Trial of Thrombectomy for Stroke with a Large Infarct of Unrestricted Size.

BACKGROUND: The use of thrombectomy in patients with acute stroke and a large infarct of unrestricted size has not been well studied. METHODS: We assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with proximal cerebral vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation and a large infarct (as defined by an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic Score of ≤5; values range from 0 to 10) detected on magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography within 6.5 hours after symptom onset to undergo endovascular thrombectomy and receive medical care (thrombectomy group) or to receive medical care alone (control group). The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability). The primary safety outcome was death from any cause at 90 days, and an ancillary safety outcome was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. RESULTS: A total of 333 patients were assigned to either the thrombectomy group (166 patients) or the control group (167 patients); 9 were excluded from the analysis because of consent withdrawal or legal reasons. The trial was stopped early because results of similar trials favored thrombectomy. Approximately 35% of the patients received thrombolysis therapy. The median modified Rankin scale score at 90 days was 4 in the thrombectomy group and 6 in the control group (generalized odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 2.06; P<0.001). Death from any cause at 90 days occurred in 36.1% of the patients in the thrombectomy group and in 55.5% of those in the control group (adjusted relative risk, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.84), and the percentage of patients with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was 9.6% and 5.7%, respectively (adjusted relative risk, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.78 to 4.68). Eleven procedure-related complications occurred in the thrombectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute stroke and a large infarct of unrestricted size, thrombectomy plus medical care resulted in better functional outcomes and lower mortality than medical care alone but led to a higher incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. (Funded by Montpellier University Hospital; LASTE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03811769.).

Oxygen Extraction Fraction Mapping on Admission Magnetic Resonance Imaging May Predict Recovery of Hyperacute Ischemic Brain Lesions After Successful Thrombectomy: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: In acute stroke, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is used to assess the ischemic core. Dynamic-susceptibility contrast perfusion magnetic resonance imaging allows an estimation of the oxygen extraction fraction (OEF), but the outcome of DWI lesions with increased OEF postrecanalization is unclear. This study investigated the impact of OEF on the fate of DWI lesions in patients achieving recanalization after thrombectomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the HIBISCUS-STROKE cohort (Cohort of Patients to Identify Biological and Imaging Markers of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Stroke; NCT: 03149705), a single-center observational study that prospectively enrolled patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging triage for thrombectomy and a day-6 T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging. Automated postprocessing of admission dynamic-susceptibility contrast perfusion magnetic resonance imaging generated OEF maps. At visual analysis, the OEF status within DWI lesions was assessed in comparison to the contralateral side and correlated with volume changes (difference of ischemic lesion between admission DWI and registered day-6 T2-FLAIR). At voxel-based analysis, recovered DWI regions (lesions present on the admission DWI but absent on the registered day-6 T2-FLAIR) and nonrecovered regions were segmented to extract semiquantitative OEF values. RESULTS: Of the participants enrolled from 2016 to 2022, 134 of 321 (41.7%) were included (median age, 71.0 years; 58.2% male; median baseline National Institutes of Health Scale score, 15.0). At visual analysis, 46 of 134 (34.3%) patients had increased OEF within DWI lesions. These patients were more likely to show a reduction in ischemic lesion volumes compared with those without increased OEF (median change, -4.0 versus 4.8 mL; P<0.0001). Multivariable analysis indicated that increased OEF within DWI lesions was associated with a reduction in ischemic lesion volumes from admission DWI to day-6 T2-FLAIR (odds ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.49-0.87]; P=0.008). At voxel-based analysis, recovered DWI regions had increased OEF, while nonrecovered regions had decreased OEF (median, 126.9% versus -27.0%; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased OEF within hyperacute DWI lesions was associated with ischemic lesion recovery between admission DWI and day-6 T2-FLAIR in patients achieving recanalization after thrombectomy. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03149705.

Value of intravenous thrombolysis in endovascular treatment for large-vessel anterior circulation stroke: individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis is recommended before endovascular treatment, but its value has been questioned in patients who are admitted directly to centres capable of endovascular treatment. Existing randomised controlled trials have indicated non-inferiority of endovascular treatment alone or have been statistically inconclusive. We formed the Improving Reperfusion Strategies in Acute Ischaemic Stroke collaboration to assess non-inferiority of endovascular treatment alone versus intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis to establish non-inferiority of endovascular treatment alone versus intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment. We searched PubMed and MEDLINE with the terms "stroke", "endovascular treatment", "intravenous thrombolysis", and synonyms for articles published from database inception to March 9, 2023. We included randomised controlled trials on the topic of interest, without language restrictions. Authors of the identified trials agreed to take part, and individual participant data were provided by the principal investigators of the respective trials and collated centrally by the collaborators. Our primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Non-inferiority of endovascular treatment alone was assessed using a lower boundary of 0·82 for the 95% CI around the adjusted common odds ratio (acOR) for shift towards improved outcome (analogous to 5% absolute difference in functional independence) with ordinal regression. We used mixed-effects models for all analyses. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023411986. FINDINGS: We identified 1081 studies, and six studies (n=2313; 1153 participants randomly assigned to receive endovascular treatment alone and 1160 randomly assigned to receive intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular treatment) were eligible for analysis. The risk of bias of the included studies was low to moderate. Variability between studies was small, and mainly related to the choice and dose of the thrombolytic drug and country of execution. The median mRS score at 90 days was 3 (IQR 1-5) for participants who received endovascular treatment alone and 2 (1-4) for participants who received intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment (acOR 0·89, 95% CI 0·76-1·04). Any intracranial haemorrhage (0·82, 0·68-0·99) occurred less frequently with endovascular treatment alone than with intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and mortality rates did not differ significantly. INTERPRETATION: We did not establish non-inferiority of endovascular treatment alone compared with intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular treatment in patients presenting directly at endovascular treatment centres. Further research could focus on cost-effectiveness analysis and on individualised decisions when patient characteristics, medication shortages, or delays are expected to offset a potential benefit of administering intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular treatment. FUNDING: Stryker and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam.

Cerebral collaterals are associated with pre-treatment brain-blood barrier permeability in acute ischemic stroke patients.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the relationship between collaterals and blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability on pre-treatment MRI in a cohort of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with thrombectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the HIBISCUS-STROKE cohort, a single-center observational study that enrolled patients treated with thrombectomy from 2016 to 2022. Dynamic-susceptibility MRIs were post-processed to generate K2 maps with arrival-time correction, which were co-registered with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. The 90th percentile of K2 was extracted from the infarct core-defined by an ADC ≤ 620 × 10-6 mm2/s with manual adjustments-and expressed as a percentage change compared to the contralateral white matter. Collaterals were assessed using pre-thrombectomy digital subtraction arteriography with an ASITN/SIR score < 3 defining poor collaterals. RESULTS: Out of 249 enrolled, 101 (40.6%) were included (median age: 72.0 years, 52.5% of males, median NIHSS score at admission: 15.0). Patients with poor collaterals (n = 44) had worse NIHSS scores (median: 16.0 vs 13.0, p = 0.04), larger infarct core volumes (median: 43.7 mL vs 9.5 mL, p < 0.0001), and higher increases in K2 (median: 346.3% vs 152.7%, p = 0.003). They were less likely to achieve successful recanalization (21/44 vs 51/57, p < 0.0001) and experienced more frequent hemorrhagic transformation (16/44 vs 9/57, p = 0.03). On multiple variable analysis, poor collaterals were associated with larger infarct cores (odds ratio (OR) = 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): [1.07, 1.17], p < 0.0001) and higher increases in K2 (OR = 6.63, 95% CI: [2.19, 20.08], p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Poor collaterals are associated with larger infarct cores and increased BBB permeability at admission MRI. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Poor collaterals are associated with a larger infarct core and increased BBB permeability at admission MRI of AIS patients treated with thrombectomy. These findings may have translational interests for extending thrombolytic treatment eligibility and developing neuroprotective strategies. KEY POINTS: In AIS, collaterals and BBB disruption have been both linked to hemorrhagic transformation. Poor collaterals were associated with larger ischemic cores and increased BBB permeability on pre-treatment MRI. These findings could contribute to hemorrhagic transformation risk stratification, thereby refining clinical decision-making for reperfusion therapies.

Iatrogenic arterial vasospasm during mechanical thrombectomy requiring treatment with intra-arterial nimodipine might be associated with worse outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Vasospasm is a common iatrogenic event during mechanical thrombectomy (MT). In such circumstances, intra-arterial nimodipine administration is occasionally considered. However, its use in the treatment of iatrogenic vasospasm during MT has been poorly studied. We investigated the impact of iatrogenic vasospasm treated with intra-arterial nimodipine on outcomes after MT for large vessel occlusion stroke. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the multicenter observational registry Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS). Consecutive patients treated with MT between January 2015 and December 2022 were included. Patients treated with medical treatment alone, without MT, were excluded. We also excluded patients who received another in situ vasodilator molecule during the procedure. Outcomes were compared according to the occurrence of cervical and/or intracranial arterial vasospasm requiring intraoperative use of in situ nimodipine based on operator's decision, using a propensity score approach. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included excellent outcome (mRS score 0-1), final recanalization, mortality, intracranial hemorrhage and procedural complications. Secondary analyses were performed according to the vasospasm location (intracranial or cervical). RESULTS: Among 13,678 patients in the registry during the study period, 434 received intra-arterial nimodipine for the treatment of MT-related vasospasm. In the main analysis, comparable odds of favorable outcome were observed, whereas excellent outcome was significantly less frequent in the group with vasospasm requiring nimodipine (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.97). Perfect recanalization, defined as a final modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction score of 3 (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.93), was also rarer in the vasospasm group. Intracranial vasospasm treated with nimodipine was significantly associated with worse clinical outcome (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.45-0.92), in contrast to the cervical location (aOR 1.37, 95% CI 0.54-3.08). CONCLUSION: Arterial vasospasm occurring during the MT procedure and requiring intra-arterial nimodipine administration was associated with worse outcomes, especially in case of intracranial vasospasm. Although this study cannot formally differentiate whether the negative consequences were due to the vasospasm itself, or nimodipine administration or both, there might be an important signal toward a substantial clinical impact of iatrogenic vasospasm during MT.

Time to Treatment With Intravenous Thrombolysis Before Thrombectomy and Functional Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.

Importance: The benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke declines with longer time from symptom onset, but it is not known whether a similar time dependency exists for IVT followed by thrombectomy. Objective: To determine whether the benefit associated with IVT plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone decreases with treatment time from symptom onset. Design, Setting, and Participants: Individual participant data meta-analysis from 6 randomized clinical trials comparing IVT plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone. Enrollment was between January 2017 and July 2021 at 190 sites in 15 countries. All participants were eligible for IVT and thrombectomy and presented directly at thrombectomy-capable stroke centers (n = 2334). For this meta-analysis, only patients with an anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion were included (n = 2313). Exposure: Interval from stroke symptom onset to expected administration of IVT and treatment with IVT plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome analysis tested whether the association between the allocated treatment (IVT plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone) and disability at 90 days (7-level modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]; minimal clinically important difference for the rates of mRS scores of 0-2: 1.3%) varied with times from symptom onset to expected administration of IVT. Results: In 2313 participants (1160 in IVT plus thrombectomy group vs 1153 in thrombectomy alone group; median age, 71 [IQR, 62 to 78] years; 44.3% were female), the median time from symptom onset to expected administration of IVT was 2 hours 28 minutes (IQR, 1 hour 46 minutes to 3 hours 17 minutes). There was a statistically significant interaction between the time from symptom onset to expected administration of IVT and the association of allocated treatment with functional outcomes (ratio of adjusted common odds ratio [OR] per 1-hour delay, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72 to 0.97], P = .02 for interaction). The benefit of IVT plus thrombectomy decreased with longer times from symptom onset to expected administration of IVT (adjusted common OR for a 1-step mRS score shift toward improvement, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.13 to 1.96] at 1 hour, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.49] at 2 hours, and 1.04 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.23] at 3 hours). For a mRS score of 0, 1, or 2, the predicted absolute risk difference was 9% (95% CI, 3% to 16%) at 1 hour, 5% (95% CI, 1% to 9%) at 2 hours, and 1% (95% CI, -3% to 5%) at 3 hours. After 2 hours 20 minutes, the benefit associated with IVT plus thrombectomy was not statistically significant and the point estimate crossed the null association at 3 hours 14 minutes. Conclusions and Relevance: In patients presenting at thrombectomy-capable stroke centers, the benefit associated with IVT plus thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone was time dependent and statistically significant only if the time from symptom onset to expected administration of IVT was short.

Impact of Day 1 carotid patency on outcome in dissection-related tandem occlusions treated with mechanical thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: The clinical benefit of mechanical thrombectomy(MT) for stroke patients with tandem occlusion is similar to that of isolated intracranial occlusions. However, the management of cervical internal carotid artery(ICA) occlusion during the MT, particularly in the setting of carotid dissection, remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the clinical impact of cervical ICA patency at day 1 on 3-month functional outcome. METHODS: We collected data from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke, a prospective national registry in 30 French centers performing MT between January 2015 and January 2022. Inclusion criteria were consecutive tandem occlusions related to cervical ICA dissection treated with MT. Tandem occlusions of other etiology, isolated cervical ICA occlusions without intracranial thrombus and patients without day-1 ICA imaging were excluded. Primary endpoint was the 3-month functional outcome. Secondary endpoints included intracranial hemorrhage(ICH), excellent outcome, mortality and early neurological improvement. A sensitivity analysis was performed in patients with intracranial favorable recanalization after MT. RESULTS: During the study period, 137 patients were included of which 89(65%) presented ICA patency at day 1. The odds of favorable outcome did not significantly differ between patients with patent and occluded ICA at day 1(68.7 vs 59.1%;aOR=1.30;95%CI 0.56-3.00,p=0.54). Excellent outcome, early neurological improvement, mortality and ICH were also comparable between groups. Sensitivity analysis showed similar results. CONCLUSION: ICA patency at day 1 in patients with tandem occlusions related to dissection did not seem to influence functional outcome. Endovascular recanalization of the cervical ICA including stenting might not be systematically required in this setting.

Thrombectomy alone versus intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy in patients with stroke: an open-label, blinded-outcome, randomised non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether thrombectomy alone is equally as effective as intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy remains controversial. We aimed to determine whether thrombectomy alone would be non-inferior to intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy in patients presenting with acute ischaemic stroke. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, open-label, blinded-outcome trial in Europe and Canada, we recruited patients with stroke due to large vessel occlusion confirmed with CT or magnetic resonance angiography admitted to endovascular centres. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a centralised web server using a deterministic minimisation method to receive stent-retriever thrombectomy alone or intravenous alteplase plus stent-retriever thrombectomy. In both groups, thrombectomy was initiated as fast as possible with any commercially available Solitaire stent-retriever revascularisation device (Medtronic, Irvine, CA, USA). In the combined treatment group, intravenous alteplase (0·9 mg/kg bodyweight, maximum dose 90 mg per patient) was administered as early as possible after randomisation for 60 min with 10% of the calculated dose given as an initial bolus. Personnel assessing the primary outcome were masked to group allocation; patients and treating physicians were not. The primary binary outcome was a score of 2 or less on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days. We assessed the non-inferiority of thrombectomy alone versus intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy in all randomly assigned and consenting patients using the one-sided lower 95% confidence limit of the Mantel-Haenszel risk difference, with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 12%. The main safety endpoint was symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage assessed in all randomly assigned and consenting participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03192332, and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Between Nov 29, 2017, and May 7, 2021, 5215 patients were screened and 423 were randomly assigned, of whom 408 (201 thrombectomy alone, 207 intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy) were included in the primary efficacy analysis. A modified Rankin scale score of 0-2 at 90 days was reached by 114 (57%) of 201 patients assigned to thrombectomy alone and 135 (65%) of 207 patients assigned to intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy (adjusted risk difference -7·3%, 95% CI -16·6 to 2·1, lower limit of one-sided 95% CI -15·1%, crossing the non-inferiority margin of -12%). Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage occurred in five (2%) of 201 patients undergoing thrombectomy alone and seven (3%) of 202 patients receiving intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy (risk difference -1·0%, 95% CI -4·8 to 2·7). Successful reperfusion was less common in patients assigned to thrombectomy alone (182 [91%] of 201 vs 199 [96%] of 207, risk difference -5·1%, 95% CI -10·2 to 0·0, p=0·047). INTERPRETATION: Thrombectomy alone was not shown to be non-inferior to intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy and resulted in decreased reperfusion rates. These results do not support omitting intravenous alteplase before thrombectomy in eligible patients. FUNDING: Medtronic and University Hospital Bern.

Brush sign and collateral supply as potential markers of large infarct growth after successful thrombectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationships between brush sign and cerebral collateral status on infarct growth after successful thrombectomy. METHODS: HIBISCUS-STROKE cohort includes acute ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombectomy after MRI triage and undergoing a day-6 MRI including FLAIR images to quantify final infarct volume (FIV). Successful reperfusion was defined as a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score ≥ 2B. Infarct growth was calculated by subtracting FIV from baseline ischemic core after co-registration and considered large (LIG) when > 11.6 mL. Brush sign was assessed on T2*-weighted-imaging and collaterals were assessed using the hypoperfusion intensity ratio, which is the volume of Time-To-Tmax (Tmax) ≥ 10 s divided by the volume of Tmax ≥ 6 s. Good collaterals were defined by a hypoperfusion intensity ratio < 0.4. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients were included, of whom 45 (34.9%) had a brush sign and 63 (48.8%) good collaterals. Brush sign was associated with greater infarct growth (p = 0.01) and larger FIV (p = 0.02). Good collaterals were associated with a smaller baseline ischemic core (p < 0.001), larger penumbra (p = 0.04), and smaller FIV (p < 0.001). Collateral status was not significantly associated with brush sign (p = 0.20) or with infarct growth (p = 0.67). Twenty-eight (22.5%) patients experienced LIG. Univariate regressions indicated that brush sign (odds ratio (OR) = 4.8; 95% confidence interval (CI): [1.9;13.3]; p = 0.004) and hemorrhagic transformation (OR = 1.7; 95%CI: [1.2;2.6]; p = 0.04) were predictive of LIG. In multivariate regression, only the brush sign remained predictive of LIG (OR = 5.2; 95%CI: [1.8-16.6], p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Brush sign is a predictor of LIG after successful thrombectomy and cerebral collateral status is not. KEY POINTS: • Few predictors of ischemic growth are known in ischemic stroke patients achieving successful mechanical thrombectomy. • Our results suggest that the brush sign-a surrogate marker of severe hypoperfusion-is independently associated with large ischemic growth (> 11.6 mL) after successful thrombectomy whereas cerebral collateral status does not.

Ultra-Early "Fishmouth stenosis" and thrombosis of a Surpass Evolve flow diversion device following treatment of multiples right siphon aneurysms.

We present a case of ultra-early symptomatic fish-mouth type stenosis (FMTS) of a Surpass Evolve flow diverter stent (SE-FDS) occurring within 24 h after deployment for the treatment of multiple unruptured right siphon aneurysms in a 44-year-old patient. The patient developed left hemiplegia and hemineglect, and was treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and Tirofiban infusion. This is the first report of an ultra-early FMTS with a SE-FDS and its mechanism is discussed in the light of available data in the literature.

Is the optimal Tmax threshold identifying perfusion deficit volumes variable across MR perfusion software packages? A pilot study.

PURPOSE: Accurate quantification of ischemic core and ischemic penumbra is mandatory for late-presenting acute ischemic stroke. Substantial differences between MR perfusion software packages have been reported, suggesting that the optimal Time-to-Maximum (Tmax) threshold may be variable. We performed a pilot study to assess the optimal Tmax threshold of two MR perfusion software packages (A: RAPID®; B: OleaSphere®) by comparing perfusion deficit volumes to final infarct volumes as ground truth. METHODS: The HIBISCUS-STROKE cohort includes acute ischemic stroke patients treated by mechanical thrombectomy after MRI triage. Mechanical thrombectomy failure was defined as a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score of 0. Admission MR perfusion were post-processed using two packages with increasing Tmax thresholds (≥ 6 s, ≥ 8 s and ≥ 10 s) and compared to final infarct volume evaluated with day-6 MRI. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included. Lengthening the threshold from ≥ 6 s to ≥ 10 s led to significantly smaller perfusion deficit volumes for both packages. For package A, Tmax ≥ 6 s and ≥ 8 s moderately overestimated final infarct volume (median absolute difference: - 9.5 mL, interquartile range (IQR) [- 17.5; 0.9] and 0.2 mL, IQR [- 8.1; 4.8], respectively). Bland-Altman analysis indicated that they were closer to final infarct volume and had narrower ranges of agreement compared with Tmax ≥ 10 s. For package B, Tmax ≥ 10 s was closer to final infarct volume (median absolute difference: - 10.1 mL, IQR: [- 17.7; - 2.9]) versus - 21.8 mL (IQR: [- 36.7; - 9.5]) for Tmax ≥ 6 s. Bland-Altman plots confirmed these findings (mean absolute difference: 2.2 mL versus 31.5 mL, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The optimal Tmax threshold for defining the ischemic penumbra appeared to be most accurate at ≥ 6 s for package A and ≥ 10 s for package B. This implies that the widely recommended Tmax threshold ≥ 6 s may not be optimal for all available MRP software package. Future validation studies are required to define the optimal Tmax threshold to use for each package.

Comparison of mechanical thrombectomy techniques in an in vitro stroke model: How to obtain a first pass recanalization?

BACKGROUND: Since mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has proven to be effective in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), significant research has been dedicated to establishing procedural techniques offering best rate of first pass effect (FPE). In this study, we compared the efficacy of different techniques in vitro to achieve the first pass recanalisation (FPR). METHODS: In vitro MT procedures were performed using a realistic silicone model of the human cerebral vasculature. The MT with stent retriever (SR) were performed with manual co-aspiration through the respective access catheter and intermediate catheter (IC), with Solumbra or partial retrieval techniques into the IC. Two SRs (Solitaire and EmboTrap) were selected to retrieve both red blood cells (RBC) rich and fibrin-rich clots. FPR rates were recorded for each case. RESULTS: Overall, 144 MT were performed. FPR rates using the partial retrieval and Solumbra technique were of 100% and 87%, respectively (p = 0.01). The rate of FPR was of 92% using the balloon-guide catheter (BGC) compared to 64% with the guide catheter (GC) (p = 0.0001). With an IC, no differences were found between using a BGC or a GC (87.9% vs 89,6%, p = 0.75). No significant difference was observed between the Embotrap and the Solitaire device for the rate of FPR (82% and 74%, respectively; p = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, FPR rates were higher with the use of an IC associated with the partial retrieval technique, regardless the guide catheter, the SR, or the clot composition. The less effective technique was the association of GC and SR, without an IC.

Effects of weather conditions on endovascular treatment case volume for patients with ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Weather conditions have been shown to influence the occurrence of cardiovascular events. We tested the hypothesis that weather parameters may be associated with variations of case volume of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Individual data from the ETIS (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) French national registry were matched to local weather stations. Meteorological parameters (rainfall, humidity, atmospheric pressure, air temperature) were gathered from national online resources. Weather readings and EVT case volumes were annually standardized per weather station and EVT center, and their associations tested with non-parametric univariable and generalized linear statistical models. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2021, 9913 EVT procedures addressed by 135 primary stroke units were matched to weather conditions. The mean daily case volume per center was 0.41 [StDev 0.33], and there was a median of 0.84 procedures daily linked to a weather station [StDev 0.47]. We found lower atmospheric pressure (ß estimate -0.04; 95%CI[-0.07;-0.03], p<0.001), higher humidity (ß estimate 0.07; 95%CI [0.05;0.09], p<0.001) and lower temperatures (ß estimate -0.08; 95%CI[-0.10;-0.06], p<0.001) to be associated with higher standardized EVT daily case volumes. These associations were stable when testing them across strata of binned EVT standardized case volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that lower ambient temperature, lower atmospheric pressure, and higher air humidity are associated with significantly more daily EVT cases in a European temperate country. These results may provide insight into both system of care optimization at times of climate change and intracranial LVO pathophysiology. REGISTRATION-URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03776877.

Successful thrombectomy is beneficial in patients with pre-stroke disability: Results from an international multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pre-stroke disability, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥3, were excluded from most trials of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute stroke. We sought to evaluate the prognostic factors associated with favorable outcome in stroke patients with known disability undergoing EVT, and the impact of successful reperfusion. METHODS: Consecutive acute stroke patients with pre-stroke disability, undergoing EVT, were retrospectively collected between 2016 to 2019 from a Canadian cohort and a multicenter French cohort (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry-ETIS). Favorable outcome was defined as an mRS equal to pre-stroke mRS. Patients achieving successful reperfusion (defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b/3) were compared with patients without successful reperfusion to determine if successful EVT was associated with better functional outcomes. RESULTS: Among 6220 patients treated with EVT, 280 (4.5%) patients with a pre-stroke mRS ≥3 were included. Sixty-one patients (21.8%) had a favorable outcome and 146 (52.1%) died at 3 months. Patients with successful reperfusion had a higher proportion of favorable 90-day mRS (27.6% versus 19.6%, p = 0.025) and a lower mortality (48.3% versus 69.6%, p = 0.008) than patients without successful reperfusion. After adjusting for baseline prognostic factors, successful reperfusion defined by TICI ≥2b was associated with favorable functional outcome (OR 3.16 CI95% [1.11-11.5]; p 0.048). CONCLUSION: In patients with pre-stroke disability, successful reperfusion is associated with a greater proportion of favorable outcome and lower mortality.

Predictors of Outcome After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Stroke Patients Aged ≥85 Years.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in elderly stroke patients remains debated. We aimed to describe outcomes and their predictors in a cohort of patients aged ≥ 85 years treated with MT. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients aged ≥ 85 years undergoing MT at two stroke centers between January 2016 and November 2019 were reviewed. Admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), pre-stroke, and 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) were collected. Successful recanalization was defined as modified thrombolysis in cerebral ischemia score ≥ 2b. Good outcome was defined as mRS 0-3 or equal to pre-stroke mRS at 3 months. RESULTS: Of 151 included patients, successful recanalization was achieved in 74.2%. At 3 months, 44.7% of patients had a good outcome and 39% had died. Any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH occurred in 20.3% and 3.6%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis identified lower pre-stroke mRS score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36-0.76), lower admission NIHSS score (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.97), successful recanalization (aOR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.32-10.09), and absence of ICH on follow-up imaging (aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.08-0.75), to be independent predictors of good outcome. Patients with successful recanalization had a higher proportion of good outcome (45.3% vs 34.3%, p = 0.013) and lower mortality at 3 months (35.8% vs 48.6%, p = 0.006) compared to patients with unsuccessful recanalization. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients aged ≥ 85 years, successful recanalization with MT is relatively common and associated with better 3-month outcome and lower mortality than failed recanalization. Attempting to achieve recanalization in elderly patients using MT appears reasonable.

Cortical Spreading Depolarizations in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An Overview of Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.

Despite significant advances in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), morbidity and mortality remain devastating particularly for high-grade SAH. Poor functional outcome usually results from delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). The pathogenesis of DCI during aneurysmal SAH has historically been attributed to cerebral vasospasm, but spreading depolarizations (SDs) are now considered to play a central role in DCI. During SAH, SDs may produce an inverse hemodynamic response leading to spreading ischemia. Several animal models have contributed to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of SDs during aneurysmal SAH and provided new therapeutic approaches including N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Herein we review the current knowledge in the field of SDs' pathogenesis and we detail the key experimental and clinical studies that have opened interesting new therapeutic approaches to prevent DCI in aneurysmal SAH.

Benefit of mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke related to calcified cerebral embolus.

PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomies (MT) in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) related to calcified cerebral embolus (CCE) have been reported, through small case series, being associated with low reperfusion rate and worse outcome, compared to regular MT. The purpose of the MASC (Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Related to Calcified Cerebral Embolus) study was to evaluate the incidence of CCEs treated by MT and the effectiveness of MT in this indication. METHODS: The MASC study is a retrospective multicentric (n = 37) national study gathering the cases of adult patients who underwent MT for acute ischemic stroke with LVO related to a CCE in France from January 2015 to November 2019. Reperfusion rate (mTICI ≥ 2B), complication rate and 90-day mRS were systematically collected. We then conducted a systematic review by searching for articles in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Google Scholar from January 2015 to March 2020. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate clinical outcome at 90 days, reperfusion rate and complications. RESULTS: We gathered data from 35 patients. Reperfusion was obtained in 57% of the cases. Good clinical outcome was observed in 28% of the patients. The meta-analysis retrieved 136 patients. Reperfusion and good clinical outcome were obtained in 50% and 29% of the cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: The MASC study found worse angiographic and clinical outcomes compared to regular thrombectomies. Individual patient-based meta-analysis including the MASC findings shows a 50% reperfusion rate and a 29% of good clinical outcome.

Cervicobrachial neuralgia due to vertebral artery loop.

PURPOSE: The main anatomic variations should be taught along with the classical anatomy curriculum, since they can mislead both diagnosis and treatment. We report here a clinical and radiological case of left C6 cervicobrachial neuralgia recurrence due to a vertebral artery loop, we then describe 13 published cases of such neurovascular conflicts. CASE: A 51-year-old woman suffered from recurrence of C6 cervicobrachial neuralgia after an initial C5-C6 decompression-fusion. Additional cervical angio-MR and CT scans found a tortuous aspect of the left vertebral artery that came into conflict with the left C6 spinal root, just after its emergence of the C5-C6 intervertebral foramen. A large posterior decompression was performed including a C5 and C6 left lateral mass resection to enlarge the foraminal space. The vertebral artery was kept in place. The patient reported a slow but consistent decrease in pain that disappeared after 3 months. Thirteen cases of a compressive vertebral loop are thereafter detailed. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION: Vascular precursors disarrangements can lead to a vertebral artery loop in contact with emerging cervical roots and potential clinical impact. This differential diagnosis should be considered for cervico-brachial neuralgia management. Moreover, the present case highlights the key role of a careful preoperative imaging assessment, as well as the need for robust knowledge of anatomy.

European Multicenter Study of ET-COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion can be concurrent with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusion in patients with COVID-19 are substantially unknown. Our aim was to study early outcomes after MT in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Multicenter, European, cohort study involving 34 stroke centers in France, Italy, Spain, and Belgium. Data were collected between March 1, 2020 and May 5, 2020. Consecutive laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases with large vessel occlusion, who were treated with MT, were included. Primary investigated outcome: 30-day mortality. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: early neurological improvement (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale improvement ≥8 points or 24 hours National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 0-1), successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade ≥2b), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: We evaluated 93 patients with COVID-19 with large vessel occlusion who underwent MT (median age, 71 years [interquartile range, 59-79]; 63 men [67.7%]). Median pretreatment National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score were 17 (interquartile range, 11-21) and 8 (interquartile range, 7-9), respectively. Anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke represented 93.5% of cases. The rate modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b to 3 was 79.6% (74 patients [95% CI, 71.3-87.8]). Thirty-day mortality was 29% (27 patients [95% CI, 20-39.4]). Early neurological improvement was 19.5% (17 patients [95% CI, 11.8-29.5]), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 5.4% (5 patients [95% CI, 1.7-12.1]). Patients who died at 30 days exhibited significantly lower lymphocyte count, higher levels of aspartate, and LDH (lactate dehydrogenase). After adjustment for age, initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, and successful reperfusion, these biological markers remained associated with increased odds of 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio of 2.70 [95% CI, 1.21-5.98] per SD-log decrease in lymphocyte count, 2.66 [95% CI, 1.22-5.77] per SD-log increase in aspartate, and 4.30 [95% CI, 1.43-12.91] per SD-log increase in LDH). CONCLUSIONS: The 29% rate of 30-day mortality after MT among patients with COVID-19 is not negligible. Abnormalities of lymphocyte count, LDH and aspartate may depict a patient's profiles with poorer outcomes after MT. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04406090.

Large vessel cardioembolic stroke and embolic stroke of undetermined source share a common profile of matrix metalloproteinase-9 level and susceptibility vessel sign length.

BACKGROUND: Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) accounts for up to 25% of ischemic strokes. Identification of biomarkers that could improve the prediction of stroke subtype and subsequently of stroke prevention still remains a major issue. METHODS: The HIBISCUS-STROKE cohort includes ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy following admission magnetic resonance imaging. Presence and length of susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) were assessed by gradient-recalled echo T2*-weighted imaging. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) was measured on sera collected at admission. A multiple logistic regression model was performed to detect independent markers distinguishing cardioembolic (CE) from large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA) subtype. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were included, of them the etiology was distributed as follows: 86 (58.5%) CE, 26 (17.7%) LAA, and 35 (23.8%) ESUS. The optimal cutoff for differentiating CE from LAA subtype was 14.5 mm for SVS length (sensitivity, 79.7%; specificity, 72.7%) and 1110 ng/ml for admission MMP-9 level (sensitivity, 85.3%; specificity, 52.2%). Multivariate analysis revealed that current smoking (odds ratio [OR] 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.93), tandem occlusion (OR 0.01, 95% CI 0.01-0.21), SVS length (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.97), and admission MMP-9 level (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00) were inversely associated with CE subtype. SVS length and MMP-9 level did not differ between ESUS and CE subtypes. CONCLUSION: SVS length and admission MMP-9 level may improve the prediction of CE subtype whose profile is close to ESUS, thus suggesting a common cardiac embolic source.