Female thermal sensitivity and behaviour across the lifespan: A unique journey.

Women are a group of individuals that undergo unique anatomical, physiological and hormonal changes across the lifespan. For example, consider the impact of the menstrual cycle, pregnancy and menopause, all of which are accompanied by both short- and long-term effects on female body morphology (e.g., changes in breast size) and temperature regulation, heat tolerance, thermal sensitivity and comfort. However, empirical evidence on how skin thermal and wetness sensitivity might change across the lifespan of women, and the implications that this has for female-specific thermal behaviours, continues to be lacking. This paper is based on a symposium presentation given at Physiology 2023 in Harrogate, UK. It aims to review new evidence on anatomical and physiological mechanisms underpinning differences in skin thermal and wetness sensitivity amongst women varying in breast size and age, in addition to their role in driving female thermal behaviours. It is hoped that this brief overview will stimulate the development of testable hypotheses to increase our understanding of the behavioural thermal physiology of women across the lifespan and at a time of climate change.

Biophysical, thermo-physiological and perceptual determinants of cool-seeking behaviour during exercise in younger and older women.

Women continue to be under-represented in thermoregulatory research despite their undergoing unique physiological changes across the lifespan. This study investigated the biophysical, thermo-physiological, and perceptual determinants of cool-seeking behaviour during exercise in younger and older women. Eleven younger (25 ± 5 years; 1.7 ± 0.1 m; 63.1 ± 5.2 kg) and 11 older women (53 ± 6 years; 1.7 ± 0.1 m; 65.4 ± 13.9 kg) performed a 40-min incremental cycling test in a thermoneutral environment (22 ± 1.7°C; 36 ± 4% relative humidity). Throughout the test, participants freely adjusted the temperature of a cooling probe applied to their wrists to offset their thermal discomfort. We continuously recorded the probe-wrist interface temperature to quantify participants' cool-seeking behaviour. We also measured changes in participants' rate of metabolic heat production, core and mean skin temperatures, and skin wetness. Finally, we body-mapped participants' skin heat, cold and wetness sensitivity. Our results indicated that: (1) older and younger women exhibited similar onset and magnitude of cool-seeking behaviour, despite older women presented reduced autonomic heat-dissipation responses (i.e., whole-body sweat losses); (2) older women's thermal behaviour was less determined by changes in core temperature (this being a key driver in younger women), and more by changes in multiple thermo-physiological and biophysical parameters (i.e., physical skin wetness, temperature and heat production); (3) older women did not present lower regional skin thermal and wetness sensitivity than younger women. We conclude that predictions of female cool-seeking behaviours based on thermo-physiological variables should consider the effects of ageing. These findings are relevant for the design of wearable cooling systems and sports garments that meet the thermal needs of women across the lifespan.

The effect of female breast surface area on skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest and following exercise in the heat.

Female development includes significant morphological changes across the breast. Yet, whether differences in breast surface area (BrSA) modify breast skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest and after exercise in the heat remain unclear. We investigated the relationship between BrSA and skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity in 20 young to middle-aged women (27 ± 8 years of age) of varying breast sizes (BrSA range: 147-502 cm2) at rest and after a submaximal run in a warm climatic chamber (32 C ${\mathrm{C}}$  ±  0 . 6 C ; ${\mathrm{0}}{\mathrm{.6C;}}$ 53% ± 1.7% relative humidity). Skin stiffness above and below the nipple and tactile sensitivity from the nipple down were measured. Associations between BrSA and both skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity at rest were determined via correlation analyses. Effects of exercise and test site were assessed by a two-way ANOVA. Skin stiffness was positively correlated with BrSA 3 cm above the areola edge (r = 0.61, P = 0.005) and at the superior areola border (r = 0.54, P = 0.016), but not below the nipple (P > 0.05). The area 3 cm below the areola was also significantly stiffer than all other test sites (P < 0.043). Tactile sensitivity did not vary with BrSA (P > 0.09), but it varied across the breast (i.e., the area 3 cm below the areola was more sensitive than the inferior areola edge; P = 0.018). Skin stiffness and tactile sensitivity across the breast decreased after exercise by ∼37% (P < 0.001) and ∼45% (P = 0.008), respectively. These findings expand our fundamental understanding of the mechanosensory properties of the female breast, and they could help to inform sportswear innovation to better meet the support needs of women of different breast sizes at rest and following exercise.

The effect of female breast surface area on heat-activated sweat gland density and output.

Female development includes significant morphological changes across the breast. Yet, whether differences in breast surface area (BrSA) modify sweat gland density and output remains unclear. The present study investigated the relationship between BrSA and sweat gland density and output in 22 young to middle-aged women (28 ± $\ \pm \ $ 10 years) of varying breast sizes (BrSA range: 147-561 cm2) during a submaximal run in a warm environment (32  ± $ \pm \ $ 0.6°C; 53  ± $ \pm \ $ 1.7% relative humidity). Local sweat gland density and local sweat rate (LSR) above and below the nipple and at the bra triangle were measured. Expired gases were monitored for the estimation of evaporative requirements for heat balance (Ereq, in W/m2). Associations between BrSA and (i) sweat gland density; (ii) LSR; and (iii) sweat output per gland for the breast sites were determined via correlation and regression analyses. Our results indicated that breast sweat gland density decreased linearly as BrSA increased (r = -0.76, P < 0.001), whereas sweat output per gland remained constant irrespective of BrSA (r = 0.29, P = 0.28). This resulted in LSR decreasing linearly as BrSA increased (r = -0.62, P = 0.01). Compared to the bra triangle, the breast had a 64% lower sweat gland density (P < 0.001), 83% lower LSR (P < 0.001) and 53% lower output per gland (P < 0.001). BrSA (R2 = 0.33, P = 0.015) explained a greater proportion of variance in LSR than Ereq (in W/m2) (R2 = 0.07, P = 0.538). These novel findings extend the known relationship between body morphology and sweat gland density and LSR, to the female breast. This knowledge could innovate user-centred design of sports bras by accommodating breast size-specific needs for sweat management, skin wetness perception and comfort.

High-density thermal sensitivity maps of the body of people with multiple sclerosis: Implications for inclusive personal comfort systems.

Inclusive thermal comfort solutions should accommodate the need of clinical groups such as people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS), who experience abnormal thermal sensitivity. The aim of this study was to develop high-density body maps of temperature sensitivity in pwMS to inform the design of patient-centred personal comfort systems. Fourteen pwMS (6 M/8 F; 48.6 ± 10.0 y) and 13 healthy individuals (CTR; 5 M/8 F; 47.8 ± 10.4) underwent a quantitative sensory test in a thermoneutral environment, during which they rated their local thermal sensations arising from the application of warm (39°C) and cold (27°C) stimuli to 115 bilateral body sites across the face, torso, upper and lower limbs. We used a z-transformation to create maps of hypo- and hyper-sensitivity for each individual MS participant using normative CTR data. We found that 50% of pwMS (N = 7/14) presented a loss of cold sensitivity over the upper limb, and a loss of warm sensitivity over the feet. Furthermore, 36% of pwMS (N = 5) presented warm hyper-sensitivity over the upper limb. Finally, cold sensitivity loss and warm sensitivity gain were more evenly distributed and affected a greater proportion of skin sites in MS (i.e. cold hypo-sensitivity = 44% of tested sites; warm hyper-sensitivity = 14%) than warm sensitivity loss (i.e. 10%), which was more focused on sites such as the feet. Our findings highlight the need to consider "thermosensory corrective power" when designing personal comfort systems, to accommodate either thermosensory loss or gain in pwMS. Our approach to clinical body mapping may support this process and help meeting the unique thermal needs of vulnerable individuals.

Optimization of Spatial and Temporal Configuration of a Pressure Sensing Array to Predict Posture and Mobility in Lying.

Commercial pressure monitoring systems have been developed to assess conditions at the interface between mattress/cushions of individuals at risk of developing pressure ulcers. Recently, they have been used as a surrogate for prolonged posture and mobility monitoring. However, these systems typically consist of high-resolution sensing arrays, sampling data at more than 1 Hz. This inevitably results in large volumes of data, much of which may be redundant. Our study aimed at evaluating the optimal number of sensors and acquisition frequency that accurately predict posture and mobility during lying. A continuous pressure monitor (ForeSitePT, Xsensor, Calgary, Canada), with 5664 sensors sampling at 1 Hz, was used to assess the interface pressures of healthy volunteers who performed lying postures on two different mattresses (foam and air designs). These data were down sampled in the spatial and temporal domains. For each configuration, pressure parameters were estimated and the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) was used to determine their ability in discriminating postural change events. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was employed to predict static postures. There was a non-linear decline in AUC values for both spatial and temporal down sampling. Results showed a reduction of the AUC for acquisition frequencies lower than 0.3 Hz. For some parameters, e.g., pressure gradient, the lower the sensors number the higher the AUC. Posture prediction showed a similar accuracy of 63-71% and 84-87% when compared to the commercial configuration, on the foam and air mattress, respectively. This study revealed that accurate detection of posture and mobility events can be achieved with a relatively low number of sensors and sampling frequency.

The Effects of Incontinence Pad Application on Loaded Skin With Reference to Biophysical and Biochemical Parameters: An Exploratory Cohort Study Using a Repeated-Measures Design.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate temporal changes in skin responses following exposure to moisture alone or moisture in combination with mechanical loading. DESIGN: Comparison cohort with a repeated-measures design. SUBJECTS AND SETTINGS: The sample comprised 12 healthy volunteers. Participants were purposely sampled from 2 different age groups; half were 32 to 39 years old and half were 50 to 62 years old. Participants identified as White, Black, or mixed; 83% (n = 10) identified as White; 8 (67%) were female. METHODS: Four sites at the sacrum were challenged with the application of specimens taken from 2 absorbent products; the pad specimens were applied dry or saturated with synthetic urine (SU; pH = 8); a further site from the sacral skin was also selected and used as a control. Skin assessments were performed at different points in time: (1) 60 minutes after exposure to dry or SU-saturated pad specimens; (2) 60 minutes after exposure to pads and mechanical loading (application of pressure in the form of 45°C high sitting); and (3) 30 minutes after removal of all pads (recovery period). Outcome measures were transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum (SC) hydration, erythema, pH, and skin inflammatory biomarkers measured at each of the time points described earlier. RESULTS: The control site and those exposed to dry pads showed minimal time-dependent changes irrespective of the parameter investigated. In contrast, significant increases in TEWL (P = .0000007) and SC hydration responses (P = .0000007) were detected at the sites under absorbent pad specimens after saturation with SU (exposure to moisture). In some participants, TEWL and SC hydration parameters were significantly higher during pressure application. Skin pH remained in the mildly acidic range throughout the test session, and no consistent trends were observed with erythema. Skin inflammatory biomarkers also exhibited considerable variability across participants; none changed significantly over time. Significant differences (P = .02) were also detected following the exposure of moisture in combination with pressure. CONCLUSION: We evaluated an array of parameters to identify changes following skin exposure to 2 absorbent pads in the presence and absence of SU and mechanical loading. Analysis revealed changes in skin barrier properties in the presence of moisture and/or pressure. This observation suggests a need for frequent pad changing as well as periods of skin off-loading to protect the skin health of individuals with incontinence.

Spatial and temporal changes in biophysical skin parameters over a category I pressure ulcer.

In acute care facilities, the detection of pressure ulcers (PUs) relies on visual and manual examination of the patient's skin, which has been reported to be inconsistent and may lead to misdiagnosis. In skin and wound research, various biophysical parameters have been extensively employed to monitor changes in skin health. Nonetheless, the transition of these measures into care settings as part of a routine clinical assessment has been limited. This study was designed to examine the spatial and temporal changes in skin biophysical parameters over the site of a category I PU, in a cohort of hospitalised patients. Thirty patients, each presenting with a category I PU, were enrolled in the study. Skin integrity was assessed at the PU-compromised site and two adjacent areas (5 and 10 cm away). Data was collected over three sessions to examine both temporal differences and longitudinal changes. Skin integrity was assessed using two biophysical parameters, namely, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and stratum corneum (SC) hydration. In addition, the influence of intrinsic factors, namely, incontinence and mobility status, on the parameters was evaluated. TEWL values at the sites compromised by PU were statistically significantly greater (P < .001) than corresponding values at the adjacent control sites at 5 and 10 cm, which were consistent with a normative range (<20 g/h/m2 ). By contrast, SC hydration values did not reveal clear distinctions between the three sites, with high inter-patient variation detected at the sites. Nevertheless, individual profiles were consistent across the three sessions, and the PU site was observed to be either abnormally dry or overhydrated in different individuals. No consistent temporal trend in either parameter was evident. However, intrinsic factors were shown to influence the parameters, with females, bedridden and incontinent patients presenting significantly higher TEWL and SC hydration values (P < .05). TEWL was able to identify differences in skin responses at skin sites compromised with a category I PU when compared to healthy adjacent skin sites. Accordingly, this parameter could be included in the clinical assessment for the identification of PU risk. Further studies are required to elucidate the role of hydration and skin barrier function in the development of PUs and their ability to monitor temporal changes in skin integrity.

Inflammatory biomarkers in sebum for identifying skin damage in patients with a Stage I pressure ulcer in the pelvic region: A single centre observational, longitudinal cohort study with elderly patients.

Pressure Ulcers (PU) are a major burden for affected patients and healthcare providers. Current detection methods involve visual assessments of the skin by healthcare professionals. This has been shown to be subjective and unreliable, with challenges associated with identifying erythema in darker colour skin. Although there exists a number of promising non-invasive biophysical techniques such as ultrasound, capacitance measurements, and thermography, the present study focuses on directly measuring the changes in the inflammatory status of the skin and underlying tissues. Therefore, in this study, we aim to analyse inflammatory cytokines collected through non-invasive sampling techniques to detect early signs of skin damage. Thirty hospitalised patients presenting with Stage I PU were recruited to evaluate the inflammatory response of skin at the site of damage and an adjacent healthy control site. Sebutapes were collected over three sessions to investigate the temporal changes in the inflammatory response. The panel of cytokines investigated included high-abundance cytokines, namely, IL-1α and IL-1RA, and low abundance cytokines; IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, INF-γ, IL-33, IL-1ß and G-CSF. Spatial and temporal differences between sites were assessed and thresholds were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of each biomarker. The results suggest significant (P < .05) spatial changes in the inflammatory response, with upregulation of IL-1α, IL-8, and G-CSF as well as down-regulation of IL-1RA over the Stage I PU compared with the adjacent control site. There were no significant temporal differences between the three sessions. Selected cytokines, namely, IL-1α, IL-1RA, IL-8, G-CSF, and the ratio IL-1α/IL-1RA offered clear delineation in the classification of healthy and Stage-I PU skin sites, with receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity. There were limited influences of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the biomarker response. Inflammatory markers provided a high level of discrimination between the sites presenting with Stage I PU and an adjacent healthy skin site, in a cohort of elderly inpatients. Indeed, the ratio of IL-1α to IL-1RA provided the highest sensitivity and specificity, indicative that inflammatory homeostasis is affected at the PU site. There was a marginal influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors, demonstrating the localised effects of the inflammation. Further studies are required to investigate the potential of inflammatory cytokines incorporated within Point of Care technologies, to support routine clinical use.

The role of friction on skin wetness perception during dynamic interactions between the human index finger pad and materials of varying moisture content.

Mechanosensory inputs arising from dynamic interactions between the skin and moisture, such as when sliding a finger over a wet substrate, contribute to the perception of skin wetness. Yet, the exact relationship between the mechanical properties of a wet substrate, such as friction, and the resulting wetness perception remains to be established under naturalistic haptic interactions. We modeled the relationship between mechanical and thermal properties of substrates varying in moisture levels (0.49 × 10-4; 1.10 × 10-4; and 2.67 × 10-4 mL·mm-2), coefficient of friction (0.783, 0.848, 1.033, 0.839, 0.876, and 0.763), and maximum thermal transfer rate (Qmax, ranging from 511 to 1,260 W·m-2·K-1), and wetness perception arising from the index finger pad's contact with such substrates. Forty young participants (20M/20F) performed dynamic interactions with 21 different stimuli using their index finger pad at a controlled angle, pressure, and speed. Participants rated their wetness perception using a 100-mm visual analog scale (very dry to very wet). Partial least squares regression analysis indicated that coefficient of friction explained only ∼11% of the variance in wetness perception, whereas Qmax and moisture content accounted for ∼22% and 18% of the variance, respectively. These parameters shared positive relationships with wetness perception, such that the greater the Qmax, moisture content, and coefficient of friction, the wetter the perception. We found no differences in wetness perception between males and females. Our findings indicate that although the friction of a wet substrate modulates wetness perception, it is still secondary to thermal parameters such as Qmax.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our skin often interacts with wet materials, yet how their physical properties influence our experience of wetness remains poorly understood. We evaluated wetness perception following naturalistic haptic interactions with materials varying in moisture content, friction, optical profiles, and heat transfer rates. We show that although mechanical parameters can influence wetness perception, their role is secondary to that of thermal factors. These findings expand our understanding of multisensory integration and could guide innovation in healthcare product design.

Regional skin wetness perception and its modulation by warm and cold whole body skin temperatures in people with multiple sclerosis.

Skin wetness sensing is important for thermal stress resilience. Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) present greater vulnerability to thermal stress; yet, it is unclear whether they present wetness-sensing abnormalities. We investigated the effects of MS on wetness sensing and their modulation with changes in mean skin temperature (Tsk). Twelve participants with MS [5 males (M)/7 females (F); 48.3 ± 10.8 yr; Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) range: 1-7] and 11 healthy controls (4 M/7 F; 47.5 ± 11.3 yr) undertook three trials, during which they performed a quantitative sensory test with either a thermoneutral (30.9°C), warm (34.8°C), or cold (26.5°C) mean Tsk. Participants reported on visual analog scales local wetness perceptions arising from the static and dynamic application of a cold-, neutral-, and warm-wet probe (1.32 cm2; water content: 0.8 mL), to the index finger pad, forearm, and forehead. Data were analyzed for the group-level effect of MS, as well as for its individual variability. Our results indicated that MS did not alter skin wetness sensitivity at a group level, across the skin sites and temperature tested, neither under normothermia nor under conditions of shifted thermal state. However, when taking an individualized approach to profiling wetness-sensing abnormalities in MS, we found that 3 of the 12 participants with MS (i.e., 25% of the sample) presented a reduced wetness sensitivity on multiple skin sites and to different wet stimuli (i.e., cold, neutral, and warm wet). We conclude that some individuals with MS may possess reduced wetness sensitivity; however, this sensory symptom may vary greatly at an individual level. Larger-scale studies are warranted to characterize the mechanisms underlying such individual variability.

Skin wetness sensitivity across body sites commonly affected by pain in people with migraine.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate skin wetness perception and thermal sensitivity in people with migraine and similar healthy controls. BACKGROUND: Environmental triggers, such as cold and humidity, are known triggers for pain in people with migraine. Sensory inputs might be implicated in such heightened responses to cold-humid environments, such that a migraine-induced hypersensitivity to cold wetness could be present in people with migraine. However, we lack empirical evidence on skin thermal and wetness sensitivity across skin sites commonly associated with reported pain in migraine, such as the forehead. METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional observational study, conducted in a university hospital setting, evaluated skin wetness perceptions and thermal sensations to wet non-noxious warm-wet, neutral-wet, and cold-wet stimuli applied to the forehead, the posterior neck, and the index finger pad of 12 patients with migraine (mean and standard deviation for age 44.5 ± 13.2 years, 7/12 [58%] women) and 36 healthy controls (mean and standard deviation for age 39.4 ± 14.6 years, 18/36 [50%] women). RESULTS: On the forehead, people with migraine reported a significantly higher wetness perception than healthy controls across all thermal stimulus (15.1 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8 to 28.5, p = 0.027, corresponding to ~ 15% difference), whereas no significant differences were found on the posterior neck nor on the index finger pad. We found no differences among groups in overall thermal sensations (-8.3 mm, 95% CI: -24.0 to 7.3, p = 0.291; -7.8 mm, 95% CI: -25.3 to 9.7, p = 0.375; and 12.4 mm, 95% CI: -4.0 to 28.9, p = 0.133; forehead, posterior neck, and index finger, respectively). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that people with migraine have a heightened sensitivity to skin wetness on the forehead area only, which is where pain attacks occur. Future studies should further explore the underlying mechanisms (e.g., TRPM8-mediated cold-wet allodynia) that lead to greater perception of wetness in people with migraine to better understand the role of environmental triggers in migraine.

Skin wetness detection thresholds and wetness magnitude estimations of the human index fingerpad and their modulation by moisture temperature.

Humans often experience wet stimuli using their hands, yet we know little on how sensitive our fingers are to wetness and the mechanisms underlying this sensory function. We therefore aimed to quantify the minimum amount of water required to detect wetness on the human index fingerpad, the wetness detection threshold, and assess its modulation by temperature. Eight blinded participants (24.0 ± 5.2 yr; 23.3 ± 3.5 body mass index) used their index fingerpad to statically touch stimuli varying in volume (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 mL) and temperature (25, 29, 33, or 37°C). During and after contact, participants rated wetness and thermal sensations using a modified yes/no task and a visual analog scale. The wetness detection threshold at a moisture temperature akin to human skin (33°C) was 24.7 ± 3.48 mL. This threshold shifted depending on moisture temperature (R = 0.746), with cooler temperatures reducing (18.7 ± 3.94 mL at 29°C) and warmer temperatures increasing (27.0 ± 3.04 mL at 37°C) thresholds. When normalized over contact area, the wetness detection threshold at 33°C corresponded to 1.926 × 10-4 mL·mm-2 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.873 × 10-4, 1.979 × 10-4 mL·mm-2]. Threshold differences were reflected by magnitude estimation data, which were analyzed using linear regression to show that both volume and moisture temperature can predict magnitude estimations of wetness (R = 0.949; R = 0.179). Our results indicate high sensitivity to wetness in the human index fingerpad, which can be modulated by moisture temperature. These findings are relevant for the design of products with wetness management properties.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The perception of wetness is a fundamental sensory experience which underpins many aspects of life, from homeostasis to enjoyable experiences. Although previous research has highlighted the importance of cold sensations in human wetness perception, the maximum sensitivity of our wetness sensing system remains to be established. This research presents a novel methodology, which for the first time, has quantified the high sensitivity of the human index fingerpad to wetness and its modulation by moisture temperature.

Blunted sweating does not alter the rise in core temperature in people with multiple sclerosis exercising in the heat.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether thermoregulatory capacity is altered by multiple sclerosis (MS) during exercise in the heat. Sixteen MS participants (EDSS: 2.9 ± 0.9; 47 ± 8 yr; 77.6 ± 14.0 kg) and 14 healthy control (CON) participants (43 ± 11 yr; 78.6 ± 17.0 kg) cycled at a heat production of 4 W·kg-1 for 60 min at 30°C, 30% relative humidity (RH) (Warm). A subset of eight MS (EDSS: 2.6 ± 0.5; 44 ± 8 yr; 82.3 ± 18.2 kg) and 8 CON (44 ± 12 yr; 81.2 ± 21.1 kg) also exercised at 35°C, 30% RH (Hot). Rectal temperature (Tre), mean skin (Tsk) temperature, and local sweat rate (LSR) on the upper back (LSRback) and forearm (LSRarm) were measured. All CON, and only 9 of 16 and 7 of 8 MS participants completed 60 min of exercise in Warm and Hot trials, respectively. All MS participants who were unable to complete exercise stopped with a ΔTre between 0.2 and 0.5°C. The time to reach a ΔTre of 0.2°C was similar (MS: 28 ± 15 min, CON: 32 ± 18 min; P = 0.51). For MS participants, completing 60-min of exercise in Warm, ΔTre (P = 0.13), ΔTsk (P = 0.45), LSRback (P = 0.69), and LSRarm (P = 0.54) was similar to CON, but ΔTb (body temperature) (MS: 0.16 ± 0.13°C, CON: 0.07 ± 0.06°C; P = 0.02) and onset time (MS: 16 ± 10 min, CON: 8 ± 5 min; P = 0.02) for sweating were greater in MS. Similarly, in Hot, ΔTre (P = 0.52), ΔTsk (P = 0.06), LSRback (P = 0.59), and LSRarm (P = 0.08) were similar, but ΔTb (MS: 0.19 ± 0.16°C, CON: 0.06 ± 0.04°C; P = 0.04) and onset time (MS: 13 ± 7 min, CON: 6 ± 3 min; P = 0.02) for sweating were greater in MS. Even at 35°C, a delayed sweating onset did not alter heat loss to sufficiently affect exercise-induced rises in core temperature. Heat intolerance with MS does not seem attributable to thermoregulatory impairments.

Ageing reduces skin wetness sensitivity across the body.

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? Ageing impairs the skin's thermal and tactile sensitivity: does ageing also induce loss of skin wetness sensitivity? What is the main finding and its importance? Older adults show an average 15% loss of skin wetness sensitivity, with this sensory deficit being mediated by a combination of reductions in skin's tactile sensing and hydration status. These findings increase knowledge of wetness sensing mechanisms across the lifespan. ABSTRACT: Humans use sensory integration mechanisms to sense skin wetness based on thermal and mechanical cues. Ageing impairs the skin's thermal and tactile sensitivity, yet we lack evidence on whether wetness sensing also changes with ageing. We mapped local skin wetness and temperature sensitivity in response to cold-, neutral- and warm-wet stimuli applied to the forehead, neck, lower back, dorsal foot, index finger and thumb, in 10 Younger (22.4 ± 1.1 years) and 10 Older (58.2 ± 5.1 years) males. We measured local skin temperature and conductance (i.e., a marker of hydration status) at the tested sites, to establish the role of skin's thermal and mechanical parameters in ageing-induced changes in wetness sensing. Irrespective of body site, Older reported overall lower wetness perceptions than Younger across all wet-stimulus temperatures (mean difference: -14.6 mm; 95% CI: -4.3, -24.9; P = 0.008; ∼15% difference). When considering regional wetness sensitivity, the effect of ageing was more pronounced in response to the cold-wet stimulus over the lover back (mean difference Older vs. Younger: -36.8 mm; 95% CI: -68.4, -5.2; P = 0.014; ∼37% difference) and dorsal foot (mean difference: -37.1 mm; 95% CI: -68.7, -5.5; P = 0.013; ∼37% difference). We found no differences between age groups on overall thermal sensations (P = 0.744) nor local skin temperature (P = 0.372); however, we found that Older presented overall lower skin conductance than Younger (mean difference: -1.56 µS; 95% CI: -0.49, -2.62; P = 0.005), which corresponded to an ∼78% reduction in skin hydration. We conclude that skin wetness sensing decreases with ageing primarily due to age-induced changes in skin mechanics and tactile sensitivity.

Heat risk exacerbation potential for neurology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and related isolation.

COVID-19 may increase the risk of heat-related symptoms during hot weather since vulnerable populations, including the elderly and those with neurological disabilities, must continue to self-isolate, often indoors. Within the chronic neurological patient population, indoor conditions in summer months present a hazard because of impaired and/or altered thermoregulation, including poor hydration status due to both autonomic and behavioral dysfunction(s). To address this increased risk, telemedicine protocols should include an assessment of the patient's environmental parameters, and when combined with physiological data from wearable devices, identify those with neurological diseases who are at higher risk of heat illness. Personalized medicine during times of self-isolation must be encouraged, and using smart technology in ambient assisted living solutions, including e-health to monitor physiological parameters are highly recommended, not only during extreme weather conditions but also during times of increased isolation and vulnerability.

Evidence for the involvement of peripheral cold-sensitive TRPM8 channels in human cutaneous hygrosensation.

In contrast to other species, humans are believed to lack hygroreceptors for sensing skin wetness. Yet, the molecular basis of human hygrosensation is currently unknown, and it remains unclear whether we possess a receptor-mediated sensing mechanism for skin wetness. The aim of this study was to assess the role of the cutaneous cold-sensitive transient receptor potential melastatin-8 (TRPM8) channel as a molecular mediator of human hygrosensation. To this end, we exploited both the thermal and chemical activation of TRPM8-expressing cutaneous Aδ cold thermoreceptors, and we assessed wetness sensing in healthy young men in response to 1) dry skin cooling in the TRPM8 range of thermosensitivity and 2) application of the TRPM8 agonist menthol. Our results indicate that 1) independently of contact with moisture, a cold-dry stimulus in the TRPM8 range of activation induced wetness perceptions across 12 different body regions and those wetness perceptions varied across the body following regional differences in cold sensitivity; and 2) independently of skin cooling, menthol-induced stimulation of TRPM8 triggered wetness perceptions that were greater than those induced by physical dry cooling and by contact with an aqueous cream containing actual moisture. For the first time, we show that the cutaneous cold-sensing TRPM8 channel plays the dual role of cold and wetness sensor in human skin and that this ion channel is a peripheral mediator of human skin wetness perception.

Independent and interactive effects of thermal stress and mental fatigue on manual dexterity.

Many occupations and sports require high levels of manual dexterity under thermal stress and mental fatigue. Yet, multistressor studies remain scarce. We quantified the interactive effects of thermal stress and mental fatigue on manual dexterity. Seven males (21.1 ± 1.3 yr) underwent six separate 60-min trials characterized by a combination of three air temperatures (hot, 37°C; neutral, 21°C; cold, 7°C) and two mental fatigue states (MF, mental fatigue induced by a 35-min cognitive battery; no-MF, no mental fatigue). Participants performed complex (O'Connor test) and simple (hand-tool test) manual tasks pre- and posttrial to determine stressor-induced performance changes. We monitored participants' rectal temperature and hand skin temperature (Thand) continuously and assessed the reaction time (hand-click test) and subjective mental fatigue (5-point scale). Thermal stress (P < 0.0001), but not mental fatigue (P = 0.290), modulated Thand (heat, +3.3°C [95% CI: +0.2, +6.5]; cold, -7.5°C [-10.7, -4.4]). Mental fatigue (P = 0.021), but not thermal stress (P = 0.646), slowed the reaction time (∼10%) and increased subjective fatigue. Thermal stress and mental fatigue had an interactive effect on the complex manual task (P = 0.040), with cold-no-MF decreasing the performance by -22% [-39, -5], whereas neutral-MF, cold-MF, and heat-MF by -36% [-53, -19], -34% [-52, -17], and -36% [-53, -19], respectively. Only mental fatigue decreased the performance in the simple manual task (-30% [-43, -16] across all thermal conditions; P = 0.002). Cold stress-induced impairments in complex manipulation increase with mental fatigue; yet combined stressors' effects are no greater than those of mental fatigue alone, which also impairs simple manipulation. Mental fatigue poses a greater challenge to manual dexterity than thermal stress.

Thermosensory mapping of skin wetness sensitivity across the body of young males and females at rest and following maximal incremental running.

KEY POINTS: Humans lack skin receptors for wetness (i.e. hygroreceptors), yet we present a remarkable wetness sensitivity. Afferent inputs from skin cold-sensitive thermoreceptors are key for sensing wetness; yet, it is unknown whether males and females differ in their wetness sensitivity across their body and whether high intensity exercise modulates this sensitivity. We mapped sensitivity to cold, neutral and warm wetness across five body regions and show that females are more sensitive to skin wetness than males, and that this difference is greater for cold than warm wetness sensitivity. We also show that a single bout of maximal exercise reduced the sensitivity to skin wetness (i.e. hygro-hypoesthesia) of both sexes as a result of concurrent decreases in thermal sensitivity. These novel findings clarify the physiological mechanisms underpinning this fundamental human sensory experience. In addition, they indicate sex differences in thermoregulatory responses and will inform the design of more effective sport and protective clothing, as well as thermoregulatory models. ABSTRACT: Humans lack skin hygroreceptors and we rely on integrating cold and tactile inputs from A-type skin nerve fibres to sense wetness. Yet, it is unknown whether sex and exercise independently modulate skin wetness sensitivity across the body. We mapped local sensitivity to cold, neutral and warm wetness of the forehead, neck, underarm, lower back and dorsal foot in 10 males (27.8 ± 2.7 years; 1.92 ± 0.1 m2 body surface area) and 10 females (25.4 ± 3.9 years; 1.68 ± 0.1 m2 body surface area), at rest and post maximal incremental running. Participants underwent our quantitative sensory test where they reported the magnitude of thermal and wetness perceptions (visual analogue scale) resulting from the application of a cold (5°C below skin temperature) wet (0.8 mL of water), neutral wet and warm wet (5°C above skin temperature) thermal probe (1.32 cm2 ) to five skin sites. We found that: (i) females were ∼14% to ∼17% more sensitive to cold-wetness than males, yet both sexes were as sensitive to neutral- and warm-wetness; (ii) regional differences were present for cold-wetness only, and these followed a craniocaudal increase that was more pronounced in males (i.e. the foot was ∼31% more sensitive than the forehead); and (iii) maximal exercise reduced cold-wetness sensitivity over specific regions in males (i.e. ∼40% decrease in foot sensitivity), and also induced a generalized reduction in warm-wetness sensitivity in both sexes (i.e. ∼4% to ∼6%). For the first time, we show that females are more sensitive to cold wetness than males and that maximal exercise induce hygro-hypoesthesia. These novel findings expand our knowledge on sex differences in thermoregulatory physiology.