Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 5(5): 100775, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36781348

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Population-level data on obstructive sleep apnea among pregnant women in the United States and associated risk for adverse outcomes during delivery may be of clinical importance and public health significance. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess trends in and outcomes associated with obstructive sleep apnea during delivery hospitalizations. STUDY DESIGN: This repeated cross-sectional study analyzed delivery hospitalizations using the National Inpatient Sample. Temporal trends in obstructive sleep apnea were analyzed using joinpoint regression to estimate the average annual percentage change with 95% confidence intervals. Survey-adjusted logistic regression models were fit to assess the association between obstructive sleep apnea and mechanical ventilation or tracheostomy, acute respiratory distress syndrome, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, peripartum hysterectomy, pulmonary edema/heart failure, stillbirth, and preterm birth. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2019, an estimated 76,753,013 delivery hospitalizations were identified, of which 54,238 (0.07%) had a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. During the study period, the presence of obstructive sleep apnea during delivery hospitalizations increased from 0.4 to 20.5 cases per 10,000 delivery hospitalizations (average annual percentage change, 20.6%; 95% confidence interval, 19.1-22.2). Clinical factors associated with obstructive sleep apnea included obesity (4.3% of women without and 57.7% with obstructive sleep apnea), asthma (3.2% of women without and 25.3% with obstructive sleep apnea), chronic hypertension (2.0% of women without and 24.5% with obstructive sleep apnea), and pregestational diabetes mellitus (0.9% of women without and 10.9% with obstructive sleep apnea). In adjusted analyses accounting for obesity, other clinical factors, demographics, and hospital characteristics, obstructive sleep apnea was associated with increased odds of mechanical ventilation or tracheostomy (adjusted odds ratio, 21.9; 95% confidence interval, 18.0-26.7), acute respiratory distress syndrome (adjusted odds ratio, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 5.4-6.5), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-1.7), stillbirth (adjusted odds ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.4), pulmonary edema/heart failure (adjusted odds ratio, 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.9-4.7), peripartum hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.23), and preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.2). CONCLUSION: Obstructive sleep apnea diagnoses are increasingly common in the obstetrical population and are associated with a range of adverse obstetrical outcomes during delivery hospitalizations.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro , Edema Pulmonar , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Embarazo , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Mortinato , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Edema Pulmonar/complicaciones , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/epidemiología , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Obesidad/diagnóstico , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/complicaciones
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(3): e235428, 2023 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36988955

RESUMEN

Importance: Reducing rates of unnecessary cesarean deliveries is both a national and a global health objective. However, there are limited national US data on trends in indications for low-risk cesarean delivery. Objective: To determine temporal trends in and indications for cesarean delivery among patients at low risk for the procedure over a 20-year period. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed 2000 to 2019 delivery hospitalizations using the National Inpatient Sample. Births at low risk for cesarean delivery were identified using a definition from the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and additional criteria. Temporal trends in cesarean birth were analyzed using joinpoint regression to estimate the average annual percentage change (AAPC) with 95% CIs. Data analysis was performed from August 2022 to January 2023. Exposure: This analysis evaluated cesarean birth trends in a population at low risk for this procedure over a 20-year period. Main Outcomes and Measures: In addition to overall cesarean birth risk, cesarean deliveries for nonreassuring fetal status and labor arrest were individually analyzed. Results: Of an estimated 76.7 million delivery hospitalizations, 21.5 million were excluded according to the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine definition, and 14.7 million were excluded according to additional criteria. Of the estimated 40 517 867 deliveries included, 12.1% (4 885 716 deliveries) were by cesarean delivery. Cesarean deliveries among patients at low risk for the procedure increased from 9.7% to 13.9% between 2000 and 2009, plateaued, and then decreased from 13.0% to 11.1% between 2012 and 2019. The AAPC for cesarean delivery was 6.4% (95% CI, 5.2% to 7.6%) from 2000 to 2005, 1.2% from 2005 to 2009 (95% CI, -1.2% to 3.7%), and -2.2% from 2009 to 2019 (95% CI, -2.7% to -1.8%). Cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status increased from 3.4% of all deliveries in 2000 to 5.1% in 2019 (AAPC, 2.1%; 95% CI, 1.7% to 2.5%). Cesarean delivery for labor arrest increased from 3.6% in 2000 to a peak of 4.8% in 2009 before decreasing to 2.7% in 2019. Cesarean deliveries for labor arrest increased during the first half of the study (2000-2009) for the active phase (from 1.5% to 2.1%), latent phase (from 1.1% to 1.5%), and second stage (from 0.9% to 1.3%) and then decreased from 2010 to 2019, from 2.1% to 1.7% for the active phase, from 1.5% to 1.2% for the latent phase, and from 1.2% to 0.9% for the second stage. Conclusions and Relevance: Cesarean deliveries among patients at low risk for cesarean birth appeared to decrease over the latter years of the study period, with cesarean deliveries for labor arrest becoming less common.


Asunto(s)
Sufrimiento Fetal , Trabajo de Parto , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Cesárea , Parto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA