The Ratio Between the Infrarenal and Suprarenal Aortic Diameter Is a Predictor of Durable Proximal Seal After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether the ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the suprarenal aortic diameter is a predictor for a durable proximal seal after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: A total of 439 patients who underwent elective EVAR between 2004 and 2018 in a single vascular referral center met our inclusion criteria. Ratios were calculated by dividing the mean infrarenal neck diameter by 4 different suprarenal aortic diameters. Patients who developed a late type 1A endoleak (n=20) or proximal neck dilatation mandating revision (n=8) were compared with the 411 patients without long-term proximal seal complications. RESULTS: Patients who developed a late type 1A endoleak had more frequently hypertension, a shorter infrarenal neck length, and a larger mean infrarenal neck diameter. The ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to all 4 suprarenal aortic diameters was higher in the late type 1A endoleak group compared with the group without a late type 1A endoleak. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression identified a combination of 6 variables as the best combination to predict a late type 1A endoleak: presence of hypertension, increased mean infrarenal neck diameter, decreased aneurysm neck length, larger ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the aortic diameter proximal to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), larger ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the aortic diameter proximal to the upper renal artery, and increased ß-angle. Of these, based on both the univariate area under the curve (AUC) and optimal LASSO model restricted to a single predictor, the ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the aortic diameter proximal to the SMA (AUC, 0.770; cutoff value, 0.997) was considered the best prognostic variable. CONCLUSION: The ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the aortic diameter proximal to the SMA is a good predictor for a late type 1A endoleak. Patients with mean infrarenal neck diameter larger than the diameter proximal to the SMA (ratio >1) are at risk for a late type 1A endoleak. CLINICAL IMPACT: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we found that the ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the aortic diameter proximal to the SMA is a good predictor for a late type 1A endoleak. We conclude that the suprarenal diameter must be taken into account before assessing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair eligibility. Patients with a ratio >1 may not be the best candidates for a durable result after EVAR and may be better off with fenestrated EVAR or open repair.

Surveillance After Surgical and Endovascular Treatment for Peripheral Artery Disease: a Dutch Survey.

OBJECTIVE: At present, there is no clear, optimal approach to surveillance after invasive treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in terms of modality, duration, clinical benefit, and cost effectiveness. The ongoing debate on the clinical benefit and cost effectiveness of standard surveillance creates a clear knowledge gap and may result in overtreatment or undertreatment. In this study, a survey was conducted among vascular surgeons in the Netherlands to assess the currently applied surveillance programmes. METHODS: All vascular surgeons from the Dutch Society for Vascular Surgery received an online survey on follow up after open and endovascular revascularisation in patients with PAD. Surveillance was defined as at least one follow up visit after intervention with or without additional imaging or ankle brachial index (ABI) measurement. Ten types of PAD intervention were surveyed. RESULTS: Surveys were returned by 97 (46.2%) of 210 vascular surgeons, and 76% reported using a routine follow up protocol after an invasive intervention. Clinical follow up only is most commonly performed after femoral endarterectomy (53%). After peripheral bypass surgery, clinical follow up only is applied rarely (4 - 8%). In six of the 10 interventions surveyed, duplex ultrasound (DUS) was the most used imaging modality for follow up. After bypass surgery, 76 - 86% of vascular surgeons perform DUS with or without ABI measurement. After endovascular interventions, 21 - 60% performed DUS surveillance. Lifelong surveillance is most often applied after aortobifemoral bypass (57%). Surveillance frequency and duration vary greatly within the same intervention. Frequencies range from every three or six months to annually. Duration ranges from one time surveillance to lifelong follow up. CONCLUSION: There is significant practice variation in surveillance after surgical and endovascular treatment of patients with PAD in the Netherlands. Prospective studies to evaluate treatment outcomes and to define the clinical need and cost effectiveness of standardised surveillance programmes for patients with PAD are recommended.

Midterm Outcomes and Aneurysm Sac Dynamics Following Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair after Previous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) is a feasible option for aortic repair after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), due to improved peri-operative outcomes compared with open conversion. However, little is known regarding the durability of FEVAR as a treatment for failed EVAR. Since aneurysm sac evolution is an important marker for success after aneurysm repair, the aim of the study was to examine midterm outcomes and aneurysm sac dynamics of FEVAR after prior EVAR. METHODS: Patients undergoing FEVAR for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms from 2008 to 2021 at two hospitals in The Netherlands were included. Patients were categorised into primary FEVAR and FEVAR after EVAR. Outcomes included five year mortality rate, one year aneurysm sac dynamics (regression, stable, expansion), sac dynamics over time, and five year aortic related procedures. Analyses were done using Kaplan-Meier methods, multivariable Cox regression analysis, chi square tests, and linear mixed effect models. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-six patients with FEVAR were identified, of whom 27% (n = 53) had had a prior EVAR. Patients with prior EVAR were significantly older (78 ± 6.7 years vs. 73 ± 5.9 years, p < .001). There were no significant differences in mortality rate. FEVAR after EVAR was associated with a higher risk of aortic related procedures within five years (hazard ratio [HR] 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 - 6.5, p = .037). Sac dynamics were assessed in 154 patients with available imaging. Patients with a prior EVAR showed lower rates of sac regression and higher rates of sac expansion at one year compared with primary FEVAR (sac expansion 48%, n = 21/44, vs. 8%, n = 9/110, p < .001). Sac dynamics over time showed similar results, sac growth for FEVAR after EVAR, and sac shrinkage for primary FEVAR (p < .001). CONCLUSION: There were high rates of sac expansion and a need for more secondary procedures in FEVAR after EVAR than primary FEVAR patients, although this did not affect midterm survival. Future studies will have to assess whether FEVAR after EVAR is a valid intervention, and the underlying process that drives aneurysm sac growth following successful FEVAR after EVAR.

Clinical Performance of the Low Profile Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft: 2 Year Results from the ZEPHYR Registry.

OBJECTIVE: The midterm outcomes of the low profile Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft from the ZEnith alPHa for aneurYsm Repair (ZEPHYR) registry are reported. METHODS: The ZEPHYR registry is a physician initiated, multicentre, non-randomised, core laboratory controlled, prospective registry. Inclusion criteria were patients with a non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm with a maximum diameter ≥ 50 mm or enlargement > 5 mm within 6 months, with a site reported infrarenal neck length of ≥ 10 mm and with the intention to electively implant the Zenith Alpha abdominal endograft. Patients from 14 sites across Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands were included. The primary endpoint was treatment success, defined as technical success and clinical success. Technical success was defined as successful delivery and deployment of the endograft in the planned position without unintentional coverage of internal iliac or renal arteries, with successful removal of the delivery system. Clinical success was defined as freedom from aneurysm sac expansion > 5 mm, type I or type III endoleaks, aneurysm rupture, stent graft migration > 10 mm, open conversion, and stent graft occlusion. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-seven patients were included in the ZEPHYR registry. The median clinical follow up was 743 days (interquartile range [IQR] 657, 806) with a median imaging follow up of 725 days (IQR 408, 788). Treatment success at 6 months, 1, and 2 years was 92.5%, 90.4%, and 85.3%, respectively. Freedom from secondary intervention was 94.3%, 93.4%, and 86.9%, respectively. The predominant reason for secondary intervention was limb complications. Freedom from limb occlusion (per patient) at 6 months, 1, and 2 years was 97.2%, 95.8%, and 92.5%, respectively. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses could not identify any independent predictor for limb complications. CONCLUSION: While treatment success is comparable with other commercially available grafts, the rate of limb complications at 2 years is of concern. The manufacturer's instructions for use should be followed closely. Further studies are necessary to investigate the root cause of the increased rate of limb complications with the Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft.

A Ratio Between Infrarenal and Suprarenal Aortic Diameters Corrects for Absolute Aortic Diameter Variations due to Patients' Sex and Body Size.

OBJECTIVES: Aortic diameters may differ significantly between patients with different gender and body size. The aim of this study was to relate absolute aortic diameters to age, sex, height, and weight of the patients and to correct for these factors by calculating the ratio between the infrarenal and the suprarenal aortic diameters. METHODS: A total of 458 patients who underwent elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) between 2004 and 2018 were included. The aortic anatomy in this group of elective EVAR patients was compared with a control group of 75 patients without an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The aortic diameter was measured at 4 suprarenal points and 4 infrarenal points. Ratios were calculated by dividing the mean infrarenal neck diameter by 4 suprarenal measurements. RESULTS: Patients in the aneurysm group had significantly larger suprarenal and infrarenal aortic diameters. The ratios between the mean infrarenal neck diameter and all 4 suprarenal measurements were larger in the AAA group than in the control group. In both groups, there was a significant correlation between the mean infrarenal neck diameter and sex, height, weight, and body surface area (BSA). However, in both groups, all 4 ratios between the mean infrarenal neck diameter and suprarenal aortic diameters were not correlated with age, sex, height, weight, or BSA, except for the ratio between the mean infrarenal neck diameter and the aortic diameter measurement proximal to the upper renal artery, which was correlated to weight and BSA in the control group. CONCLUSION: The mean infrarenal neck diameter is correlated with sex, height, weight, and BSA. However, when the suprarenal aortic diameter was used as an internal control for the mean infrarenal neck diameter, we were able to correct for these variations in aortic diameters due to sex and body size. The clinical relevance of this ratio in patients treated by EVAR has yet to be assessed in future research. CLINICAL IMPACT: In the assessment for EVAR suitability the absolute diameter of the aneurysm neck is taken into account. We believe that using absolute diameters is not the appropriate way to assess this suitability, but that patient characteristics such as age, gender and body size, should be factored into this assessment. In this paper, we show that suprarenal and infrarenal aortic diameters are both significantly increased in patients with an aneurysm compared with patients without an aneurysm. Besides, we found that mean infrarenal aortic diameter is correlated with sex, height, weight, and body surface area. Finally, we propose a new ratio system, using suprarenal diameters as an internal control, to correct for aortic diameter variations due to sex and body size.

Assessing Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Suitability According to Graft-Specific Instructions for Use in Patients With a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to ascertain endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) suitability in relation to stent-graft-specific instructions for use (IFU) in patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA), the aortic morphology of patients undergoing surgical repair of a RAAA in 2 Dutch hospitals between January 2014 and December 2019 was retrospectively assessed. Three-dimensional and central luminal line reconstructions were used. Anatomical suitability was defined according to the IFU of the stent graft system used. RESULTS: Of 128 included patients, 112 (88%) were men and the mean age was 74.1 (SD=7.6) years. Anatomy within IFU for EVAR was present in 31 patients (24%). Overall, 94 patients (73%) were treated with open surgical repair (OSR) and 34 patients (27%) were treated with EVAR. Anatomy within IFU was present in 15 OSR patients (16%) and 16 EVAR patients (47%). In patients with anatomy outside of IFU, 90% (87/97) had unsuitable neck anatomy and 64% (62/97) had insufficient neck length. An unsuitable distal iliac landing zone was observed in 35 patients. Perioperative mortality was 27% (34/128), with no difference between OSR and EVAR (25/94 vs 9/34; p=0.989). CONCLUSION: Most RAAA patients in this series did not have aortic anatomy within IFU for EVAR, mainly due to insufficient neck length. However, whether anatomy outside of IFU equates to unsuitability for EVAR in an emergency setting remains a matter of debate and warrants further research. CLINICAL IMPACT: The treatment of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm can consist of endovascular repair or open repair. Retrospective anatomical assessment shows that most patients do not have anatomy inside the instructions for use for endovascular aneurysm repair, mainly due to insufficient neck length. Whether anatomy outside the instructions for use equates unsuitability for endovascular aneurysm repair remains a matter of debate.

Outcomes and Patency of Endovascular Infrapopliteal Reinterventions in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

PURPOSE: Endovascular revascularization is the preferred treatment to improve perfusion of the lower extremity in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Patients with CLTI often present with stenotic-occlusive lesions involving the infrapopliteal arteries. Although the frequency of treating infrapopliteal lesions is increasing, the reintervention rates remain high. This study aimed to determine the outcomes and patency of infrapopliteal endovascular reinterventions. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study of 3 Dutch hospitals included patients who underwent an endovascular infrapopliteal reintervention in 2015 up to 2021 after a primary infrapopliteal intervention for CLTI. The outcome measures after the reintervention procedures included technical success rate, the mortality rate and complication rate (any deviation from the normal postinterventional course) at 30 days, overall survival, amputation-free survival (AFS), freedom from major amputation, major adverse limb event (MALE), and recurrent reinterventions (a reintervention following the infrapopliteal reintervention). Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine risk factors for AFS and freedom from major amputation or recurrent reintervention. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients with CLTI were included. A total of 87 limbs underwent an infrapopliteal reintervention in which 122 lesions were treated. Technical success was achieved in 99 lesions (81%). The 30-day mortality rate was 1%, and the complication rate was 13%. Overall survival and AFS at 1 year were 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55%-79%) and 54% (95% CI, 37%-67%), respectively, and those at 2.5 years were 45% (95% CI, 33%-56%) and 21% (95% CI, 11%-33%), respectively. Freedom from major amputation, MALE, and recurrent reinterventions at 1 year and 2.5 years were 59% (95% CI, 46%-70%) and 41% (95% CI, 25%-56%); 54% (95% CI, 41%-65%) and 36% (95% CI, 21%-51%); and 68% (95% CI, 55%-78%) and 51% (95% CI, 33%-66%), respectively. A Global Limb Anatomic Staging System score of III showed an increased hazard ratio of 2.559 (95% CI, 1.078-6.072; p=0.033) for freedom of major amputation or recurrent reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that endovascular infrapopliteal reinterventions can be performed with acceptable 30-day mortality and complication rates. However, outcomes and patency were moderate to poor, with low AFS, high rates of major amputations, and recurrent reinterventions. CLINICAL IMPACT: This multicenter retrospective study evaluating outcome and patency of endovascular infrapopliteal reinterventions for CLTI, shows that endovascular infrapopliteal reinterventions can be performed with acceptable 30-day mortality and complication rates. However, the short- and mid-term outcomes of the infrapopliteal reinterventions were moderate to poor, with low rates of AFS and a high need for recurrent reinterventions. While the frequency of performing infrapopliteal reinterventions is increasing with additional growing complexity of the disease, alternative treatment options such as venous bypass grafting or deep venous arterialization may be considered and should be studied in randomized controlled trials.

Editor's Choice - Two Year Results of the Randomised DISCOVER Trial Comparing Covered Versus Bare Metal Stents in the Common Iliac Artery.

OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that covered stents (CS) may lower restenosis rates compared with bare metal stents (BMS) after endovascular treatment of the common iliac artery. This trial aimed to provide additional evidence on the efficacy of CS vs. BMS in the common iliac artery. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, single blind controlled superiority trial compared balloon expandable CS and balloon expandable BMS for advanced atherosclerotic lesions in the common iliac artery; this was defined as a stenosis > 3 cm in length or occlusion. The primary end point was freedom from binary restenosis after two years of follow up. The study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (version: October 2008) and registered with the Dutch Trial register (NTR3381). RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-four limbs were included between 2012 and 2019 with 87 limbs in each group. Six patients crossed over from the BMS group to the CS group but were analysed according to an intention to treat principle. Freedom from binary restenosis after two years of follow up was 84.7% (95% CI 76.7 - 92.7%) in the BMS group and 89.1% (95% CI 82.4 - 95.8%) in the CS group (p = .40). Freedom from occlusion was 95.0% (95% CI 90.3 - 95.7%) in the BMS group and 96.4% (95% CI 92.5 - 100%) in the CS group (p = .66). Freedom from target lesion revascularisation was 91.1% (95% CI 84.8 - 97.3%) and 95.2% (95% CI 90.7 -99.7%), respectively (p = .31). Technical success, complications, haemodynamic success, and clinical success were also comparable between both groups. Per-protocol analysis did not affect the outcomes of the study. CONCLUSION: No difference was found between balloon expandable CS and BMS for treating advanced atherosclerotic lesions of the common iliac artery.

Aneurysm Sac Dynamics and its Prognostic Significance Following Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess aneurysm sac dynamics and its prognostic significance following fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR). METHODS: Patients undergoing F/BEVAR for degenerative complex aortic aneurysm from 2008 to 2020 at two large vascular centres with two imaging examinations (30 day and one year) were included. Patients were categorised as regression and non-regression, determined by the proportional volume change (> 5%) at one year compared with 30 days. All cause mortality and freedom from graft related events were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Factors associated with non-regression at one year and aneurysm sac volume over time were examined for FEVAR and BEVAR independently using multivariable logistic regression and linear mixed effects modelling. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-five patients were included: 122 FEVAR, of whom 34% did not regress at one year imaging (20% stable, 14% expansion); and 43 BEVAR, of whom 53% failed to regress (26% stable, 28% expansion). Following F/BEVAR, after risk adjusted analysis, non-regression was associated with higher risk of all cause mortality within five years (hazard ratio [HR] 2.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 - 5.37; p = .032) and higher risk of graft related events within five years (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.10 - 5.26; p = .029). Following multivariable logistic regression, previous aortic repair (odds ratio [OR] 2.56, 95% CI 1.11 - 5.96; p = .029) and larger baseline aneurysm diameter (OR/mm 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.09; p = .037) were associated with non-regression at one year, whereas smoking history was inversely associated with non-regression (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.04 - 0.96; p = .045). Overall following FEVAR, aneurysm sac volume decreased significantly up to two years (baseline vs. two year, 267 [95% CI 250 - 285] cm3vs. 223 [95% CI 197 - 248] cm3), remaining unchanged thereafter. Overall following BEVAR, aneurysm sac volume remained stable over time. CONCLUSION: Like infrarenal EVAR, non-regression at one year imaging is associated with higher five year all cause mortality and graft related events risks after F/BEVAR. Following FEVAR for juxtarenal aortic aneurysm, aneurysm sacs generally displayed regression (66% at one year), whereas after BEVAR for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm, aneurysm sacs displayed a concerning proportion of growth at one year (28%), potentially suggesting a persistent risk of rupture and consequently requiring intensified surveillance following BEVAR. Future studies will have to elucidate how to improve sac regression following complex EVAR, and whether the high expansion risk after BEVAR is due to advanced disease extent.

Circulating biomarkers of cardiovascular disease are related to aneurysm volume in abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Surveillance programs in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are mainly based on imaging and leave room for improvement to timely identify patients at risk for AAA growth. Many biomarkers are dysregulated in patients with AAA, which fuels interest in biomarkers as indicators of disease progression. We examined associations of 92 cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related circulating biomarkers with AAA and sac volume. METHODS: In a cross-sectional analysis, we separately investigated (1) 110 watchful waiting (WW) patients (undergoing periodic surveillance imaging without planned intervention) and (2) 203 patients after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The Cardiovascular Panel III (Olink Proteomics AB, Sweden) was used to measure 92 CVD-related circulating biomarkers. We used cluster analyses to investigate protein-based subphenotypes, and linear regression to examine associations of biomarkers with AAA and sac volume on CT scans. RESULTS: Cluster analyses revealed two biomarker-based subgroups in both WW and EVAR patients, with higher levels of 76 and 74 proteins, respectively, in one subgroup versus the other. In WW patients, uPA showed a borderline significant association with AAA volume. Adjusting for clinical characteristics, there was a difference of -0.092 (-0.148, -0.036) loge mL in AAA volume per SD uPA. In EVAR patients, after multivariable adjustment, four biomarkers remained significantly associated with sac volume. The mean effects on sac volume per SD difference were: LDLR: -0.128 (-0.212, -0.044), TFPI: 0.139 (0.049, 0.229), TIMP4: 0.110 (0.023, 0.197), IGFBP-2: 0.103 (0.012, 0.194). CONCLUSION: LDLR, TFPI, TIMP4, and IGFBP-2 were independently associated with sac volume after EVAR. Subgroups of patients with high levels of the majority of CVD-related biomarkers emphasize the intertwined relationship between AAA and CVD.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03703947.

A stable aneurysm sac after endovascular aneurysm repair as a predictor for mortality: An in-depth analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the long-term survival of patients with a stable aneurysm sac vs those with aneurysm sac regression after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and to identify the independent risk factors for aneurysm sac regression and mortality after EVAR. METHODS: We reviewed all the patients who had undergone EVAR from 2005 to 2018 with computed tomography angiography available at 1 year of follow-up. Aneurysm sac regression was defined as a diameter decrease of >10%. We used multivariable regression to identify the independent risk factors for sac regression. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were performed to test the differences in 5-year mortality between a stable sac diameter and sac regression. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 325 patients, with 185 in the sac regression group and 140 in the stable sac group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that treatment of a ruptured aneurysm was an independent risk factor for aneurysm sac regression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.96). Age (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09), ischemic heart disease (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.13-3.31), neck thrombus (HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.07-6.95), and a type II endoleak (HR, 19.21; 95% CI, 7.32-50.40) were independent risk factors for a stable aneurysm sac diameter. Multivariable Cox regression showed a significantly increased risk of mortality for patients with a stable aneurysm sac after EVAR (odds ratio, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.36-3.72). No significant differences were found in cause of death between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A stable aneurysm sac after EVAR was associated with increased mortality. Age, ischemic heart disease, neck thrombus, and a type II endoleak were independent risk factors for a stable aneurysm sac. However, a well-founded explanation for this finding is still lacking. Future research should focus on aggressive treatment of type II endoleaks and inflammatory processes as potential pathophysiologic mechanisms.

Proximal seal dilatation following fenestrated endovascular repair for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Although proximal neck dilatation following infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is common and is associated with proximal graft failure, little is known about sealing zone dilatation and its clinical relevance following fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR). We studied proximal seal dilatation (PSD) dynamics following FEVAR and assessed its clinical significance. METHODS: We included all consecutive patients treated for a juxta-/supra-renal aneurysm with fenestrated EVAR using the Zenith Fenestrated Endovascular Graft (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) from 2008 to 2018 in two large teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. The primary outcome was PSD over time and was determined using a linear mixed-effects model. Secondary outcomes included associations for early PSD and difference in aortic dilatation at the level of the covered stent compared with the bare stent. Proximal seal-related adverse events were also obtained. RESULTS: Our cohort included 84 patients with a median computed tomography angiography follow-up time of 24.5 months (interquartile range [IQR], 17-42 months). Maximum aneurysm diameter was 60.1 mm (IQR, 56.9-67.2 mm). Mean proximal seal diameter at baseline was 26.2 mm (standard deviation [SD], ±2.8 mm), mean stent oversizing was 20.1% (SD, ±9.1%), and mean proximal seal length was 29.5 mm (SD, ±11.7 mm). Proximal seal dilatation of 1.7 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-2.1 mm) was found in the first year, decelerating thereafter (second year, 0.9 mm/year; 95% CI, 0.7-1.1 mm/y). Over 10% PSD at 1 year occurred in 22 patients (27%) and was associated with stent graft oversizing (odds ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.03-1.2; P = .008) and a lower number of target vessels (four fenestrations/ref two fenestrations: odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.74; P = .029). At last available imaging, dilatation difference was higher at the level of the covered stent compared with the bare stent (3.0 mm [IQR, 1.3-5.1 mm] vs 1.6 mm [IQR, 0.8-2.5 mm]; P < .001). During the study period, only one patient (1.2%) developed a proximal seal-related adverse event (type IA endoleak). CONCLUSIONS: PSD is present following FEVAR, occurring at a faster rate in the first year and subsequently decelerating thereafter, similarly to neck dilatation after standard infrarenal EVAR. Although its clinical implication seems to remain limited in the first years following implantation, further research is required to assess the effect of PSD on long-term FEVAR outcomes.

Covered Stents vs. Angioplasty for Common Iliac Artery In Stent Restenosis: A Retrospective Comparison.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal endovascular treatment for common iliac artery in stent re-stenosis has yet to be assessed. Treatment options include, among others, angioplasty alone and repeated stenting with covered stents. METHODS: This study retrospectively compared patency and target lesion revascularisation of these treatments. All patients who underwent endovascular treatment of common iliac artery in stent re-stenosis between 2007 and 2017 were included retrospectively. The primary end point was freedom from re-stenosis. Secondary endpoints were target lesion revascularisation rate (TLR) and freedom from occlusion during follow up. RESULTS: Seventy-four interventions were included, consisting of 37 angioplasties and 37 covered stent placements in 57 patients. Freedom from re-stenosis at four years was 72.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 51.8% - 88.7%) in the covered stent group vs. 43.5% (95% CI 25.9% - 59.8%) in the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) group (p = .003). The target lesion revascularisation (TLR) rate was 16.4% (95% CI 7.1% - 35.6%) and 43.6% (95% CI 28.0% - 63.2%) respectively (p = .020). There was no difference in freedom from occlusion; this was 90.8% (95% CI 73.9% - 97.0%) in the covered stent group and 79.1% (95% CI 58.4% - 90.3%) in the PTA group (p = .49). The difference in freedom from re-stenosis and TLR remained significant after sensitivity and multivariable analyses. CONCLUSION: Covered stents offer better outcomes for common iliac artery in stent re-stenosis than angioplasty alone.

Incidence, Prognostic Significance, and Risk Factors of Acute Kidney Injury Following Elective Infrarenal and Complex Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a well known complication following cardiovascular procedures. The objective was to assess the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic significance of AKI after infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and complex EVAR (cEVAR; fenestrated or branched EVAR). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing elective infrarenal EVAR or cEVAR between 2000 and 2018 in two large teaching hospitals in the Netherlands were included. AKI was determined by serum creatinine levels increasing > 1.5 times or by an absolute increase of 26.5 mmol/L from baseline value (KDIGO criteria). The primary outcome was incidence of peri-operative AKI development. Secondary outcomes included mid-term renal function (RIFLE criteria), overall survival, and risk factors for AKI development. To determine survival and risk factors for AKI, multivariable Cox regression and logistic regression analyses were performed, accounting for pre-operative renal function and other confounders. RESULTS: In total, 540 patients who underwent infrarenal EVAR with 147 patients who underwent cEVAR also included. The incidence of AKI was 8.7% (n = 47) in infrarenal EVAR patients and 23% (n = 34) in cEVAR patients (fenestrated EVAR 18%; branched EVAR 38%). In contrast to patients without AKI, the renal function of surviving patients with AKI remained significantly reduced at six weeks and did not return to pre-operative values following infrarenal EVAR (three year estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 59.3 ± 23.1 mL/min/1.73m2vs. pre-operative eGFR 74.0 ± 21.7 mL/min/1.73m2; p = .006) or following cEVAR (three year eGFR 52.0 ± 23.7 mL/min/1.73m2vs. pre-operative eGFR 65.4 ± 18.6 mL/min/1.73m2; p = .082). After risk adjusted analysis, compared with non-AKI, post-operative AKI development was associated with a higher three year mortality rate following both infrarenal and cEVAR (infrarenal EVAR mortality hazard ratio [HR 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 - 2.7 [p = .046]; cEVAR mortality HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1 - 5.2 [p = .033]). Following multivariable logistic regression, pre-operative chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2; odds ratio [OR] 2.2, 95% CI 1.03 - 4.8) and neck diameter (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.2) were significantly associated with AKI following infrarenal EVAR, whereas for cEVAR only contrast volume (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0 - 1.2]) was found to be statistically significantly associated with AKI. CONCLUSION: AKI is a well described complication following infrarenal EVAR and is common after cEVAR. As AKI seems to be associated with permanent renal deterioration and lower survival, efforts to prevent AKI are essential. Future studies are required to assess what factors are associated with a higher risk of developing AKI following cEVAR.

Thirty-day Results from the ZEPHYR Registry: Outcomes of EVAR Using the Zenith Alpha™ Abdominal Endovascular Graft for the Treatment of AAA in 347 Patients.

BACKGROUND: To report technical and clinical 30-day results following treatment with the Zenith Alpha™ abdominal stent graft from the ZEnith alPHa for aneurYsm Repair Registry (ZEPHYR). METHODS: Multicenter, nonrandomized, single arm, core laboratory-controlled, prospective registry collecting data on the Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft being used in subjects with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) from sites in Germany, Belgium, and The Netherlands between December 2016 and December 2019. Inclusion criteria were non-ruptured AAAs with a maximum diameter ≥50 mm or enlargement >5 mm over 6 months with an AAA neck length ≥10 mm (site reported). Primary outcome measure was treatment success at 30 days. Treatment success was defined as a combined endpoint consisting of technical and clinical success. Technical success was defined as successful stent graft delivery and deployment as well as successful removal of the delivery system. Clinical success at 30 days was defined as freedom from type I and III endoleak, aneurysm rupture, conversion to open surgery and stent graft occlusion. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-seven subjects were included from 14 sites with a median age of 73.0 years (IQR 68.0-79.0). Thirty-four patients were female (9.8%). The median AAA diameter was 58.3 mm (IQR 55.0-63.5). The median proximal neck diameter was 23.6 mm (IQR 22.0-25.2) with a median proximal neck length of 24.4 mm (IQR 15.0-34.8) and a median infrarenal neck angulation of 24.5° (IQR 15.0-35.0). The right and left common iliac diameter were 16.1 mm (IQR 14.1-19.4) and 16.2 mm (IQR 14.1-19.1), respectively. The treatment success rate at 30 days was 94.8% (N = 329). Technical success was achieved in 333 patients (96.0%). The clinical success rate at 30 days was 98.8% (N = 343). Three patients had limb occlusions at 30 day follow up (0.9%). One patient had a type Ib endoleak (0.3%). Seventy percent of vascular access approaches were percutaneous. The reintervention rate was 1.7% (N = 6) within 30 days. Indications for reinterventions were a false aneurysm at puncture site (N = 1), limb complications (N = 2), stentgraft-associated renal artery occlusions (N = 2), and an external iliac artery thrombosis (N = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular aneurysm repair using the Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft is effective in the short term. Long term results will be reported in the future.

Remodeling of Abdominal Aortic Angulation and Curvature After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Patients With vs Without Late Type Ia Endoleak or Endograft Migration.

PURPOSE: To investigate aortic remodeling of the supra- and infrarenal aorta from preoperative to 1 month and midterm follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) by analyzing changes in angulation and curvature in patients with vs without late type Ia endoleak or device migration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a multicenter database, 35 patients (mean age 76±5 years; 31 men) were identified with late (>1 year) type Ia endoleak or endograft migration (≥10 mm) and defined as the complication group. The control group consisted of 53 patients (mean age 75±7 years; 48 men) with >1-year computed tomography angiography (CTA) follow-up and no evidence of endoleaks. Suprarenal and infrarenal angles were measured on centerline reconstructions of the preoperative, 1-month, and midterm CTA scans. The value and location relative to baseline of maximum suprarenal and infrarenal curvature were determined semiautomatically using dedicated software. Changes were determined at 1 month compared with the preoperative CTA and at midterm compared with 1 month. RESULTS: Preoperative suprarenal angulation was significantly greater in the complication group compared to the controls (34°±18° vs 24°±17°, p=0.008). It decreased significantly at 1 month in the complication group (29°±16°, p=0.011) and at midterm follow-up in the controls (20°±19°, p<0.001). Preoperative infrarenal angulation was not significantly different (57°±15° vs 49°±24°, p=0.114). This measurement increased significantly through midterm follow-up in the complication group (63°±23°, p<0.001) but remained stable in the controls (46°±22°). Preoperative suprarenal curvature was not significantly different (38±22 m-1 vs 29±25 m-1, p=0.115). This variable increased significantly through midterm follow-up in the complication group (44±22 m-1) but remained constant in the controls (28±22 m-1). Preoperative infrarenal curvature was significantly greater in the complication group (77±29 m-1 vs 65±28 m-1, p=0.047) and decreased significantly in both groups during midterm follow-up (50±17 m-1 vs 41±19 m-1 p=0.033). The location of the maximum curvature with regard to baseline shifted significantly distally in the complication group (54±43 to 72±41 mm, p<0.001), while it remained stable in the controls (46±33 to 48±31 mm). CONCLUSION: At midterm follow-up, significant differences in supra- and infrarenal angulation and curvature were observed between patients with vs without type Ia endoleak or migration. The location of the maximum curvature shifted distally in patients with complications. The aortic morphology is more stable during midterm follow-up in the patients without endoleaks.

Bypass surgery in a mangled forearm using an intramedullary tunnel through the radius.

Critical ischemia in the upper extremity is rare. A surgical bypass is thought to be the superior treatment option. We describe a rare case where regular tunneling options of the bypass were not available and an intramedullary tunnel was used.

Angioplasty versus stenting for iliac artery lesions.

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis of the iliac artery may result in a stenosis or occlusion, which is defined as iliac artery occlusive disease. A range of surgical and endovascular treatment options are available. Open surgical procedures have excellent patency rates but at the cost of substantial morbidity and mortality. Endovascular treatment has good safety and short-term efficacy with decreased morbidity, complications and costs compared with open surgical procedures. Both percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting are commonly used endovascular treatment options for iliac artery occlusive disease. A stenotic or occlusive lesion of the iliac artery can be treated successfully by PTA alone. If PTA alone is technically unsuccessful, additional stent placement is indicated. Alternatively, a stent could be placed primarily to treat an iliac artery stenosis or occlusion (primary stenting, PS). However, there is limited evidence to prove which endovascular treatment strategy is superior for stenotic and occlusive lesions of the iliac arteries. This is an update of the review first published in 2015. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus primary stenting for stenotic and occlusive lesions of the iliac artery. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 24 September 2019. We also undertook reference checking and citation searching to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and primary stenting for iliac artery occlusive disease. We excluded quasi-randomised trials, case reports, case-control or cohort studies. We did not exclude studies based on the language of publication. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected suitable trials, extracted data, assessed trial quality and performed data analyses. When there was disagreement, consensus would be reached first by discussion between the two authors and, if needed, through consultation with a third author. We used GRADE criteria to assess the certainty of the evidence and presented the main results in a 'Summary of findings' table. The main outcomes of interest were technical success, complications, symptomatic improvement of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), patency, reinterventions, resolutions of symptoms and signs, and improvement in walking distance as reported by the patient. MAIN RESULTS: We identified no new studies for this update. Previously, we identified two RCTs, with a combined total of 397 participants, as meeting the selection criteria. One study included mostly stenotic lesions (95%), whereas the second study included only iliac artery occlusions. Heterogeneity between these two studies meant it was not possible to pool the data. Both studies were of moderate methodological quality with some risk of bias relating to selective reporting and non-blinding of participants and personnel. Both studies occurred in the 1990s and techniques have since evolved. We assessed the overall certainty of the evidence to be low. We downgraded by two levels: one for risk of bias concerns and one for imprecision and indirectness. There was no evidence of a difference following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with selective stenting compared to primary stenting (PS) in technical success rates in either the study involving stenotic lesions (odds ratio (OR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 2.99; 279 participants; low certainty evidence); or the study involving iliac artery occlusions (OR 2.95, 95% CI 0.12 to 73.90; 112 participants; low certainty evidence). In one trial, PTA of iliac artery occlusions resulted in a higher rate of major complications, especially distal embolisation (OR 4.50 95% CI 1.18 to 17.14; 1 study, 112 participants; low certainty evidence). Immediate complications were similar in the second study (OR 1.81, 95% CI 0.64 to 5.13; 1 study, 279 participants; low certainty evidence). Neither study reported on delayed complications. No evidence of a difference was seen in symptomatic improvement (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.27; 1 study, 157 participants; low certainty evidence). The second study did not provide data but reported no differences. For the outcome of patency, no evidence of a difference was seen in the study involving iliac occlusion at two years (OR 1.60, 95% CI 0.34 to 7.44; 1 study, 57 participants; low certainty evidence); or the study involving stenotic lesions at two years (71.3% in the PS group versus 69.9% in the PTA group). Only one study reported on reintervention (six to eight years, OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.67 to 2.23; 1 study, 279 participants; low certainty evidence); and resolution of symptoms and signs (12 months, OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.00; 1 study, 219 participants; low certainty evidence), with no evidence of a difference detected in either outcome. Neither study reported on improvement in walking distance as reported by the patient. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to make general conclusions about the effects of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus primary stenting for stenotic and occlusive lesions of the iliac artery. Data from one study indicate that primary stenting in iliac artery occlusions may result in lower distal embolisation rates (low certainty evidence). The evidence in this review, based on two studies, was assessed as low certainty, with downgrading decisions based on limitations in risk of bias, imprecision and indirectness. More studies are required to strengthen our confidence in the results.

Remote Iliac Artery Endarterectomy: A Case Series and Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term results of remote iliac artery endarterectomy (RIAE) in 2 vascular referral centers and review existing literature. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 109 consecutive patients (mean age 64.2±10.7 years; 72 men) who underwent 113 RIAE procedures for lower limb ischemia from January 2004 to August 2015 at 2 vascular centers. The majority of limbs (82, 72.6%) had TASC II D lesions (31 TASC II C). Primary outcome measures were primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency. A comprehensive literature search was performed in the PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify all English-language studies published after 1990 reporting the results of RIAE. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 95 (84.1%) of the 113 procedures. The complication rate was 13.7%, and 30-day mortality was 0%. At 5 years, primary patency was 78.2%, assisted primary patency was 83.4%, and secondary patency was 86.7%. Hemodynamic success was obtained in 91.7% of patients, and clinical improvement was observed in 95.2%. Freedom from major amputation was 94.7% at 5 years. The systematic review comprised 6 studies including 419 RIAEs, and pooled data showed results similar to the current study. CONCLUSION: For external iliac artery occlusions extending into the common femoral artery, RIAE appears to be a valuable hybrid treatment option. It combines acceptable morbidity and low mortality with good long-term patency. It has some advantages over an open surgical iliofemoral bypass or complete endovascular revascularization and could be the best treatment option in selected cases.

Determination of Endograft Apposition, Position, and Expansion in the Aortic Neck Predicts Type Ia Endoleak and Migration After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

PURPOSE: To describe the added value of determining changes in position and apposition on computed tomography angiography (CTA) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) to detect early caudal displacement of the device and to prevent type Ia endoleak. METHODS: Four groups of elective EVAR patients were selected from a dataset purposely enriched with type Ia endoleak and migration (>10 mm) cases. The groups included cases of late type Ia endoleak (n=36), migration (n=9), a type II endoleak (n=16), and controls without post-EVAR complications (n=37). Apposition of the endograft fabric with the aortic neck, shortest distance between the fabric and the renal arteries, expansion of the main body (or dilatation of the aorta in the infrarenal sealing zone), and tilt of the endograft toward the aortic axis were determined on the first postoperative and the last available CTA scan without type Ia endoleak or migration. Differences in these endograft dimensions were compared between the first vs last scan and among the 4 groups. RESULTS: No significant differences in endograft configurations were observed among the groups on the first postoperative CTA scan. On the last CTA scan before a complication arose, the position of the fabric relative to the renal arteries, expansion of the main body, and apposition of the fabric with the aortic neck were significantly different between the type Ia endoleak (median follow-up 15 months) and migration groups (median follow-up 23 months) compared with the control group (median follow-up 19 months). Most endograft dimensions had changed significantly compared with the first postoperative CTA scan for all groups. Apposition had increased in the control group but had decreased significantly in the type Ia endoleak and migration groups. CONCLUSION: Progressive changes in dimensions of the endograft within the infrarenal neck could be detected on regular CTA scans before the complication became urgent in many patients.