RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Ustekinumab was recently approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Although data from the UNIFI clinical trial are encouraging, real-world data assessing effectiveness and safety are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness, safety and pharmacokinetics of ustekinumab in a large cohort of refractory UC patients. METHODS: Multicenter observational study of UC patients who received ustekinumab for active disease. The Partial Mayo Score (PMS), endoscopic activity, C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FC) were recorded at baseline and at different time points. Demographic and clinical data, adverse events (AEs) and surgeries were documented. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were analyzed from 4 referral Spanish hospitals. The clinical remission rates were 59%, 56.5%, 57% and 69% of patients at weeks 8, 16, 24 and 52, respectively. Normalization of FC was achieved in 39.6%, 41% and 51% at weeks 8, 24 and 52, respectively. CRP normalization was observed in 79%, 75% and 76.5% of patients at weeks 8, 24 and 52, respectively. Fewer previous anti-TNF agents and loss of response to anti-TNF were associated with clinical response and normalization of FC, respectively. AEs were observed in 5 patients, and 9 underwent colectomy. Ustekinumab persistence rates were 91%, 83% and 81% at 24, 48 and 96 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ustekinumab demonstrated, in the real-world setting, long-term effectiveness and a favorable safety profile in a cohort of refractory UC patients.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Ustekinumab , Humanos , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inducción de Remisión , Proteína C-ReactivaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Identifying novel treatment strategies for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and at risk of relapse is critical. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in lowering fecal calprotectin (FC) levels in UC patients in clinical remission and at risk of relapse. METHODS: This multicenter study comprised a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase (part I) and an open-label, non-randomized phase (part II). Eligible participants with UC in clinical remission, treated with 5-aminosalicylic acid and with FC levels ≥250 µg/g were randomized to receive 5 mg/day of BDP or placebo for 4 weeks (part I). At week 5, patients with FC ≥100 µg/g were treated with 5 mg/day of BDP for 4 weeks (part II), and FC levels were tested at week 9. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were randomized: 22 received BDP (group A) and 21 placebo (group B). At week 4, 13 patients (59.1%) in group A and 3 (17.6%) in group B had FC levels <100 µg/g (p-value = 0.010). In the double-blind phase of the study, no patient relapsed in group A and 4 in group B (p-value = 0.049). Both treatment groups showed a favorable safety profile, with most common adverse events being gastrointestinal disorders. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter, randomized clinical trial including patients with UC in clinical remission but with elevated FC, BDP was efficacious in reducing FC and well-tolerated.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The recommendations of the Spanish Ministry of Health on vaccination in risk groups include mesalazine among the treatments with a possible negative effect on its effectiveness. However, this is not the recommendation of most experts. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of mesalazine on the humoral response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: VACOVEII is a Spanish, prospective, multicenter study promoted by GETECCU, which evaluates the effectiveness of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with IBD. This study includes IBD patients who have recieved the full vaccination schedule and without previous COVID-19 infection. Seroconversion was set at 260BAU/mL (centralized determination) and was assessed 6 months after full vaccination. In this subanalysis of the study, we compare the effectiveness of the vaccine between patients treated with mesalazine and patients without treatment. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients without immunosuppressive therapy were included, of which 32 did not receive any treatment and 92 received only mesalazine. Six months after full vaccination, no significant differences are observed in the mean concentrations of IgG anti-S between both groups. In the multivariate analysis, antibody titers were independently associated with the use of mRNA vaccines and with SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSION: Mesalazine does not have a negative effect on the response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in IBD patients.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Mesalamina , Humanos , Mesalamina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Vacunación , Anciano , Seroconversión , Eficacia de las Vacunas , SARS-CoV-2/inmunologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of penetrating complications in Crohn's disease (CD) increases progressively over time, but evidence on the medical treatment in this setting is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of biologic agents in CD complicated with internal fistulizing disease. METHODS: Adult patients with CD-related fistulae who received at least 1 biologic agent for this condition from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry were included. Exclusion criteria involved those receiving biologics for perianal disease, enterocutaneous, rectovaginal, anastomotic, or peristomal fistulae. The primary end point was fistula-related surgery. Predictive factors associated with surgery and fistula closure were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression and survival analyses. RESULTS: A total of 760 patients from 53 hospitals (673 receiving anti-tumor necrosis factors, 69 ustekinumab, and 18 vedolizumab) were included. After a median follow-up of 56 months (interquartile range, 26-102 months), 240 patients required surgery, with surgery rates of 32%, 41%, and 24% among those under anti-tumor necrosis factor, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab, respectively. Fistula closure was observed in 24% of patients. Older patients, ileocolonic disease, entero-urinary fistulae, or an intestinal stricture distal to the origin of the fistula were associated with a higher risk of surgery, whereas nonsmokers and combination therapy with an immunomodulator reduced this risk. DISCUSSION: Biologic therapy is beneficial in approximately three-quarters of patients with fistulizing CD, achieving fistula closure in 24%. However, around one-third still undergo surgery due to refractory disease. Some patient- and lesion-related factors can identify patients who will obtain more benefit from these drugs.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn , Fístula , Fístula Rectal , Adulto , Humanos , Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Terapia Biológica , Necrosis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fístula Rectal/etiología , Fístula Rectal/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination decreases in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, specially under anti-TNF treatment. However, data on medium-term effectiveness are limited, specially using new recommended seroconversion rate (>260BAU/mL). Our aim was to evaluate the 6-month>260 BAU-seroconversion rate after full vaccination and after booster-dose. METHODS: VACOVEII is a Spanish multicenter, prospective study promoted by GETECCU. IBD patients full vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 and without previous COVID-19 infection, treated or not with immunosuppressants, were included. The booster dose was administered 6 months after the full vaccination. Seroconversion was set at 260BAU/mL, according to most recent recommendations and was assessed 6 months after the full vaccination and 6 months after booster-dose. RESULTS: Between October 2021 and March 2022, 313 patients were included (124 no treatment or mesalazine; 55 immunomodulators; 87 anti-TNF; 19 anti-integrin; and 28 ustekinumab). Most patients received mRNA-vaccines (86%). Six months after full vaccination, overall seroconversion rate was 44.1%, being significantly lower among patients on anti-TNF (19.5%, p<0.001) and ustekinumab (35.7%, p=0.031). The seroconversion rate after booster was 92%. Again, anti-TNF patients had a significantly lower seroconversion rate (67%, p<0.001). mRNA-vaccine improved seroconversion rate (OR 11.720 [95% CI 2.26-60.512]). CONCLUSION: The full vaccination regimen achieves suboptimal response in IBD patients, specially among those anti-TNF or ustekinumab. The booster dose improves seroconversion rate in all patients, although it remains limited in those treated with anti-TNF. These results reinforce the need to prioritize future booster doses in patients on immunosuppressants therapy, specially under anti-TNF, and using mRNA-vaccines.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: monocytes play an important role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease but data are scarce regarding activity biomarkers, above all in patients under biologic therapies. OBJECTIVE: the aim of this study was to evaluate the value of monocyte measurements in predicting flares in inflammatory bowel disease patients under maintenance treatment with anti-TNF. METHODS: a prospective, observational cohort study was designed. Relapse was defined as a Harvey-Bradshaw score > 4 in Crohn's disease, and a partial Mayo score ≥ 2 in ulcerative colitis. Monocyte concentration was quantified at 4-month intervals for twelve months. A total of 95 consecutive patients were included. Median age was 42 years, 50.5 % were female, and 75 % had Crohn's disease. RESULTS: sixteen months after inclusion, 65 (68.4 %) patients remained in clinical remission. Mean monocyte count preceding a relapse was 563 (standard deviation: 144) compared to 405 (standard deviation: 177) in patients who remained in remission. Final monocyte count was significantly different between relapse and remission in Crohn's disease (0.82; 95 % CI: 0.71-0.90; p < 0.005). According to the multivariate analysis, only monocytes and fecal calprotectin were related to more relapses. CONCLUSION: in conclusion, in inflammatory bowel disease patients under anti-TNF therapy, repeat monocyte counts could help monitor patients, at least in Crohn's disease.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedad de Crohn , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Heces/química , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito/análisis , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Monocitos/química , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Inducción de Remisión , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis TumoralRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a multifactorial pathology with an increasing incidence. There is no study that has assessed a possible relationship with very high residential radon exposure in the study area. The aim of the study was to analyze if residential radon concentration is associated with a higher incidence of IBD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: an ecological study was performed. All incident cases of inflammatory bowel disease in the area of Santiago de Compostela were included between January and December 2017. Radon levels at a municipal level were correlated with demographic factors and type of IBD. RESULTS: ninety-six patients were included, 63 (65.6 %) with ulcerative colitis, 29 (30.25) with Crohn's disease and four (4.2 %) with indeterminate colitis. The incidence rate per 100,000 inhabitants-year was 21.6 cases. There were no statistically significant differences in the type of disease developed regarding radon levels (p > 0.05). No correlation between radon levels and the cumulative incidence of inflammatory bowel disease at the municipal level was observed (Spearman's rho = 0.13, p-value 0.5). CONCLUSION: in the area of Santiago de Compostela, there is a higher incidence of IBD in comparison with previous studies using western countries as reference. However, there was no correlation with the municipal average radon concentration and incidence of IBD or any of its types in this study.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Colitis , Enfermedad de Crohn , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Radón , Enfermedad Crónica , Colitis Ulcerosa/epidemiología , Colitis Ulcerosa/etiología , Enfermedad de Crohn/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Crohn/etiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/etiología , Radón/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Several vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are currently in use and are recommended in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Data are scarce about the gastroenterologists and IBD patient's acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. The aim of the study was to evaluate the intention to get vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among IBD patients from gastroenterologists and patient's perspective. METHODS: An online anonymous survey was sent to 8000 patients from ACCU-Spain and 1000 members of the GETECCU. Three invitations were sent between October-December 2020. Descriptive analyses were performed, comparing physicians and patients responses by standard statistical analyses. RESULTS: 144 gastroenterologists [63% female, mean age 43 years (SD 9.5)], and 1302 patients [72% female, mean age 43 years (SD 12)] responded to the survey. 95% of the physicians recommended SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for IBD patients and 87% consider that their vaccination strategies has not changed after the pandemic compared to 12% who considered that they currently refer more patients to vaccination. Regarding to IBD patients, only 43% of patients were willing to receive the vaccine and 43% were not sure. Male sex (p<0.001) and mesalazine treatment (p=0.021) were positively associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine acceptance. After multivariate analysis, only male sex was significantly associated with vaccination intent (OR=1.6; 95% confidence interval=1.2-2.0; p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Gastroenterologists and patient's perspective about SARS-CoV-2 are different. Future efforts to increase COVID-19 vaccine and decrease unfounded beliefs among IBD patients are needed.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gastroenterólogos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicacionesRESUMEN
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may require different immunosuppressive treatments throughout their illness. It is essential to assess the immunization status of patients at diagnosis or, if this is not possible, at least before the beginning of immunosuppressive therapy and, subsequently, administering the appropriate vaccines. Therefore, the aim of this work is to establish clear and concise recommendations on vaccination in patients with IBD in the different settings of our clinical practice including vaccination in children, during pregnancy, breastfeeding or on trips. This consensus document emphasises the differences between inactivated and attenuated vaccines and the different degrees of immunosuppression and correlates them with the administration of both mandatory and optional vaccines recommended to our patients with IBD. Finally, as a summary, 17 recommendations are established based on the available scientific evidence and expert opinion. A multidisciplinary team with extensive experience in IBD and vaccination, made up of specialists in gastroenterology, paediatrics, nursing and pharmacy, has participated in the preparation of these recommendations of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedad de Crohn , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Niño , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Vacunación , Enfermedad CrónicaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: (a) To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of anti-TNF trough levels to predict mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); (b) to determine the best cut-off point to predict mucosal healing in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF. METHODS: This is a multicenter, prospective study. IBD patients under anti-TNF treatment for at least 6 months that had to undergo an endoscopy were included. Mucosal healing was defined as: Simple endoscopic score for Crohn's Disease < 3 for Crohn's disease (CD), Rutgeerts score < i2 for CD in postoperative setting, or Mayo endoscopic score ≤ 1 for ulcerative colitis (UC). Anti-TNF concentrations were measured using SMART ELISAs at trough. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were included. Anti-TNF trough levels were significantly higher among patients that had mucosal healing than among those who did not. The area under the curve of infliximab for mucosal healing was 0.63 (best cutoff value 3.4 µg/mL), and for adalimumab 0.60 (best cutoff value 7.2 µg/mL). In the multivariate analysis, having anti-TNF drug levels above the cutoff values [odds ratio (OR) 3.1]) and having UC instead of CD (OR 4) were associated with a higher probability of having mucosal healing. Additionally, the need for an escalated dosage (OR 0.2) and current smoking habit (OR 0.2) were also associated with a lower probability of mucosal healing. CONCLUSIONS: There was an association between anti-TNF trough levels and mucosal healing in IBD patients; however, the accuracy of the determination of infliximab and adalimumab concentrations able to predict mucosal healing was suboptimal.
Asunto(s)
Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Mucosa Intestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos , Adalimumab/sangre , Adalimumab/farmacocinética , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios/sangre , Antiinflamatorios/farmacocinética , Productos Biológicos/sangre , Productos Biológicos/farmacocinética , Colitis Ulcerosa/sangre , Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnóstico , Colitis Ulcerosa/inmunología , Enfermedad de Crohn/sangre , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Crohn/inmunología , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Humanos , Infliximab/sangre , Infliximab/farmacocinética , Mucosa Intestinal/inmunología , Mucosa Intestinal/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , España , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/inmunologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disease of the digestive tract and up to 20-30% of UC patients may suffer a severe flare-up during the course of the disease. Although there are national and international recommendations about its clinical management, there is not enough information about the treatment of acute severe UC in clinical practice. METHODS: An electronic and anonymous survey with 51 multiple-choice questions was performed among all the members of the Spanish Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Working Group (GETECCU). RESULTS: Out of the 164 responders (20%), most were gastroenterologists (95%), with 59% from tertiary hospitals treating a median of 5 patients per year (IQR: 3-8) with a severe flare-up of ulcerative colitis. An endoscopic examination was routinely performed in 86% of patients (62% at admission). The most commonly used corticosteroid was methylprednisolone, usually at a dose of 60mg/day, and its response was assessed after a median of 3days (IQR: 3-5). Both in thiopurine-naïve and thiopurine-refractory patients, infliximab was the drug most frequently prescribed as rescue therapy. Half of responders (55%) had ever prescribed a first dose of infliximab higher than 5 mg/kg, and a higher proportion (73%) had ever prescribed an earlier dose of infliximab in the second or third infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Acute severe UC is generally managed according to current treatment guidelines in our setting. The rescue therapy most commonly prescribed is infliximab, and the use of intensified or accelerated regimens with this biological drug is not unusual.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , EspañaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND GOAL: Predicting relapse in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients could allow early changes in therapy. We aimed at evaluating the accuracy of consecutive fecal calprotectin (FC) measurements to predict flares in IBD patients under maintenance treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drugs. STUDY: A prospective longitudinal cohort study with 16-month follow-up period was designed. IBD patients in clinical remission for at least 6 months under anti-TNF therapy were included. FC was quantified at 4-month intervals for 1 year, and patients were clinically evaluated for relapse at 2-month intervals. Diagnostic accuracy of FC for predicting relapse was evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: In total, 95 of 106 included patients finalized the study and were analyzed (median age 44 y, 50.5% female, 75% with Crohn's disease). A total of 30 patients (31.6%) had a relapse over follow-up. FC concentration was significantly higher in patients who relapsed (477 µg/g) than in patients who maintained in remission (65 µg/g) (P<0.005). The optimal cutoff to predict remission was 130 µg/g (negative predictive value of 100%), and 300 µg/g to predict relapse (positive predictive value of 78.3%). CONCLUSIONS: FC is a good predictor of clinical relapse and a particularly good predictor of remission over the following 4 months in patients with IBD on maintenance therapy with anti-TNF drugs. FC levels <130 µg/g is consistently associated with maintained disease remission, whereas concentrations >300 µg/g allow predicting relapse with a high probability at any time over the following 4 months.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito/análisis , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Heces/química , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is currently based on the objective evaluation of intestinal lesions. It would therefore be interesting to have access to simple and non-invasive tools to monitor IBD activity and to identify the presence of lesions. Faecal calprotectin (FC) is the main cytosolic protein of neutrophils, it is resistant to bacterial degradation and it is stable at room temperature for several days, characteristics that make it suitable for use in clinical practice. It can be used to differentiate between inflammatory and functional processes, it correlates with endoscopic activity, it is associated with clinical and endoscopic response to treatment and it has short-term prognostic value. This paper offers an up-to-date perspective on the information that FC can provide clinicians to aid diagnosis, monitoring and management of IBD.
Asunto(s)
Heces/química , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/diagnóstico , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito/análisis , Biomarcadores , Cromatografía de Afinidad , Colitis/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Humanos , Inflamación , Neutrófilos/metabolismo , Pronóstico , Recurrencia , Manejo de EspecímenesRESUMEN
AIMS: To establish recommendations for the management of psychological problems affecting patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: A meeting of a group of IBD experts made up of doctors, psychologists, nurses and patient representatives was held. The following were presented: 1) Results of a previous focal group, 2) Results of doctor and patient surveys, 3) Results of a systematic review of tools for detecting anxiety and depression. A guided discussion was then held about the most important psychological and emotional problems associated with IBD, appropriate referral criteria and situations to be avoided. The validated instrument most applicable to clinical practice was selected. A recommendations document and a Delphi survey were designed. The survey was sent to the group and to a scientific committee of the GETECCU group in order to establish the level of agreement with these recommendations. RESULTS: Fifteen recommendations were established linked to 3 key processes: 1) What steps should be taken to identify psychological problems at an IBD appointment; 2) What are the criteria for referring patients to a mental health specialist; 3) How to approach psychological problems. CONCLUSIONS: Resources should be made available to healthcare professionals so that they can treat these problems during consultations, identify the disorders which could affect the clinical course of the disease and determine their impact on the patient's life in order that these can be treated and followed up by the most suitable professional. These recommendations could serve as a basis for redesigning IBD services or processes and as justification for the training of healthcare personnel.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/psicología , Síntomas Afectivos/diagnóstico , Síntomas Afectivos/tratamiento farmacológico , Síntomas Afectivos/etiología , Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/etiología , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/etiología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Emociones , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Riesgo , Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas/etiologíaRESUMEN
A 47-year-old man was attended at the emergency room for severe chest pain after eating sausage with subsequent vomiting and mild upper gastrointestinal bleeding. In the chest radiography we could not see abnormalities. He referred previous episodes of choking without consulting. The urgent gastroscopy detected tertiary contractile activity (nutcracker esophagus) and a foreign body in the lower third of the esophagus. After removing the food bolus, we observed a 4 cm longitudinal tear compatible with esophageal rupture or Boerhaave's syndrome in the right posterior wall of the lower esophagus, proximal to the gastroesophageal junction. Thoracic-abdominal computed tomography (TC) confirmed a perforation of the lower esophagus, with pneumothorax and cervical and chest emphysema. Surgical treatment was indicated: esophageal suture, myotomy and gastric fundoplication. The patient presented good evolution. Boerhaave's syndrome is a rare syndrome, but with high mortality (35%). Mackler triad is very characteristic: vomiting, retrosternal pain and cervical subcutaneous emphysema; but it occurs rarely. Chest radiography is useful, showing abnormalities in up to 90% of patients. The differential diagnosis includes cardiorespiratory disorders: acute myocardial infarction, spontaneous pneumothorax, pericarditis or pneumonia. The role of endoscopy is small, mainly limited to prosthesis placement in high-risk surgical patients. In our case the chest radiograph was initially normal, probably related to bolus impaction and, in presence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, gastroscopy was performed which allowed us to early diagnosis and treatment.
Asunto(s)
Perforación del Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Gastroscopía/métodos , Enfermedades del Mediastino/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Cuerpos Extraños/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Predicting relapse in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) could allow for early changes of treatment. Close monitoring of fecal calprotectin (FC) could be useful to predict relapse in IBD. Aim of the study was to evaluate the predictive value of a rapid FC test to predict flares in patients with IBD under maintenance therapy with Infliximab. STUDY: A prospective observational cohort study was designed. IBD patients in clinical remission under maintenance Infliximab therapy were included. FC was measured using a rapid test on a stool sample obtained within 24 hours before Infliximab infusion. Clinical examination was performed 2 months after that infusion. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included (52.8% female). Thirty-three patients (62.3%) had Crohn's disease and 20 (37.7%) had ulcerative colitis. All patients were in remission at inclusion. After 2 months, 41 patients (77.4%) remained in clinical remission and 12 (22.6%) presented a relapse. FC (mean±SD) in relapsing and not-relapsing disease was 332±168 and 110±163 µg/g, respectively (P<0.005). A FC concentration>160 µg/g had a sensitivity of 91.7%, and specificity of 82.9% to predict relapse. CONCLUSIONS: In IBD patients under Infliximab maintenance therapy, high FC levels allow predicting relapse within the following 2 months. Long-term remission is associated with low calprotectin levels. Further studies are required to confirm these results.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Heces/química , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito/metabolismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Área Bajo la Curva , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnóstico , Colitis Ulcerosa/metabolismo , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Crohn/metabolismo , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Recurrencia , Inducción de Remisión , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Regulación hacia Arriba , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Predicting relapse in Crohn's disease (CD) patients by measuring non-invasive biomarkers could allow for early changes of treatment. Data are scarce regarding the utility of monitoring calprotectin to predict relapse. The aim of the study was to evaluate the predictive value of a rapid test of faecal calprotectin (FC) to predict for flares in CD patients on maintenance treatment with adalimumab (ADA). METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort study was designed. Inclusion criteria were CD patients in clinical remission on a standard dose of ADA therapy. Fresh FC was measured using a rapid test. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included (median age 38 years, 56.7% female). After the 4 months follow-up, 70.0% patients remained in clinical remission and 30.0% had a relapse. FC concentration at inclusion was significantly higher in those patients who relapsed during the follow-up (625 µg/g) compared to those who stayed in remission (45 µg/g). The optimal cut-off for FC to predict relapse was 204 µg/g. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.968. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value of FC to predict relapse were 100%, 85.7%, 74.1%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In CD patients on ADA maintenance therapy, FC levels measured with a rapid test allow relapse over the following months to be predicted with high accuracy. Low FC levels exclude relapse within at least 4 months after testing, whereas high levels are associated with relapse in three out of every four patients.
Asunto(s)
Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Heces/química , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito/análisis , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Data on ustekinumab and vedolizumab in the elderly inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population are limited. The aim of the current study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of both in an elderly real-life population. METHODS: A multicentric retrospective study was performed on IBD patients who started vedolizumab or ustekinumab between 2010 and 2020. Clinical and endoscopic remission rates and (serious) adverse events (AE) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 911 IBD patients were included, with 171 (19%) aged above 60 (111 VDZ, 60 UST). Elderly patients treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab had an increased risk for non-IBD hospitalization (10.5% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.021) and malignancy (2.3% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.045) compared to the younger population. Corticosteroid-free clinical (50% vs. 44%; p = 0.201) and endoscopic remission rates (47.9% vs. 31%, p = 0.07) at 1 year were similar. Comparing vedolizumab to ustekinumab in the elderly population, corticosteroid-free (47.9% vs. 31%, p = 0.061) and endoscopic remission rates (66.7% vs. 64.4%, p = 0.981) were similar. Vedolizumab- and ustekinumab-treated patients had comparable infection rates (13.5% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.504), IBD flare-ups (4.5% vs. 5%, p = 1.000), the occurrence of new EIMs (13.5% vs. 10%, p = 0.504), a risk of intestinal surgery (5.4% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.742), malignancy (1.8% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.613), hospitalization (9.9% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.721), and mortality (0.9% vs. 1.7%, p = 1.000). AE risk was associated only with corticosteroid use. CONCLUSIONS: Ustekinumab and vedolizumab show comparable effectiveness and safety in the elderly IBD population. Elderly IBD patients have an increased risk for non-IBD hospitalizations and malignancy compared to the younger IBD population, with corticosteroid use as the main risk factor.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: No consensus exists on optimal strategy to prevent postoperative recurrence [POR] after ileocaecal resection [ICR] for Crohn's disease [CD]. We compared early medical prophylaxis versus expectant management with treatment driven by findings at elective endoscopy 6-12 months after ICR. METHODS: A retrospective, multicentric, observational study was performed. CD patients undergoing first ICR were assigned to Cohort 1 if a biologic or immunomodulator was [re]started prophylactically after ICR, or to Cohort 2 if no postoperative prophylaxis was given and treatment was started as reaction to elective endoscopic findings. Primary endpoint was rate of endoscopic POR [Rutgeerts >i1]. Secondary endpoints were severe endoscopic POR [Rutgeerts i3/i4], clinical POR, surgical POR, and treatment burden during follow-up. RESULTS: Of 346 included patients, 47.4% received prophylactic postoperative treatment [proactive/Cohort 1] and 52.6% did not [reactive/Cohort 2]. Endoscopic POR [Rutgeertsâ >i1] rate was significantly higher in Cohort 2 [41.5% vs 53.8%, OR 1.81, pâ =â 0.039] at endoscopy 6-12 months after surgery. No significant difference in severe endoscopic POR was found [OR 1.29, pâ =â 0.517]. Cohort 2 had significantly higher clinical POR rates [17.7% vs 35.7%, OR 3.05, pâ =â 0.002] and numerically higher surgical recurrence rates [6.7% vs 13.2%, OR 2.59, pâ =â 0.051]. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed no significant difference in time to surgical POR of proactive versus expectant/reactive approach [HR 2.50, pâ =â 0.057]. Quasi-Poisson regression revealed a significantly lower treatment burden for immunomodulator use in Cohort 2 [mean ratio 0.53, pâ =â 0.002], but no difference in burden of biologics or combination treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The PORCSE study showed lower rates of endoscopic POR with early postoperative medical treatment compared with expectant management after first ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease.