RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Epicutaneo-Caval Catheters (ECCs) are critical for good neonatal care. No previous studies have evaluated which insertion method provides the highest likelihood of success. METHODS: This study aimed to compare the success rates and cost of modified Seldinger technique (MST) and split needle technique (SNT). MST was introduced to St Michael's Neonatal Unit, SNT was already in use. Routinely documented data on ECC insertion was retrospectively collected from the clinical notes. Practitioners were able to use their preferred insertion method. A sub-group analysis of success rates in patients born at ⩾35-weeks GA was performed. RESULTS: There was a significantly higher first pass (53% vs 26%; p = 0.014) and overall (72% vs 40%; p = 0.0046) successful ECC insertion rate with fewer venipunctures per successful ECC with MST (2.5 vs 6.5; p = 0.002). Logrank test demonstrated a significantly higher successful ECC insertion with MST for patients of all GA (p = 0.003) and for neonates born at ⩾35 weeks (p = 0.015). The cost per successful MST ECC was £156.41 versus £152.51 for SNT. CONCLUSION: In this uncontrolled retrospective study, there was a higher chance of successful ECC insertion with MST, with a reduced number of venipunctures and similar costs per successful ECC. Further work in randomised studies is needed to verify this finding and should focus on other clinical outcomes, including rates in central line associated blood stream infections.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Periférico , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , FlebotomíaRESUMEN
Ina 24-month-old girl with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and invasive aspergillosis, only combination therapy with liposomal amphotericin B and caspofungin achieved a good response. Combination therapy could be a useful treatment option in children with invasive fungal disease, but before it can be routinely recommended, carefully controlled in vivo studies and well-designed randomized clinical trials are needed.