Patient-reported impairment following TKA is reduced when a computationally simulated predicted ideal alignment is achieved.

PURPOSE: Joint dynamics following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) may influence patient-reported outcome. Simulations allow many knee alignment approaches to a single patient to be considered prior to surgery. The simulated kinematics can be matched to patient-reported outcome to predict kinematic patterns most likely to give the best outcome. This study aims to validate one such previously developed algorithm based on a simulated deep knee bend (the Dynamic Knee Score, DKS). METHODS: 1074 TKA patients with pre- and post-operative Computerised Tomography (CT) scans and 12-month post-operative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes (KOOS) Scores were identified from the 360 Med Care Joint Registry. Landmarking and registration of implant position was performed on all CT scans, and each of the achieved TKAs was computationally simulated and received a predictive outcome score from the DKS. In addition, a set of potential alternative surgical plans which might have been followed were simulated. Comparison of patient-reported issues and DKS score was evaluated in a counter-factual study design. RESULTS: Patient-reported impairment with the knee catching and squatting was shown to be 30% lower (p = 0.005) and 22% lower (p = 0.026) in patients where the best possible DKS result was the one surgically achieved. Similar findings were found relating attainment of the best tibial slope and posterior femoral resection DKS plans to patient-reported difficulty straightening the knee (40% less likely, p < 0.001) and descending stairs (35% less likely, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The DKS has been shown to correlate with presence of patient-reported impairments post-TKA and the resultant algorithm can be applied in a pre-operative planning setting. Outcome optimization in the future may come from patient-specific selection of an alignment strategy and simulations may be a technological enabler of this trend. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (Retrospective Cohort Study).

How does the use of quantified gap-balancing affect component positioning and limb alignment in robotic total knee arthroplasty using functional alignment philosophy? A comparison of two robotic platforms.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the effect of an image-based (MAKO) system using a gap-balancing technique with an imageless (OMNIbot) robotic tool utilising a femur-first measured resection technique. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients undergoing primary TKA with a functional alignment philosophy performed by a single surgeon using either the MAKO or OMNIbot robotic systems. In all cases, the surgeon's goal was to create a balanced knee and correct sagittal deformity (eliminate any fixed flexion deformity). Intra-operative data and patient-reported outcomes (PROMS) were compared. RESULTS: A total of 207 MAKO TKA and 298 OMNIbot TKAs were analysed. MAKO TKA patients were younger (67 vs 69, p=0.002) than OMNIbot patients. There were no other demographic or pre-operative alignment differences. Regarding implant positioning, in MAKO TKAs the femoral component was more externally rotated in relation to the posterior condylar axis (2.3° vs 0.1°, p<0.001), had less valgus femoral cuts (1.6° vs 2.7° valgus, p<0.001) and more varus tibial cuts (2.4° vs 1.9° varus, p<0.001), and had more bone resected compared to OMNIbot TKAs. OMNIbot cases were more likely to require tibial re-cuts than MAKO (15% vs 2%, p<0.001). There were no differences in femur recut rates, soft tissue releases, or rate of achieving target coronal and sagittal leg alignment between robotic systems. A subgroup analysis of 100 MAKO and 100 OMNIbot propensity-matched TKAs with 12-month follow-up showed no significant difference in OKS (42 vs 43, p=0.7) or OKS PASS scores (83% vs 91%, p=0.1). MAKO TKAs reported significantly better symptoms according to their KOOS symptoms score than patients that had OMNIbot TKAs (87 vs 82, p=0.02) with a higher proportion of KOOS PASS rates, at a slightly longer follow-up time (20 months vs 14 months, p<0.001). There were no other differences in PROMS. CONCLUSION: A gap-balanced technique with an image-based robotic system (MAKO) results in different implant positioning and bone resection and reduces tibial recuts compared to a femur-first measured resection technique with an imageless robotic system (OMNIbot). Both systems achieve equal coronal and sagittal deformity correction and good patient outcomes at short-term follow-ups irrespective of these differences.

Implementation of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty in the public health system: a comparative cost analysis.

PURPOSE: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may improve the precision of bone preparation and component alignment when compared to the conventional surgical approach; however, the detailed cost analysis of robotic-assisted TKA is lacking. This study aims to compare in-hospital costs between robotic-assisted and computer-navigated TKA. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary TKA at a public hospital in Sydney between October 2018 and June 2019 were included. Patient demographics, surgical outcomes and in-hospital cost variables including, staff, critical care, emergency department, diagnostic, prosthesis, operating room, ward and other related costs until the discharge to the community were collected. Differences across in-hospital costs between robotic-assisted and computer-navigated TKA were compared using independent Student's t-tests. RESULTS: Of the 258 primary TKAs, 181 (70.2%) were computer-navigated and 77 (29.8%) robotic-assisted. Surgical time (p < 0.001) and operating time (p < 0.001) were both significantly shorter in computer-navigated TKA, while robotic-assisted TKA cases were more likely to be discharged directly home without extended in-patient rehabilitation (p = 0.014). When removing the capital costs of surgical equipment and maintenance, there was no difference in total in-hospital cost between computer-navigated ($19,512.3) and robotic-assisted TKA ($18,347.1; p = 0.179). When these capital costs were included, the mean in-hospital cost of robotic-assisted surgery was $21,507.6 compared to $19,659.7 for computer-navigated TKA (p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: The total in-hospital cost, during the implementation period of robotic-assisted TKA, is comparable with computer-navigated TKA. Robotic-assisted TKA was significantly more expensive when the upfront cost of the robotic system and maintenance costs were included. Longer term cost benefit of robotic-assisted TKA should be investigated in future studies.

The posteromedial corner of the knee: an international expert consensus statement on diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: To establish recommendations for diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation of posteromedial corner (PMC) knee injuries using a modified Delphi technique. METHODS: A list of statements concerning the diagnosis, classification, treatment and rehabilitation of PMC injuries was created by a working group of four individuals. Using a modified Delphi technique, a group of 35 surgeons with expertise in PMC injuries was surveyed, on three occasions, to establish consensus on the inclusion or exclusion of each statement. Experts were encouraged to propose further suggestions or modifications following each round. Pre-defined criteria were used to refine item lists after each survey. The final document included statements reaching consensus in round three. RESULTS: Thirty-five experts had a 100% response rate for all three rounds. A total of 53 items achieved over 75% consensus. The overall rate of consensus was 82.8%. Statements pertaining to PMC reconstruction and those regarding the treatment of combined cruciate and PMC injuries reached 100% consensus. Consensus was reached for 85.7% of the statements on anatomy of the PMC, 90% for those relating to diagnosis, 70% relating to classification, 64.3% relating to the treatment of isolated PMC injuries, and 83.3% relating to rehabilitation after PMC reconstruction. CONCLUSION: A modified Delphi technique was applied to generate an expert consensus statement concerning the diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation practices for PMC injuries of the knee with high levels of expert agreement. Though the majority of statements pertaining to anatomy, diagnosis, and rehabilitation reached consensus, there remains inconsistency as to the optimal approach to treating isolated PMC injuries. Additionally, there is a need for improved PMC injury classification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: an evolution in progress. A concise review of the available systems and the data supporting them.

INTRODUCTION: A review of the data supporting robotic systems currently available is presented focussing on precision and reproducibility, radiological outcomes, clinical outcomes, and survivorship. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scientific literature published on robotic systems for knee arthroplasty was reviewed using the reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were any study involving robotic-assisted UKA or TKA that reported precision of implant positioning or functional outcomes or range of motion or survivorship, including cadaveric or dry bone studies with a minimum of 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies were identified for robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, and 24 studies for robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Those that reported on radiological outcomes or cadaver studies consistently demonstrated improved precision with the use of robotic systems irrespective of the system. PROMS and survival data demonstrated equivalent short-term results. However, many studies reported outcomes inconsistently and few had long-term clinical follow-up or survivorship data. CONCLUSIONS: This review adds to the body of evidence supporting improved precision and reproducibility with robotic assistance in knee arthroplasty. Despite intensive funding of research into robotic knee systems, there remains considerable heterogeneity in exposure and outcome analysis and few quality long-term studies demonstrating translation to better clinical outcomes and implant survivorship.

ACL hamstring grafts fixed using adjustable cortical suspension in both the femur and tibia demonstrate healing and integration on MRI at one year.

PURPOSE: To present the clinical outcomes and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of adjustable cortical suspensory fixation for the femur and tibia in hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. METHODS: A cohort of 233 sequential patients was analysed for graft failure rate and subjective IKDC, Tegner and Lysholm scores. 144 validated 1-year MRIs assessed and correlated graft healing and tunnel widening. RESULTS: At mean follow-up of 28 months ± 8.2 [median 26, range 12-49], the graft failure rate was 4.7%. Significant improvements were seen in all clinical scores (p < 0.001). MRI analysis showed 71% with fully integrated grafts in the tibia and 24% in the femur, with the remainder all showing greater than 50% integration. Graft signal was low and homogenous in 67% in the tibia, 29% in the intra-articular portion and 20% in the femur. One patient had greater than 50% high signal in the tibial graft and one in the intra-articular graft, all others demonstrated greater than 50% low signal. Both graft integration and signal were significantly better in the tibia than the femur (p < 0.01). Tunnel widening was 2.2 ± 1.4 mm and 2.7 ± 1.3 mm in the tibia and femur, respectively. Comparison of individual MRI appearances and overall clinical outcome at the same 12-month point demonstrated no consistent significant correlation. CONCLUSION: Adjustable cortical suspensory fixation in both femoral and tibial tunnels provides good clinical outcomes and a low graft rupture rate. Grafts demonstrate healing with comparatively low tunnel widening. There was no consistent significant correlation between the appearances on MRI and clinical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study, Level III.

Healthy knee KT1000 measurements of anterior tibial translation have significant variation.

PURPOSE: The most commonly used arthrometer for measuring and reporting anterior tibial translation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is the KT1000. Reports on its consistency and reproducibility vary in the literature, but it remains the "gold standard". The purpose of this study was to assess agreement of KT1000 measurements in a daily clinical setting. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of anterior knee translation in the healthy knee of 770 patients over a 17-year time period was performed. In this cohort, a total of 24 investigators performed 1890 measurement sets at 89 Newtons (N), 134N and at maximum manual force (MMax) level. To assess the inter- and intra-observer agreement, the intraclass-correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The "investigator effect" was a difference between two examiners in the same patient and the "device effect'' a difference within one examiner in the same patient. Minimally important difference (MID) was calculated as 0.5 of the standard deviation. RESULTS: Thirteen investigators were female, performing 1099 measurements and 11 were male, performing 791 measurements. ICC ranged between 0.558 and 0.644. At the MMax level, male investigators had a higher mm reading than female investigators (p < 0.001). Increased experience did not correlate with a higher ICC. MID ranged between 0.85 and 1.65 mm. CONCLUSION: This study investigated the KT1000 arthrometer in a clinical setting with a large number of investigators. This device delivers moderate agreement of results. Both the device and investigator effect are present. The MMax level has shown the lowest agreement and a dependency on the investigator gender. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III diagnostic study.

Large variability exists in the management of posterolateral corner injuries in the global surgical community.

PURPOSE: The management of posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries has significantly evolved over the past 2 decades. The purpose of this study was to determine the current worldview of key concepts on the diagnosis, treatment strategy, and rehabilitation for patients presenting with PLC injuries. METHODS: A 12-question multiple-choice online survey was designed to address key questions in the diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of PLC injuries. The survey was distributed to the most important international sports medicine societies worldwide. Clinical agreement was defined as > 80% of agreement in responses and general agreement was defined as > 60% of agreement in responses. RESULTS: 975 surgeons completed the survey with 49% from Europe, 21% from North America, 12% from Latin America, 12% from Asia, and smaller percentages from Africa and Oceania. Less than 14% of respondents manage more than ten PCL injuries yearly. Clinical agreement of > 80% was only evident in the use of MRI in the diagnosis of PLC injury. Responses for surgical treatment were split between isometric fibular-based reconstruction techniques and anatomically based fibular and tibial-based reconstructions. A general agreement of > 60% was present for the use of a post-operative brace in the early rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: In the global surgical community, there remains a significant variability in the diagnosis, treatment, and postoperative management of PLC injuries. The number of PLC injuries treated yearly by most surgeons remains low. As global clinical consensus for PLC remains elusive, societies will need to play an important role in the dissemination of evidence-based practices for PLC injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Correlation of tibial component size and rotation with outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Tibial component design and positioning contribute more to patient satisfaction than previously realized. A surgeon needs to decide on the size and rotation, bearing in mind that coverage should be as high as possible, whilst malrotation and overhang should be avoided. No study investigates the impact of each of these components on clinical outcomes in a single cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 1-year postoperative outcomes measured with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) Score, as well as a previously validated rotational CT protocol. Coverage, rotation from Insall's axis, and overhang of an asymmetric tibial baseplate were measured, and positive and negative correlations to clinical outcomes were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 499 knees were analyzed. Patient average age was 68.4 years. Rotation within 7° internal and 5° external from Insall's axis was a "safe zone". Mean coverage was 76%. A total of 429 knees (94%) had a coverage of at least 70% and 102 knees (22%) greater than 80%. Overhang was detected in 23% of the cohort. Increased coverage was correlated to increased KOOS score and overhang correlated with a decreased KOOS score (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the individual role of three aspects of tibial component implantation properties in postoperative pain and short-term functional outcomes. Upsizing to the point of overhang with rotational tolerance of 7° internal and 3° external to Insall's axis demonstrates best patient reported outcomes. Overhang decreases the clinical outcome by the same margin as loss of 16% of coverage.

Posterolateral corner of the knee: an expert consensus statement on diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: To develop a statement on the diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation concepts of posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries of the knee using a modified Delphi technique. METHODS: A working group of three individuals generated a list of statements relating to the diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation of PLC injuries to form the basis of an initial survey for rating by an international group of experts. The PLC expert group (composed of 27 experts throughout the world) was surveyed on three occasions to establish consensus on the inclusion/exclusion of each item. In addition to rating agreement, experts were invited to propose further items for inclusion or to suggest modifications of existing items at each round. Pre-defined criteria were used to refine item lists after each survey. Statements reaching consensus in round three were included within the final consensus document. RESULTS: Twenty-seven experts (100% response rate) completed three rounds of surveys. After three rounds, 29 items achieved consensus with over 75% agreement and less than 5% disagreement. Consensus was reached in 92% of the statements relating to diagnosis of PLC injuries, 100% relating to classification, 70% relating to treatment and in 88% of items relating to rehabilitation statements, with an overall consensus of 81%. CONCLUSIONS: This study has established a consensus statement relating to the diagnosis, classification, treatment, and rehabilitation of PLC injuries. Further research is needed to develop updated classification systems, and better understand the role of non-invasive and minimally invasive approaches along with standardized rehabilitation protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Consensus of expert opinion, Level V.

Advanced Age Is Not a Barrier to Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Detailed Analysis of Outcomes and Complications in an Elderly Cohort Compared With Average Age Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients.

BACKGROUND: Life expectancy and higher complication rates have made the routine use of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in elderly patients disputed by some authors. The purpose of this study was to assess patient and implant survivorship, complication and revision rates, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMS) in a cohort of patients aged above 80 years undergoing TKA. A comparison with a propensity matched cohort of patients of average age within our database for TKA was performed. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data identified 644 patients over the age of 80 years undergoing a TKA within a 14-year period. After calculating the average age of all TKA patients within the reviewed database, a cohort deemed average age was created within 1 standard deviation of the average age and matched using the following criteria: gender, surgeon, diagnosis, procedure type, and year. The primary outcomes were survivorship of the implant and the patient. The secondary outcomes were complications, transfusion rates, discharge destination, and PROMS. RESULTS: The revision rate was low for both groups (P = .051). Implant survivorship at 10 years was similar (P = .07). Mortality rate was higher in the elderly (P < .001). General complication rate was higher in the elderly (P = .031). Surgical complications rates were similar (P = .702). The PROMS at final follow-up were 4% lower in the elderly (P < .001). CONCLUSION: TKA in the elderly is a safe procedure. With measures minimizing the perioperative complications and blood loss, the outcome can be expected to be similar to patients of average age. The projected implant and patient survivorship in the elderly cohort is long enough to suggest that TKA in the elderly could have a high impact on remaining quality of life. Level III retrospective study.

Clinical and Statistical Validation of a Probabilistic Prediction Tool of Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Predicting patients at risk of a poor outcome would be useful in patient selection for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Existing models to predict outcome have seen limited functional implementation. This study aims to validate a model and shared decision-making tool for both clinical utility and predictive accuracy. METHODS: A Bayesian belief network statistical model was developed using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. A consecutive series of consultations for osteoarthritis before and after introduction of the tool was used to evaluate the clinical impact of the tool. A data audit of postoperative outcomes of TKA patients exposed to the tool was used to evaluate the accuracy of predictions. RESULTS: The tool changed consultation outcomes and identified patients at risk of limited improvement. After introduction of the tool, patients booked for surgery reported worse Knee Osteoarthritis and Injury Outcome Score pain scores (difference, 15.2; P < .001) than those not booked, with no significant difference prior. There was a 27% chance of not improving if predicted at risk, and a 1.4% chance if predicted to improve. This gives a risk ratio of 19× (P < .001) for patients not improving if predicted at risk. CONCLUSION: For a prediction tool to be clinically useful, it needs to provide a better understanding of the likely clinical outcome of an intervention than existed without its use when the clinical decisions are made. The tool presented here has the potential to direct patients to surgical or nonsurgical pathways on a patient-specific basis, ensuring patients who will benefit most from TKA surgery are selected.

The effectiveness of robotic hip and knee arthroplasty on patient-reported outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to determine the effectiveness of semi-active and active robotic hip and knee arthroplasty on post-operative patient-reported outcomes of function, pain, quality of life and satisfaction with surgery. METHODS: PubMed, Medline, Embase and CENTRAL were searched. Included were comparative studies investigating the effectiveness of semi-active or active robotic hip or knee arthroplasty compared to any other surgical intervention on function, pain, quality of life and satisfaction with surgery. Risk of bias and the strength of the evidence were assessed using the Downs and Black tool and the GRADE system, respectively. Relative risks, mean differences and 95% CI were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving 1342 patients were included. All studies compared robotic to conventional surgery, with active robotic surgery evaluated in total hip or knee arthroplasty and semi-active robotic surgery in total hip or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Most studies presented some risk of bias, and the strength of evidence was rated as low to very low quality. Random-effects meta-analyses showed that post-operative functional outcomes were comparable between active robotic and conventional total hip and knee arthroplasty at the short-, medium- and long-term follow-up. No significant difference in pain, quality of life and satisfaction with surgery were reported in individual studies. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic and meta-analyses indicates that functional outcomes for patients undergoing active robotic total hip and knee arthroplasty were comparable to conventional surgery. Whether semi-active or active robotic hip or knee arthroplasty is effective in improving post-operative pain, quality of life and satisfaction with surgery is unclear. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42017059932.

Patient Variation Limits Use of Fixed References for Femoral Rotation Component Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Optimal rotational alignment of the femoral component is a common goal during total knee arthroplasty. The posterior condylar axis (PCA) is thought to be the most reproducible reference in surgery, while the transepicondylar axis (TEA) seems to better approximate the native kinematic flexion axis. This study sought to determine if rules based on patient gender or coronal alignment could allow reliable reproduction of the TEA from the PCA. METHODS: Three-dimensional models based on preoperative computed tomography were made representing a patient's arthritic knee joint. The landmarks were defined and angular relationships determined. RESULTS: The population group of 726 patients contained large anatomic variation. When applying the standard reference rule of 3° external rotation from the PCA, 36.9% of patients would have a rotational target greater than ±2° from their TEA. When applying the mean external rotation of the TEA from the PCA (1.85°) from this population, this proportion dropped to 26.0% of patients. The use of statistically significant gender and coronal alignment relationships to define the femoral rotation did not reduce the proportion of patients in ±2° error. CONCLUSION: This study shows that gender and coronal alignment relationships to the TEA to PCA angle are not clinically significant as a quarter of patients would still have a target for rotation greater than ±2° from the TEA using these relationships. Superior tools for orienting rotational cuts directly to the TEA in surgery or preoperative identification of relevant patient-specific angles might capture the proportion of patients for whom standard reference angles are not appropriate.

Patient-Specific Simulated Dynamics After Total Knee Arthroplasty Correlate With Patient-Reported Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Component alignment variation following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) does not fully explain the instance of long-term postoperative pain. Joint dynamics following TKA vary with component alignment and patient-specific musculoskeletal anatomy. Computational simulations allow joint dynamics outcomes to be studied across populations. This study aims to determine if simulated postoperative TKA joint dynamics correlate with patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Landmarking and 3D registration of implants was performed on 96 segmented postoperative computed tomography scans of TKAs. A cadaver rig-validated platform for generating patient-specific simulation of deep knee bend kinematics was run for each patient. Resultant dynamic outcomes were correlated with a 12-month postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). A Classification and Regression Tree (CART) was used for determining nonlinear relationships. RESULTS: Nonlinear relationships between the KOOS pain score and rollback and dynamic coronal alignment were found to be significant. Combining a dynamic coronal angular change from extension to full flexion between 0° and 4° varus (long leg axis) and measured rollback of no more than 6 mm without rollforward formed a "kinematic safe zone" of outcomes in which the postoperative KOOS score is 10.5 points higher (P = .013). CONCLUSION: The study showed statistically significant correlations between kinematic factors in a simulation of postoperative TKA and postoperative KOOS scores. The presence of a dynamic safe zone in the data suggests a potential optimal target for any given individual patient's joint dynamics and the opportunity to preoperatively determine a patient-specific alignment target to achieve those joint dynamics.

Gait adaptations following multiple-ligament knee reconstruction occur with altered knee kinematics during level walking.

PURPOSE: The biomechanical behaviour of the knee following multiple-ligament reconstruction (MLKR) may play a role in the pathogenesis of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to compare three-dimensional knee kinematics and gait characteristics of MLKR patients to healthy controls during level walking. METHODS: Three-dimensional optoelectronic motion capture during overground walking was performed on 16 patients with MLKR and a group of healthy controls matched individually to each patient for age, gender, height and weight. Three-dimensional knee angles were extracted from the weight acceptance and propulsion sub-phases of gait. Statistical analysis was performed using group-aggregated data, as well as for each patient-control pair using a single-case approach. RESULTS: Although group analysis detected few differences, single-case analysis revealed significant differences for a proportion of patients for all dependent variables during weight acceptance and propulsion sub-phases of stance. These kinematic differences occurred in the context of reduced gait velocity, step length and cadence, as well as increased time spent in double support. CONCLUSION: Patients with MLKR display abnormalities in knee kinematics during gait at an average of 4.5 years after surgery. The pattern of kinematic abnormalities appears individual specific and may not be related to differences in spatiotemporal gait characteristics. The current findings describe detailed functional outcomes of MLKR reconstruction at average medium-term follow-up that provide improved prognostic information for clinicians to counsel patients with these types of injuries.

Evaluating the cost of robotic-assisted total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

As uptake of robotic-assisted arthroplasty increases there is a need for economic evaluation of the implementation and ongoing costs associated with robotic surgery. The aims of this study were to describe the in-hospital cost of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) and robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RA-UKA) and determine the influence of patient characteristics and surgical outcomes on cost. This prospective cohort study included adult patients (≥ 18 years) undergoing primary unilateral RA-TKA and RA-UKA, at a tertiary hospital in Sydney between April 2017 and June 2021. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, and in-hospital cost variables were extracted from hospital medical records. Differences between outcomes for RA-TKA and RA-UKA were compared using independent sample t-tests. Logistic regression was performed to determine drivers of cost. Of the 308 robotic-assisted procedures, 247 were RA-TKA and 61 were RA-UKA. Surgical time, time in the operating room, and length of stay were significantly shorter in RA-UKA (p < 0.001); whereas RA-TKA patients were older (p = 0.002) and more likely to be discharged to in-patient rehabilitation (p = 0.009). Total in-hospital cost was significantly higher for RA-TKA cases (AU$18580.02 vs $13275.38; p < 0.001). Robotic system and maintenance cost per case was AU$3867.00 for TKA and AU$5008.77 for UKA. Patients born overseas and lower volume robotic surgeons were significantly associated with higher total cost of RA-UKA. Increasing age and male gender were significantly associated with higher total cost of RA-TKA. Total cost was significantly higher for RA-TKA than RA-UKA. Robotic system costs for RA-UKA are inflated by the software cost relative to the volume of cases compared with RA-TKA. Cost is an important consideration when evaluating long term benefits of robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty in future studies to provide evidence for the economic sustainability of this practice.

Combined anterolateral complex and anterior cruciate ligament injury: Anatomy, biomechanics, and management-State-of-the-art.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture typically occurs because of sudden axial loading of the knee in conjunction with a coupled valgus and rotational moment about the tibia. However, the ACL is not the only structure damaged during this mechanism of injury, and studies have shown that the anterolateral complex (ALC) of the knee is also commonly involved. Biomechanical studies have established that the ALC plays an important role as a secondary stabiliser to control anterolateral rotatory laxity (ALRL). Indeed, it has been suggested that failure to address injury to the ALC at the time of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) may increase the risk of graft failure owing to persistent ALRL. The concept of combining a lateral extra-articular procedure to augment ACLR for the treatment of ACL injury emerged with a view to decrease the failure rate of either procedure in isolation. This state-of-the-art review discusses the history of the anatomy of the ALC, the biomechanics of a variety of lateral extra-articular augmentation procedures, and provides clinical guidelines for their use in primary ACLR.

Navigation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: State of the art.

Computer navigation (CN) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery has been used mainly for two purposes: to enhance the accuracy of tunnel position and to evaluate the kinematics of the ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and the stability achieved by different surgical techniques. Many studies have shown that navigation may improve the accuracy of anatomical tunnel orientation and position during ACL reconstructive surgery compared with normal arthroscopic tunnel placement, especially regarding the femoral side. At the same time, it has become the gold-standard method for intraoperative knee kinematic assessment, as it permits a quantitative multidirectional knee joint laxity evaluation. CN in ACL surgery has been associated with diverse problems. First, in most optic systems additional skin incisions and drill holes in the femoral bone are required for fixation of a reference frame to the femur. Second, additional radiation exposure and extra medical cost to the patient for preoperative planning are usually needed. Third, CN, due to additional steps, has more opportunities for error during preoperative planning, intraoperative registration, and operation. Fourth, soft tissues, including the skin and subcutaneous tissues, are usually not considered during the preoperative planning, which can be a problem for kinematic and stability assessment. Many studies have concluded that ACLR using a CN system is more expensive than conventional surgery, it adds extra time to the surgery and it is not mitigated by better clinical outcomes. This, combined with costs and invasiveness, has limited the use of CN to research-related cases. Future technology should prioritize less invasive intra-operative surgical navigation.