus on vision gains rather than PED resolution because there is no apparent correlation between anatomical and functional improvement in most eyes with PED and nAMD.

The 0.19-mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant for Diabetic Macular Edema: Intraocular Pressure-Related Effects over 36 Months.

PURPOSE: To evaluate effects of the 0.19-mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN) on intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a 36-month, phase IV, nonrandomized, open-label, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 202 eyes from 159 patients who received the 0.19-mg FAc implant after a successful prior steroid challenge per the United States label indication. METHODS: Study eyes were assessed for IOP values, incidence of IOP elevations, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) for up to 36 months post-FAc implant. RESULTS: Mean IOP was stable over 36 months post-FAc; IOP change from baseline peaked at 2.12 mmHg at 9 months, then declined to baseline levels. At 36 months, eyes had a 32.5% cumulative probability of an IOP event > 25 mmHg and a 15.6% probability of an IOP event > 30 mmHg (Kaplan-Meier). The probability of requiring IOP-lowering medication at any time by month 36 was 38.3%. A total of 78% of eyes did not have IOP elevations > 25 mmHg if similar values were seen with the previous steroid challenge. Although 7.4% of eyes had an IOP > 30 mmHg during a scheduled study visit, most exceeded this threshold only once (60%). Regardless of IOP status, mean BCVA remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Over 36 months, the 0.19-mg FAc implant was associated with relatively stable IOPs in patients with DME, and there was no significant impact of IOP elevations identified regarding their effects on long-term visual outcomes. The probability that a prior corticosteroid challenge will not predict an IOP elevation > 25 mmHg over 36 months post-FAc is 22%; therefore, routine IOP monitoring should be scheduled. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Fluocinolone acetonide 0.18-mg implant for treatment of recurrent inflammation due to non-infectious uveitis: a case series of 15 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Uncontrolled non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment (NIU-PS) can lead to vision loss due to repeated bouts of inflammation and consequent tissue damage. Patients with chronic NIU-PS who experience recurrent uveitis after being treated with systemic and short-acting local corticosteroids may benefit from the sustained-release 0.18-mg fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAi). METHODS: In this case series, 18 eyes with chronic, recurrent NIU-PS and cystoid macular edema (CME) treated with the 0.18-mg FAi were analyzed retrospectively. Data on patient demographics, clinical history, previous and concomitant treatments for uveitis recurrence, time to and number of uveitis recurrences, intraocular pressure (IOP), central subfield thickness (CST), and visual acuity (VA) were collected and summarized. RESULTS: A majority of patients (14/15 [93%]) had a history of ocular surgery, largely cataract extraction, and all developed chronic and recurrent NIU-PS and CME. At baseline, patients had a mean age of 72 years (range: 46 to 93), were 53% male, and had a mean duration of NIU-PS of 3 years (range: 1 to 19). Patients were followed for an average of 16.5 months (range: 2 to 42.5 months) post FAi. Eleven of the 18 eyes (61%) had ≥ 5 recurrences of uveitis since diagnosis, with an average time to recurrence of approximately 12 weeks (range: 1 to 27). All eyes treated with the 0.18-mg FAi showed reduced NIU-PS recurrence and visual and anatomical improvement, as measured by VA and CST, respectively. Two eyes had an IOP elevation that was managed with topical therapy, and one eye was treated with topical prednisolone for additional inflammation management. Two eyes required adjunct therapy with short-acting intravitreal corticosteroids at 7 and 16 weeks for NIU-PS recurrence after 0.18-mg FAi insertion. CONCLUSION: After receiving the 0.18-mg FAi, eyes with uncontrolled NIU-PS had sustained resolution of CME and inflammation with limited need for supplementary steroid drops or injections and minimal steroid class-specific adverse effects; none required incisional IOP-lowering surgery.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C and D Signaling Pathways as Potential Targets for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Narrative Review.

The development of treatments targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathways have traditionally been firstly investigated in oncology and then advanced into retinal disease indications. Members of the VEGF family of endogenous ligands and their respective receptors play a central role in vasculogenesis and angiogenesis during both development and physiological homeostasis. They can also play a pathogenic role in cancer and retinal diseases. Therapeutic approaches have mostly focused on targeting VEGF-A signaling; however, research has shown that VEGF-C and VEGF-D signaling pathways are also important to the disease pathogenesis of tumors and retinal diseases. This review highlights the important therapeutic advances and the remaining unmet need for improved therapies targeting additional mechanisms beyond VEGF-A. Additionally, it provides an overview of alternative VEGF-C and VEGF-D signaling involvement in both health and disease, highlighting their key contributions in the multifactorial pathophysiology of retinal disease including neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Strategies for targeting VEGF-C/-D signaling pathways will also be reviewed, with an emphasis on agents currently being developed for the treatment of nAMD.

Development of a Consensus Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Noninfectious Uveitis Affecting the Posterior Segment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A consensus exercise was carried out to address unmet needs in the classification, diagnosis, and management of patients with chronic noninfectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment (NIU-PS), with a focus on chronic postoperative inflammation/cystoid macular edema. METHODS: Eight experts participated in roundtable discussions and consensus-building exercises to develop clear guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic NIU-PS. The group addressed questions surrounding clinical features, diagnostic tests, and treatment considerations. RESULTS: Clinicians agreed that chronic uveitis/intraocular inflammation should be defined as having persistence or recurrence for 3 or more months. Diagnosis is informed by evaluation of signs and symptoms, use of imaging, and exclusion of infectious etiologies. Management should be initiated with the least invasive therapies, proceeding to intraocular injections, and/or long-term intravitreal or systemic therapies, as necessary. CONCLUSION: This manuscript offers an up-to-date consensus guideline based on clinical experience. Future clinical trials may help to test and reevaluate these recommendations. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:XX-XX.].

Ocular, Visual, and Anatomical Outcomes in Eyes Requiring Incisional Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Surgery Following the 0.19-mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To assess ocular, visual, and anatomical outcomes following the 0.19-mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN®) and incisional intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering surgery in diabetic macular edema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From a 36-month, phase 4, open-label, observational study (N = 202 eyes, 159 patients), 8 eyes (7 patients) required IOP-lowering surgery post-FAc; eyes were segregated by FAc-induced (n = 5, 2.47%) versus neovascular glaucoma (NVG)-related (n = 3, 1.49%) IOP elevations and assessed for IOP, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and cup-to-disc ratio (c/d). RESULTS: Changes at 36 months were +5.4 letters BCVA (P > 0.05) and +0.09 c/d (P = 0.0217); IOP and CST were unchanged. FAc-induced-group eyes required fewer IOP-lowering medications than NVG-group eyes (2.0 versus 4.0; P < 0.01) but for longer duration (15.2 versus 2.6 months; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Post-FAc IOP-lowering surgery, regardless of cause, largely did not affect the outcomes measured; these procedures, then, may not meaningfully threaten positive outcomes. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:22-29.].

Screen Failures in Clinical Trials in Retina.

PURPOSE: Disparities in clinical trials are a major problem because of significant underrepresentation of certain gender, racial, and ethnic groups. Several factors including stringent eligibility criteria and recruitment strategies hinder our understanding of retinal disease. Thus, we aimed to study the various reasons of screen failures and specific patient and study characteristics among screen failures. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional retrospective study. METHODS: Screening data of 87 trials from 6 centers were analyzed. Study characteristics (disease studied, phase of trial, and route of drug administration) and patient demographics (age, gender, race, ethnicity, and employment status) were compared among different causes of screen failures. Screen failures were broadly classified into 6 categories: exclusion because of vision-based criteria, exclusion because of imaging findings, exclusion because of other factors, patient-related criteria, physician-related criteria, and miscellaneous. Descriptive statistics, Pearson chi-square test, and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of various reasons for screen failures in multiple trials and its trend among different study and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Among 87 trials and 962 patients, 465 (48.2%) patients were successfully randomized and 497 (51.8%) patients were classified as screen failures. The trials were conducted for various retinal diseases. Mean age was 76.50 ±10.45 years and 59.4% were females. Predominantly White patients (93.4%) and unemployed/retired patients (66.6%) were screened. Of the 497 screen failures, most were because of patients not meeting inclusion criteria of imaging findings (n = 221 [44.5%]) followed by inclusion of vision-based criteria (n = 73 [14.7%]), exclusion because of other factors (n = 75 [15.1%]), patient-related (n = 34 [6.8%]), physician-related (n = 28 [5.6%]), and miscellaneous reasons (n = 39 [7.8%]). Reason for screen failure was not available for 27 (5.4%) patients. A higher proportion of patients screened for surgical trials (15%) declined to participate in the study compared with noninvasive trials involving topical drugs and photobiomodulation (0%) (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients not meeting the imaging and vision-cased criteria were the most common reasons for screen failures. White patients and unemployed patients predominantly participated in clinical trials. Patients are more inclined to continue participation in noninvasive clinical trials compared with surgical trials. Better recruitment strategies and careful consideration of study criteria can aid in decreasing the rate of screen failures.

Endophthalmitis in Eyes Treated with the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab: Summary of Cases during Clinical Trial Development.

PURPOSE: The Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) is approved in the United States for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The United States Prescribing Information has a Boxed Warning for endophthalmitis and reports the incidence rate in patients developing endophthalmitis after receiving the PDS compared with monthly intravitreal ranibizumab. Endophthalmitis cases noted in the Boxed Warning, treatment outcomes, potential contributing factors, and potential mitigations are summarized. DESIGN: Retrospective review of endophthalmitis cases in PDS-treated patients in the phase II Ladder (NCT02510794) and phase III Archway (NCT03677934) and Portal (NCT03683251) trials. PARTICIPANTS: Endophthalmitis cases in the pooled all-PDS safety population (N = 555) including PDS patients in Ladder, Archway, or Portal. METHODS: Ladder patients received PDS (10, 40, or 100 mg/ml) with pro re nata refill-exchanges. Archway patients received PDS 100 mg/ml with fixed refill-exchanges every 24 weeks (PDS Q24W). Portal patients received PDS Q24W from day 1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical features, management, and visual outcomes were summarized. Cases were summarized by date of PDS implant and/or refill, other prior invasive procedures/refills, and preceding/concurrent conjunctival complications. RESULTS: Twelve endophthalmitis events were reported in 11 patients (11/555 [2.0%]) through March 12, 2021. All were cultured (3 were culture positive) and treated with intravitreal antibiotics. Two cases (2/555 [0.4%]) occurred in the immediate postoperative period (days 5 and 6). Nine cases occurred later (day range: 57-853), including 4 before the first refill-exchange (day range: 57-161). Five patients received between 1 and 11 refill-exchanges before the event (onset: 6-168 days after last refill-exchange). Seven cases (7/11 [63.6%]) had preceding/concurrent conjunctival complications. At last follow-up, 7 patients recovered vision to study baseline levels or ≥20/40; 4 patients experienced vision loss of ≥15 ETDRS letters. CONCLUSIONS: Endophthalmitis is a serious complication that can endanger vision after any ocular procedure, including PDS implantation. Most, but not all, of this limited series of endophthalmitis cases were late onset, associated with conjunctival breach, and recovered vision with treatment. Meticulous attention to PDS surgical techniques with vigilant monitoring of conjunctiva during follow-up may minimize risk of endophthalmitis. Prompt treatment is critical for optimizing patient outcomes. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Phase I DAVIO Trial: EYP-1901 Bioerodible, Sustained-Delivery Vorolanib Insert in Patients With Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Purpose: To evaluate safety and tolerability of EYP-1901, an intravitreal insert containing vorolanib, a pan-VEGF receptor inhibitor packaged in a bioerodible delivery technology (Durasert E™) for sustained delivery, in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) previously treated with anti-VEGF therapy. Design: Phase I, multicenter, prospective, open-label, dose-escalation trial. Participants: Patients with wAMD and evidence of prior anti-VEGF therapy response. Methods: Patients received a single intravitreal injection of EYP-1901. Main Outcome Measures: The primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability of EYP-1901. Secondary objectives assessed biologic activity of EYP-1901 including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST). Exploratory analyses included reduction in anti-VEGF treatment burden and supplemental injection-free rates. Results: Seventeen patients enrolled in the 440 µg (3 patients), 1030 µg (1 patient), 2060 µg (8 patients), and 3090 µg (5 patients) dose cohorts. No dose-limiting toxicity, ocular serious adverse events (AEs), or systemic AEs related to EYP-1901 were observed. There was no evidence of ocular or systemic toxicity related to vorolanib or the delivery technology. Moderate ocular treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) included reduced visual acuity (2/17) and retinal exudates (3/17). One patient with reduced BCVA had 3 separate reductions of 17, 18, and 16 letters, and another had a single drop of 25 letters. One severe TEAE, neovascular AMD (i.e., worsening/progressive disease activity), was reported in 1 of 17 study eyes but deemed unrelated to treatment. Mean change from baseline in BCVA was -1.8 letters and -5.4 letters at 6 and 12 months. Mean change from baseline in CST was +1.7 µm and +2.4 µm at 6 and 12 months. Reduction in treatment burden was 74% and 71% at 6 and 12 months. Of 16 study eyes, 13, 8, and 5 were injection-free up to 3, 6, and 12 months. Conclusion: In the DAVIO trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04747197), EYP-1901 had a favorable safety profile and was well tolerated in previously treated eyes with wAMD. Measures of biologic activity remained relatively stable following a single EYP-1901 injection. These preliminary data support ongoing phase II and planned phase III trials to assess efficacy and safety. Financial Disclosures: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Interim Results of the Phase III Portal Extension Trial of the Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: The Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) is approved in the United States for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Portal (NCT03683251) is evaluating long-term safety and tolerability of the PDS in patients with nAMD who completed the phase II Ladder (NCT02510794) or phase III Archway (NCT03677934) trials. DESIGN: Multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label, extension clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: All-PDS safety population (N = 555) comprises patients enrolled in Portal who completed Ladder or Archway. Due to data availability, efficacy population comprises Ladder-to-Portal patients only: patients who previously received PDS 10, 40, or 100 mg/ml pro re nata (as-needed [PRN]; n = 58, 62, 59, respectively) or monthly intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5-mg injections (monthly ranibizumab; n = 41) in Ladder and subsequently enrolled in Portal. METHODS: Ladder patients received PDS refill-exchanges PRN or monthly ranibizumab. Archway patients received PDS 100 mg/ml with fixed refill-exchanges every 24 weeks (PDS Q24W) or monthly ranibizumab. Once enrolled in Portal, all patients receive PDS Q24W from day 1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ocular adverse events of special interest (AESIs); changes from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and center point thickness (CPT); supplemental ranibizumab treatment between refill-exchange procedures; PDS Patient Preference Questionnaire results. RESULTS: In the All-PDS safety population (mean follow-up, 111 weeks), 137 (24.7%) patients had ≥ 1 ocular AESI; most common were cataract (11.4%), vitreous hemorrhage (6.1%), conjunctival thickening (bleb)/filtering bleb leak (6.3%). Endophthalmitis occurred in 11 of 555 (2.0%) patients. For Ladder-to-Portal patients previously treated with PDS 100 mg/ml or monthly ranibizumab, BCVA remained stable from baseline to month 48; mean (95% confidence interval) changes from baseline were 0.1 (-6.6, 6.8; n = 31) and 2.3 (-9.4, 14.1; n = 15) letters, respectively; CPT remained stable through month 48. Approximately 95% of patients did not need supplemental treatment before each refill-exchange for > 2 years since Portal enrollment. Of Ladder-to-Portal previous monthly ranibizumab patients, 92% preferred the PDS over injections. CONCLUSIONS: Interim results from Portal suggest 4-year maintenance of visual/anatomic outcomes with PDS 100 mg/ml, with the PDS preferred to monthly injections. Long-term safety profile of the PDS is well characterized.

Anti-VEGF Pharmaceutical Prior Authorization in Retina Practices.

Importance: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injections, a mainstay of treatment for many retinal diseases to optimize visual outcomes, have been included in prior authorization (PA) initiatives. However, if clinicians are extremely accurate in their use of anti-VEGF medications, such administrative burdens may need reconsideration. Objective: To quantify PA for anti-VEGF medications (aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab) that were approved and determine associated administrative burdens experienced by retina practices. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective multicenter quality improvement study conducted from January 2022 through June 2022, and participants were 9 private retina practices across the US. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall rate of approval of PA requests, reasons for requesting PA, and overall rate of delay of care resulting from PA procedures. Results: In total, 2365 PA requests were recorded, 2225 of which met inclusion criteria. Overall, 2140 (96.2%) requests were approved. The most common reason for requesting PA, at 64% (1423 of 2225 requests), was reauthorization for a previously utilized medication. Of the 2140 approvals, 59.6% (1277) resulted in a delay in care greater than 24 hours, and 40% (863) were given on the date of service. In a granular analysis of a subset of delayed approvals, 23.9% (173 of 725) were approved within 1 day, 15.9% (115 of 725) were approved within 2 to 3 days, 21.5% (156 of 725) were approved within 4 to 7 days, 26.3% (191 of 725) were approved within 8 to 31 days, and 12.4% (90 of 725) were approved within more than 31 days. Overall, PA denial for step therapy was 2.9% (65 of 2225) of requests and uncovered diagnoses was 0.9% (20 of 2225) of requests. The median staff time spent to obtain a single PA was 100 (range, 0-200) minutes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, PA requests were almost always approved but led to a delay in patient care in most patients. The current study suggests that the PA process may not be effective for retina specialists if these results can be generalized to other practices in the US and if less burdensome and less costly approaches could result in similar approval rates. Potential short-term solutions may include eliminating the PA process for bevacizumab and reauthorizations for established patients.

Biosimilars in the Treatment of Retinal Disease in the United States.

Biosimilars have recently emerged into the vitreoretinal pharmaceutical market. This review defines biosimilars, discusses the approval process, and reviews the benefits, risks, and controversies regarding biosimilars. This review also discusses ranibizumab biosimilars that have recently received United States Food and Drug Administration approval in the United States and discusses anti-vascular endothelial growth factor biosimilars that are in development. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:362-366.].

Bilateral Hypotony Maculopathy Associated With Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Therapy Unresponsive to Corticosteroid Treatment.

In rare instances, immunotherapy associated with hypotony and uveitis has been documented. We report the case of a 72-year-old man treated with 2 months of ipilimumab and nivolumab for metastatic melanoma who developed bilateral hypotony maculopathy and serous choroidal detachments without prominent initial uveitis. Despite treatment with topical, periocular, and intraocular corticosteroid injection, hypotony persisted 18 months after immunotherapy cessation. The patient's unresponsiveness to corticosteroids indicates the need to further explore the mechanism behind immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated hypotony. We hypothesize that immunotherapy significantly decreased aqueous humor production through ciliary body inflammation, disruption, or shutdown. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:301-304.].

The 0.19-mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: An Expert Consensus.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To better understand the level of agreement among retina specialists on the role of inflammation in diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME), and the use of 0.19-mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant in DME treatment, a consensus survey was drafted and disseminated to retina specialists across the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the modified Delphi method, a list of 12 consensus statements were generated by the coauthors based on short-answer responses to an initial survey. In total, 56 retina specialists completed the entire consensus survey. Except for two multiple-choice questions, there were 10 consensus statements that used a modified Likert scale to indicate their level of agreement to the statement: Agree = 3, Mostly Agree = 2, Mostly Disagree = 1, Disagree = 0. Percentage agreement and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and a consensus threshold was set at > 80% agreement for each statement. RESULTS: Seven of 10 consensus statements using the modified Likert scale reached consensus, including those on the role of inflammation in pathophysiology of DR/DME, injection burden and patient adherence, and efficacy and safety of the FAc implant. The remaining three statements displayed high agreement with average scores > 80%, but the 95% CIs were below threshold. These included the impact of the FAc implant on DR progression, FAc as baseline therapy for DME, and the effectiveness of the steroid challenge to mitigate intraocular pressure risk after FAc use. Two multiple-choice questions focused on clinical situations in which corticosteroids would be used as baseline therapy for DME (pseudophakic eye [73%], recent stroke/myocardial infarction [66%], and pregnancy/breastfeeding [66%]) and which delivery route satisfies the steroid challenge for the FAc implant (intravitreal [100%], sub-tenon/periocular [73%], and topical [57%]). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians highly agreed on the role of inflammation in pathophysiology of DR/DME, injection burden and patient adherence, and efficacy and safety of the FAc implant. However, full consensus was not found on the impact of the FAc implant on DR progression, FAc as baseline therapy for DME, and the effectiveness of the steroid challenge to mitigate intraocular pressure risk after FAc use. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2023;54(3):166-173.].