A systematic review for the antidepressant effects of sleep deprivation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Sleep deprivation (SD) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have been commonly used to treat depression. Recent studies suggest that co-therapy with rTMS and SD may produce better therapeutic effects than either therapy alone. Therefore, this study was to review the current findings to determine if rTMS can augment the therapeutic effects of SD on depression. METHODS: Embase, JSTOR, Medline, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for clinical studies published between January 1985 and March 2015 using the search term "rTMS/repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation AND sleep deprivation AND depress*". Only randomized and sham-controlled trials (RCTs) involving the combined use of rTMS and SD in depression patients were included in this systematic review. The scores of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression were extracted as primary outcome measures. RESULTS: Three RCTs with 72 patients that met the inclusion criteria were included for the systematic review. One of the trials reported skewed data and was described alone. The other two studies, which involved 30 patients in the experimental group (SD + active rTMS) and 22 patients in the control group (SD + sham rTMS), reported normally distributed data. The primary outcome measures showed different results among the three publications: two of which showed great difference between the experimental and the control subjects, and the other one showed non-significant antidepressant effect of rTMS on SD. In addition, two of the included studies reported secondary outcome measures with Clinical Global Impression Rating Scale and a self-reported well-being scale which presented good improvement for the depressive patients in the experiment group when compared with the control. The follow-up assessments in two studies indicated maintained results with the immediate measurements. CONCLUSIONS: From this study, an overview of the publications concerning the combined use of rTMS and SD is presented, which provides a direction for future research of therapies for depression. More studies are needed to confirm whether there is an augmentative antidepressant effect of rTMS on SD.

[Causes of death in STZ-induced rat models of diabetes mellitus].

OBJECTIVE: To identify conditions that may improve the successful rate of STZ-induced rat models of diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: 100 male SD rats were randomly divided into control group (n = 10) and experimental group (n = 90). Rats in the experimental group were treated with intraperitoneal injection of STZ 65 mg/kg once, and were then categorized into succeeded DM model group and failed group. Their body masses and levels of fasting blood glucose (FBG), urine glucose (UG), urine protein (UP), urine routine, renal function, liver function, blood lipids and kidney hypertrophy index (KHI) were monitored and compared. Dead rats were dissected to observe diseased organs. Pathological changes of those diseased organs were examined by HE staining. RESULTS: DM rat models were established through a single intraperitoneal injection of STZ, with a success rate of 58.89%. During the experiment, 43.33% of rats died. Compared with the rats in the failed group, the DM rat models had significantly higher levels of body mass, food intake, water intake, urine output, FBG, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, KHI, urinary tract infections, and mortality; but lower levels of total protein, albumin and cholesterol and triglyceride (P < 0.05). Nine rats died of pulmonary edema; 19 died of renal abscess. The causes of 11 dead rats were not clear. CONCLUSION: DM rat models can be established through a single intraperitoneal injection of STZ 65 mg/kg, but with high mortality rate. The deaths may be associated with infection, malnutrition, suffocation of lymphatic circulation, toxicity of STZ, and changes in environmental and climate conditions.

Antibiotic prophylaxis vs. on­demand antibiotic treatment in endoscopic therapy for variceal hemorrhage: A meta­analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The aim of the present study was to conduct a meta-analysis for elucidating the effects of antibiotic prophylaxis on infection, rebleeding and mortality in patients who underwent endoscopic therapy for variceal hemorrhage. Articles on antibiotic prophylaxis and on-demand antibiotic administration following endoscopic therapy for acute variceal bleeding were searched on PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library between January 1959 and February 2024, to elucidate whether the use of prophylactic antibiotics was necessary. The quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool and RevMan software version 5.4.1 was used for meta-analysis of the data. The current meta-analysis included four RCTs and 322 patients with acute variceal bleeding who underwent endoscopic therapy. All included studies were of high quality according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. According to the results of the meta-analysis, the incidence of infection in the prophylactic antibiotic group was significantly lower than that in the on-demand group [odds ratio (OR), 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.13-0.74; P=0.009]. The prophylactic antibiotic group also exhibited a lower incidence of rebleeding compared with that of the on-demand group (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.72; P=0.003). No significant differences were noted in the incidence of mortality between the two groups (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.45-1.92; P=0.83). In conclusion, the data indicated that antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended to be used in patients who have undergone endoscopic therapy for variceal hemorrhage.

[Investigate the effects of compound radix notoginseng on renal interstitial fibrosis and kidney-targeting treatment].

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the effects of compound Radix Notoginseng on renal interstitial fibrosis and kidney-targeting treatment. METHODS: 100 healthy Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into 5 groups: Unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) group, sham-operation (SOR) group, Radix Notoginseng (RN) group, compound Radix Notoginseng (CRN) group and Losartan (ARB) group. After operation, RN, CRN and ARB groups were intragastric administrated with RN (3 mL/d), CRN (3 mL/d) and ARB [20 mg/(kg x d)] respectively. Each group randomly included 18 rats for statistical analysis. The histological changes of renal interstitial tissues were observed by HE, Masson and PAS staining. Total kidney collagen content was determined by measuring the amount of hydroxyproline. The mRNA of alpha-SMA, collagen I and fibronectin were reverse transcribed and quantified by real-time PCR. The expression of alpha-SMA protein was assessed by immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis. RESULTS: In UUO model, the obstructed kidney showed typical features of renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis, such as severe tubular loss, dilation, atrophy, infiltration of inflammatory cells, interstitial matrix deposition (P < 0.05). Partial correlation assay showed that the expression of alpha-SMA was related to the renal tubular injury (r = 0.55; P < 0.05). Administration of RN, CRN and ARB improved tubulointerstitial damage and collagen matrix accumulation induced by UUO in different degree. The expression of the alpha-SMA at mRNA and protein levels were significantly increased in the UUO group (P < 0.05), which was also suppressed by treatment with RN, CRN and ARB in different degree. Moreover, more effective role in preventing fibrosis was observed in CRN group than when compared with that of RN group. CONCLUSION: RN and CRN can inhibit UUO-induced renal interstitial fibrosis in rats, and CRN treatment is more effective than RN in reducing interstitial fibrosis.

[Serological screening of autoantigens associated with vasculitis in systemic lupus erythematosus].

OBJECTIVE: To screen autoantigens associated with vasculitis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by serological analysis of recombinant cDNA expression library (SEREX). METHODS: A cDNA expression library derived from human microvascular endothelial cells (HMVEC) was screened with pooled sera from patients with SLE. Pooled sera were preadsorbed to reduce the background sera activity. The obtained preadsorbed pooled sera of patients were used for immunoscreening. Immunoscreening procedure was done according to the instruction manual provided by the manufacturer (Stratagene). RESULTS: Eleven distinct positive clones were identified. Bioinformatic analysis revealed these 11 positive clones encoding three different proteins: SSA, SSB and YB-1. As for YB-1, there are hitherto no reports unveiling its association with vasculitis in SLE. CONCLUSION: The association of YB-1 with vasculitis in SLE was found for the first time in this study. SEREX has offered a new strategy to explore the autoantigens related to SLE. By SEREX, we may find out the autoantigen which is helpful to the diagnosis and treatment of SLE, and to the prognostication concerned.

High Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapy For Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence supports an analgesic effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for neuropathic pain (NP). However, the optimal parameters of rTMS (stimulation frequency and treatment sessions) for achieving long-term analgesic effects remain unknown. This study analyzed the current findings in the literature. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the optimal parameters of rTMS for NP, including the rTMS sessions needed for inducing acute as well as long-term analgesic effects. STUDY DESIGN: A meta-analysis of the analgesic effect of high frequency rTMS (HF- rTMS) for neuropathic patients. SETTING: This meta-analysis examined all studies involving the analgesic efficacy of HF-rTMS for NP. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for clinical studies of rTMS treatment on NP published before December 31, 2014. Crude standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for pain intensity after different treatment sessions (from 1 to 10) and follow-up of one or 2 months after rTMS treatment using random effect models. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies (including 32 trials and 589 patients) were selected for the meta-analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All 3 HF-rTMS treatments (5, 10, and 20 Hz) produced pain reduction, while there were no differences between them, with the maximal pain reduction found after one and 5 sessions of rTMS treatment. Further, this significant analgesic effect remained forone month after 5 sessions of rTMS treatment. LIMITATIONS: There are limitations of this meta-analysis. For example, the long-term analgesic effects of different HF-rTMS and low frequency (LF) rTMS sessions, including the single session of rTMS on different NP of varying origins have yet not been evaluated; the full degree of pain relief is still unclear for many rTMS studies. CONCLUSIONS: HF-rTMS stimulation on primary motor cortex is effective in relieving pain in NP patients. Although 5 sessions of rTMS treatment produced a maximal analgesic effect and may be maintained for at least one month, further large-scale and well-controlled trials are needed to determine if this enhanced effect is specific to certain types of NP such as post-stroke related central NP.

Modulation of interhemispheric activation balance in motor-related areas of stroke patients with motor recovery: Systematic review and meta-analysis of fMRI studies.

BACKGROUND: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies suggest that stroke-induced motor deficits are associated with an interhemispheric imbalance of motor activation. This meta-analysis aims to determine the changes of interhemispheric activation balance (IHAB) in motor-related cortices along with post-stroke motor recovery. METHODS: We searched PubMed for fMRI studies that investigated IHAB in stroke patients with motor recovery. Laterality indexes (LIs, (ipsilesional activation-contralesional activation)/(ipsilesional activation+contralesional activation)) before and after motor improvement were extracted as the outcome measures of IHAB. Data were synthesized by calculating standardized mean difference (SMD, Hedges' adjusted g) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: After the rejection of 459 studies, 22 trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The LIs of sensorimotor cortex (SMC, 22 trials, 195 subjects), premotor cortex (PMC, 12 trials, 93 subjects), supplementary motor area (SMA, 12 trials, 92 subjects), and cerebellum (CB, 4 trials, 31 subjects) were assessed. Studies sampling from stroke patients with motor improvement showed positive changes of LI in SMC (SMD, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.41-1.01; P<0.00001) and PMC (SMD, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.36-1.00; P<0.0001), but not in SMA (SMD, 0.07; 95% CI, -0.62 to 0.75; P=0.85) and CB (SMD, -0.17; 95% CI, -1.52 to 1.19, P=0.81). Studies involving stroke patients with poor motor recovery showed non-significant changes in all of the four motor-related cortices (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that along with good motor recovery of stroke patients, the IHAB is up-regulated in SMC and PMC, but not significantly changed in SMA and CB. Because of the limited data, further studies are needed to verify the findings.

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as an Alternative Therapy for Cognitive Impairment in Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have indicated that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) could improve cognitive function in people with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Yet the results are inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate recent rTMS studies conducted in mild to moderate AD patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE databases and Science Direct were searched for studies of rTMS treatment on AD patients with cognitive impairment published before February 2015. The relevant primary outcomes of cognition were extracted from those included studies. A crude standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated by using random effect models. RESULTS: Seven studies with a total of 94 mild to moderate AD patients were included in this meta-analysis. A significant overall rTMS treatment effect on cognition was found for all AD patients (p = 0.0008, SMD = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.41-1.58). Stratification analysis showed that this effect is stimulation frequency- and hemisphere-dependent. High frequency stimulation (>1.0 Hz) (p <  0.05) but not low frequency stimulation (≤1.0 Hz) (p >  0.05) was significantly effective in improving the cognition of AD patients. Further, rTMS stimulation on right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and bilateral DLPFC (p <  0.05), but not on the left DLPFC (p >  0.05) was significantly effective in improving cognitive function of AD patients. A significant effect was observed in the rTMS subgroup (p <  0.05), rather than in the rTMS+drug subgroup (p >  0.05). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis supports that high frequency rTMS stimulation on right- or bilateral-DLPFC has significant therapeutic effect on cognitive function in patients with mild to moderate AD. Due to small number of studies included, more well-controlled rTMS studies should be evaluated in AD patients in the future.