Pathological evaluation of mesocolic resection quality and ex vivo methylene blue injection: what is the impact on lymph node harvest after colon resection for cancer?

BACKGROUND: Although the National Quality Forum has endorsed the harvest of ≥12 lymph nodes as a standard quality indicator for colon cancer surgery, this minimum quantity is not reached in many centers. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the implementation of a mesocolon evaluation pathological protocol and ex vivo arterial methylene blue injection on the number of nodes harvested after colon cancer resection. DESIGN: A prospective series was compared with a historical group. SETTINGS: This study was conducted by a specialized colorectal multidisciplinary team at a tertiary teaching hospital. PATIENTS: From June 2009 to December 2009, all the specimens after colon resection for cancer were analyzed with the use of a "mesocolon quality pathological evaluation" protocol. Moreover, a consecutive series of specimens was analyzed after arterial ex vivo injection of methylene blue. We compared the study groups with our previous series (2005-2009). INTERVENTIONS: The "mesocolon quality pathological evaluation" protocol was used with or without arterial methylene blue ex vivo injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure was the number of lymph nodes harvested. RESULTS: The mean number (SD) of lymph nodes collected was 20.6 (10.5), 37.1 (12.8), and 47.6 (12.9) (p < 0.0001) in the control, protocol, and methylene blue groups. In the control group, the minimum number of 12 and 18 lymph nodes collected was not reached in 92 (15.9%) and 258 (44.6%) patients. In contrast, all patients in the protocol and methylene blue groups had more than 18 lymph nodes collected. The multivariate analysis confirmed the application of the "mesocolon quality pathological evaluation" protocol and the methylene blue ex vivo injection, along with the type of resection and the length of the specimen, to be independent factors determining the number of nodes collected. LIMITATIONS: The patients are not randomly selected and are compared with a retrospective series. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a "mesocolon quality pathological evaluation" protocol along with the arterial ex vivo injection of methylene blue can significantly increase the number of nodes isolated after colonic resection, reaching a 100% rate of specimens with more than 12 nodes.

Preoperative chemoradiation may not always be needed for patients with T3 and T2N+ rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiation is becoming the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, since the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME), local recurrence rates have been reduced significantly, and some patients can be spared from potentially toxic over treatment. The current study was designed to assess the factors that predict recurrence in an institutional series of patients with rectal cancer who had clinical T2 lymph node-positive (cT2N+) tumors or cT3N0/N+ tumors and underwent radical surgery without receiving preoperative chemoradiation. METHODS: Between November 1997 and November 2008, the authors' multidisciplinary group preoperatively staged 398 patients with rectal cancer by using endorectal ultrasonography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. The analysis included 152 consecutive patients with cT2N+, cT3N0, or cT3N+ rectal cancer who underwent TME without receiving preoperative chemoradiation. Macroscopic assessment of the mesorectal excision and circumferential resection margins were determined. Factors potentially related to local recurrence (LR), disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 39 months, the 5-year actuarial LR, DFS, and CSS rates were 9.5%, 65.4%, and 77.8%, respectively, for the whole group. Threatened mesorectal fascia at preoperative staging was the only independent preoperative factor that predicted a higher risk for LR (P = .007), shorter DFS (P = .007), and shorter CSS (P = .05). In particular, the 5-year LR rates for patients with and without preoperative threatened circumferential resection margins were 19.4% and 5.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current results suggested that patients with rectal cancer clinically staged as T3N0/N+ or T2N+ with a free margin >2 mm from mesorectal fascia may undergo TME alone, avoiding over treatment with preoperative chemoradiation.

Microneedling dilates the follicular infundibulum and increases transfollicular absorption of liposomal sepia melanin.

Encapsulation of chemicals in liposomes and microneedling are currently used techniques to enhance the penetration of several substances through skin and hair. In this study, we apply a liposomal melanin-fluorescein compound to an ex vivo model of human skin, using a new electrical microneedling device (Nanopore turbo roller). The product was applied by hand massage (A) or with the assistance of the electrical roller for 2 minutes (B). An additional test was performed free of product and with only the E-roller (C). Histological changes and product absorption were evaluated by optical and fluorescent microscopy 60 and 90 minutes after the treatment. Site B showed larger deposits of melanin-fluorescein at superficial and deep levels of hair structures in comparison to site A. Light, epidermal deposits of the melanin-fluorescein complex were also observed. Sites B and C showed a significant widening (47%) of the follicular infundibulum which could explain the increased penetration of the formulation. Microneedling also removed the scales and sebum residues in the neighborhood of the infundibulum. Targeting hair follicles with melanin may be useful to dye poorly pigmented hairs, improving laser hair removal. The procedure accelerates the delivery of melanin into hair structures allowing an even absorption, larger pigment deposits, and deeper penetration of the formulation into the hair.

The role of the pathologist in rectal cancer diagnosis and staging and surgical quality assessment.

Since the introduction of the total mesorectal excision by Heald, many changes in the therapeutic management of rectal cancer have been incorporated. The multidisciplinary approach to colorectal cancer, integrated in a team of different specialists, ensures individualised treatment for each patient with rectal cancer. Therefore the role of the pathologist has acquired an important relevance, not only in diagnosing but also managing and evaluating the surgical specimen. The knowledge of preoperative staging, distance between tumour and anal verge or in patients subjected to a neoadjuvant treatment is necessary for the pathologist to make a detailed, accurate and good-quality report. Parameters such as the macroscopic quality of the mesorectum, the status of the circumferential resection margin and the lymph node harvest are considered basic criteria recommended by the current guidelines for the multidisciplinary team audit.

Macroscopic assessment of mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a useful tool for improving quality control in a multidisciplinary team.

BACKGROUND: High quality of surgical technique and the use of descriptive measures to assess and report surgical proficiency have been shown to influence locoregional tumor control in patients with rectal cancer. In this study, the authors have aimed to audit the implementation of a macroscopic assessment of mesorectal excision (MAME) and to investigate factors that influenced surgical quality and disease recurrence. METHODS: All curative resections for rectal cancer were prospectively evaluated for MAME between 1998 and 2007. Mesorectal specimens were graded into 3 types: complete, nearly complete, and incomplete categories. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified independent risk factors for noncomplete mesorectum categories as well as local and overall tumor recurrence. RESULTS: Of 359 specimens, 294 (81.9%) underwent evaluation; 82.3% were "complete." Abdominoperineal resection (APR) was the sole covariate associated with inadequate mesorectal excision (odds ratio [OR]=2.7; P=.003). Independent predictors of local recurrence were circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement (OR=3.6; P=.027) and noncomplete mesorectum (OR=4.4; P=.008). CRM+ (OR=3.1; P=.004), poorly differentiated tumors (OR=14.2; P=.010), nodal involvement (OR=2.9; P=.010), and APR (OR=2.9; P=.006) were independent risk factors for overall recurrence. In lower third tumors, noncomplete mesorectum occurred more frequently in APR compared with sphincter-saving procedures (31.1% vs 18.8%; P=.088). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the value of auditing MAME. Good proficiency of mesorectal excision is associated with lower tumor recurrences after curative surgery, and is a morphological tool found to be useful in clinical practice.