Cost-effectiveness analysis of interventional liver-directed therapies for downstaging of HCC before liver transplant.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are the 2 most used modalities for patients with HCC while awaiting liver transplant. The purpose of this study is to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing TACE and TARE for downstaging (DS) patients with HCC. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed comparing TACE and TARE in DS HCC over a 5-year time horizon from a payer's perspective. The clinical course, including those who achieved successful DS leading to liver transplant and those who failed DS with possible disease progression, was obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing. Costs and effectiveness were measured in US dollars and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed. TARE achieved a higher effectiveness of 2.51 QALY (TACE: 2.29 QALY) at a higher cost of $172,162 (TACE: $159,706), with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $55,964/QALY, making TARE the more cost-effective strategy. The difference in outcome was equivalent to 104 days (nearly 3.5 months) in compensated cirrhosis state. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that TARE was more cost-effective in 91.69% of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations. TARE was more effective if greater than 48.2% of patients who received TACE or TARE were successfully downstaged (base case: 74.6% from the pooled analysis of multiple published cohorts). TARE became more cost-effective when the cost of TACE exceeded $4,831 (base case: $12,722) or when the cost of TARE was lower than $43,542 (base case: $30,609). Subgroup analyses identified TARE to be the more cost-effective strategy if the TARE cohort required 1 fewer locoregional therapy than the TACE cohort. TARE is the more cost-effective DS strategy for patients with HCC exceeding Milan criteria compared to TACE.

Per-patient Negative Predictive Value of the CT and MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA) is a high-specificity, lower-sensitivity grading system to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and recurrence after local-regional therapy. However, the emphasis on specificity can result in disease understaging, potentially leading to poorer posttransplant outcomes. Purpose To determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of pretransplant CT and MRI assessment for viable HCC on a per-patient basis using the LI-RADS TRA, considering explant pathology as the reference standard. Materials and Methods Patient records from 218 consecutive adult patients from a single institution with HCC who underwent liver transplant from January 2011 to November 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Two readers blinded to the original report reviewed immediate (within 90 days) pretransplant imaging and characterized observations according to the LI-RADS TRA. Based on this, patients with LR-4, LR-5, or LR-TR (treatment response) viable tumors were designated as viable tumor; patients with solely LR-3 or LR-TR equivocal tumors were designated as equivocal; and patients with only LR-TR nonviable lesions were designated as no viable disease. Patients were designated as within or outside the Milan criteria. These per-patient designations were compared with the presence of viable disease at explant pathology. Fisher exact test was used to compare the differences between CT and MRI. Weighted κ values were used to calculate interreader reliability. Results Final study sample consisted of 206 patients (median age, 61 years [IQR, 57-65 years]; 157 male patients and 49 female patients). Per-patient LI-RADS TRA assessment of pretransplant imaging had an NPV of 32% (95% CI: 27, 38) and 26% (95% CI: 20, 33) (readers 1 and 2, respectively) for predicting viable disease. Seventy-five percent (reader 1) and 77% (reader 2) of patients deemed equivocal had residual tumors at explant pathology. Weighted interreader reliability was substantial (κ = 0.62). Conclusion Patient-based stratification of viable, equivocal, and nonviable disease at pretransplant CT or MRI, based on LI-RADS TRA, demonstrated low negative predictive value in excluding HCC at explant pathology. © RSNA, 2023 See also the editorial by Tamir and Tau in this issue.

Ethiodized oil as an imaging biomarker after conventional transarterial chemoembolization.

Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) utilizing ethiodized oil as a chemotherapy carrier has become a standard treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has been adopted as a bridging and downstaging therapy for liver transplantation. Water-in-oil emulsion made up of ethiodized oil and chemotherapy solution is retained in tumor vasculature resulting in high tissue drug concentration and low systemic chemotherapy doses. The density and distribution pattern of ethiodized oil within the tumor on post-treatment imaging are predictive of the extent of tumor necrosis and duration of response to treatment. This review describes the multiple roles of ethiodized oil, particularly in its role as a biomarker of tumor response to cTACE. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: With the increasing complexity of locoregional therapy options, including the use of combination therapies, treatment response assessment has become challenging; Ethiodized oil deposition patterns can serve as an imaging biomarker for the prediction of treatment response, and perhaps predict post-treatment prognosis. KEY POINTS: • Treatment response assessment after locoregional therapy to hepatocellular carcinoma is fraught with multiple challenges given the varied post-treatment imaging appearance. • Ethiodized oil is unique in that its' radiopacity can serve as an imaging biomarker to help predict treatment response. • The pattern of deposition of ethiodozed oil has served as a mechanism to detect portions of tumor that are undertreated and can serve as an adjunct to enhancement in order to improve management in patients treated with intraarterial embolization with ethiodized oil.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Interventional Liver-Directed Therapies for a Single, Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates.

PURPOSE: To assess the cost effectiveness of 3 main locoregional therapies (LRTs) (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE], transarterial radioembolization [TARE], and percutaneous ablation) as bridging therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed comparing the 3 LRTs for patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a diameter of 3 cm or less over a 5-year time horizon from a payer's perspective. The clinical courses, including transplantation, decompensation resulting in delisting, and the need for a second LRT, were based on data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (2016-2019). Costs and effectiveness were measured in U.S. dollars and quality-adjusted life-years, respectively. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 2,594, 1,576, and 903 patients underwent TACE, ablation, and TARE, respectively. Ablation was the dominant strategy, with the lowest expected cost and highest effectiveness. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that ablation was the most cost-effective strategy in 93.9% of simulations. A subgroup analysis was performed for different wait times, with ablation remaining the most cost-effective strategy. The sensitivity analysis showed that ablation was most effective if the risk of waitlist dropout was less than 2.00% and the rate of transplantation was more than 15.1% quarterly. TARE was most effective if the risk of dropout was less than 1.19% and the rate of transplantation was more than 24.0%. TACE was most effective if the risk of dropout was less than 1.01% and the rate of transplantation was more than 45.7%. Ablation remained the most cost-effective modality until its procedural cost was more than $34,843. CONCLUSIONS: Ablation is the most cost-effective bridging strategy for patients with a single, small (≤3 cm) HCC prior to liver transplantation. The conclusion remained robust in multiple sensitivity analyses.

Socioeconomic and Survival Analysis of Radioembolization in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is associated with longer survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and whether access to TARE is influenced by socioeconomic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with ICC in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2018 was performed with Cox regression analysis to identify predictors of survival. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Socioeconomic factors were compared between 2 groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and χ2 test. Propensity score-matched cohorts were created between patients with ICC who did and did not undergo TARE. RESULTS: The number of patients receiving TARE for ICC increased over time from 1 in 2004 to 210 in 2018. Patients in the TARE group were more likely to be White (87.9% vs 84.3%; P = .012) and less likely to be Hispanic/Latino (7.7% vs 11.0%; P = .009). Fewer patients who underwent TARE were uninsured (0.9% vs 2.8%; P = .012). Older age, male sex, non-White race, higher tumor grade size, and stage, earlier year of diagnosis, lack of treatment with surgery or systemic therapy, and presence of lymphatic or vascular invasion exhibited significant associations with decreased survival (P < .05 for all). Patients who underwent TARE had longer survival in both unadjusted and adjusted cohorts, with an OS of 17.5 months (vs 7.2 months in the non-TARE group) after propensity matching. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ICC who had undergone TARE experienced significantly longer survival than that experienced by those who had not after adjusting for measurable confounders. Significant socioeconomic disparities in access to TARE remain.

Liver-Directed Therapy for Neuroendocrine Tumor Metastases in the Era of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy.

OPINION STATEMENT: The treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) liver metastases involves a multidisciplinary approach that includes liver-directed therapies (LDT) and systemic treatments, such as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). LDT has demonstrated efficacy in rapidly reducing tumor bulk, improving symptoms, and delaying disease progression. Interventional radiologists should be consulted prior to switching therapy for patients with progressive or symptomatic neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases. Long-term follow-up data on the safety of Yttrium-90 radioembolization before and after PRRT remain limited. Therefore, a more conservative approach may be to preferentially employ transarterial embolization (TAE) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients' somatostatin receptor-avid disease who may be future candidates for PRRT. Notable exceptions where radioembolization may be a preferred treatment strategy may be patients with history of biliary tract instrumentation, asymmetric unilobar disease distribution, and rapidly progressive diffuse liver involvement. Selection of local treatment modality, sequencing, and combination of LDT with systemic therapy require further investigation.

Phase I prospective trial of TAS-102 (trifluridine and tipiracil) and radioembolization with 90Y resin microspheres for chemo-refractory colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Extrahepatic disease progression limits clinical efficacy of Yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization (TARE) for patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) has overall survival benefit for patients with refractory mCRC and may be a radiosensitizer. METHODS: Sequential lobar TARE using 90Y resin microspheres in combination with TAS-102 in 28-day cycles were used to treat adult patients with bilobar liver-dominant chemo-refractory mCRC according to 3 + 3 dose escalation design with a 12-patient dose expansion cohort. Study objectives were to establish safety and determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of TAS-102 in combination with TARE. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients (14 women, 7 men) with median age of 60 years were enrolled. No dose limiting toxicities were observed. Treatment related severe adverse events included cytopenias (10 patients, 48%) and radioembolization-induced liver disease (2 patients, 10%). Disease control rate in the liver lobes treated with TARE was 100%. Best observed radiographic responses were partial response for 4 patients (19%) and stable disease for 12 patients (57%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of TAS-102 and TARE for patients with liver-dominant mCRC is safe and consistently achieves disease control within the liver. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02602327 (first posted 11/11/2015).

The Key Role of Staging Definitions for Assessment of Downstaging for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

The success of liver transplant (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is dependent on accurate tumor staging using validated imaging criteria, and adherence to acceptable criteria based on tumor size and number. Other factors including α-fetoprotein (AFP) and response to local regional therapy (LRT) have now played a larger role in candidate selection. Tumor downstaging is defined as reduction in the size of viable tumors using LRT to meet acceptable criteria for LT, and serves as a selection tool for a subgroup of HCC with more favorable biology. The application of tumor downstaging requires a structured approach involving three key components in tumor staging-initial tumor stage and eligibility criteria, tumor viability assessment following LRT, and target tumor stage prior to LT-and incorporation of AFP into staging and treatment response assessments. In this review, we provide in-depth discussions of the key role of these staging definitions in ensuring successful outcome.

Hepatic Toxicity After Selective Chemoembolization Is Associated With Decreased Survival Among Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for and outcomes of hepatotoxicity after selective chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study included 182 patients (136 men and 46 women; median age, 63 years [interquartile range, 57-70 years]) who underwent 338 consecutive doxorubicin drug-eluting bead (DEB) chemoembolization procedures between 2011 and 2014. Outcomes were assessed until November 2019. In 97% of procedures, two or fewer segments were targeted. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage was 0 or A for 77 procedures (22.8%), B for 75 (22.2%), C for 122 (36.1%), and D for 64 (18.9%). Hepatotoxicity was defined as worsened ascites or encephalopathy or as grade 3 or 4 elevations in liver function test results, creatinine levels, or the international normalized ratio within 30 days. Risk factors were assessed by univariate and multivariable generalized estimating equations. Transplant-free survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS. Hepatotoxicity was observed after 84 of 338 procedures (24.9%) performed for 70 of 182 patients (38.5%) and was irreversible for 40 procedures (11.8%). On multivariable analysis, risk factors for irreversible toxicity included Child-Pugh class C liver function (odds ratio [OR], 4.4; 95% CI, 1.0-19.0; p = .04), BCLC stage C (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.6-16.0; p = .006) or D (OR, 7.4; 95% CI, 2.1-25.5; p = .002) disease, TIPS or hepatofugal portal venous flow (OR, 6.3; 95% CI, 2.3-17.0; p < .001), and a serum α-fetoprotein level of 200 ng/mL or greater (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1-6.1; p = .03). Irreversible toxicity was associated with reduced transplant-free survival among patients who were ineligible for liver transplant (hazard ratio, 2.5; standard error, 0.42; p = .03). CONCLUSION. Irreversible hepatotoxicity was common after selective chemoembolization in patients with advanced stage disease, an elevated serum α-fetoprotein level, or reduced hepatic portal venous perfusion, and it may hasten death among patients who are ineligible for liver transplant.

Non-operative management of biliary complications after Liver Transplantation in pediatric patients: A 30-year experience.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous and endoscopic therapeutic interventions for biliary strictures and leaks following LT in children. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 49 consecutive pediatric liver transplant recipients (27 girls, 22 boys, mean age at transplant 3.9 years) treated at our institution from 1989 to 2019 for biliary leak and/or biliary stricture was performed. Minimally invasive approach was considered clinically successful if it resulted in patency of the narrowed biliary segment and/or correction of the biliary leak. RESULTS: Forty-two patients had a stricture at the biliary anastomosis; seven had a biliary leak. After an average 13.8 years of follow-up, long-term clinical success with minimally invasive treatment (no surgery or re-transplant) was achieved for 24 children (57%) with biliary stricture and 4 (57%) with biliary leaks. Eight patients required re-transplant; however, only one was due to failure of both percutaneous and surgical management. For biliary strictures, failure of non-surgical management was associated with younger age at stricture diagnosis (p < .02). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous and endoscopic management of biliary strictures and leaks after LT in children is associated with a durable result in >50% of children.

Outcomes of transjugular liver biopsies for liver transplant recipients with bicaval and piggyback hepatic vein anastomoses.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplant hepatic venous anastomoses are usually created using "bicaval" or "piggyback" techniques, which may result in unfavorable angulation between the inferior vena cava and hepatic veins, and makes hepatic vein catheterization and tissue sampling during transjugular liver biopsy (TLB) technically challenging. PURPOSE: To compare the technical successes and complications of TLBs for recipients of liver transplants with bicaval and piggyback hepatic vein anastomoses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Information on type of hepatic vein surgical anastomosis was available for 190 adult patients in whom 306 consecutive TLBs were performed during 2009-2017: 158 with bicaval and 148 with piggyback anastomoses. The primary outcome of procedural success was defined as obtaining a tissue sample sufficient to make a pathologic diagnosis. RESULTS: A technical success rate of 97% with adequate liver tissue for diagnosis was similar between the anastomotic groups (P = 0.50). TLB was unsuccessful in 3% of patients with piggyback anastomoses due to unfavorable hepatic venous anatomy whereas biopsy was successful in all patients with bicaval anastomoses (P = 0.02). Fluoroscopy times were not significantly different (12.1 vs. 13.9 min, P = 0.08). Rates of major complication were similar between the two groups (3% vs. 3%, P > 0.99). CONCLUSION: TLB is safe and effective for liver transplant patients regardless of the type of hepatic vein anastomosis. While failure to catheterize or advance the stiffened biopsy cannula into the hepatic vein is more likely to occur in patients with piggyback anastomoses, this is a rare occurrence.

Intermediate to Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Cryoablation for Renal Masses.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse outcomes of percutaneous cryoablation (CA) for treatment of renal masses in a large cohort of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 299 CA procedures (297 masses in 277 patients) performed between July 2007 and May 2018 at a single institution. The mean patient age was 66.1 years (range, 30-93 years) with 65.8% being male. A total of 234 (78.8%) masses were biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The mean maximal tumor diameter was 2.5 cm (range, 0.7-6.6 cm). Efficacy was assessed only for ablations of biopsy-proven RCC, whereas the evaluation of adverse events and renal function included all masses. Complications were graded according to the Society of International Radiology classification. RESULTS: Major complications occurred in 3.0% of procedures (n = 9), none of which resulted in death or permanent disability. The mean imaging follow-up period was 27.4 months (range, 1-115) for the 199 RCC patients (204 ablated tumors) with follow-up imaging available. Complete response on initial follow-up imaging at mean 4.2 months (range, 0.3-75.6) was achieved in 195 of 204 tumors (95.6%) after a single session and in 200 of 204 tumors (98.0%) after 1 or 2 sessions. Of the RCC patients achieving complete response initially, local recurrence during the follow-up period occurred in 3 of 200 tumors (1.5%). Metastatic progression occurred in 10 of 193 (5.2%) RCC patients without prior metastatic disease during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: CA for renal masses is safe and remains efficacious through intermediate- and long-term follow-up.

Outcomes after Peripancreatic Fluid Drainage in Patients with Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent image-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections after simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent peripancreatic fluid collection drainage after SPK, from January 2000 to August 2017, at a single institution was performed. Patient characteristics, surgical technique, medication regimen, microbial analysis, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. Thirty-one patients requiring a total of 41 drainages were included in this study. The median age was 44 years (range 30-58 years), and median time between SPK and drainage was 28 days (range 8 to 3,401 days). Fisher's exact test, unpaired Student t-tests, and Pearson correlations were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Fever (51%) and abdominal pain (31%) were the most common presenting symptoms. The average amount of fluid drained at the time of drain placement was 97 mL (SD 240 mL). The average time spent with a drain in place was 33 days (SD 31 days). Microorganisms were isolated in the fluid of 22 of 41 drainages (54%), with mixed gastrointestinal flora being the most common. No further intervention was needed in 34 of 41 drainages (82%). However, drainage failed in 5 of 31 patients (16%), requiring surgical intervention with removal of the pancreas transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections after SPK transplantation is a safe and effective treatment option.

Safety and Efficacy of Transjugular Liver Biopsy in Patients with Left Lobe-Only Liver Transplants.

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) via the left hepatic vein in patients with left lobe-only liver transplants (LLOTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review revealed 43 TJLBs performed in 26 patients with LLOTs (mean age 51.3 y; range, 18-73 y) between January 2009 and June 2016 at a single institution. A comparison group of 44 randomly selected TJLBs performed in 37 orthotopic whole liver transplant (OWLT) recipients (mean age 57.6 y; range, 35-74 y) during the same time period was evaluated. Patient demographics, type and age of transplant, technical success, adequacy of samples, number of portal tracts obtained, pathologic diagnosis, and complication rate were reviewed. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 98% (42/43) of LLOT procedures. TJLB failed in 1 patient with LLOT, in whom no patent hepatic veins were identified. Technical success was achieved in 100% (44/44) in the OWLT group. Mean (SD) number of needle passes was 4.12 (1.25) in the LLOT group vs 3.95 (1.28) in the OWLT group (P = .54). Mean (SD) specimen length was 1.16 (0.75) cm in the LLOT group vs 1.19 (0.58) cm in the OWLT group (P = .78). Mean (SD) number of portal tracts obtained in the LLOT group was 10.7 (5.26) vs 12.3 (4.68) in the OWLT group (P = .17). No major complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: TJLB in adult patients with LLOTs appears safe and feasible, with favorable rates of technical success and adequacy of sampling.

90Y Radioembolization for Hepatic Malignancy in Patients with Previous Biliary Intervention: Multicenter Analysis of Hepatobiliary Infections.

Purpose To determine the frequency of hepatobiliary infections after transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium 90 (90Y) in patients with liver malignancy and a history of biliary intervention. Materials and Methods For this retrospective study, records of all consecutive patients with liver malignancy and history of biliary intervention treated with TARE at 14 centers between 2005 and 2015 were reviewed. Data regarding liver function, 90Y dosimetry, antibiotic prophylaxis, and bowel preparation prophylaxis were collected. Primary outcome was development of hepatobiliary infection. Results One hundred twenty-six patients (84 men, 42 women; mean age, 68.8 years) with primary (n = 39) or metastatic (n = 87) liver malignancy and history of biliary intervention underwent 180 procedures with glass (92 procedures) or resin (88 procedures) microspheres. Hepatobiliary infections (liver abscesses in nine patients, cholangitis in five patients) developed in 10 of the 126 patients (7.9%) after 11 of the 180 procedures (6.1%; nine of those procedures were performed with glass microspheres). All patients required hospitalization (median stay, 12 days; range, 2-113 days). Ten patients required percutaneous abscess drainage, three patients underwent endoscopic stent placement and stone removal, and one patient needed insertion of percutaneous biliary drains. Infections resolved in five patients, four patients died (two from infection and two from cancer progression while infection was being treated), and one patient continued to receive suppressive antibiotics. Use of glass microspheres (P = .02), previous liver resection or ablation (P = .02), and younger age (P = .003) were independently predictive of higher infection risk. Conclusion Infectious complications such as liver abscess and cholangitis are uncommon but serious complications of transarterial radioembolization with 90Y in patients with liver malignancy and a history of biliary intervention.

Operator Dose Reduction during Transjugular Liver Biopsy Using a Radiation-Attenuating Drape: A Prospective, Randomized Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of disposable radiation-absorbing surgical drapes on operator radiation dose during transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This dual-arm prospective, randomized study was conducted between May 2017 and January 2018 at a single institution. TJLB procedures (N = 62; patient age range, 19-80 y) were assigned at a 1:1 ratio to the use of radiation-absorbing surgical drapes or standard surgical draping. The primary outcome was cumulative radiation equivalent dose incident on the operator, as determined by an electronic personal dosimeter worn at the chest during each procedure. Cumulative kerma-area product (KAP), total fluoroscopy time, and total number of exposures used during each liver biopsy procedure were also determined. RESULTS: Mean radiation dose incident on the operator decreased by 56% with the use of radiation-absorbing drapes (37 µSv ± 35; range, 4-183 µSv) compared with standard draping (84 µSv ± 58; range, 11-220 µSv). Radiation incident on the patient was similar between groups, with no significant differences in mean KAP, total fluoroscopy time, and number of exposures acquired during the procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Use of disposable radiation-absorbing drapes reduces scatter radiation to interventionalists performing TJLB.

Reassessing the boundaries of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Where do we stand with tumor down-staging?

UNLABELLED: Down-staging of hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation (LT) has generated a lot of interest in recent years and has been identified in two recent national conferences on hepatocellular carcinoma as one of the priorities for research. Down-staging is defined as reduction in the tumor burden using local regional therapy specifically to meet acceptable criteria for LT. The rationale behind down-staging of tumors initially exceeding conventional criteria for LT is to select a subgroup of tumors with favorable biology and prognosis for LT as assessed by their response to local regional therapy. The expectation is to achieve comparable posttransplant survival between patients who achieve successful tumor down-staging before LT and those whose tumors meet LT criteria at the outset without needing down-staging. The application of tumor down-staging requires a highly structured approach using a treatment protocol that includes five essential components: eligibility criteria, down-staging endpoints, selection of the type of local regional therapy, minimal observation period from successful tumor down-staging to LT, and criteria for treatment failure and exclusion from LT. This review article summarizes published data on down-staging and addresses key questions related to each of the components of the down-staging protocol as well as treatment efficacy. CONCLUSION: Based on a review of published data and recommendations from recent national and international conferences on hepatocellular carcinoma and LT, a standardized down-staging protocol is proposed to further evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of applying tumor down-staging on a broader scale.

Radiation Dose Reduction during Uterine Fibroid Embolization Using an Optimized Imaging Platform.

PURPOSE: To assess radiation dose reduction during uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) using an optimized angiographic processing and acquisition platform. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiation dose data for 70 women (mean age, 46 y; range, 34-67 y) who underwent UFE were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-one patients underwent UFE using the baseline fluoroscopic and angiographic image acquisition platform, and 49 underwent UFE after implementing an optimized imaging platform in otherwise identical angiography suites. Cumulative kerma-area product (CKAP), cumulative air kerma (CAK), total fluoroscopy time, and image exposure number were collected for each procedure. Image quality was assessed by 3 interventional radiologists blinded to the platform used for image acquisition and processing. RESULTS: Patients undergoing UFE using the new x-ray fluoroscopy platform had significantly lower CKAP and CAK indicators than patients for whom baseline settings were used. Mean CKAP decreased by 60% from 438.5 Gy · cm2 (range, 180.3-1,081.1 Gy · cm2) to 175.2 Gy · cm2 (range, 47.1-757.0 Gy · cm2; P < .0001). Mean CAK decreased by 45% from 2,034.2 mGy (range, 699.3-5,056.0 mGy) to 1,109.8 mGy (range, 256.6-4,513.6 mGy; P = .001). No degradation of image quality was identified through qualitative evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Significant reduction in patient radiation dose indicators can be achieved with use of an optimized image acquisition and processing platform.

Intention to treat outcome of T1 hepatocellular carcinoma with the "wait and not ablate" approach until meeting T2 criteria for liver transplant listing.

Patients with T1 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; 1 lesion < 2 cm) are currently not eligible for priority listing for liver transplantation (LT). A common practice is to wait without locoregional therapy (LRT) until tumor growth occurs from T1 to T2 (1 lesion 2-5 cm or 2-3 lesions ≤ 3 cm) to be eligible for listing with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease exception. We aimed to evaluate the intention to treat outcome of the "wait and not ablate" approach for nonresection candidates with T1 HCC until tumor growth to T2. The study included 114 patients with T1 HCC 1.0-1.9 cm followed by serial imaging every 3 months. Two investigators performed independent imaging reviews to confirm the diagnosis. Median increase in total tumor diameter was 0.14 cm/month. Probabilities of progression from T1 to directly beyond T2 without LT listing were 4.4% at 6 months and 9.0% at both 12 and 24 months. The 1- and 3-year survival was 94.5% and 75.5%. In multivariate analysis, predictors of rapid tumor progression, defined as a > 1 cm increase in total tumor diameter over 3 months, included alcoholic liver disease (odds ratio [OR], 6.52; P = 0.02) and Hispanic race (OR, 3.86; P = 0.047), whereas hepatitis B appeared to be protective (OR, 0.09; P = 0.04). By competing risks regression, predictors of exclusion from LT (with or without listing for LT under T2) were alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥ 500 ng/mL (HR, 12.69; 95% confidence interval, 2.8-57.0; P = 0.001) and rapid tumor progression (HR, 5.68; P < 0.001). In conclusion, the "wait and not ablate" approach until tumor growth from T1 to T2 before LT listing is associated with a <10% risk of tumor progression to directly beyond T2 criteria. However, patients with AFP ≥ 500 ng/mL and rapid tumor progression are at high risk for wait-list dropout and should receive early LRT.

Downstaging of hepatocellular cancer before liver transplant: long-term outcome compared to tumors within Milan criteria.

UNLABELLED: We report on the long-term intention-to-treat (ITT) outcome of 118 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing downstaging to within Milan/United Network for Organ Sharing T2 criteria before liver transplantation (LT) since 2002 and compare the results with 488 patients listed for LT with HCC meeting T2 criteria at listing in the same period. The downstaging subgroups include 1 lesion >5 and ≤8 cm (n = 43), 2 or 3 lesions at least one >3 and ≤5 cm with total tumor diameter ≤8 cm (n = 61), or 4-5 lesions each ≤3 cm with total tumor diameter ≤8 cm (n = 14). In the downstaging group, 64 patients (54.2%) had received LT and 5 (7.5%) developed HCC recurrence. Two of the five patients with HCC recurrence had 4-5 tumors at presentation. The 1- and 2-year cumulative probabilities for dropout (competing risk) were 24.1% and 34.2% in the downstaging group versus 20.3% and 25.6% in the T2 group (P = 0.04). Kaplan-Meier's 5-year post-transplant survival and recurrence-free probabilities were 77.8% and 90.8%, respectively, in the downstaging group versus 81% and 88%, respectively, in the T2 group (P = 0.69 and P = 0.66, respectively). The 5-year ITT survival was 56.1% in the downstaging group versus 63.3% in the T2 group (P = 0.29). Factors predicting dropout in the downstaging group included pretreatment alpha-fetoprotein ≥1,000 ng/mL (multivariate hazard ratio [HR]: 2.42; P = 0.02) and Child's B versus Child's A cirrhosis (multivariate HR: 2.19; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Successful downstaging of HCC to within T2 criteria was associated with a low rate of HCC recurrence and excellent post-transplant survival, comparable to those meeting T2 criteria without downstaging. Owing to the small number of patients with 4-5 tumors, further investigations are needed to confirm the efficacy of downstaging in this subgroup.