Colon Volume by Computed Tomography and Scintigraphic Colonic Transit in Constipated Patients With or Without Redundant Colon.

Redundant colon, also referred to as "dolichocolon," is an anatomical variant associated with elongation and redundancy thought to be associated with constipation, abdominal pain, and distention.1,2 Diagnosis requires radiological visualization of the non-dilated colon in situ via barium enema or abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT). Colonic redundancy is based on 3 criteria: sigmoid loop displaced cranially relative to the iliac crests (type 1); transverse colon caudal to the iliac crests (type 2); and redundant loops at the hepatic or splenic flexure (type 3).2 Rarely, dolichocolon may meet all 3 criteria.2.

Recto-anal Pressures in Constipated Men and Women Undergoing High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry.

BACKGROUND: In constipated individuals, high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRM) may suggest the presence of a defecatory disorder. Despite known physiological differences between men and women, our understanding of functional anorectal pathophysiology is based upon predominantly female cohorts. Results are generalized to men. AIMS: To evaluate whether recto-anal pressure patterns in constipated men are similar to those in constipated women. METHODS: The electronic health records at Mayo Clinic, Rochester were used to identify constipated adult patients, without organic anorectal disease, who had undergone HRM and balloon expulsion testing (BET) in 2018, 2019, and 2020. Comparative analyses were performed. RESULTS: Among 3,298 constipated adult patients (2,633 women, 665 men), anal and rectal pressures were higher in men. Women more likely to have HRM findings suggestive of a defecatory disorder (39% versus 20%, P < 0.001). Women were more likely to exhibit a type 4 pattern (27% versus 14%, P < 0.001), and less likely to exhibit a type 1 pattern (14% versus 38%, P < 0.001), of dyssynergia. Men were more likely to have an abnormal balloon expulsion test (BET, 34% versus 29%, P = 0.006). Nominal logistic regression demonstrates that male sex, age over 50 years, reduced recto-anal gradient during simulated evacuation, and types 2 and 4 dyssynergia are associated with an abnormal BET. CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective study, constipated men and women exhibited different patterns of dyssynergia both in the presence and absence of an abnormal BET. These findings were independent of sex-specific baseline physiological differences.

Results of Anorectal Physiological Testing in Patients with Limited English Proficiency.

BACKGROUND: Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) experience barriers to healthcare. These include language barriers and difficulty accessing medical subspecialties. Consequently, patients with LEP may be underrepresented, and may be more likely to have abnormal results, among individuals referred for anorectal testing. AIMS: To explore whether differences exist in the results of high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRM), rectal sensory testing (RST), and balloon expulsion testing (BET) between patients with LEP and English proficiency (EP). METHODS: The electronic health records at Mayo Clinic, Rochester were used to identify constipated patients without organic anorectal disease who had undergone anorectal testing in 2018, 2019, and 2020. The language spoken by the patients was determined. HRM, RST, and BET results were compared. Nominal logistic regression explored the influence of age, gender, test operator, and LEP on the likelihood of abnormal findings. KEY RESULTS: Among 3298 patients (80% female, mean age ± standard deviation 46 ± 16 years), 67 (2%) had LEP. HRM measurements were similar in LEP and EP patients. However, LEP patients were more likely to have abnormal BET and RST. Logistic regression revealed that age (older than 50 years), gender, test operator, and LEP influenced the results of BET and RST, with LEP having the strongest influence. CONCLUSIONS: Results of anorectal testing in constipated patients differ between LEP and EP patients. This is likely to represent a difference in disease prevalence between these groups, for example, due to referral bias, rather than a difference in physiology or a language barrier.

Retrospective evaluation of operator bias in the performance of high-resolution anorectal manometry.

BACKGROUND: Measurements obtained during high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRM) are subject to operator-patient interactions. For example, standardized enhanced instruction delivered by a single operator in a test-retest fashion did not consistently increase pressures generated during dynamic maneuvers. It is probable that factors other than verbal instruction effect communication during the procedure. To investigate this hypothesis, we retrospectively examined inter-operator variance in HRM results. METHODS: The electronic health records at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, were used to identify patients who had undergone HRM in 2019 and 2020. The analysis focused on constipated patients. The instructions given to the patients they had examined, and the pressure measurements obtained during HRM, by 6 different nurse operators were compared. KEY RESULTS: When performing HRM on their individual patients (range 126-673), the 6 nurses used similar instructions for each of the maneuvers and sensory testing thresholds. The proportion of patients with prolonged balloon expulsion tests and the rectal sensory thresholds were similar among operators. Significant variance was seen in the mean rectoanal pressures at rest, during squeeze, and during dynamic maneuvers. The proportion of patients with manometry results suggestive of a defecatory disorder differed between operators by 18% and 28% in women <50 and >50 years old, respectively. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Operators obtain significantly different results during HRM despite using similar instructions to patients. Substantial differences in the proportion of patients with manometry findings suggestive of a defecatory disorder among operators may have a significant impact on the diagnoses and therapies offered to constipated patients.

Automatic semantic segmentation of kidney cysts in MR images of patients affected by autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease.

PURPOSE: For patients affected by autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), successful differentiation of cysts is useful for automatic classification of patient phenotypes, clinical decision-making, and disease progression. The objective was to develop and evaluate a fully automated semantic segmentation method to differentiate and analyze renal cysts in patients with ADPKD. METHODS: An automated deep learning approach using a convolutional neural network was trained, validated, and tested on a set of 60 MR T2-weighted images. A three-fold cross-validation approach was used to train three models on distinct training and validation sets (n = 40). An ensemble model was then built and tested on the hold out cases (n = 20), with each of the cases compared to manual segmentations performed by two readers. Segmentation agreement between readers and the automated method was assessed. RESULTS: The automated approach was found to perform at the level of interobserver variability. The automated approach had a Dice coefficient (mean ± standard deviation) of 0.86 ± 0.10 vs Reader-1 and 0.84 ± 0.11 vs. Reader-2. Interobserver Dice was 0.86 ± 0.08. In terms of total cyst volume (TCV), the automated approach had a percent difference of 3.9 ± 19.1% vs Reader-1 and 8.0 ± 24.1% vs Reader-2, whereas interobserver variability was - 2.0 ± 16.4%. CONCLUSION: This study developed and validated a fully automated approach for performing semantic segmentation of kidney cysts in MR images of patients affected by ADPKD. This approach will be useful for exploring additional imaging biomarkers of ADPKD and automatically classifying phenotypes.