CNS effects of a CCR5 inhibitor in HIV-infected subjects: a pharmacokinetic and cerebral metabolite study.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a pharmacokinetic and in vivo cerebral (1)H magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) study to assess CSF exposure and cerebral metabolite ratios (CMRs) following maraviroc intensification. METHODS: HIV-infected neurologically asymptomatic adults receiving tenofovir, emtricitabine and lopinavir/ritonavir with plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/mL were eligible and received intensified therapy with 150 mg of maraviroc twice daily. (1)H-MRS was performed in several cerebral locations, including the right basal ganglia (RBG), to assess CMRs, including N-acetyl aspartate/creatine (NAA/Cr), at baseline and after 14 days. Subsequently, on day 15, blood samples were obtained to determine plasma concentrations of maraviroc pre-dose (C(trough)) and then paired blood and CSF samples were collected at 4 or 6 h post-dose. Associations between maraviroc exposure, clinical parameters and changes to CMRs were evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00982878). RESULTS: Twelve subjects (75% male) participated with a mean (SD) CD4+ cell count of 503 (199) cells/µL. Mean (SD) maraviroc plasma concentrations at pre-dose, 4 h post-dose and 6 h post-dose were 337 (74), 842 (174) and 485 (100) ng/mL and CSF concentrations at 4 h post-dose and 6 h post-dose were 7.5 (1.3) and 5.1 (1.2) ng/mL. The mean maraviroc CSF : plasma ratio (range) was 1.01% (0.57%-1.61%). An increase of 14.8% was observed for the RBG NAA/Cr ratio, which was significantly associated with higher maraviroc plasma C(trough) (P = 0.05, r = 0.61), but not CSF concentration (P = 0.16, r = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: After 14 days of maraviroc intensification, small increases in cerebral metabolite markers of neuronal integrity (NAA/Cr ratios) were observed and are associated with maraviroc plasma C(trough).

Mouse DNA contamination in human tissue tested for XMRV.

BACKGROUND: We used a PCR-based approach to study the prevalence of genetic sequences related to a gammaretrovirus, xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus, XMRV, in human prostate cancer. This virus has been identified in the US in prostate cancer patients and in those with chronic fatigue syndrome. However, with the exception of two patients in Germany, XMRV has not been identified in prostate cancer tissue in Europe. Most putative associations of new or old human retroviruses with diseases have turned out to be due to contamination. We have looked for XMRV sequences in DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin- embedded prostate tissues. To control for contamination, PCR assays to detect either mouse mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) or intracisternal A particle (IAP) long terminal repeat DNA were run on all samples, owing to their very high copy number in mouse cells. RESULTS: In general agreement with the US prevalence, XMRV-like sequences were found in 4.8% of prostate cancers. However, these were also positive, as were 21.5% of XMRV-negative cases, for IAP sequences, and many, but not all were positive for mtDNA sequences. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that contamination with mouse DNA is widespread and detectable by the highly sensitive IAP assay, but not always with less sensitive assays, such as murine mtDNA PCR. This study highlights the ubiquitous presence of mouse DNA in laboratory specimens and offers a means of rigorous validation for future studies of murine retroviruses in human disease.

The effects of a nucleoside-sparing antiretroviral regimen on the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted darunavir in HIV type-1-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Nucleoside-sparing combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimens might be an attractive therapeutic option for HIV type-1 (HIV-1)-infected patients; however, the pharmacokinetic profiles of such regimens are frequently unknown. METHODS: Fourteen HIV-1-infected patients (age 21-55 years, 64% male) on stable cART with plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/ml entered this Phase I pharmacokinetic study. In period 1, patients received tenofovir/emtricitabine/-darunavir/ritonavir (300/200/800/100 mg) all once daily. During period 2, raltegravir 400 mg twice daily was added to the regimen and in period 3 tenofovir/emtricitabine was discontinued. At steady state, intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was undertaken. Differences in the geometric mean ratio (GMR) for pharmacokinetic parameters between periods 2 versus 1 and period 3 versus 1 were assessed for darunavir and ritonavir (period 3 versus 2 for raltegravir). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were observed between period 2 versus period 1. During period 3, darunavir GMR (95% confidence interval) values for trough and maximum plasma concentration (C(trough) and C(max)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and elimination half-life (t(1/2)) were 0.64 ng/ml (0.44-0.93), 1.05 ng/ml (0.90-1.24), 0.92 ng h/ml (0.78-1.08) and 0.69 h (0.46-1.05), respectively, when compared with period 1. No statistically significant changes were observed in ritonavir or raltegravir pharmacokinetic parameters. Darunavir C(trough)<550 ng/ml (the minimum effective concentration for protease-resistant HIV viral isolates) was observed in four patients during period 3 only. No clinically significant safety concerns were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Darunavir C(trough) is reduced by 36% when administered without tenofovir/emtricitabine in HIV-1-infected patients. This interaction might be of clinical significance in the management of individuals with protease-resistant HIV viral isolates.