RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Perioperative corticosteroid administration is associated with reduced postoperative nausea, pain, and enhanced recovery after surgery. However, potential complications including wound and periprosthetic joint infections remain a concern for surgeons after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: A systematic review of the search databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE was made in January 2021 to identify comparative studies evaluating infection risk after perioperative corticosteroid administration in TJA. PRISMA guidelines were used for this review. Meta-analysis was used to assess infection risk in accordance with joint and corticosteroid dosing regimen used. RESULTS: 201 studies were returned after initial search strategy, with 29 included for review after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were categorized as using low- or high-dose corticosteroid with single or repeat dosing regimens. Single low-dose corticosteroid administration was not associated with an increased risk of infection (P = .4; CI = 0.00-0.00). Single high-dose corticosteroid was not associated with an increased infection risk (P = .3; CI = 0.00-0.01) nor did repeat low-dose regimens result in increased risk of infection (P = .8; CI = -0.02-0.02). Studies assessing repeat high-dosing regimens reported no increased infection, with small numbers of participants included. No significant risk difference in infection risk was noted in hip (P = .59; CI = -0.03-0.02) or knee (P = .2; CI = 0.00-0.01) arthroplasty. Heterogeneity in patient profiles included in studies to date was noted. CONCLUSION: Use of perioperative corticosteroid in TJA does not appear to be associated with increased risk of postoperative infection in patients with limited comorbidities. Further research is warranted to evaluate postoperative complications after TJA in these at-risk patient populations.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Humanos , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios , Periodo PosoperatorioRESUMEN
Petechial development as a result of venous compression has variously been described as acute dermal capillary rupture, mask phenomenon, and Rumpel-Leede Phenomenon. We describe the case of a patient who developed a facial petechial rash following a laparoscopic abdominal hysterectomy in steep Trendelenburg position. We review the physiological effects of laparoscopic surgical techniques and Trendelenburg positioning. These physiological effects lead to cephalad venous compression and are analogous to the venous compression caused by a tourniquet. The circumstances preceding its development and the characteristics of the facial rash lead us to conclude that the patient we present developed facial Rumple-Leede Phenomenon.