Current Measurement Strategies of Coronal Tibiofemoral Subluxation: A Systematic Review of Literature.

OBJECTIVE. Coronal tibiofemoral (TF) subluxation has generated interest in the last several years due to newfound clinical implications of its presence. However, controversy within the literature concerning how to measure and calculate coronal TF subluxation on radiographic imaging remains. The purpose of this study was to describe how coronal TF subluxation is being measured and calculated in the literature with the goal of describing a reproducible and validated technique for clinical adoption. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A PubMed literature search was performed in March 2020 according to PRISMA guidelines. The terms "tibiofemoral subluxation" and "tibial femoral subluxation" were included in the search. Criteria of interest included radiographic view and evaluation, anatomic landmarks used, and measurement validity. RESULTS. Review of relevant literature resulted in 744 articles, 16 of which met our inclusion criteria. A wide range of measuring techniques, anatomic landmarks, and radiographic views were used with varying validity. Full-limb radiographic views were the most common. Six studies measured the translation of the mechanical axes of the tibia and femur. Eight studies measured the translation of either femoral condyle in reference to the tibial plateau. Coordinate-based software with the iterative closest point algorithm was used in two studies. Whether coronal TF subluxation should be divided by tibial plateau width to account for knee size was controversial. CONCLUSION. A variety of approaches exist for diagnosing and quantifying coronal TF subluxation because of the lack of clear anatomic landmarks within the TF joint that can be used to measure coronal TF subluxation in the horizontal plane. Even when using the same anatomic landmarks, studies varied on how to measure coronal TF subluxation radiographically and whether knee size should be accounted for. Further studies are necessary to standardize (via inter- and intraobserver validation with a control group) an easy, reproducible, and minimally biased approach to measuring coronal TF subluxation on radiographic imaging. We believe our systematic review succinctly provides the necessary information to either develop such a tool or encourage future studies to compare existing techniques to find the most reliable and clinically useful approach for evaluating coronal TF subluxation.

Word of Mouth and Online Reviews Are More Influential Than Social Media for Patients When Selecting a Sports Medicine Physician.

Purpose: To (1) identify the percentage of patients seen in an orthopaedic sports medicine practice who use social media and (2) identify the role that social media has in physician selection as compared with other factors. Methods: After institutional review board approval was received, new patients aged 18 years or older who attended a single orthopaedic sports medicine office from February 2020 to May 2021 were identified for inclusion. Sociodemographic information was recorded, and each patient was asked to fill out a questionnaire that assessed social media usage and online resources used to choose and formulate opinions regarding the patient's provider. Results: Two hundred patients met the inclusion criteria and completed the questionnaire. Of these, 96.5% reported social media use. The most common online method of searching for and identifying a physician was Google (50.5%). Social media outlets such as Facebook, Instagram, or LinkedIn were only used 15.5% of the time to search for and select a physician. Older patients were more likely to use recommendations from friends and family in their consideration when selecting a physician. Conclusions: Despite almost all participants stating that they use social media, only 15.5% of patients reported that they used social media to search for and potentially select their physician. Our study suggests that although social media can be a helpful tool for patient education, other factors such as physician education and physician reputation through word-of-mouth referrals, online reviews, and online ratings seem to play a larger role in the patient's selection of his or her physician. Clinical Relevance: This information may be of value to orthopaedic surgeons looking for ways to build their patient base, online reputation, or other aspects of their practice on the Internet.