Can NIRS be a surrogate indicator of elective shunt in carotid endarterectomy? A single-center observational retrospective study says no.

BACKGROUND: Neuromonitoring during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under general anesthesia is desirable and may be useful for preventing brain ischemia, but the selection of the most appropriate method remains controversial. PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) compared to multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in indicating elective shunts and predicting postoperative neurological status. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study including 86 consecutive patients with CEA under general anesthesia. NIRS and multimodality IONM were performed during the procedure. IONM included electroencephalography (EEG), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated for each neuromonitoring modality. RESULTS: NIRS presented a sensitivity and a specificity for detecting brain ischemia of 77.7% and 89.6%, respectively (PPV = 46.6% and NPV = 97.2%). In contrast, a 100% sensitivity and specificity for multimodality IONM was determined (PPV and NPV = 100%). No significant difference (in demographical or clinical data) between "true positive" and "false-positive" patients was identified. Among the methods included in multimodality IONM, EEG showed the best results for predicting postoperative outcome after CEA (PPV and NPV=100%). CONCLUSION: NIRS is inferior to multimodality IONM in detecting brain ischemia and predicting postoperative neurological status during CEA under general anesthesia.

Androgen Receptor Activity Is Associated with Worse Survival in Glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Some evidence about the role of the androgen receptor (AR) in pathogenesis of glioblastoma have been reported, but no study has focused on measuring the activity of the AR in GB. Therefore, the aim of this work is to study the role of AR and its activity as prognostic biomarkers in glioblastoma (GB). METHODS: Molecular and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas database were used. The AR-expression at protein-level was obtained from reversed phase protein array (RPPA) assays. The AR-activity was determined by calculating the AR-score, an index calculated by using the expression (at RNA-level) of 13 androgen-responsive-genes. Univariate and multivariate Cox-regression analyses were performed. Finally, a correlation analysis was conducted between protein expression data and the AR-score. RESULTS: Two-hundred and thirty-three patients were included. RPPA data showed a mean AR abundance of 0.027(Statistical Deviation = 0.38) in GB. The univariate Cox-regression analysis showed that the AR-Score was associated with a worse prognosis (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.070) while the AR-expression did not show any relationship with survival (HR = 0.869). The association of the AR-score with worse overall survival (OS) was still significant in the multivariate analysis (HR = 1.054). The highest correlation coefficients between the AR-score and RPPA were identified in a group of proteins involved in apoptotic process regulation. CONCLUSIONS: GB patients with a high AR-activity present a worse prognosis in terms of OS. Thus, the activity of the AR may have a pathogenic role in GB. In this regard, the activation of the AR in GB may be associated with a dysregulation of apoptosis.

Radiological and Not Clinical Variables Guide the Surgical Plan in Patients with Glioblastoma.

Background and Purpose: The extent of resection is the most important prognostic factor in patients with glioblastoma. However, the factors influencing the decision to perform a biopsy instead of maximal resection have not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to analyze the factors associated with the intention to achieve maximal resection in glioblastoma patients. Methods: A retrospective single-center case-series analysis of patients with a new diagnosis of glioblastoma was performed. Patients were distributed into two groups: the biopsy (B) and complete resection (CR) groups. To identify factors associated with the decision to perform a B or CR, uni- and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed. Cox regression analysis was also performed in the B and CR groups. Results: Ninety-nine patients with a new diagnosis of glioblastoma were included. Sixty-eight patients (68.7%) were treated with CR. Ring-enhancement and edema volume on presurgical magnetic resonance imaging were both associated with CR. Corpus callosum involvement and proximity to the internal capsule were identified as factors associated with the decision to perform a biopsy. In the multivariate analysis, edema volume (OR = 1.031; p = 0.002) and proximity to the internal capsule (OR = 0.104; p = 0.001) maintained significance and were considered independent factors. In the survival analysis, only corpus callosum involvement (HR = 2.055; p = 0.035) and MGMT status (HR = 0.484; p = 0.027) presented statistical significance in the CR group. Conclusions: The volume of edema and proximity to the internal capsule were identified as independent factors associated with the surgical decision. The radiological evaluation and not the clinical situation of the patient influences the decision to perform a biopsy or CR.

Evaluation of Zonulin Expression and Its Potential Clinical Significance in Glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma, the deadliest adult brain tumor, poses a significant therapeutic challenge with a dismal prognosis despite current treatments. Zonulin, a protein influencing tight junctions and barrier functions, has gained attention for its diverse roles in various diseases. This study aimed to preliminarily analyze the circulating and tumor zonulin levels, evaluating their impact on disease prognosis and clinical-radiological factors. Additionally, we investigated in vitro zonulin expression in different glioblastoma cell lines under two different conditions. The study comprised 34 newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients, with blood samples collected before treatment for zonulin and haptoglobin analysis. Tumor tissue samples from 21 patients were obtained for zonulin expression. Clinical, molecular, and radiological data were collected, and zonulin protein levels were assessed using ELISA and Western blot techniques. Furthermore, zonulin expression was analyzed in vitro in three glioblastoma cell lines cultured under standard and glioma-stem-cell (GSC)-specific conditions. High zonulin expression in glioblastoma tumors correlated with larger preoperative contrast enhancement and edema volumes. Patients with high zonulin levels showed a poorer prognosis (progression-free survival [PFS]). Similarly, elevated serum levels of zonulin were associated with a trend of shorter PFS. Higher haptoglobin levels correlated with MGMT methylation and longer PFS. In vitro, glioblastoma cell lines expressed zonulin under standard cell culture conditions, with increased expression in tumorsphere-specific conditions. Elevated zonulin levels in both the tumor and serum of glioblastoma patients were linked to a poorer prognosis and radiological signs of increased disruption of the blood-brain barrier. In vitro, zonulin expression exhibited a significant increase in tumorspheres.

Androgen deficiency is associated with a better prognosis in glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: The androgen receptor (AR) has been demonstrated to play a role in the pathogenesis of glioblastoma; however, the implications of circulating testosterone levels in the biology of glioblastoma remain unknown. AIM: This study aimed to analyze the association between circulating testosterone levels and the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma. METHODS: Forty patients with primary glioblastoma were included in the study. The main prognostic endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Circulating testosterone levels were used to determine the state of androgen deficiency (AD). AR expression was analyzed by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, and immunofluorescence. Survival analysis was performed using the log-rank test and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Most of the patients showed AR expression, and it was mainly located in the cytoplasm, as well as in the nucleus of tumor cells. Patients with AD presented a better PFS than those patients with normal levels (252.0 vs. 135.0 days; p = 0.041). Furthermore, normal androgenic status was an independent risk factor for progression in a multivariate regression model (hazard ratio = 6.346; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Circulating testosterone levels are associated with the prognosis of glioblastoma because patients with AD show a better prognosis than those with normal androgenic status.

High Expression of FOXP2 Is Associated with Worse Prognosis in Glioblastoma.

OBJECTIVE: FOXP2 expression has been associated with the prognosis of some tumors, but the role of FOXP2 in glioblastoma remains unclear. The aim of the present work is to study the role of FOXP2 as a prognostic biomarker in glioblastoma. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational case series study in which the expression of FOXP2 has been analyzed both at protein level (immunohistochemistry, n = 62) and at mRNA level (RNAseq, in a cohort of glioblastoma patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas [TCGA] database, n = 148). Other molecular and clinical data have also been included in the study, with special focus on miRNA expression data. Survival analysis using log-rank test and COX-regression have been used. Non-parametric statistical tests were also used to study differences between low and high FOXP2 expression groups. RESULTS: Patients with a high expression of FOXP2 protein showed a worse prognosis than those patients with low expression in progression-free survival (hazard ratio 1.711; P = 0.034) and overall survival (hazard ratio 1.809; P = 0.014). These associations were still statistically significant in multivariate analysis. No prognostic association was found with FOXP2 RNA expression. Interestingly, 2 miRNAs that target FOXP2 (hsa-miR-181a-2-3p and hsa-miR-20a-3p) showed an interaction effect on overall survival with FOXP2 expression. A low level of these miRNA expression was associated with a significantly worse prognosis in patients with high FOXP2 RNA expression (log-rank test; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Greater expression of FOXP2 at the protein level is associated with a worse prognosis. This protein expression may be regulated by the expression of specific miRNAs that target FOXP2 mRNA: hsa-miR-181a-2-3p and hsa-miR-20a-3p.