Complications following arthroscopic-assisted coracoclavicular stabilization in patients with unstable lateral clavicle fractures.

PURPOSE: Lateral clavicle fractures are unstable and prone to nonunions, which is why they are often treated surgically rather than conservatively. Despite the variety of surgical techniques found in the literature, the best method for treating this rare fracture type has not yet been determined. Our case series aimed to describe a coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction technique and to assess complications and patient outcomes 1 year postoperatively. METHODS: Nineteen patients who underwent surgery for an unstable lateral clavicle fracture (IIB, IIC, IID) with a suture button device (Dog Bone, Arthrex, Inc., Naples, FL, USA) were available for clinical and radiological follow-up. The assessments included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment (ASES) score, the Constant Score (CS), the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), as well as the ipsilateral and contralateral coracoclavicular distance. RESULTS: The median age was 50 years (IQR 28-59), 13 (68.4%) were male and the delay to surgery was 5 days (IQR 2-9). The median clinical scores were 100 (ASES), 91 (CS), and 95 (SSV). The CC distance improved postoperatively (p = 0.003). However, nonunion occurred in 3 (15.8%) patients, 5 (26.3%) had other complications, and 5 (26.3%) needed revision surgery (4 plate removals and 1 pseudoarthrosis). The overall complication rate was 36.8%. CONCLUSION: Restoring the CC ligaments alone could not reliably achieve fracture stability, with more than one-third of cases in this series experiencing major complications. Given the high revision and nonunion rates, we do not recommend this type of surgical technique.

Is malunion of the greater tuberosity after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with complex proximal humerus fracture associated with worse clinical outcomes? A prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To assess patient outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with complex proximal humerus fracture and the clinical implications of greater tuberosity malunions. METHODS: This prospective study included 56 patients who underwent RSA (DELTA XTEND™, DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA) to treat proximal humerus fractures. We used a standardized suture technique to reattach the tuberosities. Demographic, comorbidity, and radiological parameters were collected. Assessments at 2-year follow-up (n = 49) are given as follows: range of motion (ROM), pain level, Constant Murley scores (CS), subjective shoulder value (SSV), and tuberosity healing. RESULTS: Anatomic tuberosity healing was achieved in 31 (55%) patients (group 1), 14 (25%) had a malunion (group 2), and complete migration occurred in 11 (20%) (group 3). No statistically significant differences between groups 1 and 2 were detected: CS (p = 0.53), SSV (p = 0.07), ROM (forward flexion (FF) p = 0.19, internal rotation (IR) p = 0.34, and external rotation (ER) p = 0.76). Group 3 had poorer outcomes (median [IQR]) than group 1: CS (59 [50-71]) vs. 72 [65-78]), FF (120 [100-150]) vs. 150 [125-160] and ER (- 20 [- 20 to 10] vs. 30 [20-45], respectively. Three complications (group 1) occurred: one-stage revision after low-grade infection, haematoma due to early rivaroxaban intake, and open reduction and internal fixation for acromion insufficiency fracture. No patients showed signs of stem or glenoid loosening after 2 years. CONCLUSION: Cases with complete superior migration experienced poorer clinical outcomes than those with anatomic healing. Despite a relatively high malunion rate, the outcomes were not significantly worse in these patients compared to anatomically healed GT cases.