Do improvements in motivational language predict alcohol use in motivational interviewing? Ambivalence matters.

OBJECTIVE: Motivational Interviewing (MI) is described as a method for improving clinical outcomes by reducing client ambivalence. If this is true, MI's focus on improving clients' motivational language should be most useful for clients with ambivalence about change and less valuable for those who are ready to implement new behaviors or are opposed to change. To address this hypothesis and potentially add precision to MI delivery in clinical settings, we tested whether the relationship between clients' in-session motivational language and posttreatment alcohol use depended on their baseline motivation to change. METHOD: Client speech from 149 sessions from Project MATCH were analyzed. A cluster analysis of the percent change talk during the first decile of the session identified three motivational groups: opposed, ambivalent, and ready. The change in percent change talk (C-PCT) across the session was calculated for each group. Zero-inflated negative binomial analysis was used to test whether the effect of C-PCT on end-of-treatment drinking varied between motivational groups. RESULTS: The count part of the model revealed a significant interaction between C-PCT and membership in the ambivalent group (b = -17.710, 95% CI [-25.775, -9.645], p < .001), only for those who received MI. Favorable C-PCT was associated with less drinking (b = -15.735, p = .004). Only baseline drinking was a significant predictor of abstinence at follow-up (b = .032, 95% CI [0.012, 0.051], p = .001). CONCLUSION: A putative MI mechanism-improved client motivational language-appears most important for clients who express ambivalence in the opening minutes of the session, with minimal value for those who do not. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Effect of cognitive-behavioral techniques for problem gambling and gambling disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: To measure the effect of cognitive-behavioral techniques (CBTs) on gambling disorder severity and gambling behavior at post-treatment and follow-up. METHOD: Seven databases and two clinical trial registries were searched to identify peer-reviewed studies and unpublished studies of randomized controlled trials. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool assessed risk of bias in the included studies. A random effect meta-analysis with robust variance estimation was conducted to measure the effect of CBTs relative to minimally treated or no treatment control groups. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies representing 3991 participants were identified. CBTs significantly reduced gambling disorder severity (g = -1.14, 95% CI = -1.68, -0.60, 95% prediction interval [PI] = -2.97, 0.69), gambling frequency (g = -0.54, 95% CI = -0.80, -0.27, 95% PI = -1.48, 0.40) and gambling intensity (g = -0.32, 95% CI = -0.51, -0.13, 95% PI = -0.76, 0.12) at post-treatment relative to control. CBTs had no significant effect on follow-up outcomes. Analyses supported the presence of publication bias and high heterogeneity in effect size estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive-behavioral techniques are a promising treatment for reducing gambling disorder and gambling behavior; however, the effect of cognitive-behavioral techniques on gambling disorder severity and gambling frequency and intensity at post-treatment is overestimated, and cognitive-behavioral techniques may not be reliably efficacious for all individuals seeking treatment for problem gambling and gambling disorder.

Effects of cognitive behavioral techniques for gambling on recovery defined by gambling, psychological functioning, and quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Individuals who experience gambling harms report that sustained recovery involves changing both gambling behaviors and psychological symptoms, as well as building a meaningful life. However, there is limited understanding about the effect of cognitive behavioral (CB) techniques on psychological symptoms and quality of life. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of CB techniques for gambling-related harms on broader recovery outcomes such as psychological symptoms and quality of life. METHOD: A systematic article search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials of CB techniques with nonactive and minimal treatment control groups that assessed psychological symptoms or quality of life as outcomes. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to examine the effect of CB techniques relative to nonactive and minimal treatment control groups. RESULTS: A total of nine studies representing 658 participants were included. Eight studies reported outcomes on depression and anxiety, three on substance use, and six on quality of life. CB techniques significantly reduced anxiety (g = -0.44) and depression (g = -0.35) at posttreatment, but not substance use. CB techniques also significantly increased quality of life at posttreatment (g = 0.40). There was a large amount of heterogeneity suggesting the magnitude of effects could vary significantly in future randomized trials. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies should examine the longitudinal associations between gambling harms, psychological symptoms, and quality of life and to assess whether changes in gambling harms throughout treatment precede or are a consequence of changes in psychological symptoms and quality of life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

A patient-centered nurse-supported primary care-based collaborative care program to treat opioid use disorder and depression: Design and protocol for the MI-CARE randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Opioid use disorder (OUD) contributes to rising morbidity and mortality. Life-saving OUD treatments can be provided in primary care but most patients with OUD don't receive treatment. Comorbid depression and other conditions complicate OUD management, especially in primary care. The MI-CARE trial is a pragmatic randomized encouragement (Zelen) trial testing whether offering collaborative care (CC) to patients with OUD and clinically-significant depressive symptoms increases OUD medication treatment with buprenorphine and improves depression outcomes compared to usual care. METHODS: Adult primary care patients with OUD and depressive symptoms (n ≥ 800) from two statewide health systems: Kaiser Permanente Washington and Indiana University Health are identified with computer algorithms from electronic Health record (EHR) data and automatically enrolled. A random sub-sample (50%) of eligible patients is offered the MI-CARE intervention: a 12-month nurse-driven CC intervention that includes motivational interviewing and behavioral activation. The remaining 50% of the study cohort comprise the usual care comparison group and is never contacted. The primary outcome is days of buprenorphine treatment provided during the intervention period. The powered secondary outcome is change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 depression scores. Both outcomes are obtained from secondary electronic healthcare sources and compared in "intent-to-treat" analyses. CONCLUSION: MI-CARE addresses the need for rigorous encouragement trials to evaluate benefits of offering CC to generalizable samples of patients with OUD and mental health conditions identified from EHRs, as they would be in practice, and comparing outcomes to usual primary care. We describe the design and implementation of the trial, currently underway. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05122676. Clinical trial registration date: November 17, 2021.

What can clients tell us about whether to use motivational interviewing? An analysis of early-session ambivalent language.

BACKGROUND: Although motivational interviewing (MI) is an effective method for promoting change in problematic alcohol and other drug use, it does not benefit all clients. Clinicians have little empirical guidance on who is likely to benefit from MI and who is not. We hypothesized that differences in clients' spontaneously offered language early in the session would predict their responsiveness to MI during the remainder of the session. METHOD: The study obtained coding data from 125 counseling sessions from a large randomized controlled trial of clinician training. A cluster analysis created one group of clients whose language reflected ambivalence, and one group whose language reflected readiness to change. We conducted a univariate analysis of variance to compare the mean change in percent change talk across the session between groups. RESULTS: Clients whose language reflected ambivalence early in the session had a greater change in their percent change talk during the remainder of the session, compared to those whose language reflected greater readiness to change (F (1,90) = 63.02, t = 7.94, p < .001). Surprisingly, the group whose language reflected readiness had a decrease in their percent change talk during the remainder of the session (M = -10.9%, SD = 16.3%). Adjusting the results for regression to the mean effects did not eliminate these differences. CONCLUSION: Clients' language early in the session may offer clinicians some guidance on whether MI is likely to be useful or counterproductive in the treatment of substance use disorder.

Should Substance Use Counselors Choose a Direction For Their Clients? Motivational Interviewing Trainers May Be Ambivalent.

Motivational Interviewing (MI) is comprised of a client-centered relationship and a clear intention on the part of the practitioner to influence behavior change. This study explores MI trainers' decisions about their use of directionality in MI as they instruct others in the method. 111 MI trainers were asked to select content they would include in a hypothetical MI training. Almost half of trainers chose to teach trainees to "always maintain an attitude of equipoise", a strategy that is contradicted by MI theory and empirical data. This finding suggests a theoretical rift within the MI community with implications for substance use counseling.

With odds of a single session, motivational interviewing is a good bet.

First sessions of psychotherapy present a rare and potent opportunity for therapists and clients alike. Motivational interviewing is established as a stand-alone method for promoting behavior change as well as a useful prelude to other therapies. This article provides a rationale and empirical support for the use of motivational interviewing in first psychotherapy sessions. A case illustration and practical guidelines for therapists are included. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).