RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patients with liver cirrhosis who are candidates for liver transplantation must be evaluated both clinically and socially in order to obtain the optimal outcomes and avoid futile therapeutic measures. For the evaluation of the social aspects in these patients, no validated scale in Spanish is available. The SIPAT (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation) scale is an instrument that measures the social, family and psychological aspects in candidates for solid organ transplantation. The objective of this study is to adapt and validate an abbreviated version of the SIPAT scale in Spanish for patients with liver cirrhosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study carried out in the Hepatology Unit of the La Fe Unversity Hospital in Valencia, by questionnaire validation methodology. To analyze the reliability of the questionnaire, the internal consistency of all variables was calculated, for variability an exploratory factor analysis, and for stability the test-retest test was carried out. RESULTS: 96 patients who were admitted for decompensated cirrhosis to the Hepatology Unit of the La Fe Hospital in Valencia between November 1, 2017 and January 31, 2017 were selected. 84% were men, the mean age was 60.01 (SD 10.12) years. In 73.2% of those admitted, the etiology of cirrhosis was alcoholic. 14.4% had a Child's stage A, 57.7% B and 27.8% C. The internal consistency of all variables reached a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.766. In the exploratory factor analysis, 6 dimensions of the questionnaire were identified that explain 84.27% of the total variability. To see the stability of the instrument, the measurement was repeated at 2 and 6 months of follow-up, obtaining in the test-retest a kappa agreement of 0.612 and 0.565 respectively. CONCLUSION: The SIPAT-11 questionnaire has good psychometric characteristics in cirrhotic patients who are candidates for liver transplantation. It is easy to complete and can be administered by professionals who are not specialists in the area of Mental Health.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of penetrating complications in Crohn's disease (CD) increases progressively over time, but evidence on the medical treatment in this setting is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of biologic agents in CD complicated with internal fistulizing disease. METHODS: Adult patients with CD-related fistulae who received at least 1 biologic agent for this condition from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry were included. Exclusion criteria involved those receiving biologics for perianal disease, enterocutaneous, rectovaginal, anastomotic, or peristomal fistulae. The primary end point was fistula-related surgery. Predictive factors associated with surgery and fistula closure were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression and survival analyses. RESULTS: A total of 760 patients from 53 hospitals (673 receiving anti-tumor necrosis factors, 69 ustekinumab, and 18 vedolizumab) were included. After a median follow-up of 56 months (interquartile range, 26-102 months), 240 patients required surgery, with surgery rates of 32%, 41%, and 24% among those under anti-tumor necrosis factor, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab, respectively. Fistula closure was observed in 24% of patients. Older patients, ileocolonic disease, entero-urinary fistulae, or an intestinal stricture distal to the origin of the fistula were associated with a higher risk of surgery, whereas nonsmokers and combination therapy with an immunomodulator reduced this risk. DISCUSSION: Biologic therapy is beneficial in approximately three-quarters of patients with fistulizing CD, achieving fistula closure in 24%. However, around one-third still undergo surgery due to refractory disease. Some patient- and lesion-related factors can identify patients who will obtain more benefit from these drugs.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn , Fístula , Fístula Rectal , Adulto , Humanos , Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Terapia Biológica , Necrosis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fístula Rectal/etiología , Fístula Rectal/terapiaRESUMEN
Gallstone ileus is a rare complication of cholelithiasis, characterized by mechanical bowel obstruction due to a biliary calculus originating from a bilioenteric fistula. The Rigler triad, consisting of aerobilia, ectopic gallstone, and intestinal obstruction, is rarely observed in its complete form. We present the case of a 92-year-old male with a history of acute lithiasic cholecystitis who presented to the Emergency department with acute epigastric pain. Initial evaluation revealed gallbladder dilatation, gallstones, and gallbladder wall thickening suggestive of acute cholecystitis. During hospitalization, the patient experienced an episode of hematemesis, leading to the diagnosis of a cholecystoduodenal fistula and a large blood clot in the duodenal bulb. Further imaging showed an ectopic gallstone causing small bowel obstruction. The patient underwent urgent surgery for stone extraction, followed by endoscopic intervention for the bleeding vessel identified at a subsequent gastroscopy. Unfortunately, the patient had a poor postoperative course and passed away seven days later. This case report highlights the exceptional occurrence of both the Rigler triad and upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a patient with gallstone ileus. Surgical intervention is crucial for the initial resolution of intestinal obstruction, followed by cholecystectomy and repair of the bilioenteric fistula. Awareness of these rare presentations is important for timely diagnosis and appropriate management of this uncommon complication of cholelithiasis.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Inadequate social support is associated with higher mortality both in the general population and in patients with chronic diseases. There are no studies that have described social support in liver cirrhosis and its impact on prognosis. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the impact social support has in the survival of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. METHODS: Prospective multicentric cohort study (2016-2019). Patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis were included. Epidemiological, clinical and social variables were collected, using the validated Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey, with a 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients were included, of which 79.5% were men. The most common etiology of cirrhosis was alcohol (74.8%), mean age was 60 years (SD 10.29), mean MELD was 15.6 (SD 6.3) and most of the patients had a Child-Pugh B (53.5%) or C (35.4%). In the assessment of social support, we observed that most of the patients (92.2%) had adequate global support. At the end of the follow-up (median 314 days), 70.1% of the patients survived. The 1-year survival rate in patients with inadequate global social support was 30%, compared to 73.5% in the presence of social support. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, inadequate social support predicted survival with an adjusted HR of 5.5 (95% CI 2,3-13,4) independently of MELD (HR 1.1, 95% CI 1-1.2), age (HR 1, 95% CI 1-1.1) and hepatocarcinoma (HR 10.6, 95% CI 4.1-27.4). CONCLUSION: Adequate social support improves survival in liver cirrhosis, independently of clinical variables. Social intervention strategies should be considered for their management.
Asunto(s)
Cirrosis Hepática , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Prospectivos , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Pronóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) with donors after circulatory death (DCD) have been considered suboptimal due to higher rates of ischemic cholangiopathy, especially when the super-rapid recovery (SRR) technique is used. This study aimed to compare the incidence of complications between recipients receiving DCD vs those receiving donors after brain death (DBD) in a large-volume liver transplant centre. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study (LT from January 2015 to December 2018) comparing recipients who underwent a LT with DCD vs. a control group of LT with DBD, matched 1:1 without replacement by propensity score matching that included the following variables: LT indication, recipient sex and age, donor age and MELD score. RESULTS: 51 recipients with DCD-LT (29 SRR, 22 normothermic regional perfusion [NRP]) were matched with 51 DBD-LT recipients. Biliary complications were more frequent in DCD, 10% (n=5), all with SRR technique, vs 2% (n=1) in the DBD group, p=0.2. Two patients (4%) suffered primary graft non-function in the DCD group (1 SRR and 1 NRP) versus zero in the DBD group (p=0.49). Postoperative bleeding and reinterventions were also higher in the DCD group: 7 (13.7%) vs 1 (1.95%) and 8 (15.7%) vs 2 (3.9%) respectively (p=0.06 and 0.09). On the 1st postoperative day AST/ALT peak was higher in DCD (p≤0001). The incidence of rejection, vascular complications, renal injury, hospital stay, and readmissions were similar in both groups. Cumulative 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-year graft and patient survival were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: DCD donors are an adequate option to increase the donor pool in LT, achieving similar graft and patient survival rates to those achieved with DBD donors, especially when the NRP technique is used.
Asunto(s)
Supervivencia de Injerto , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Muerte Encefálica , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Hígado , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de TejidosRESUMEN
We report the case of an 81-year-old female with large bowel obstruction secondary to a giant simple renal cyst (16 cm), which was producing a compression of the descending colon against the abdominal wall. Percutaneous drainage of the renal cyst was performed by a urologist. The follow-up CT scan revealed a collapsed cyst with resolution of the bowel obstruction. The patient showed resolution of the symptoms with an improvement in blood test results.
Asunto(s)
Quistes , Obstrucción Intestinal , Enfermedades Renales Quísticas , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quistes/complicaciones , Quistes/diagnóstico por imagen , Drenaje/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Enfermedades Renales Quísticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Renales Quísticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
We report the case of a 67-year-old male with a history of arterial hypertension and atrial fibrillation, who was admitted for acute renal failure (creatinine: 4.41 mg/dl) and hypotension. He also presented hyponatremia (129 mmol/L) and hypokalemia (2.7 mmol/L). The patient referred profuse diarrhea during the previous two months as a possible triggering cause. Physical examination showed signs of dehydration and palpation of a polypoid mass in the rectal ampulla.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Adenoma Velloso , Lesiones Precancerosas , Neoplasias del Recto , Desequilibrio Hidroelectrolítico , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Adenoma Velloso/complicaciones , Adenoma Velloso/diagnóstico , Adenoma Velloso/cirugía , Anciano , Diarrea/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias del Recto/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico , Síndrome , Desequilibrio Hidroelectrolítico/etiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Infections in cirrhotic patients caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria are currently increasing and are associated with greater morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: To assess the epidemiology, risk factors and prognoses of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study on patients with liver cirrhosis who developed an infection during hospitalisations between July 2014 and August 2016 at our centre (Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain). RESULTS: Urinary tract infection (30.2%) and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (22.1%) were the most common infections. A total of 102 microbiological isolates were analysed: 50% in community-acquired infections, 36% in isolates associated with healthcare infections and 14% in nosocomial infections. Escherichia coli was the main aetiology (29.4%). The overall multiresistance rate was 28.4%. The univariate analysis showed that infection caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria (28.4%) was associated with nosocomial infection compared to those associated with healthcare (OR 5.46; 95% CI: 1.22-24.43; P=.039) and healthcare-associated infections (compared to community-acquired infections, OR 3.39; 95% CI: 1.09-10.54; P=.048), use of antibiotics (OR 4.37; 95% CI: 1.59-11.99; P=.005), hospital admission in the previous 90 days (OR 3.18; 95% CI: 1.19-8.47; P=.018), active cancer (OR 2.93; 95% CI: 1.08-7.99; P=.038), and use of prophylactic norfloxacin (OR 3; 95% CI: 1.02-8.79; P=.012). Moreover, it was associated with a higher rate of sepsis (OR 3.13; 95% CI: 1.18-8.32; P=.025). The failure of initial treatment was related to greater development of acute renal failure (P<.001), sepsis (P=.012), septic shock (P=.002), ICU admission (P<.001) and mortality (P<.001). CONCLUSION: The rate of multidrug-resistant bacteria infections in our centre is comparable to that of other European centres with similar characteristics. The results obtained make it recommendable to implement the antibiotic treatment guidelines in current clinical practice guidelines, limiting the use of carbapenems to nosocomial infections and healthcare-associated infections with other risk factors of multidrug resistance or signs of severe sepsis. Early and adequate empirical treatment correlates with a better prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/complicaciones , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención TerciariaAsunto(s)
Enteritis/complicaciones , Eosinofilia/complicaciones , Gastritis/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Enteritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Enteritis/patología , Eosinofilia/diagnóstico por imagen , Eosinofilia/patología , Femenino , Gastritis/complicaciones , Gastritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Gastritis/patología , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XAsunto(s)
Endometriosis/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Íleon/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Urgencias Médicas , Endometriosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Endometriosis/patología , Endometriosis/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades del Íleon/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades del Íleon/cirugía , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Laparotomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumatosis Cistoide Intestinal/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: MELD3.0 has been proposed to stratify patients on the liver transplant waiting list (WL) to reduce the historical disadvantage of women in accessing liver transplant. Our aim was to validate MELD3.0 in 2 unique populations. METHODS: This study is a 2-center retrospective cohort study from Toronto, Canada, and Valencia, Spain, of all adults added to the liver transplant WL between 2015 and 2019. Listing indications whose short-term survival outcome is not adequately captured by the MELD score were excluded. All patients analyzed had a minimum follow-up of 3 months after inclusion in the WL. RESULTS: Six hundred nineteen patients were included; 61% were male, with a mean age of 56 years. Mean MELD at inclusion was 18.00 ± 6.88, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium (MELDNa) 19.78 ± 7.00, and MELD3.0 20.25 ± 7.22. AUC to predict 90-day mortality on the WL was 0.879 (95% CI: 0.820, 0.939) for MELD, 0.921 (95% CI: 0.876, 0.967) for MELDNa, and 0.930 (95% CI: 0.888, 0.973) for MELD3.0. MELDNa and MELD3.0 were better predictors than MELD (p = 0.055 and p = 0.024, respectively), but MELD3.0 was not statistically superior to MELDNa (p = 0.144). The same was true when stratified by sex, although the difference between MELD3.0 and MELD was only significant for women (p = 0.032), while no statistical significance was found in either sex when compared with MELDNa. In women, AUC was 0.835 (95% CI: 0.744, 0.926) for MELD, 0.873 (95% CI: 0.785, 0.961) for MELDNa, and 0.886 (95% CI: 0.803, 0.970) for MELD3.0; differences for the comparison between AUC in women versus men for all 3 scores were nonsignificant. Compared to MELD, MELD3.0 was able to reclassify 146 patients (24%), the majority of whom belonged to the MELD 10-19 interval. Compared to MELDNa, it reclassified 68 patients (11%), most of them in the MELDNa 20-29 category. CONCLUSIONS: MELD3.0 has been validated in centers with significant heterogeneity and offers the highest mortality prediction for women on the WL without disadvantaging men. However, in these cohorts, it was not superior to MELDNa.