Oral insulin (ORMD-0801) in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A dose-finding 12-week randomized placebo-controlled study.

AIMS: To assess the safety and efficacy of multiple daily doses of oral insulin (ORMD-0801) in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) over 12 weeks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants with T2DM on metformin or combination oral therapy with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels ≥ 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) were randomized to receive ORMD-0801 8 mg or 16 mg once (QD) or twice (BID) daily, or 32 mg QD, BID or three times daily (TID) over a 12-week period. RESULTS: A total of 373 subjects were randomized to active treatment or placebo (~60% male, age ~ 56 years, HbA1c 9%-9.8%; 75-84 mmol/mol). Placebo-adjusted HbA1c changes from baseline to Week 12 were observed with ORMD-0801 8 mg BID (-7.15 ± 3.57 mmol/mol [-0.65% ± 0.33%]; P = 0.046). However, a significant site interaction was observed in two sites. After excluding these, HbA1c reduction was observed with 8 mg QD (-0.81 ± 0.37%; -8.89 ± 4.01 mmol/mol; P = 0.028, n = 15), 8 mg BID (-0.82 ± 0.37%; -8.95 ± 4.08 mmol/mol; P = 0.029, n = 17), 32 mg QD (-0.54 ± 0.26%; -5.89 ± 2.78 mmol/mol;P = 0.036, n = 69) and 32 mg BID (-0.53 ± 0.26%; -5.80 ± 2.83 mmol/mol; P = 0.042, n = 68). No effect was observed with 16 mg QD (0.25 ± 0.37%; 2.76 ± 3.99 mmol/mol; P = 0.48, n = 18), 16 mg BID (-0.36 ± 0.40%; -3.97 ± P = 0.36, n = 15) or 32 mg TID (-0.45 ± 0.27%, -4.89 ± 2.90 mmol/mol; P = 0.093, n = 69). Continuous glucose monitor and serum glucose measurements showed similar trends but were not significant. ORMD-0801 was safe, well tolerated and not associated with weight gain or hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Oral insulin (ORMD-0801) induced greater reductions in HbA1c when compared to placebo, and was safe and well tolerated in individuals with uncontrolled T2DM. The efficacy and safety findings support continued development of the 8-mg dose at bedtime, which is currently being evaluated in two Phase 3 trials.

Design and rationale for the Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects of Lorcaserin in Overweight and Obese Patients-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 61 (CAMELLIA-TIMI 61) trial.

OBJECTIVES: Lorcaserin, a selective serotonin 2C receptor agonist, is an effective pharmacologic weight-loss therapy that improves several cardiovascular risk factors. The long-term clinical cardiovascular and metabolic safety and efficacy in patients with elevated cardiovascular risk are unknown. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: CAMELLIA-TIMI 61 (NCT02019264) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lorcaserin with regard to major adverse cardiovascular events and progression to diabetes in overweight or obese patients at high cardiovascular risk. Overweight or obese patients either with established cardiovascular disease or with diabetes and at least 1 other cardiovascular risk factor were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to lorcaserin 10 mg twice daily or matching placebo. The primary safety objective is to assess for noninferiority of lorcaserin for the composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (major adverse cardiovascular event [MACE]) (with noninferiority defined as the upper bound of a 1-sided 97.5% CI excluding a hazard ratio of 1.4) compared with placebo assessed at an interim analysis with 460 adjudicated events. The efficacy objectives, assessed at study completion, will evaluate the superiority of lorcaserin for the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or any coronary revascularization (MACE+) and the key secondary end point of conversion to diabetes. Recruitment began in January 2014 and was completed in November 2015 resulting in a total population of 12,000 patients. The trial is planned to continue until at least 1,401 adjudicated MACE+ events are accrued and the median treatment duration exceeds 2.5 years. CONCLUSION: CAMELLIA-TIMI 61 is investigating the safety and efficacy of lorcaserin for MACEs and conversion to diabetes in overweight or obese patients with established cardiovascular disease or multiple cardiovascular risk factors.

Thrittene, homologous with somatostatin-28((1-13)), is a novel peptide in mammalian gut and circulation.

Preprosomatostatin is a gene expressed ubiquitously among vertebrates, and at least two duplications of this gene have occurred during evolution. Somatostatin-28 (S-28) and somatostatin-14 (S-14), C-terminal products of prosomatostatin (ProS), are differentially expressed in mammalian neurons, D cells, and enterocytes. One pathway for the generation of S-14 entails the excision of Arg13-Lys14 in S-28, leading to equivalent amounts of S-28((1-12)). Using an antiserum (F-4), directed to the N-terminal region of S-28 that does not react with S-28((1-12)), we detected a peptide, in addition to S-28 and ProS, that was present in human plasma and in the intestinal tract of rats and monkeys. This F-4 reacting peptide was purified from monkey ileum; and its amino acid sequence, molecular mass, and chromatographic characteristics conformed to those of S-28((1-13)), a peptide not described heretofore. When extracts of the small intestine were measured by RIA, there was a discordance in the ratio of peptides reacting with F-4 and those containing the C terminus of ProS, suggesting sites of synthesis for S-28((1-13)) distinct from those for S-14 and S-28. This was supported by immunocytochemistry, wherein F-4 reactivity was localized in gastrointestinal (GI) endocrine cells and a widespread plexus of neurons within the wall of the distal gut while immunoreactivity to C-terminal domains of S-14 and S-28 in these neurons was absent. Further, F-4 immunoreactivity persisted in similar GI endocrine cells and myenteric neurons in mice with a targeted deletion of the preprosomatostatin gene. We believe that these data suggest a novel peptide produced in the mammalian gut, homologous with the 13 residues of the proximal region of S-28 but not derived from the ProS gene. Pending characterization of the gene from which this peptide is derived, its distribution, and function, we have designated this peptide as thrittene. Its localization in both GI endocrine cells and gut neurons suggests that thrittene may function as both a hormone and neurotransmitter.

Progression to type 2 diabetes, healthcare utilization, and cost among pre-diabetic patients with or without comorbid hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined progression to type 2 diabetes and compared healthcare utilization and costs among patients with pre-diabetes, with or without comorbid hypertension. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study drew from a large national claims database (2003-2008). Patients were ≥18 years of age with a medical claim or lab value indicating the presence of pre-diabetes. The index date was the first pre-diabetes diagnosis (ICD-9 codes 790.21, 790.22, 790.29) or qualifying lab value of fasting plasma glucose or impaired glucose intolerance. All patients had ≥12-month data pre- and post- index date. Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify risk factors affecting progression to type 2 diabetes, and to estimate the impact of hypertension status and diabetes progression on healthcare utilization and cost. RESULTS: 144,410 patients met study criteria, with an average follow-up of 802 (SD 344) days. Among participants, 30.7% progressed to diabetes, with a mean 288 (SD 340) days from pre-diabetes identification to diabetes diagnosis. Compared with patients who did not progress, the total adjusted medical costs for patients who developed diabetes increased by $1429 in 1 year, $2451 in 2 years, and $3621 in 3 years (p < 0.001). Patients with concomitant hypertension were significantly more likely to progress to type 2 diabetes, and had higher total medical costs compared to patients without hypertension ($476 higher in 1 year, $949 in 2 years, $1378 in 3 years). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pre-diabetes who progressed to type 2 diabetes had higher healthcare utilization and costs compared with patients who did not. The presence of hypertension substantially increased costs and was associated with higher likelihood of diabetes progression. Blood pressure, lifestyle intervention, body mass index, and other factors cannot be examined due to the limitations of the data. Results may not be generalizable to patients with insurance other than commercial or Medicare.