Lymphoblastic Lymphoma: a Concise Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) is a rare, highly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma variant virtually indistinguishable from acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We review the advancements in diagnostics, staging, treatment, and response assessment. RECENT FINDINGS: T-LBL displays a mediastinal mass with pleuro-pericardic effusions as key distinctive features and is far more frequent than B-LBL. LBL is exquisitely sensitive to ALL-type chemotherapy, achieving cure rates in the order of 70% in adults and even more in children. Positron-emission tomography, genetic risk classifications, and minimal disseminated/residual disease assays are increasingly used to detect occult sites of involvement and predict treatment outcome. Stem cell transplantation is effective and should be considered for very high-risk subsets and/or at salvage. Although curable in the majority of patients, about 25-30% of adults with LBL patients experience resistance or relapse following first-line therapy. It is essential to identify these cases early on and to explore new modalities of precision medicine with targeted agents.

INCB84344-201: Ponatinib and steroids in frontline therapy for unfit patients with Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have improved survival for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, prognosis for old or unfit patients remains poor. In the INCB84344-201 (formerly GIMEMA LAL 1811) prospective, multicenter, phase 2 trial, we tested the efficacy and safety of ponatinib plus prednisone in newly diagnosed patients with Ph+ ALL ≥60 years, or unfit for intensive chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Forty-four patients received oral ponatinib 45 mg/d for 48 weeks (core phase), with prednisone tapered to 60 mg/m2/d from days-14-29. Prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy was administered monthly. Median age was 66.5 years (range, 26-85). The primary endpoint (complete hematologic response [CHR] at 24 weeks) was reached in 38/44 patients (86.4%); complete molecular response (CMR) in 18/44 patients (40.9%) at 24 weeks. 61.4% of patients completed the core phase. As of 24 April 2020, median event-free survival was 14.31 months (95% CI 9.30-22.31). Median overall survival and duration of CHR were not reached; median duration of CMR was 11.6 months. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were rash (36.4%), asthenia (22.7%), alanine transaminase increase (15.9%), erythema (15.9%), and γ-glutamyltransferase increase (15.9%). Cardiac and vascular TEAEs occurred in 29.5% (grade ≥3, 18.2%) and 27.3% (grade ≥3, 15.9%), respectively. Dose reductions, interruptions, and discontinuations due to TEAEs occurred in 43.2%, 43.2%, and 27.3% of patients, respectively; 5 patients had fatal TEAEs. Ponatinib and prednisone showed efficacy in unfit patients with Ph+ ALL; however, a lower ponatinib dose may be more appropriate in this population. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01641107.

MRD-Based Therapeutic Decisions in Genetically Defined Subsets of Adolescents and Young Adult Philadelphia-Negative ALL.

In many clinical studies published over the past 20 years, adolescents and young adults (AYA) with Philadelphia chromosome negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph- ALL) were considered as a rather homogeneous clinico-prognostic group of patients suitable to receive intensive pediatric-like regimens with an improved outcome compared with the use of traditional adult ALL protocols. The AYA group was defined in most studies by an age range of 18-40 years, with some exceptions (up to 45 years). The experience collected in pediatric ALL with the study of post-induction minimal residual disease (MRD) was rapidly duplicated in AYA ALL, making MRD a widely accepted key factor for risk stratification and risk-oriented therapy with or without allogeneic stem cell transplantation and experimental new drugs for patients with MRD detectable after highly intensive chemotherapy. This combined strategy has resulted in long-term survival rates of AYA patients of 60-80%. The present review examines the evidence for MRD-guided therapies in AYA's Ph- ALL, provides a critical appraisal of current treatment pitfalls and illustrates the ways of achieving further therapeutic improvement according to the massive knowledge recently generated in the field of ALL biology and MRD/risk/subset-specific therapy.

Relevance of antiphospholipid antibody profile in the clinical outcome of ITP: a single-centre study.

OBJECTIVES: The relevance of detecting antibodies against anticardiolipin, ß2-glycoprotein I (ß2gpI) or lupus anticoagulant (LA), collectively called antiphospholipid autoantibodies (APA), in subjects with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is still a debated issue. In particular, whether APA profile may affect the clinical course of ITP is unknown. METHODS: In this study, we report our experience in a cohort of ITP patients with APA with specific interest to the relevance of different antiphospholipid antibody profiles in clinical outcome and response to treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-seven out of 159 patients (23.2%) fulfilling ITP criteria had a platelet count ≤50 × 109/L and tested positive at APA at ITP onset. Twenty-three (62.1%) patients received at least one line of treatment for ITP. Fourteen subjects (37.8%) showing triple positivity for APA showed a significantly lower median platelet count compared to other APA patients (p = .006). Among these ITP subjects with triple positivity, 85.7% needed a treatment because of low platelet count compared to 47.8% ITP patients with non-triple-positive APA (p = .0094). ITP/APA subjects who received immunosuppressors had a higher rate of thrombosis (p = .024) as well as thrombosis developed in subjects who were on steroid therapy at a significantly higher dosage than subjects who did not develop thrombotic episodes (p < .001). When considering treatment, CR and SR rate were significantly higher in ITP/triple-positive patients compared to non-triple-positive subjects (p = .021 and p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: The profile of APA may affect the outcome of patients with ITP.

Safety and efficacy of switching from branded to generic imatinib in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated in Italy.

The use of generic drugs after patent expiration of their originators is a relative novelty in the treatment of chronic cancer patients in Western countries. In this observational study we analyzed a cohort of 294 Italian chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated frontline with branded imatinib (Glivec®) for at least 6 months and then uniformly switched to generic imatinib upon requirement of health authorities in early 2017. Median age at diagnosis was 57 years (range 19-87). Sokal risk was low/intermediate/high in 55%, 32% and 8% of cases, respectively. Median duration of branded imatinib treatment was 7.4 years (range 0.5-16.7). At a median follow-up of 7.5 months after switch to generic imatinib, 17% of patients reported new or worsening side effects, but grade 3-4 non-hematological adverse events were rare. Six patients switched back to branded imatinib, with improvement in the side effect profile, and 4 pts moved to bosutinib or nilotinib for resistance/intolerance. The majority of patients were in major (26%) or deep molecular response (66%) at the time of switch. Molecular responses remained stable, improved or worsened in 61%, 25% and 14% of patients, respectively. We conclude that switch to generic imatinib for patients who have been receiving branded imatinib appears to be effective and safe. Molecular responses may continue to improve over time. Some patients experienced new or worsened side effects but less than 5% of the whole cohort needed to switch back to branded imatinib or move to other treatments. Savings were around 3 million Euros.

Excellent outcomes of 2G-TKI therapy after imatinib failure in chronic phase CML patients.

Second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (2G-TKIs) dasatinib and nilotinib produced historical rates of about 50% complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and about 40% major molecular response (MMR) in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients failing imatinib. Direct comparisons between dasatinib and nilotinib are lacking, and few studies addressed the dynamics of deep molecular response (DMR) in a "real-life" setting. We retrospectively analyzed 163 patients receiving dasatinib (n = 95) or nilotinib (n = 68) as second-line therapy after imatinib. The two cohorts were comparable for disease's characteristics, although there was a higher rate of dasatinib use in imatinib-resistant and of nilotinib in intolerant patients. Overall, 75% patients not in CCyR and 60% patients not in MMR at 2G-TKI start attained this response. DMR was achieved by 61 patients (37.4%), with estimated rate of stable DMR at 5 years of 24%. After a median follow-up of 48 months, 60% of patients persisted on their second-line treatment. Rates and kinetics of cytogenetic and molecular responses, progression-free and overall survival were similar for dasatinib and nilotinib. In a "real-life" setting, dasatinib and nilotinib resulted equally effective and safe after imatinib failure, determining high rates of CCyR and MMR, and a significant chance of stable DMR, a prerequisite for treatment discontinuation.