RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In recent years mental health officials have reported a rise in the number of forensic patients present within their state psychiatric hospitals and the adverse impacts that these trends had on their hospitals. To date there have been no large-scale national studies conducted to determine if these trends are specific only to a few states or representative of a more global trend. The purpose of this study was to investigate these reported trends and their national prevalence. METHODS: The forensic directors of each state behavioral health agency (including the District of Columbia) were sent an Excel spreadsheet that had two components: a questionnaire and data tables with information collected between 1996 and 2014 from the State Profiling System maintained by the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors Research Institute. They were asked to verify and update these data and respond to the questionnaire. RESULTS: Responses showed a 76% increase nationally in the number of forensic patients in state psychiatric hospitals between 1999 and 2014. The largest increase was for individuals who were court-committed after being found incompetent to stand trial and in need of inpatient restoration services. DISCUSSION: The data reviewed here indicate that increases in forensic referrals to state psychiatric hospitals, while not uniform across all states, are nonetheless substantial. CONCLUSION: More research is needed to determine whether this multi-state trend is merely a coincidence of differing local factors occurring in many states, or a product of larger systemic factors affecting mental health agencies and the courts.
Asunto(s)
Psiquiatría Forense/tendencias , Hospitales Psiquiátricos/tendencias , Hospitales Provinciales/tendencias , Enfermos Mentales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Violencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
Clubhouses are recovery centers that help persons with serious mental illness obtain and maintain community-based employment, education, housing, social integration, and other services. Key informants from U.S. clubhouses were interviewed to create a conceptual framework for clubhouse sustainability. Survival analyses tested this model for 261 clubhouses. Clubhouses stayed open significantly longer if they had received full accreditation, had more administrative autonomy, and received funding from multiple rather than sole sources. Cox regression analyses showed that freestanding clubhouses which were accredited endured the longest. Budget size, clubhouse size, and access to managed care did not contribute significantly to sustainability.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/rehabilitación , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Rehabilitación Psiquiátrica , Comunidad Terapéutica , Acreditación , Presupuestos , Educación , Empleo , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Vivienda , Humanos , Relaciones Interpersonales , Masculino , Recuperación de la Salud Mental , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Investigación Cualitativa , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
A history of commitment to a mental health facility disqualifies applicants for gun licenses. Identifying such a history has become increasingly complex as the locus of confinement has become more diversified and privatized. In Massachusetts, prior to 2014, the databases used to identify individuals who would be disqualified on such grounds had not contemporaneously matched the evolution of the state's mental health systems. A survey of Massachusetts police chiefs, who, as in many jurisdictions, are charged with certifying qualification, indicates that some have broadened the scope of their background checks to include the experience of their officers with respect to certain applicants. The survey identifying these patterns, conducted in 2014, preceded by one month significant legislative reforms that mandate the modification of the reporting into a centralized database commitments to all types of mental health and substance use facilities, thus allowing identification of all commitments occurring in the state. The anticipated utilization of a different database mechanism, which has parallels in several other states, potentially streamlines the background check process, but raises numerous concerns that need to be addressed in developing and using such databases.
Asunto(s)
Internamiento Obligatorio del Enfermo Mental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Armas de Fuego/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aplicación de la Ley/métodos , Trastornos Mentales , Internamiento Obligatorio del Enfermo Mental/tendencias , Humanos , Massachusetts , Policia , Política Pública , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
To examine the prevalence of criminal thinking in mentally disordered offenders, incarcerated male (n = 265) and female (n = 149) offenders completed measures of psychiatric functioning and criminal thinking. Results indicated 92% of the participants were diagnosed with a serious mental illness, and mentally disordered offenders produced criminal thinking scores on the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) and Criminal Sentiments Scale-Modified (CSS-M) similar to that of non-mentally ill offenders. Collectively, results indicated the clinical presentation of mentally disordered offenders is similar to that of psychiatric patients and criminals. Implications are discussed with specific focus on the need for mental health professionals to treat co-occurring issues of mental illness and criminality in correctional mental health treatment programs.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Prisioneros/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas PsicológicasRESUMEN
We compared arrest onset and frequency and types of charges between a statewide cohort of adolescent girls in the public mental health system and girls of the same age in the general population to investigate important differences that could have policy or intervention implications. Girls in the public mental health system were arrested at earlier ages more frequently and were charged with more serious offenses than were girls in the general population. Our results strongly argue for cooperation between the public mental health and justice systems to provide mental health and offender rehabilitation in their shared population.
Asunto(s)
Derecho Penal/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Massachusetts , Salud Pública , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Random assignment to a preferred experimental condition can increase service engagement and enhance outcomes, while assignment to a less-preferred condition can discourage service receipt and limit outcome attainment. We examined randomized trials for one prominent psychiatric rehabilitation intervention, supported employment, to gauge how often assignment preference might have complicated the interpretation of findings. Condition descriptions, and greater early attrition from services-as-usual comparison conditions, suggest that many study enrollees favored assignment to new rapid-job-placement supported employment, but no study took this possibility into account. Reviews of trials in other service fields are needed to determine whether this design problem is widespread.
Asunto(s)
Comportamiento del Consumidor , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Distribución Aleatoria , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Pacientes Desistentes del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The excessive prevalence of comorbid substance abuse among persons with severe mental illness has been well established and identified as the source of numerous negative outcomes. An overlooked aspect of illicit drug use in this population is its illegality and the potentially dire criminal sanctions. This study examined the prevalence of drug arrests in a cohort of persons receiving services from a state mental health agency who were followed for roughly ten years. METHODS: Data on arrest spanning from 1991 to 2000 were obtained for all individuals receiving inpatient, case management, or residential services from July 1991 to June 1992 (N=13,816). Reports of prevalence were based on the number with at least one drug-related arrest in the observation period. RESULTS: Five percent of individuals in the cohort experienced at least one drug-related arrest (N=720). These included simple possession as well as manufacturing and distribution. The prevalence was much higher (15%) among persons aged 18 to 25 years than in other age groups. Roughly 95% of persons with a drug arrest also had an arrest for another type of offense. This pattern is similar to that observed among persons with a drug-related arrest in the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Convictions on drug charges can void access to Section Eight housing and other benefits and are associated with other patterns of offending that also carry significant criminal sanctions. State mental health agencies may wish to target interventions toward youthful clientele by focusing specifically on the risks associated with involvement with illicit drugs.
Asunto(s)
Crimen/tendencias , Servicios de Salud Mental , Sector Público , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the relationship of age and gender with risk of arrest among adolescents and young adults who were intensive adolescent users of public mental health services. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health (DMH) and juvenile and criminal courts. Participants were youths receiving DMH adolescent case management services sometime in 1994-1996 who were born between 1976 and 1979 (781 males and 738 females). They were cross-matched to document arrests between age seven and 25. The study examined age at first arrest, age-specific risk, and the relationship between arrest history and arrest risk by gender and age. RESULTS: Most males (69%) and almost half the females (46%) were arrested by age 25. First arrest was most common before age 18. As in the general population, males' arrest patterns were more concerning than those of females, although patterns were of concern in both groups. Most female arrestees had multiple arrests, many as adults. No gender differences were observed for several factors, including risk of first arrest over age 18. Risk was far greater for those arrested in the previous year than for those never arrested. CONCLUSIONS: Findings justify concerns of public mental health systems regarding justice system involvement of adolescent clients. Risk of first arrest was significant from early adolescence through age 24, indicating a need for arrest prevention into young adulthood. The heightened arrest risk at all ages among those who were recently arrested demarcates a population in need of immediate intervention.
Asunto(s)
Crimen/tendencias , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Mental , Sector Público , Adolescente , Adulto , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
Previous research studies have examined the treatment of people with mental illnesses by the police. Much available data support the adoption of the Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) model. A key issue in CIT development has been reduction in the use of force by CIT officers, and it is suggested that such adoption does accomplish such reduction. However, to date, scant research compares variation in police use of force by CIT officers across populations with mental illnesses, co-occurring disorders, and substance abuse disorders, as compared to their non-disordered peers. Using data from the Portland Police Bureau, a police agency in which all patrol officers have been trained in the CIT model, we analyze whether police use-of-force differs across these groups. Police use-of-force data were collected for 4211 incidents from the Portland Police Bureau from 2008 to 2011. Results indicate that people perceived as having comorbid behavioral health disorders were generally more likely to have force used against them, and more likely to be perceived as resistant, than people that were perceived as having only substance use disorder, only mental health disorders, or no apparent behavioral health disorders. People with co-occurring disorders are more likely to be perceived as violently resisting police officers and have force used against them. Further, people with no perceived disorders are more likely to have a firearm pointed at them in use-of-force encounters, but also the least likely to be perceived as resisting.
Asunto(s)
Coerción , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/legislación & jurisprudencia , Enfermos Mentales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Enfermos Mentales/psicología , Policia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Agresión/psicología , Comorbilidad , Conducta Cooperativa , Hostilidad , Humanos , Intención , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Although criminal justice involvement among persons with severe mental illness is a much discussed topic, few large-scale studies systematically describe the patterns and prevalence of arrest in this population. This study examined rates, patterns, offenses, and sociodemographic correlates of arrest in a large cohort of mental health service recipients. METHODS: The arrest records of 13,816 individuals receiving services from the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health from 1991 to 1992 were examined over roughly a ten-year period. Bivariate relationships between sociodemographic factors and arrest were also examined. RESULTS: About 28 percent of the cohort experienced at least one arrest. The most common charges were crimes against public order followed by serious violent offenses and minor property crime. The number of arrests per individual ranged from one to 71. Five percent of arrestees (roughly 1.5 percent of the cohort) accounted for roughly 17 percent of arrests. The proportion of men arrested was double that of women. Persons 18 to 25 years of age had a 50 percent chance of at least one arrest. This rate declined with age but did so unevenly across offense types. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of arrest appeared substantial among persons with severe mental illness, but the bulk of offending appeared concentrated in a small group of persons and among persons with sociodemographic features similar to those of offenders in the general population. Data such as these could provide a platform for designing jail diversion and other services to reduce both initial and repeat offending among persons with serious mental illness.
Asunto(s)
Crimen/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Prisioneros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Demografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
In American jurisprudence, two justifications have traditionally been put forth to support the government's social control of persons with mental illness: police power and parens patriae. As public mental hospitals became less available as loci in which to exercise these functions, governments sought alternative means to achieve the same ends. One prominent but quite controversial means is involuntary outpatient treatment (IOT). While the concerns about IOT have been myriad, one often alluded to but never documented is that of "net-widening." That is, once IOT became available, it would be applied to an ever greater number of individuals, progressively expanding the margins of the designated population to whom it is applied, despite the formal standard for its application remaining constant. We tested the net-widening belief in a naturalistic experiment in Massachusetts. We found that net-widening did not occur, despite an environment strongly conducive to that expansion. At this time, whatever the arguments against IOT might be, net-widening should not be one of them.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Coerción , Desinstitucionalización/legislación & jurisprudencia , Desinstitucionalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Programas Obligatorios , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Control Social FormalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Psychiatric emergency hold laws permit involuntary admission to a health care facility of a person with an acute mental illness under certain circumstances. This study documented critical variation in state laws, identified important questions for evaluation research, and created a data set of laws to facilitate the public health law research of emergency hold laws' impact on mental health outcomes. METHODS: The research team built a 50-state, open-source data set of laws currently governing emergency holds. A protocol and codebook were developed so that the study may be replicated and extended longitudinally, allowing future research to accurately capture changes to current laws. RESULTS: Although every state and the District of Columbia have emergency hold laws, state law varies on the duration of emergency holds, who can initiate an emergency hold, the extent of judicial oversight, and the rights of patients during the hold. The core criterion justifying an involuntary hold is mental illness that results in danger to self or others, but many states have added further specifications. Only 22 states require some form of judicial review of the emergency hold process, and only nine require a judge to certify the commitment before a person is hospitalized. Five states do not guarantee assessment by a qualified mental health professional during the emergency hold. CONCLUSIONS: The article highlights variability in state law for emergency holds of persons with acute mental illness. How this variability affects the individual, the treatment system, and law enforcement behavior is unknown. Research is needed to guide policy making and implementation on these issues.
Asunto(s)
Internamiento Obligatorio del Enfermo Mental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Urgencias Médicas , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Clinical trials show that opioid agonist therapy (OAT) with methadone or buprenorphine is more effective than behavioral treatments, but state policymakers remain ambivalent about covering OAT for long periods. We used Medicaid claims for 52,278 Massachusetts Medicaid beneficiaries with a diagnosis of opioid abuse or dependence between 2004 and 2010 to study associations between use of methadone, buprenorphine or other behavioral health treatment without OAT, and time to relapse and total healthcare expenditures. Cox Proportional Hazards ratios for patients treated with either methadone or buprenorphine showed approximately 50% lower risk of relapse than behavioral treatment without OAT. Expenditures per month were from $153 to $233 lower for OAT episodes compared to other behavioral treatment. Co-occurring alcohol abuse/dependence quadrupled the risk of relapse, other non-opioid abuse/dependence doubled the relapse risk and severe mental illness added 80% greater risk compared to those without each of those disorders. Longer current treatment episodes were associated with lower risk of relapse. Relapse risk increased as prior treatment exposure increased but prior treatment was associated with slightly lower total healthcare expenditures. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of OAT that has been demonstrated in clinical trials persists at the population level in a less controlled setting and that OAT is associated with lower total healthcare expenditures compared to other forms of behavioral treatment for patients with opioid addiction. Co-occurring other substance use and mental illness exert strong influences on cost and risk of relapse, suggesting that individuals with these conditions need more comprehensive treatment.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Terapia Conductista/estadística & datos numéricos , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/terapia , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/economía , Terapia Conductista/economía , Buprenorfina/economía , Terapia Combinada , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/economía , Metadona/economía , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/economía , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/economía , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: One of the goals of managed mental health care has been to lower the use of inpatient psychiatric treatment. In the past, interventions that have limited hospitalization for persons with severe mental illness have led to greater involvement of these individuals with the criminal justice and forensic mental health systems. The authors examined associations between Medicaid managed mental health care in Massachusetts and rates of admission to the inpatient forensic mental health service maintained by the state's mental health department. METHODS: A total of 7,996 persons who were receiving services from the department before and after the introduction of managed care were studied. A logistic regression model based on generalized estimating equations was used to identify associations between Medicaid beneficiary status and forensic hospitalization before and after the introduction of managed care. RESULTS: The overall rate of forensic hospitalization declined in the study cohort in both periods. However, no significant decline was observed in the risk of forensic hospitalization among Medicaid beneficiaries whose care had become managed. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results of this study warrant further exploration, the risk of forensic hospitalization among Medicaid beneficiaries should be considered by policy makers in the design of mental health system interventions.
Asunto(s)
Psiquiatría Forense/economía , Hospitales Psiquiátricos/organización & administración , Hospitales Provinciales/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Mental/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud , Massachusetts , Medicaid , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos EstadísticosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study examined Medicaid claims forms to determine the prevalence, severity, and co-occurrence of physical illness within a representative sample of persons with serious mental illness (N=147). METHODS: Representativeness of health problems in the study sample was established through comparison with a larger sample of persons with serious mental illness enrolled in Medicaid within the same state. Standardized annual costs were then assigned to Medicaid claims diagnoses, and individual health problem severity was measured as the sum of estimated treatment costs for diagnosed conditions. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of the study sample (N=109) had been given a diagnosis of at least one chronic health problem, and 50 percent (N=73) had been given a diagnosis of two or more chronic health problems. Of the 14 chronic health conditions surveyed, chronic pulmonary illness was the most prevalent (31 percent incidence) and the most comorbid. Persons with chronic pulmonary illness were second only to those with infectious diseases in average annual cost of treatment ($8,277). Also, 50 percent or more of participants in eight other diagnostic categories had chronic pulmonary illness. A regression analysis identified age, obesity, and substance use disorders as significant predictors of individual health problem severity. CONCLUSIONS: Risk adjustment for physical health is essential when setting performance standards or cost expectations for mental health treatment. Excluding persons with chronic health problems from mental health service evaluations restricts generalizability of research findings and may promote interventions that are inappropriate for many persons with serious mental illness.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica/economía , Comorbilidad , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones/economía , Infecciones/epidemiología , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Masculino , Massachusetts , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Psicóticos/economía , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/economía , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/economía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Lack of access to hospitalization is an often-cited risk factor for incarceration among persons with severe mental illness. This proposition is examined by comparing self-reports of lifetime psychiatric hospitalization histories of mentally ill jail inmates with data from a national sample of non-incarcerated mentally ill. Roughly 52% of mentally ill jail detainees reported at least one psychiatric hospitalization, a rate nearly three times that of the comparison group. The data call into question the notion that mentally ill jail inmates have reduced access to psychiatric inpatient treatment, without addressing the adequacy of the treatment received. Longitudinal studies are needed to explore temporal relationships to better understand the relationship between mental health treatment and criminal justice involvement.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Psiquiátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermos Mentales/estadística & datos numéricos , Prisioneros/psicología , Autorrevelación , Adulto , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/clasificación , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Prisioneros/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
The purpose of this paper is to cast a vision for the next generation of behavioral health and criminal justice interventions for persons with serious mental illnesses in the criminal justice system. The limitations of first generation interventions, including their primary focus on mental health treatment connection, are discussed. A person-place framework for understanding the complex factors that contribute to criminal justice involvement for this population is presented. We discuss practice and research recommendations for building more effective interventions to address both criminal justice and mental health outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Derecho Penal , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Prisioneros/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prisioneros/psicología , Predicción , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Persons who abuse or are dependent on opioids are at elevated risk for arrest. Co-occurring behavioral health problems may exacerbate that risk, although the extent of any such increase has not been described. This study examines such risk factors among 40,238 individuals with a diagnosis of opioid abuse or dependence who were enrolled in the Massachusetts Medicaid program in 2010. Medicaid data were merged with statewide arrest data to assess the effects of co-existing mental illness, substance abuse, and previous arrests on arrest during 2010. Persons with serious mental illnesses (psychotic and bipolar disorders) and those with two or more pre-2010 arrests had significantly increased greater odds of arrest. We believe this to be the first study examining effects of co-occurring risk factors on arrest in a large population with opioid dependency/abuse. These findings identify predictors of arrest that could be used to design interventions targeting specific co-occurring risk factors.
Asunto(s)
Crimen/psicología , Derecho Penal/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/psicología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicacionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a 2008 dose-based prior authorization policy for Massachusetts Medicaid beneficiaries using buprenorphine + naloxone for opioid addiction treatment. Doses higher than 16 mg required progressively more frequent authorizations. DATA SOURCES: Mediciaid claims for 2007 and 2008 linked with Department of Public Health (DPH) service records. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted time series for all buprenorphine users and a longitudinal cohort analysis of 2,049 individuals who began buprenorphine treatment in 2007. Outcome measures included use of relapse-related services, health care expenditures per person, and buprenorphine expenditures. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We used ICD-9 codes and National Drug Codes to identify individuals with opioid dependence who filled prescriptions for buprenorphine. Medicaid and DPH data were linked with individual identifiers. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Individuals using doses >24 mg decreased from 16.5 to 4.1 percent. Relapses increased temporarily for some users but returned to previous levels within 3 months. Buprenorphine expenditures decreased but total expenditures did not change significantly. CONCLUSION: Prior authorization policies strategically targeted by dose level appear to successfully reduce use of higher than recommended buprenorphine doses. Savings from these policies are modest and may be accompanied by brief increases in relapse rates. Lower doses may decrease diversion of buprenorphine.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/economía , Buprenorfina/administración & dosificación , Buprenorfina/economía , Control de Medicamentos y Narcóticos , Gastos en Salud , Medicaid/economía , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/economía , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/economía , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Massachusetts , Recurrencia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Criminal justice problems among those with bipolar disorder lead to disruption in social functioning, treatment, and recovery. Understanding factors that contribute to arrest during episodes of illness can help inform approaches to risk management and improve clinical care. METHODS: Data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), a longitudinal, nationally representative survey conducted in two waves were used to identify factors that predicted inter-wave criminal justice involvement during bipolar I manic episodes. RESULTS: Over 10% of respondents experienced legal involvement during their most severe manic episode. Risk was found in a range of historical, clinical, and contextual factors. Multivariate analyses suggest risk is particularly high for those who are unemployed, non-white, have past juvenile detention, have a prior arrest (while using substances or when manic), used an illicit drug in the past year, and whose mania is characterized by both social and occupational impairment. Legal problems were particularly elevated among those who lacked health insurance while experiencing both social and occupational impairment. LIMITATIONS: Respondents did not include prisoners and hospital inpatients; criminal justice problems were only assessed with regard to the most severe manic episode. CONCLUSIONS: The particular array of factors that elevate the risk of legal involvement during manic episodes offers guidance when identifying prevention strategies and evaluating patients in clinical and forensic settings. Reducing such involvement will require that these issues be dealt with in the broader context of mental health and other services, which in turn necessitates providing adequate access to healthcare.