Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Crit Care Med ; 48(8): 1217-1232, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32697495

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Expound upon priorities for basic/translational science identified in a recent paper by a group of experts assigned by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. DATA SOURCES: Original paper, search of the literature. STUDY SELECTION: By several members of the original task force with specific expertise in basic/translational science. DATA EXTRACTION: None. DATA SYNTHESIS: None. CONCLUSIONS: In the first of a series of follow-up reports to the original paper, several members of the original task force with specific expertise provided a more in-depth analysis of the five identified priorities directly related to basic/translational science. This analysis expounds on what is known about the question and what was identified as priorities for ongoing research. It is hoped that this analysis will aid the development of future research initiatives.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis/terapia , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional , Comités Consultivos , Predicción , Humanos , Microbiota/fisiología , Investigación , Sepsis/etiología , Sepsis/metabolismo , Sepsis/mortalidad , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/métodos , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/tendencias
2.
Trials ; 22(1): 376, 2021 Jun 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34078421

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is associated with capillary leakage and vasodilatation and leads to hypotension and tissue hypoperfusion. Early plasma volume replacement is required to achieve haemodynamic stability (HDS) and maintain adequate tissue oxygenation. The right choice of fluids to be used for plasma volume replacement (colloid or crystalloid solutions) is still a matter of debate, and large trials investigating the use of colloid solutions containing gelatine are missing. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of plasma volume replacement using either a combined gelatine-crystalloid regime (1:1 ratio) or a pure crystalloid regime. METHODS: This is a prospective, controlled, randomized, double-blind, international, multicentric phase IV study with two parallel groups that is planned to be conducted at European intensive care units (ICUs) in a population of patients with hypovolaemia in severe sepsis/septic shock. A total of 608 eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either a gelatine-crystalloid regime (Gelaspan® 4% and Sterofundin® ISO, B. Braun Melsungen AG, in a 1:1 ratio) or a pure crystalloid regime (Sterofundin® ISO) for plasma volume replacement. The primary outcome is defined as the time needed to achieve HDS. Plasma volume replacement will be target-controlled, i.e. fluids will only be administered to volume-responsive patients. Volume responsiveness will be assessed through passive leg raising or fluid challenges. The safety and efficacy of both regimens will be assessed daily for 28 days or until ICU discharge (whichever occurs first) as the secondary outcomes of this study. Follow-up visits/calls will be scheduled on day 28 and day 90. DISCUSSION: This study aims to generate evidence regarding which regimen-a gelatine-crystalloid regimen or a pure crystalloid regimen-is more effective in achieving HDS in critically ill patients with hypovolaemia. Study participants in both groups will benefit from the increased safety of target-controlled plasma volume replacement, which prevents fluid administration to already haemodynamically stable patients and reduces the risk of harmful fluid overload. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The European clinical trial database EudraCT 2015-000057-20 and the ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02715466 . Registered on 17 March 2016.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Ensayos Clínicos Fase IV como Asunto , Electrólitos , Fluidoterapia , Gelatina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Volumen Plasmático , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/terapia , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/terapia
3.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 56: 11-18, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34629620

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory tract infection caused by a newly emergent coronavirus, that was first recognized in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has defined the infection as a global pandemic and there is a health and social emergency for the management of this new infection. While most people with COVID-19 develop only mild or uncomplicated illness, approximately 14% develop severe disease that requires hospitalization and oxygen support, and 5% require admission to an intensive care unit. In severe cases, COVID-19 can be complicated by the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and septic shock, and multiorgan failure. This consensus document has been prepared on evidence-informed guidelines developed by a multidisciplinary panel of health care providers from four Spanish scientific societies (Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine [SEMICYUC], Spanish Society of Pulmonologists [SEPAR], Spanish Society of Emergency [SEMES], Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation, and Pain [SEDAR]) with experience in the clinical management of patients with COVID-19 and other viral infections, including SARS, as well as sepsis and ARDS. The document provides clinical recommendations for the noninvasive respiratory support (noninvasive ventilation, high flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannula) in any patient with suspected or confirmed presentation of COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure.This consensus guidance should serve as a foundation for optimized supportive care to ensure the best possible chance for survival and to allow for reliable comparison of investigational therapeutic interventions as part of randomized controlled trials.

4.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 44(7): 429-438, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32312600

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory tract infection caused by a newly emergent coronavirus, that was first recognized in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has defined the infection as a global pandemic and there is a health and social emergency for the management of this new infection. While most people with COVID-19 develop only mild or uncomplicated illness, approximately 14% develop severe disease that requires hospitalization and oxygen support, and 5% require admission to an intensive care unit. In severe cases, COVID-19 can be complicated by the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and septic shock, and multiorgan failure. This consensus document has been prepared on evidence-informed guidelines developed by a multidisciplinary panel of health care providers from four Spanish scientific societies (Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine [SEMICYUC], Spanish Society of Pulmonologists [SEPAR], Spanish Society of Emergency [SEMES], Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation, and Pain [SEDAR]) with experience in the clinical management of patients with COVID-19 and other viral infections, including SARS, as well as sepsis and ARDS. The document provides clinical recommendations for the noninvasive respiratory support (noninvasive ventilation, high flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannula) in any patient with suspected or confirmed presentation of COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure. This consensus guidance should serve as a foundation for optimized supportive care to ensure the best possible chance for survival and to allow for reliable comparison of investigational therapeutic interventions as part of randomized controlled trials.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Aerosoles , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Contaminación de Equipos , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Profesional a Paciente/prevención & control , Ventilación no Invasiva/instrumentación , Ventilación no Invasiva/normas , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/instrumentación , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiología , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32513456

RESUMEN

The current COVID-19 pandemic has rendered up to 15% of patients under mechanical ventilation. Because the subsequent tracheotomy is a frequent procedure, the three societies mostly involved (SEMICYUC, SEDAR and SEORL-CCC) have setup a consensus paper that offers an overview about indications and contraindications of tracheotomy, be it by puncture or open, clarifying its respective advantages and enumerating the ideal conditions under which they should be performed, as well as the necessary steps. Regular and emergency situations are displayed together with the postoperative measures.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Consenso , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Sociedades Médicas , Traqueostomía/normas , Anestesiología , Broncoscopía/efectos adversos , Broncoscopía/normas , COVID-19 , Contraindicaciones de los Procedimientos , Unidades de Cuidados Coronarios , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/normas , Urgencias Médicas , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Otolaringología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos , Pandemias , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/normas , Respiración Artificial/normas , Resucitación , SARS-CoV-2 , España , Factores de Tiempo , Traqueostomía/efectos adversos , Traqueostomía/métodos
6.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 43(8): 480-488, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30922608

RESUMEN

Immunotherapy seeks to harness the power of the immune system to eradicate malignant tissues. Despite impressive therapeutic success, however, it can be accompanied by severe adverse effects such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS). These therapies cause the release of a great amount of cytokines, with IL-6 playing a central role, that can potentially lead to multiple organ dysfunction. The diagnosis is based on the presence of compatible clinical symptoms, elevated biomarkers and recent treatment with a biological agent. Mild cases can be managed through symptomatic treatment and fluids, while more severe episodes may need supportive therapy and specific care with the anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody tocilizumab. Although corticosteroids are also effective, they suppress T-cell activity, and so should only be considered as second line therapy or in cases of severe neurological involvement, since tocilizumab does not cross the blood-brain barrier. Cytokine release syndrome generally has a good prognosis, often being reversible and with a good response to specific treatment. Despite possible concerns about the admission of such patients (mainly with advanced oncological disease), we consider that the Intensive Care Unit should remain an option, since these individuals present a potentially reversible drug-related adverse event and are being treated with a new drug that could change the prognosis of the disorder. Intensive care medicine will become a key component in the management of the complications of modern cancer therapies, dealing with patients presenting an overactive immune system producing organ dysfunction while also trying to maintain treatment efficacy. This is the new paradigm.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Neoplasias/terapia , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Encefalopatías/tratamiento farmacológico , Encefalopatías/etiología , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/etiología , Citocinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Interleucina-6/antagonistas & inhibidores , Linfohistiocitosis Hemofagocítica/genética , Pronóstico , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/uso terapéutico , Evaluación de Síntomas
7.
Genome Med ; 11(1): 66, 2019 10 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31665078

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sepsis, a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated systemic immune response to infection, associates with reduced responsiveness to subsequent infections. How such tolerance is acquired is not well understood but is known to involve epigenetic and transcriptional dysregulation. METHODS: Bead arrays were used to compare global DNA methylation changes in patients with sepsis, non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and healthy controls. Bioinformatic analyses were performed to dissect functional reprogramming and signaling pathways related to the acquisition of these specific DNA methylation alterations. Finally, in vitro experiments using human monocytes were performed to test the induction of similar DNA methylation reprogramming. RESULTS: Here, we focused on DNA methylation changes associated with sepsis, given their potential role in stabilizing altered phenotypes. Tolerized monocytes from patients with sepsis display changes in their DNA methylomes with respect to those from healthy controls, affecting critical monocyte-related genes. DNA methylation profiles correlate with IL-10 and IL-6 levels, significantly increased in monocytes in sepsis, as well as with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score; the observed changes associate with TFs and pathways downstream to toll-like receptors and inflammatory cytokines. In fact, in vitro stimulation of toll-like receptors in monocytes results in similar gains and losses of methylation together with the acquisition of tolerance. CONCLUSION: We have identified a DNA methylation signature associated with sepsis that is downstream to the response of monocytes to inflammatory signals associated with the acquisition of a tolerized phenotype and organic dysfunction.


Asunto(s)
Citocinas/genética , Metilación de ADN , ADN/análisis , Mediadores de Inflamación/metabolismo , Inflamación/complicaciones , Monocitos/patología , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/complicaciones , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , ADN/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monocitos/inmunología , Monocitos/metabolismo , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/genética , Fenotipo , Sepsis/etiología , Sepsis/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA