Enteric neural disruption in necrotizing enterocolitis occurs in association with myenteric glial cell CCL20 expression.

OBJECTIVE: The aetiology of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is unknown, but luminal factors and epithelial leakiness appear critical triggers of an inflammatory cascade. A separate finding has been suggested in mouse models, in which disruption of glial cells in the myenteric plexus induced a severe NEC-like lesion. We have thus looked for evidence of neuroglial abnormality in NEC. METHODS: We studied full-thickness resected specimens from 20 preterm infants with acute NEC and from 13 control infants undergoing resection for other indications. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed for immunological (CD3, syndecan-1, human leucocyte antigen-DR), neural (glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], nerve growth factor receptor, neurofilament protein, neuron-specific enolase), and functional markers (Ki67), and for potential inflammatory regulators (interleukin-12, transforming growth factor-ß, CCL20, CCR6). RESULTS: Expression of the chemokine CCL20 and its receptor CCR6 was significantly upregulated in myenteric plexus in NEC, with CCL20 strongly expressed by glial cells. In 9 of 20 cases with NEC, myenteric plexus architecture and GFAP+ glial cells were normal, with preserved submucosal and mucosal innervation; however, 11 cases showed disrupted myenteric plexus architecture, reduced GFAP expression, and loss of submucosal and mucosal innervation. Persistent abnormalities were identified in the 2 infants who had ongoing inflammation at ileostomy closure. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings identified heterogeneity among patients with NEC. Approximately half showed evidence of marked neural abnormality extending from the deeper layers of the intestine, associated with glial activation and myenteric plexus disruption. The factors that may activate enteric glia in this manner, potentially including bacterial products or viruses, remain to be determined.

Probiotics for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis is a chronic relapsing disease characterised by diffuse mucosal inflammation limited to the colon. Current maintenance treatments have multiple adverse events and an effective treatment with minimal adverse events is desired. Several studies have demonstrated the importance of intestinal flora in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis. It has been suggested that modifying the bacterial flora with probiotics may attenuate the inflammatory process and prevent relapses in ulcerative colitis. OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives were to determine the efficacy and safety of probiotics for the maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Tials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2011), EMBASE (1974 to July 2011), CINAHL (1982 to July 2011) and the Cochrane Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Functional Bowel Disorders Group Specialised Trial Register were searched. Manufacturers of probiotics were contacted to identify any unpublished trials. References of trials were also searched for any additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared probiotics against placebo or any other intervention for the maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction and assessment of methodological quality of included studies were independently performed by two authors. The main outcome measure was the occurrence of clinical or endoscopic relapse. MAIN RESULTS: Four studies (n = 587) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Three trials compared probiotics to mesalazine and one trial compared probiotics with placebo. The studies ranged in length from 3 to 12 months. The risk of bias was high in two studies due to incomplete outcome data and lack of blinding. The methods used for allocation concealment were unclear for all four studies. There was no statistically significant difference between probiotics and mesalazine for maintenance of remission in UC. Relapse was reported in 40.1% of patients in the probiotics group compared to 34.1% of patients in the mesalazine group (3 studies; 555 patients: OR 1.33; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.90 ; I(2) = 11%). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse events. Twenty-six per cent of patients in the probiotics group experienced at least one adverse event compared to 24% of patients in the mesalazine group (2 studies; 430 patients OR 1.21; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.84; I(2) =27%). Adverse events reported in the mesalazine-controlled studies include diarrhea, mucous secretion, bloody stools, abdominal pain, flatulence and distension, nausea and vomiting and headache. A small placebo controlled trial (n = 32) found no statistically significant difference in efficacy. Seventy-five per cent of probiotic patients relapsed at one year compared to 92% of placebo patients (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.03 to 2.68). Adverse events reported in the placebo-controlled study include flatulence, abdominal bloating and pain, changes in faecal consistency, arthralgia, sacroiliitis, tiredness, incontinence, stress, oral blisters, eye dryness, headache, dizziness, influenza, gastroenteritis, cystitis and pneumonia. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Given the relatively small number of patients in the pooled analysis, the small number of events and the high risk and unclear risk of bias in the included studies, there is insufficient evidence to make conclusions about the efficacy of probiotics for maintenance of remission in UC. There is a lack of well-designed RCTs in this area and further research is needed.

Reduced production of sulfated glycosaminoglycans occurs in Zambian children with kwashiorkor but not marasmus.

BACKGROUND: Kwashiorkor, a form of severe malnutrition with high mortality, is characterized by edema and systemic abnormalities. Although extremely common, its pathophysiology remains poorly understood, and its characteristic physical signs are unexplained. OBJECTIVE: Because kwashiorkor can develop in protein-losing enteropathy, which is caused by a loss of enterocyte heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG), and previous observations suggest abnormal sulfated glycosaminoglycan (GAG) metabolism, we examined whether intestinal GAG and HSPG are abnormal in children with kwashiorkor. DESIGN: Duodenal biopsy samples collected from Zambian children with marasmus (n = 18), marasmic kwashiorkor (n = 8), and kwashiorkor (n = 15) were examined for expression of HSPG, GAGs, and immunologic markers and compared against reference samples from healthy UK control children. GAG and HSPG expression density and inflammatory cell populations were quantitated by computerized analysis. RESULTS: The kwashiorkor group was less wasted and had a lower HIV incidence than did the other groups. All duodenal biopsy samples showed inflammation compared with the histologically uninflamed control samples. Biopsy samples from marasmic children had greater inflammation and greater CD3+ and HLA-DR (human leukocyte antigen DR)-positive cell densities than did samples from children with kwashiorkor. Expression of both HSPG and GAGs was similar between marasmic and well-nourished UK children but was markedly lower in children with kwashiorkor in both the epithelium and lamina propria. Although underglycosylated and undersulfated, epithelial syndecan-1 protein was normally expressed in kwashiorkor, which confirmed that abnormalities arise after core protein synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal HSPG loss occurs in kwashiorkor, which may precipitate protein-losing enteropathy to cause edema. If occurring systemically, impaired HSPG expression could cause several previously unexplained features of kwashiorkor. We speculate that a genetic predisposition to reduced HSPG biosynthesis may offer a contrasting selective advantage, by both diminishing protein catabolism during transient undernutrition and protecting against specific infectious diseases.