Safety of autologous fat grafting in breast cancer: a multicenter Italian study among 17 senonetwork breast units autologous fat grafting safety: a multicenter Italian retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting (AFG), defined as the re-implant to the breast of fat tissue from different body areas, has been firstly applied to esthetic plastic surgery and then has moved to reconstructive surgery, mainly used for scar correction and opposite breast altering. Nevertheless, due to the potentially unsafe stem-like properties of adipocytes at the tumoral bed level, no clear evidence of the procedure's oncological safety has been clearly documented at present. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of early breast cancer (BC) patients from 17 Italian Breast Units and assessed differences in terms of locoregional recurrence rate (LRR) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) between patients who underwent AFG and patients who did not. Differences were analyzed in the entire cohort of invasive tumors and in different subgroups, according to prognostic biological subtypes. RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 60 months, LRR was 5.3% (n = 71) in the matched population, 3.9% (n = 18) in the AFG group, and 6.1% (n = 53) in the non-AFG group, suggesting non-inferiority of AFG (p = 0.084). Building Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed non-inferiority of the AFG procedure for LRFS (aHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.41-1.30, p = 0.291). The same effect, in terms of LRFS, was also documented among different biological subtypes (luminal-like group, aHR 0.76, 95% CI 0.34-1.68, p = 0.493; HER2 enriched-like, aHR 0.89, 95% CI 0.19-4.22, p = 0.882; and TNBC, aHR 0.61, 95% CI 0.12-2.98, p = 0.543). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms in a very large, multicenter cohort of early BC patients that, aside the well-known benefits on the esthetic result, AFG do not interfere negatively with cancer prognosis.

Reverse Expansion Following Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: A Natural, Safe and Effective Autologous Technique for Breast Reconstruction.

The majority of surgeons choose an implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Nevertheless, lipofilling is a constantly growing technique allowing a complete breast reconstruction without prosthesis. We introduce our experience using reverse expansion for breast reconstruction following a nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with a subpectoral skin expander. In the period January 2010-August 2021, 106 breast reconstruction procedures were performed on 50 patients after a NSM. We harvested an amount of fat tissue using a 2.5 mm liposuction cannula, we centrifuged it 3 min at 4000 rpm and injected in the recipient site using 3 ml syringes and Coleman cannulas. At the beginning of every session, the breast expander was deflated of a saline volume similar to the one of the fat to be injected. We harvested an average of 679.2 ccs of fat per session and injected an average of 319.3 ccs per breast. The mean number of sessions has been 2.4 per breast. The average number of sessions in a radiotreated patients' subgroup has been slightly higher than a control group. The mean follow-up time was 63.5 months and we observed no complications in 105 over 106 procedures. Lipofilling has proven to be a safe and effective technique for complete breast reconstruction. Our procedure considers the use of a breast expander as a device to prepare the recipient site. Reverse expansion after a NSM allows a like-with-like reconstruction and it might be the first reconstructive choice in a selected group of patients.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Reverse Expansion for Breast Reconstruction after Skin-sparing and Nipple-sparing Mastectomy: Our First 100 Cases.

Patients with breast cancer have experienced advancements both in oncological treatment and in aesthetics as a result of developments in reconstructive techniques. We aimed to present our experience with the reverse expansion technique, summarizing the results of our first 100 cases of reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy and nipple-sparing mastectomy. Methods: From January 2010 to September 2018, 253 breast reconstruction procedures were performed on 100 patients. The reverse expansion technique consists of autologous fat tissue transplantation requiring the combined use of a skin expander and of multiple lipofilling sessions. At the beginning of every session the breast expander was deflated by removing a saline volume similar to that of the fat to be injected. Results: Overall, 56 breast reconstructions after skin-sparing mastectomy and 44 after nipple-sparing mastectomy were performed. An average of 661.5 cm3 of fat per session was harvested and an average of 305.3 cm3 per breast was injected. The average number of sessions to achieve breast reconstruction was 2.53. Only four complications after 253 procedures (1.5%) were reported: one donor site hemorrhage due to genetic lack of coagulation factors, and three surgical site infections. Conclusions: Considering the large number of positive factors such as a fast postoperative recovery, an easy learning curve, a lack of need of a specialized surgical team, a natural look of the breast shape, and the soft consistency of the grafted tissue, we believe this technique could be the first choice for autologous reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy and nipple-sparing mastectomy.