Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 92
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 117(28): 16149-16153, 2020 Jul 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32606247

RESUMEN

The Atacama Large Millimeter Array has allowed a detailed observation of molecules in protoplanetary disks, which can evolve toward solar systems like our own. While CO, [Formula: see text], HCO, and [Formula: see text] are often abundant species in the cold zones of the disk, [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] are only found in a few regions, and more-complex organic molecules are not observed. We simulate, experimentally, ice processing in disks under realistic conditions, that is, layered ices irradiated by soft X-rays. X-ray emission from young solar-type stars is thousands of times brighter than that of today's sun. The ice mantle is composed of a [Formula: see text]:[Formula: see text]:[Formula: see text] mixture, covered by a layer made of [Formula: see text] and CO. The photoproducts found desorbing from both ice layers to the gas phase during the irradiation converge with those detected in higher abundances in the gas phase of protoplanetary disks, providing important insights on the nonthermal processes that drive the chemistry in these objects.

2.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 31(2): e13561, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35174571

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work is to evaluate the association of comorbidities with various outcomes in patients diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer who underwent surgery. Data were gathered on sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, disease course, and the EuroQol EQ-5D and EORTC QLQ-C30 scores, up to 5 years after surgery. The main outcomes of the study were mortality, complications, readmissions, reoperations, and changes in PROMs up to 5 years. Multivariable multilevel logistic regression models were used in the analyses. RESULTS: Mortality at some point during the 5-year follow-up was related to cardiocerebrovascular, hemiplegia and/or stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, cancer, and dementia. Similarly, complications were related to cardiovascular disease, COPD, diabetes, hepatitis, hepatic or renal pathologies, and dementia; readmissions to cardiovascular disease, COPD, and hepatic pathologies; and reoperations to cerebrovascular and diabetes. Finally, changes in EQ-5D scores at some point during follow-up were related to cardiocerebrovascular disease, COPD, diabetes, pre-existing cancer, hepatic and gastrointestinal pathologies, and changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores to cardiovascular disease, COPD, diabetes, and hepatic and gastrointestinal pathologies. CONCLUSIONS: Optimising the management of the comorbidities most strongly related to adverse outcomes may help to reduce those events in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias del Recto , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 97(4): E514-E517, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33197132

RESUMEN

Transcatheter closure of large apical muscular ventricular septal defects (VSDs) can be performed via transfemoral or hybrid approach. A very large apical muscular VSD was closed via a hybrid approach. A strategy for deployment of a right ventricular stay suture was utilized to minimize the risk of device embolization without the use of bypass and without externalization of a portion of the device.


Asunto(s)
Defectos del Tabique Interventricular , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Defectos del Tabique Interventricular/diagnóstico por imagen , Defectos del Tabique Interventricular/cirugía , Ventrículos Cardíacos , Humanos , Suturas , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 759, 2020 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32795358

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined gender differences in the clinical management of rectal cancer. We examine differences in stage at diagnosis and preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 22 hospitals in Spain including 770 patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. Study outcomes were disseminated disease at diagnosis and receiving preoperative radiotherapy. Age, comorbidity, referral from a screening program, diagnostic delay, distance from the anal verge, and tumor depth were considered as factors that might explain gender differences in these outcomes. RESULTS: Women were more likely to be diagnosed with disseminated disease among those referred from screening (odds ratio, confidence interval 95% (OR, CI = 7.2, 0.9-55.8) and among those with a diagnostic delay greater than 3 months (OR, CI = 5.1, 1.2-21.6). Women were less likely to receive preoperative radiotherapy if they were younger than 65 years of age (OR, CI = 0.6, 0.3-1.0) and if their tumors were cT3 or cT4 (OR, CI = 0.5, 0.4-0.7). CONCLUSIONS: The gender-specific sensitivity of rectal cancer screening tests, gender differences in referrals and clinical reasons for not prescribing preoperative radiotherapy in women should be further examined. If these gender differences are not clinically justifiable, their elimination might enhance survival.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Proctectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Diagnóstico Tardío/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Prospectivos , Radioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Recto/patología , Recto/cirugía , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , España/epidemiología
5.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(5): 2339-2350, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31485982

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of readmission and reoperation on colon or rectal cancer patients in clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and to identify predictors of these events up to 1 year after surgery. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer who underwent surgery at 1 of 22 hospitals. Medical history, clinical parameters, and PROMs were evaluated as possible predictors. Multivariable multilevel logistic regression and survival models were used in the analyses to create the clinical prediction rules. Models were developed in a derivation sample and validated in a different sample. RESULTS: Readmission and reoperation were related to clinical outcomes and changes in some PROMs. Predictors of readmission in colon cancer were ASA class (odds ratio (OR) 4.5), TNM (OR for TNM III 3.24, TNM IV 4.55), evidence of residual tumor (R2) (OR 3.96), and medical (OR 1.96) and infectious (OR 2.01) complications within 30 days after surgery, while for rectal cancer, the predictors identified were age (OR 1.03), R2 (OR 6.48), infectious complications within 30 days (OR 2.29), hemoglobin (OR 3.26), lymph node ratio (OR 2.35), and surgical complications within 1 month (OR 3.04). Predictors of reoperation were TNM IV (OR 5.06), surgical complications within 30 days (OR 1.98), and type and site of tumor (OR 1.72) in colon cancer and being male (OR 1.52), age (OR 1.80), stoma (OR 1.87), and surgical complications within 1 month (OR 1.95) in rectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical prediction rule models are easy to use and could help to develop and implement interventions to reduce preventable readmissions and reoperations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02488161 Identifier: NCT02488161.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Oportunidad Relativa , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
6.
Surg Endosc ; 34(3): 1167-1176, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31140003

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It has been argued that laparoscopy should be a standard treatment in rectal cancer due to its greater technical complexity. The objective of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare laparoscopy with open surgery for rectal cancer adjusting for age and clinical stage. METHODS: A real-world prospective cost-effectiveness cohort study was conducted with data on costs and effectiveness at individual patient level. A "genetic matching" algorithm was used to correct for selection bias. After balancing the sample groups, combined multivariate analysis of total costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was performed using seemingly unrelated regression (SUR) models. These models were first constructed without interactions and, subsequently, effects of any age-stage interaction were analyzed. RESULTS: The sample included 601 patients (400 by laparoscopy and 201 by open surgery). Crude cost-effectiveness analysis indicated that overall laparoscopy was cheaper and associated with higher QALYs. The SUR models without interactions showed that while laparoscopy remained dominant, the incremental effectiveness decreased to the point that it offered no statistically significant benefits over open surgery. In the subgroup analysis, at advanced stages of the disease, although none of the coefficients were significant, the mean incremental effectiveness (QALYs value) for laparoscopy was positive in younger patients and negative in older patients. Further, for advanced stages, the mean cost of open surgery was lower in both age subgroups but differences did not reach statistical significance. In early stages, laparoscopy cost was significantly lower in the subgroup younger than 70 and higher in the older subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy in surgery for rectal cancer justifies this being the standard surgical procedure in young patients and those at initial stages. The choice of procedure should be discussed with patients who are older and/or in advanced stages of the disease. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02488161.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Laparoscopía/economía , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Prospectivos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias del Recto/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Retina ; 40(7): 1234-1244, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31259813

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate 52-week efficacy and safety of a treat-and-extend regimen of intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg on treatment-naive Type 3 neovascularization lesions. METHODS: Phase IV, prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter trial including patients with untreated Stage I/II Type 3 neovascularization lesions and baseline best-corrected visual acuity between 78 and 23 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. Primary endpoint: mean change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline at 52 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-two eyes from 32 patients were included (mean ± SD age: 78.2 ± 7.7 years, 68.8% females, baseline best-corrected visual acuity: 57.9 ± 15.4 [Snellen fraction 20/70]). Best-corrected visual acuity increased by 10.5 ± 15.9 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters at Week 52 (P = 0.0001). The mean foveal and choroidal thickness decreased by 129.1 ± 80.1 µm (P < 0.0001) and 64.3 ± 96.5 (P = 0.0001), respectively. The proportion of patients with intraretinal/subretinal fluid decreased from 28 (87.5%) at baseline to 3 (11.5%) at Week 52 (P < 0.0001). Pigment epithelial detachment and lesion area showed nonsignificant changes over 52 weeks. The mean number of injections was 8.0 ± 2.0. Seven (21.9%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events and two (6.3%) experienced serious adverse events; one (3.1%) ocular serious adverse event requiring treatment withdrawal, endophthalmitis, and one (3.1%) nonocular spontaneously resolved serious adverse event, palpitations. One (3.1%) patient experienced an APTC ATE: nonfatal stroke not related to trial treatment. CONCLUSION: A treat-and-extend regimen of aflibercept improves visual acuity and retinal edema in eyes with Type 3 neovascularization over 52 weeks with good tolerability.


Asunto(s)
Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/administración & dosificación , Agudeza Visual , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico
8.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 29(6): e13317, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32945024

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with early, intermediate or late recurrence colon cancer recurrence. METHODS: A total of 1,732 consecutive patients with colon cancer were recruited and followed for a period of 5 years. Recurrence at 1 year (early), from 1 to 2 (early), from 2 to 3 (intermediate) and from 3 to 5 years (late) was the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Predictors of early recurrence (AUC (95% CI):0.74 (0.70-0.78) were as follows: TNM stage II and III, more than one type of invasion, haemoglobin <10 g/dl, residual tumour (R1), ASA IV, log odds of positive lymph nodes ratio ≥-0.53, perforation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, infectious complications within 1 year and CEA pre- and post-intervention. These factors remained significant for predicting intermediate (AUC [95% CI]: 0.72 [0.67-0.77]) and late (AUC [95% CI]: 0.68 [0.63-0.74]) recurrence, except for ASA class, log lymph node ratio, perforation and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, laterality (left) and medical complications up to 2 years were significant. CONCLUSIONS: These risk factors show good predictive ability of early, intermediate and late recurrence, confirming factors established by guidelines and adding some others. They could serve to provide more appropriate and accurate treatment and follow-up tailored to patient characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
9.
Tumour Biol ; 42(4): 1010428319835684, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30957671

RESUMEN

We investigate the clinical and pathological features related to variations in colorectal tumour apoptosis, proliferation and angiogenesis and the influence of the latter in short-term mortality (2 years); 551 tumour samples from a prospective cohort of patients with colorectal cancer were examined and tumour biology markers were determined as follows: percentage of apoptotic cells, by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) dUTP Nick-End Labeling technique; Ki-67 antigen, as a cell proliferation marker and density of microvessels (as a marker of angiogenesis). An increase in the percentage of cellular apoptosis is significantly related to the presence of poorly differentiated tumours, with vascular invasion (p < 0.001). The CD105 angiogenesis marker is not related to any clinical-pathological parameter except that of higher frequency in older patients (p = 0.03). Ki-67 is more frequently expressed in tumours with less nervous invasion (p = 0.05). Neither apoptosis nor angiogenesis present any significant association with short-term survival. The only marker clearly related to 2-year survival is Ki-67, which is shown to be a good prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 0.49; 95% confidence interval = 0.27-0.90). Therefore, in a prospective cohort of colorectal cancer patients, only Ki-67 is a marker of good prognosis in short-term follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Antígeno Ki-67/genética , Neovascularización Patológica/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Apoptosis/genética , Proliferación Celular/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Endoglina/genética , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neovascularización Patológica/epidemiología , Neovascularización Patológica/patología , Pronóstico
10.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(11): 4133-4144, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30793242

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To identify and validate risk factors that contribute to prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS) in patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 1955 patients admitted to 22 hospitals for primary resection of colorectal cancer. Multivariate analyses were used to identify and validate risk factors, randomizing patients into a derivation and a validation cohort. Multiple correspondence and cluster analysis were performed to identify clinical subtypes based on LOS. RESULTS: The strongest independent predictors of prolonged LOS were postoperative reintervention, surgical site infection, open surgery, and distant metastasis. The multiple correspondence and cluster analysis provided three groups of patients in relation to prolonged LOS: patients with the longest LOS included the highest percentage of patients with open surgery, distant metastasis, deep surgical site infections, emergency admissions, additional diagnostic factors, and highly contaminated surgical sites. Patients with prolonged LOS (> 14 days) were more likely to develop adverse outcomes within 30 days after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing resection of colorectal cancer cluster into different groups based on LOS of the index admission. Those with prolonged LOS were more likely to develop adverse outcomes within 30 days after discharge. Some of the strongest independent predictors of prolonged LOS, such as surgical infections or open surgery, could be modified to reduce LOS and, in turn, other adverse outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02488161.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica
11.
Foot Ankle Surg ; 25(5): 565-570, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30321939

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Weil's osteotomy (WO) is the most applied surgical treatment for metatarsalgia, a persistent pain in the lesser metatarsals' heads. We aim to review its effectiveness and safety compared to the percutaneous technique known as distal metatarsal mini-invasive osteotomy (DMMO). METHODS: Systematic review in Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Cinahl and Cochrane Library. We included studies that directly compared WO and DMMO for the treatment of primary metatarsalgia. Data on pain, function, complications and patients' satisfaction were extracted and narratively synthesized. RESULTS: Four retrospective studies were identified. There were no significant differences in clinical effectiveness or patients' satisfaction. Time to bone healing was significantly longer for DMMO, whereas WO showed more wound problems and metatarsophalangeal stiffness. Other complications were infrequent in the two procedures. CONCLUSION: Evidence on the direct comparison of WO and DMMO is scarce and of low quality. Randomized studies are needed in order to control for potential confounders.


Asunto(s)
Artrodesis/métodos , Huesos Metatarsianos/cirugía , Metatarsalgia/cirugía , Articulación Metatarsofalángica/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Osteotomía/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Humanos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 33(1): 99-103, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29110087

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic with that of open surgery up to 2 years after intervention in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery (laparoscopic or open) between June 2010 and December 2012 in 22 acute hospitals. Main outcomes were mortality, complications, reoperation, readmission, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), as measured using the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-Q30 and Q29, the Barthel Index (BI), and the Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Multivariable multilevel logistic regression and generalized linear models were used in the analyses after adjusting for specific propensity scores developed for each outcome and time point. RESULTS: In the multivariable analysis, rates of some medical complications after surgery during admission (renal failure and paralytic ileus) and infectious (urinary tract infection, septic shock, and localized intra-abdominal infection) and at 1 year (renal and heart failure) were higher among patients who underwent open surgery than among those who underwent laparoscopic surgery. There were no differences between the two surgical approaches in all other parameters assessed at the different time points or in all PROMs evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery and open surgery provide quite similar results in patients with rectal cancer up to 2 years after intervention in most outcomes, though the rates of certain medical and infectious complications at admission and up to 1 year after the intervention were higher in open surgery.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Humanos , Análisis Multivariante , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Qual Life Res ; 27(9): 2217-2226, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29748823

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) in various shoulder pathologies, based on a systematic review and expert standardized evaluations. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Titles and abstracts were reviewed and finally the included articles were grouped according to patients' pathologies. Two expert evaluators independently assessed the CMS properties of reliability, validity, responsiveness to change, interpretability and burden score in each group, using the EMPRO (Evaluating Measures of Patient Reported Outcomes) tool. The CMS properties were assessed per attribute and overall for each considered group. Only the concept and measurement model was assessed globally. RESULTS: Five individual pathologies (i.e. subacromial, fractures, arthritis, instability and frozen shoulder) and two additional groups (i.e. various pathologies and healthy subjects) were considered. Overall EMPRO scores ranged from 58.6 for subacromial to 30.6 points for instability. Responsiveness to change was the only quality to obtain at least 50 points across all groups, but for frozen shoulder. Insufficient information was obtained in relation to the concept and measurement model and great variability was seen in the other evaluated attributes. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence does not support the CMS as a gold standard in shoulder evaluation. Its use is advisable for subacromial pathology; but data are inconclusive for other shoulder conditions. Prospective studies exploring the psychometric properties of the scale, particularly for fractures, arthritis, instability and frozen shoulder are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review.


Asunto(s)
Psicometría/métodos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Hombro/patología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
14.
Rheumatol Int ; 38(3): 473-479, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29256101

RESUMEN

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) measures the quality of life of patients with osteoarthritis (OA), and there is a specific scale for the physical functioning dimension, the short version with seven items WOMAC-pf. This study describes the application of the Rasch model to explore scale invariance and response stability of the WOMAC-pf short version across affected joint and over time. A sample of 884 patients with OA, from 15 hospitals in Spain, completed the WOMAC-pf before surgery (baseline) and at 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery of hip or knee. The invariance by joint was explored through the differential item functioning (DIF) analysis of the Rasch model using baseline data, and time stability (DIF by time) were evaluated in stack data (each participant is represented four times, one by time point). Mean age of the patients was of 69.13 years (SD 10.01), 59.3% of them were women (n = 524), 59.2% had knee OA (n = 523) and 40.8% hip OA (n = 361). Item "putting on socks" showed DIF by joint and time. Fit to the Rasch model using stack data improved when this item was removed. Good reliability for individual use, local independency and unidimensionality of the models were confirmed. WOMAC-pf 7-item short version was invariant over time and joint when item "putting on socks" was removed. Researchers should carefully evaluate this item as it presents problems in scale invariance and stability, which could affect results when comparing data by joint or when computing change scores.


Asunto(s)
Articulación de la Cadera/fisiopatología , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/diagnóstico , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/psicología , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/psicología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Recuperación de la Función , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , España , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 49, 2018 01 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29378647

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To validate and recalibrate the CR- POSSUM model and compared its discriminatory capacity with other European models such as POSSUM, P-POSSUM, AFC or IRCS to predict operative mortality in surgery for colorectal cancer. METHODS: Prospective multicenter cohort study from 22 hospitals in Spain. We included patients undergoing planned or urgent surgery for primary invasive colorectal cancers between June 2010 and December 2012 (N = 2749). Clinical data were gathered through medical chart review. We validated and recalibrated the predictive models using logistic regression techniques. To calculate the discriminatory power of each model, we estimated the areas under the curve - AUC (95% CI). We also assessed the calibration of the models by applying the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 1.5% and 30-day mortality, 1.7%. In the validation process, the discriminatory power of the CR-POSSUM for predicting in-hospital mortality was 73.6%. However, in the recalibration process, the AUCs improved slightly: the CR-POSSUM reached 75.5% (95% CI: 67.3-83.7). The discriminatory power of the CR-POSSUM for predicting 30-day mortality was 74.2% (95% CI: 67.1-81.2) after recalibration; among the other models the POSSUM had the greatest discriminatory power, with an AUC of 77.0% (95% CI: 68.9-85.2). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed good fit for all the recalibrated models. CONCLUSION: The CR-POSSUM and the other models showed moderate capacity to discriminate the risk of operative mortality in our context, where the actual operative mortality is low. Nevertheless the IRCS might better predict in-hospital mortality, with fewer variables, while the CR-POSSUM could be slightly better for predicting 30-day mortality. TRAIL REGISTRATION: Registered at: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02488161.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitales , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo , España/epidemiología
16.
J Transl Med ; 15(1): 146, 2017 06 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28646893

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Serous chorioretinopathy has been associated with MEK inhibitors, including cobimetinib. We describe the clinical features of serous retinopathy observed with cobimetinib in patients with BRAF V600-mutated melanoma treated in the Phase III coBRIM study. METHODS: In the coBRIM study, 493 patients were treated in two randomly assigned treatment groups: cobimetinib and vemurafenib (n = 247) or vemurafenib (n = 246). All patients underwent prospective ophthalmic examinations at screening, at regular intervals during the study, and whenever ocular symptoms developed. Patients with serous retinopathy were identified in the study database using a group of relevant and synonymous adverse event terms. RESULTS: Eighty-six serous retinopathy events were reported in 70 patients (79 events in 63 cobimetinib and vemurafenib-treated patients vs seven events in seven vemurafenib-treated patients). Most patients with serous retinopathy identified by ophthalmic examination had no symptoms or had mild symptoms, among them reduced visual acuity, blurred vision, dyschromatopsia, and photophobia. Serous retinopathy usually occurred early during cobimetinib and vemurafenib treatment; median time to onset was 1.0 month. Most events were managed by observation and continuation of cobimetinib without dose modification and resolved or were resolving by the data cutoff date (19 Sept 2014). CONCLUSIONS: Cobimetinib treatment was associated with serous retinopathy in patients with BRAF V600-mutated melanoma. Retinopathy was generally asymptomatic or mild. Periodic ophthalmologic evaluations at regular intervals and at the manifestation of any visual disturbance are recommended to facilitate early detection and resolution of serous retinopathy while patients are taking cobimetinib. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01689519). First received: September 18, 2012.


Asunto(s)
Azetidinas/efectos adversos , Azetidinas/uso terapéutico , Coriorretinopatía Serosa Central/inducido químicamente , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Mutación/genética , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Coriorretinopatía Serosa Central/diagnóstico por imagen , Coriorretinopatía Serosa Central/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Melanoma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Factores de Tiempo , Vemurafenib
17.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 33(4): 454-462, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28857017

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The methodological quality of an economic evaluation performed alongside a clinical trial can be underestimated if the paper does not report key methodological features. This study discusses methodological assessment issues on the example of a systematic review on cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy for knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Six economic evaluation studies included in the systematic review and related clinical trials were assessed using the 10-question check-list by Drummond and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. RESULTS: All economic evaluations were performed alongside a clinical trial but the studied interventions were too heterogeneous to be synthesized. Methodological quality of the economic evaluations reported in the papers was not free of drawbacks, and in some cases, it improved when information from the related clinical trial was taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: Economic evaluation papers dedicate little space to methodological features of related clinical trials; therefore, the methodological quality can be underestimated if evaluated separately from the trials. Future economic evaluations should follow more strictly the recommendations about methodology and the authors should pay special attention to the quality of reporting.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/normas , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/rehabilitación , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/economía , Literatura de Revisión como Asunto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica/normas
18.
BMC Cancer ; 16: 435, 2016 07 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27391216

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancers are one of the most common forms of malignancy worldwide. But two significant areas of research less studied deserve attention: health services use and development of patient stratification risk tools for these patients. DESIGN: a prospective multicenter cohort study with a follow up period of up to 5 years after surgical intervention. Participant centers: 22 hospitals representing six autonomous communities of Spain. Participants/Study population: Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer that have undergone surgical intervention and have consented to participate in the study between June 2010 and December 2012. Variables collected include pre-intervention background, sociodemographic parameters, hospital admission records, biological and clinical parameters, treatment information, and outcomes up to 5 years after surgical intervention. Patients completed the following questionnaires prior to surgery and in the follow up period: EuroQol-5D, EORTC QLQ-C30 (The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire) and QLQ-CR29 (module for colorectal cancer), the Duke Functional Social Support Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Barthel Index. The main endpoints of the study are mortality, tumor recurrence, major complications, readmissions, and changes in health-related quality of life at 30 days and at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years after surgical intervention. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: In relation to the different endpoints, predictive models will be used by means of multivariate logistic models, Cox or linear mixed-effects regression models. Simulation models for the prediction of discrete events in the long term will also be used, and an economic evaluation of different treatment strategies will be performed through the use of generalized linear models. DISCUSSION: The identification of potential risk factors for adverse events may help clinicians in the clinical decision making process. Also, the follow up by 5 years of this large cohort of patients may provide useful information to answer different health services research questions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02488161 . Registration date: June 16, 2015.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 14: 23, 2016 Feb 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26887590

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is one of the most widely used health-related quality of life questionnaires for patients with heart failure (HF). It provides scores for two dimensions, physical and emotional, and a total score. However, there are some concerns about its factor structure and alternatives have been proposed, some including a third factor representing a social dimension. The objectives of the present study were to analyze the internal structure of the MLHFQ and the unidimensionality of the total score, and to compare the different factor structures proposed. METHODS: The MLHFQ was given to 2565 patients with HF. The structural validity of the questionnaire was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Rasch analysis. These two approaches were also applied to the alternative structures proposed. RESULTS: The CFA results for the hypothesized model of two latent factors and the Rasch analysis confirmed the adequacy of the physical and emotional scales. Rasch analysis for the total score showed only two problematic items. The results of the CFA for other two-factor structures proposed were not better than the results for the original structure. The Rasch analyses applied to the different social factors yielded the best results for Munyombwe's social dimension, composed of six items. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the validity of using the MLHFQ physical, emotional and total scores in patients with HF, for clinical practice and research. In addition, they confirmed the existence of a third factor, and we recommend the use of Munyombwe's social factor.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/psicología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/rehabilitación , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Anciano , Emociones , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Examen Físico
20.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 14(1): 147, 2016 Oct 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27756317

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to validate the self-report section of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire (ASES-p) into Spanish. METHODS: Shoulder pathology patients were recruited and followed up to 6 months post treatment. The ASES-p, Constant, SF-36 and Barthel scales were filled-in pre and post treatment. Reliability was tested with Cronbach's alpha, convergent validity with Spearman's correlations coefficients. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and the Rasch model were implemented for assessing structural validity and unidimensionality of the scale. Models with and without the pain item were considered. Responsiveness to change was explored via standardised effect sizes. RESULTS: Results were acceptable for both tested models. Cronbach's alpha was 0.91, total scale correlations with Constant and physical SF-36 dimensions were >0.50. Factor loadings for CFA were >0.40. The Rasch model confirmed unidimensionality of the scale, even though item 10 "do usual sport" was suggested as non-informative. Finally, patients with improved post treatment shoulder function and those receiving surgery had higher standardised effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: The adapted Spanish ASES-p version is a valid and reliable tool for shoulder evaluation and its unidimensionality is supported by the data.


Asunto(s)
Autoinforme , Dolor de Hombro/etnología , Dolor de Hombro/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Humanos , Lenguaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Hombro/fisiopatología , Dolor de Hombro/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Traducciones , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA