RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of low-fidelity simulation on students' confidence, knowledge, and skills in pediatric physical assessments, and to compare students' interest ratings of topics and effectiveness of learning activities between students' who experienced simulation and those who did not. METHODS: Within a pediatric elective, a vital signs and physical assessment activity was re-designed to incorporate a low-fidelity heart and breath sounds simulator. Students rated their confidence in completing 9 different physical assessment skills before and after the activity and assessment. Students' perspectives of the activity were also assessed. Course evaluation surveys were compared with prior course offerings (without simulation) to determine a change in students' interest ratings of the topic and effectiveness of learning activities. The Wilcoxon signed rank test, thematic analysis, and descriptive statistics were used to analyze outcomes. RESULTS: All 106 second professional year students in the elective completed the pre- and post-simulation surveys and course evaluations for 3 offerings. Students' post-simulation average confidence scores increased statistically on all 9 skills compared with pre-simulation scores. All students agreed or strongly agreed "the lecture and simulation activity done in class helped me overcome challenges I had with learning the skill." Students (98%) successfully demonstrated competency on the formal assessment. Compared with previous course offerings, students reported higher interest ratings in the topics and instruction effectiveness when simulation was incorporated into the activity. CONCLUSIONS: Low-fidelity simulation is an effective teaching and learning approach to increase students' confidence, knowledge, and interest in pediatric vital signs and physical assessment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pharmacy school accreditors recommend curricular integration. With today's complex health care system, there is also a need for more intentional and seamless blending, characterizing what we propose as "high-level curricular integration" (i.e. intentional "weaving" of multiple disciplines to form a coherent whole). Despite accreditors' recommendations, the practical definition and implementation guidelines of high-level curricular integration are not clear. We aimed to describe high-level curricular integration practices in pharmacy schools by systematically reviewing the literature addressing four elements of high-level curricular integration. These were (1) organizational thread, (2) pedagogies, (3) evaluation strategies, and (4) barriers. METHODS: A PRISMA-guided (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) literature search strategy was conducted to examine the scientific literature. Inclusion criteria were English written literature related to one or more of the four elements of high-level curricular integration in pharmacy schools. RESULTS: After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, 28 articles were included. The most used organizational thread was disease-oriented (n = 8, 28.5%), and the most reported pedagogy was case studies (n = 11, 39%). Over half of the studies reported how the integration experience was evaluated. Most studies addressed barriers (n = 21, 75%), with the most reported barriers being time (n = 12, 42%) and workload (n = 12, 42%). IMPLICATIONS: This review aimed to define and describe high-level integration within schools of pharmacy through four elements. Numerous and diverse trends were identified, and these four elements should be considered when planning, implementing, evaluating, and reporting curriculum integration experiences.