Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 38
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
World J Urol ; 40(3): 651-658, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35066636

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: IRIS™ provides interactive, 3D anatomical visualizations of renal anatomy for pre-operative planning that can be manipulated by altering transparency, rotating, zooming, panning, and overlaying the CT scan. Our objective was to analyze how eye tracking metrics and utilization patterns differ between preoperative surgical planning of renal masses using IRIS and CT scans. METHODS: Seven surgeons randomly reviewed IRIS and CT images of 9 patients with renal masses [5 high complexity (RENAL score ≥ 8), 4 low complexity (≤ 7)]. Surgeons answered a series of questions regarding patient anatomy, perceived difficulty (/100), confidence (/100), and surgical plan. Eye tracking metrics (mean pupil diameter, number of fixations, and gaze duration) were collected. RESULTS: Surgeons spent significantly less time interpreting data from IRIS than CT scans (- 67.1 s, p < 0.01) and had higher inter-rater agreement of surgical approach after viewing IRIS (α = 0.16-0.34). After viewing IRIS, surgical plans although not statistically significant demonstrated a greater tendency towards a more selective ischemia approaches which positively correlated with improved identification of vascular anatomy. Planned surgical approach changed in 22/59 of the cases. Compared to viewing the CT scan, left and right mean pupil diameter and number/duration of fixations were significantly lower when using IRIS (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p = 0.42, p < 0.01, respectively), indicating interpreting information from IRIS required less mental effort despite under-utilizing its interactive features. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons extrapolated more detailed information in less time with less mental effort using IRIS than CT scans and proposed surgical approaches with potential to enhanced surgical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Cirujanos , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Riñón/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Nefrectomía/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
2.
BJU Int ; 127(6): 645-653, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32936977

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a multi-institutional validation of a high-fidelity, perfused, inanimate, simulation platform for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) using incorporated clinically relevant objective metrics of simulation (CROMS), applying modern validity standards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a combination of three-dimensional (3D) printing and hydrogel casting, a RAPN model was developed from the computed tomography scan of a patient with a 4.2-cm, upper-pole renal tumour (RENAL nephrometry score 7×). 3D-printed casts designed from the patient's imaging were used to fabricate and register hydrogel (polyvinyl alcohol) components of the kidney, including the vascular and pelvicalyceal systems. After mechanical and anatomical verification of the kidney phantom, it was surrounded by other relevant hydrogel organs and placed in a laparoscopic trainer. Twenty-seven novice and 16 expert urologists, categorized according to caseload, from five academic institutions completed the simulation. RESULTS: Clinically relevant objective metrics of simulators, operative complications, and objective performance ratings (Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills [GEARS]) were compared between groups using Wilcoxon rank-sum (continuous variables) and parametric chi-squared (categorical variables) tests. Pearson and point-biserial correlation coefficients were used to correlate GEARS scores to each CROMS variable. Post-simulation questionnaires were used to obtain subjective supplementation of realism ratings and training effectiveness. RESULTS: Expert ratings demonstrated the model's superiority to other procedural simulations in replicating procedural steps, bleeding, tissue texture and appearance. A significant difference between groups was demonstrated in CROMS [console time (P < 0.001), warm ischaemia time (P < 0.001), estimated blood loss (P < 0.001)] and GEARS (P < 0.001). Six major intra-operative complications occurred only in novice simulations. GEARS scores highly correlated with the CROMS. CONCLUSIONS: This perfused, procedural model offers an unprecedented realistic simulation platform, which incorporates objective, clinically relevant and procedure-specific performance metrics.


Asunto(s)
Benchmarking , Simulación por Computador , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Nefrectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
3.
BJU Int ; 125(2): 322-332, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31677325

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To incorporate and validate clinically relevant performance metrics of simulation (CRPMS) into a hydrogel model for nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (NS-RARP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anatomically accurate models of the human pelvis, bladder, prostate, urethra, neurovascular bundle (NVB) and relevant adjacent structures were created from patient MRI by injecting polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogels into three-dimensionally printed injection molds. The following steps of NS-RARP were simulated: bladder neck dissection; seminal vesicle mobilization; NVB dissection; and urethrovesical anastomosis (UVA). Five experts (caseload >500) and nine novices (caseload <50) completed the simulation. Force applied to the NVB during the dissection was quantified by a novel tension wire sensor system fabricated into the NVB. Post-simulation margin status (assessed by induction of chemiluminescent reaction with fluorescent dye mixed into the prostate PVA) and UVA weathertightness (via a standard 180-mL leak test) were also assessed. Objective scoring, using Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) and Robotic Anastomosis Competency Evaluation (RACE), was performed by two blinded surgeons. GEARS scores were correlated with forces applied to the NVB, and RACE scores were correlated with UVA leak rates. RESULTS: The expert group achieved faster task-specific times for nerve-sparing (P = 0.007) and superior surgical margin results (P = 0.011). Nerve forces applied were significantly lower for the expert group with regard to maximum force (P = 0.011), average force (P = 0.011), peak frequency (P = 0.027) and total energy (P = 0.003). Higher force sensitivity (subcategory of GEARS score) and total GEARS score correlated with lower nerve forces (total energy in Joules) applied to NVB during the simulation with a correlation coefficient (r value) of -0.66 (P = 0.019) and -0.87 (P = 0.000), respectively. Both total and force sensitivity GEARS scores were significantly higher in the expert group compared to the novice group (P = 0.003). UVA leak rate highly correlated with total RACE score r value = -0.86 (P = 0.000). Mean RACE scores were also significantly different between novices and experts (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: We present a realistic, feedback-driven, full-immersion simulation platform for the development and evaluation of surgical skills pertinent to NS-RARP. The correlation of validated objective metrics (GEARS and RACE) with our CRPMS suggests their application as a novel method for real-time assessment and feedback during robotic surgery training. Further work is required to assess the ability to predict live surgical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Impresión Tridimensional , Próstata/anatomía & histología , Prostatectomía/educación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/educación , Entrenamiento Simulado , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/educación , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/normas , Benchmarking , Competencia Clínica , Simulación por Computador , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Hidrogeles , Internado y Residencia , Masculino , Modelos Anatómicos , Prostatectomía/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/normas , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas
4.
Cancer ; 124(2): 278-285, 2018 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28976544

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) may be recommended for patients with a prior negative systematic biopsy (SB). However, a proportion of these patients will continue to have no prostate cancer (PCa) identified on magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion biopsy (FB) despite abnormal mpMRI findings. METHODS: In this multi-institutional, retrospective study, clinical and mpMRI parameters were assessed for 285 consecutive patients with at least 1 prior negative biopsy who underwent FB for a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of 3 to 5 at the University of Rochester Medical Center from December 2014 to December 2016, or at the University of Alabama at Birmingham from February 2014 to February 2017. Nomograms were generated for predicting benign prostate pathology on both the targeted biopsy and the concurrent SB. RESULTS: Benign pathology was found in 132 of 285 patients (46.3%). In a multivariate analysis, the predictors of benign prostate pathology on FB were age, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, and PI-RADS score. The predicted probabilities were plotted on a receiver operating characteristic curve, and the area under the curve was 0.825. The nomogram demonstrated excellent calibration and a high net benefit in a decision curve analysis. With a theoretical cutoff probability of ≥0.7 used to recommend deferment of FB, 61 of 285 patients (21.4%) would have avoided an unnecessary biopsy, and only 4 of 285 patients (1.4%) with PCa with a Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 would have been missed. CONCLUSIONS: False-positive mpMRI examinations may occur in up to 46.3% of patients with a prior negative biopsy. Thus, a multi-institutional nomogram has been developed and validated for predicting benign pathology after FB in patients with a prior negative biopsy, and this may help to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies in the setting of abnormal mpMRI findings. Cancer 2018;124:278-85. © 2017 American Cancer Society.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Nomogramas , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía
5.
J Urol ; 199(1): 106-113, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28728994

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Recently a large body of evidence has emerged indicating that cribriform morphology is an aggressive prostate cancer morphological pattern associated with higher cancer specific mortality. In a comprehensive analysis we compared traditional and contemporary prostate biopsy techniques to detect prostate cancer with cribriform morphology with radical prostatectomy serving as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried a retrospectively maintained, single institution, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging database of 1,001 patients to identify 240 who underwent magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy and concurrent systematic biopsy from December 2014 to December 2016. Of the 3,978 biopsy cores obtained 694 positive cores were rereviewed by a genitourinary pathologist for pattern 4 subtype (cribriform, fused and poorly formed glands). Using paired analysis pathological results among 3 biopsy methods (systematic biopsy, targeted biopsy and systematic plus targeted biopsy) were compared. Prostatectomy specimens were also pathologically reviewed. RESULTS: Systematic plus targeted biopsy was superior to systematic biopsy alone or targeted biopsy alone to detect cribriform morphology (all p <0.0001). On final histopathology cribriform tumor foci were associated with an increased percent of pattern 4 involvement and extraprostatic extension (p <0.0001 and 0.003, respectively). Only 17.4% of cribriform tumors in pure form were visible on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Based on final histopathology the sensitivity of systematic biopsy, targeted biopsy and systematic plus targeted biopsy for cribriform morphology was 20.7%, 28.6% and 37.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although systematic plus targeted biopsy was the most accurate biopsy method to detect cribriform morphology, biopsy sensitivity and specificity remained poor.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Imagen Multimodal , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Anciano , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía
6.
J Urol ; 208(5): 1035-1036, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36094875
7.
J Urol ; 198(2): 316-321, 2017 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28163032

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We determined whether Gleason pattern 4 architecture impacts tumor visibility on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and correlates with final histopathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 83 tumor foci were identified in 22 radical prostatectomy specimens from patients with a prior negative biopsy who underwent magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion biopsy followed by radical prostatectomy from January 2015 to July 2016. A genitourinary pathologist rereviewed tumor foci for Gleason architectural subtype. Each prostate imaging reporting and data system category 3 to 5 lesion on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging was paired with its corresponding pathological tumor focus. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine predictors of tumor visibility. RESULTS: Of the 83 tumor foci identified 26 (31%) were visible on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, 33 (40%) were Gleason score 3+3 and 50 (60%) were Gleason score 3+4 or greater. Among tumor foci containing Gleason pattern 4, increasing tumor size and noncribriform predominant architecture were the only independent predictors of tumor detection on multivariable analysis (p = 0.002 and p = 0.011, respectively). For tumor foci containing Gleason pattern 4, 0.5 cm or greater, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging detected 10 of 13 (77%), 5 of 14 (36%) and 9 of 10 (90%) for poorly formed, cribriform and fused architecture, respectively (p = 0.01). The size threshold for the detection of cribriform tumors was higher than that of other architectural patterns. Furthermore, cribriform pattern was identified more frequently on systematic biopsy than on targeted biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced visibility of cribriform pattern on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging has significant ramifications for prostate cancer detection, surveillance and focal therapy.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Anciano , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
8.
J Urol ; 197(3 Pt 1): 640-646, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27613356

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Active surveillance is an established option for men with low risk prostate cancer. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion guided biopsy may better identify patients for active surveillance compared to systematic 12-core biopsy due to improved risk stratification. To our knowledge the performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in following men on active surveillance with visible lesions is unknown. We evaluated multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion guided biopsy to monitor men on active surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included men from 2007 to 2015 with prostate cancer on active surveillance in whom magnetic resonance imaging visible lesions were monitored by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and fusion guided biopsy. Progression was defined by ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade group 1 to 2 and ISUP grade group 2 to 3. Significance was considered at p ≤0.05. RESULTS: A total of 166 patients on active surveillance with 2 or more fusion guided biopsies were included in analysis. Mean followup was 25.5 months. Of the patients 29.5% had pathological progression. Targeted biopsy alone identified 44.9% of patients who progressed compared to 30.6% identified by systematic 12-core biopsy alone (p = 0.03). Fusion guided biopsy detected 26% more cases of pathological progression on surveillance biopsy compared to systematic 12-core biopsy. Progression on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging was the sole predictor of pathological progression at surveillance biopsy (p = 0.013). Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging progression in the entire cohort had 81% negative predictive value, 35% positive predictive value, 77.6% sensitivity and 40.5% specificity in detecting pathological progression. CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging progression predicts the risk of pathological progression. Patients with stable multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings have a low rate of progression. Incorporating fusion guided biopsy in active surveillance nearly doubled our detection of pathological progression compared to systematic 12-core biopsy.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional , Vigilancia de la Población , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Anciano , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos
9.
J Urol ; 196(1): 62-7, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26880408

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Urologists face a dilemma when a lesion identified on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging is benign on image guided fusion biopsy. We investigated the detection rate of prostate cancer on repeat fusion biopsy in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging lesions initially found to be pathologically benign on fusion biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of all patients from 2007 to 2014 who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and image guided fusion biopsy. We identified men who underwent rebiopsy of the same discrete lesion after initial fusion biopsy results were benign. Data were documented on a per lesion basis. We manually reviewed UroNav system (Invivo, Gainesville, Florida) needle tracking to verify accurate image registration. Multivariate analysis was used to identify clinical and imaging factors predictive of prostate cancer detection at repeat fusion biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 131 unique lesions were rebiopsied in 90 patients. Of these 131 resampled lesions 21 (16%) showed prostate cancer, which in 13 (61.9%) was Gleason 3 + 3. On multivariate analysis only lesion growth on repeat multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging was significantly associated with prostate cancer detection at repeat biopsy (HR 3.274, 95% CI 1.205-8.896, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Pathologically benign multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging lesions on initial image guided fusion biopsy are rarely found to harbor clinically significant prostate cancer on repeat biopsy. When prostate cancer was identified, most disease was low risk. An increase in lesion diameter was an independent predictor of prostate cancer detection. While these data are retrospective, they may provide some confidence in the reliability of negative initial image guided fusion biopsies despite a positive multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging finding.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/métodos , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
J Urol ; 195(6): 1737-43, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26812301

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: As the adoption of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsy expands, the reproducibility of outcomes at expert centers becomes essential. We sought to validate the comprehensive NCI (National Cancer Institute) experience with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and fusion guided biopsy in an external, independent, matched cohort of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared 620 patients enrolled in a prospective trial comparing systematic biopsy to fusion guided biopsy at NCI to 310 who underwent a similar procedure at Long Island Jewish Medical Center. The propensity score, defined as the probability of being treated outside NCI, was calculated using the estimated logistic regression model. Patients from the hospital were matched 1:1 for age, prostate specific antigen, magnetic resonance imaging suspicion score and prior negative biopsies. Clinically significant disease was defined as Gleason 3 + 4 or greater. RESULTS: Before matching we found differences between the cohorts in age, magnetic resonance imaging suspicion score (each p <0.001), the number of patients with prior negative biopsies (p = 0.01), and the overall cancer detection rate and the cancer detection rate by fusion guided biopsy (each p <0.001). No difference was found in the rates of upgrading by fusion guided biopsy (p = 0.28) or upgrading to clinically significant disease (p = 0.95). A statistically significant difference remained in the overall cancer detection rate and the rate by fusion guided biopsy after matching. On subgroup analysis we found a difference in the overall cancer detection rate and the rate by fusion guided biopsy (p <0.001 and 0.003) in patients with prior negative systematic biopsy but no difference in the 2 rates (p = 0.39 and 0.51, respectively) in biopsy naïve patients. CONCLUSIONS: Improved detection of clinically significant cancer by magnetic resonance imaging and fusion guided biopsy is reproducible by an experienced multidisciplinary team consisting of dedicated radiologists and urologists.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
11.
Future Oncol ; 12(21): 2417-2430, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27400645

RESUMEN

Accurate risk stratification of prostate cancer is achieved with a number of existing tools to ensure the identification of at-risk patients, characterization of disease aggressiveness, prediction of cancer burden and extrapolation of treatment outcomes for appropriate management of the disease. Statistical tables and nomograms using classic clinicopathological variables have long been the standard of care. However, the introduction of multiparametric MRI, along with fusion-guided targeted prostate biopsy and novel biomarkers, are being assimilated into clinical practice. The majority of studies to date present the outcomes of each in isolation. The current review offers a critical and objective assessment regarding the integration of multiparametric MRI and fusion-guided prostate biopsy with novel biomarkers and predictive nomograms in contemporary clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Nomogramas , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Biomarcadores , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Vigilancia de la Población , Pronóstico , Riesgo
12.
J Urol ; 193(5): 1608-13, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25498569

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The urology work force is contracting at a time when service demand is increasing due to demographic changes, especially in rural areas. We investigated the impact of rural status and urologist density on kidney and renal pelvis, bladder and prostate cancer mortality at the county level in Illinois. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We stratified the 102 Illinois counties by 2003 RUCCs as urban (36, RUCCs 1 to 3) and rural (66, RUCCs 4 to 9). Area Health Resource Files were used for county demographic data and urologist density. County level age adjusted mortality rates from 1990 to 2010 were derived from National Center for Health Statistics data using SEER*Stat. We examined the associations of urological cancer mortality rates with rural status and urologist density. RESULTS: Average urologist density significantly differed between rural and urban counties (1.9 vs 3.4/100,000 population, p < 0.01). The kidney and renal pelvis cancer mortality rate in rural counties was higher than in urban counties while that of prostate cancer was lower (4.9 vs 4.3 and 28.7 vs 32.2/100,000 population, respectively, each p < 0.01). Urologist density correlated with the mortality rate of kidney and renal pelvis cancer (Pearson coefficient -0.33, p < 0.01) but not with the bladder or prostate cancer mortality rate. Multiple regression analysis revealed that rurality and lower urologist density (p = 0.01 and < 0.05) were significantly associated with higher kidney and renal pelvis cancer mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Rural residence and low urologist density were associated with increased kidney and renal pelvis cancer mortality on the county level in Illinois. Further expansion and testing of evidence-based telemedicine is warranted because remote technical consultation is now technologically feasible, effective, inexpensive and satisfactory to patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/mortalidad , Urología , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiología , Masculino , Salud Rural , Recursos Humanos
13.
Curr Urol Rep ; 16(7): 50, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26063625

RESUMEN

The diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer continue to evolve with advances in science and technology. The utilization of multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) to identify lesions in the prostate has given clinicians the ability to visualize malignancy in the prostate with greater confidence. With this new ability came the advancement of fusion biopsy platforms, which allow for direct targeting of these lesions. As with any new technology in medicine, the proper use of these modalities and how they fit into current clinical practice need to be addressed. This review summarizes the current knowledge on how to best optimize which men undergo mp-MRI and fusion biopsies both in the screening and treatment settings.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Biopsia , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Invasividad Neoplásica , Recurrencia , Programas Informáticos
14.
Curr Urol Rep ; 16(6): 42, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26017850

RESUMEN

Approximately one in seven American men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during his lifetime, and at least 50% of newly diagnosed patients will present with low-risk disease. In the last decade, the decision-making paradigm for management has shifted due to high rates of disease detection and overtreatment, attributed to prostate-specific antigen screening, with more men deferring definitive treatment for active surveillance. The advent of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) and MRI/ transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion-guided prostate biopsy has refined the process of diagnosis, identifying patients with clinically-significant cancer and larger disease burden who would most likely benefit from intervention. In parallel, the utilization of MP-MRI in the surveillance of low-grade, low-volume disease is on the rise, reflecting support in a growing body of literature. The aim of this review is to appraise and summarize the data evaluating the role of magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance for prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Selección de Paciente , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
J Urol ; 190(1): 139-43, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23376142

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The human eye is a highly radiosensitive portion of the body and repeat radiation exposure can lead to cataract. The minimum fractionated long-term dose to initiate cataract formation is about 2,500 mSv. We determined whether further radiation related precautions are necessary to protect the eyes of the surgeon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiation doses received near the right eye of the operating surgeon were measured with a thermoluminescent dosimeter badge worn near the eye of 6 urologists for a single endourological procedure at an academic center. Procedures included stent insertion, ureteroscopic lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The mean radiation dose was calculated. Extrapolated doses required to potentiate cataract formation were also calculated. RESULTS: We assessed 28 urological procedures for radiation exposure, of which 13 were ureteroscopy done for calculus disease (range 0.05 to 0.66 mSv) and 7 were ureteral stent insertion (range 0.13 to 0.32 mSv). The mean radiation dose received during these cases was 0.208 mSv. Based on the mean dose and an average of 20 such cases per month, it would take about 50 years to reach the minimum threshold for progressive cataract formation. Eight percutaneous renal operations were performed and the mean dose received was 0.125 mSv (range 0.04 to 0.22). Based on 10 cases per month, this would require more than 160 years of exposure to reach the minimal threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term radiation can lead to cataract formation. However, the accumulated lifetime exposure of the typical urologist may not necessitate further safety precautions, such as lead-lined glasses.


Asunto(s)
Catarata/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Adulto , Catarata/epidemiología , Catarata/fisiopatología , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Dosis de Radiación , Traumatismos por Radiación/epidemiología , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
16.
Asian J Urol ; 10(4): 431-439, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38024437

RESUMEN

Objective: To evaluate the predictive validity of IRIS™ (Intuitive Surgical®, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) as a planning tool for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) by assessing the degree of overlap with intraoperative execution. Methods: Thirty-one patients scheduled for RAPN by four experienced urologists were enrolled in a prospective study. Prior to surgery, urologists reviewed the IRIS™ three-dimensional model on an iphone Operating System (iOS) app and completed a questionnaire outlining their surgical plan including surgical approach, and ischemia technique as well as confidence in executing this plan. Postoperatively, questionnaires assessing the procedural approach, clinical utility, efficiency, and effectiveness of IRIS™ were completed. The degree of overlap between the preoperative and intraoperative questionnaires and between the planned approach and actual execution of the procedure was analyzed. Questionnaires were answered on a 5-point Likert scale and scores of 4 or greater were considered positive. Results: Mean age was 65.1 years with a mean tumor size of 27.7 mm (interquartile range 17.5-44.0 mm). Hilar tumors consisted of 32.3%; 48.4% of patients had R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores of 7-9. On preoperative questionnaires, the surgeons reported that in 67.7% cases they were confident that they can perform the procedure successfully, and on intraoperative questionnaires, the surgeons reported that in 96.8% cases IRIS™ helped achieve good spatial sensation of the anatomy. There was a high degree of overlap between preoperative and intraoperative questionnaires for the surgical approach, interpreting anatomical details and clinical utility. When comparing plans for selective or off-clamp, the preoperative plan was executed in 90.0% of cases intraoperatively. Conclusion: A high degree of overlap between the preoperative surgical approach and intraoperative RAPN execution was found using IRIS™. This is the first study to evaluate the predictive accuracy of IRIS™ during RAPN by comparing preoperative plan and intraoperative execution.

17.
Ther Adv Urol ; 14: 17562872221106883, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35872881

RESUMEN

Background: Our goal is to review current literature regarding the role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) and identify trends in rate of reclassification of risk category, performance of fusion biopsy (FB) versus systematic biopsy (SB), and progression-free survival. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search in PubMed and identified 121 articles. A narrative summary was performed. Results: Thirty-two articles were chosen to be featured in this review. SB and FB are complementary in detecting higher-grade disease in follow-up. While FB was more likely than SB to detect clinically significant disease, FB missed 6.4-11% of clinically significant disease. Imaging factors that predicted upgrading include number of lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), lesion density, and MRI suspicion level. Conclusion: Incorporating mpMRI FB in conjunction with SB should be part of contemporary AS protocols. mpMRI should additionally be used routinely for follow-up; however, mpMRI is not currently sensitive enough in detecting disease progression to replace biopsy in the surveillance protocol.

18.
Urology ; 153: 333-338, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32562776

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe our technique of robot-assisted synchronous bilateral nephrectomy (RASBN) for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). METHODS: Given prior abdominal surgery/transplant in most patients, we prefer an open cut-down access to place a 12 mm port 10 cm infraumbilically. Four (8 mm) robotic ports are then placed under vision in a fan distribution along the umbilical level. The operating table is placed in reverse Trendelenburg and tilted opposite to the targeted side. Provided there are no concerns for malignancy, some cysts encountered in large kidneys (>2.5 L) may require puncture, to facilitate access and mobilization. The resected kidney is placed in a large bag and tucked in the pelvis. A similar procedure is carried out on the contralateral side after redocking the robot and tilting the table in the opposite direction. The specimen bags are extracted by elongating the lower midline 12 mm port site. RESULTS: Seven cases of RASBN performed for ADPKD were identified (December 2015 to December 2018). Median (interquartile range, IQR) values for patient demographics were: Age = 59 years (47-63), body mass index = 29 (26-32), and American Society of Anaesthesiology grade = 3. Three patients had prior deceased- and 4 had prior living- donor transplants. Indication for nephrectomy were: pain (5), hemorrhage into cysts (3), and renal masses (2). Perioperative outcomes were: operating room time = 388 minutes, estimated blood loss = 200 mL, hemoglobin change = 1.3 g/dL, transfusion = 0, length of hospital stay = 3 days, Grade I Clavien-Dindo complications = 2 cases. All patients were alive at a median follow-up of 3.8 years. CONCLUSION: RASBN is safe and effective in ADPKD even in the context of prior renal transplant patients with attendant comorbidities.


Asunto(s)
Nefrectomía/métodos , Riñón Poliquístico Autosómico Dominante/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
J Endourol ; 35(3): 383-389, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33451273

RESUMEN

Introduction: The use of volume-rendered images is gaining popularity in the surgical planning for complex procedures. IRIS™ is an interactive software that delivers three-dimensional (3D) virtual anatomical models. We aimed to evaluate the preoperative clinical utility of IRIS for patients with ≤T2 localized renal tumors who underwent either partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN). Patients and Methods: Six urologists (four faculty and two trainees) reviewed CT scans of 40 cases over 2 study phases, using conventional two-dimensional (2D) CT alone (Phase-I), followed by the CT + IRIS 3D model (Phase-II). After each review, surgeons reported their decision on performing a PN or an RN and rated (Likert scale) their confidence in completing the procedure as well as how the imaging modality influenced specific procedural decisions. Modifications to the choice of procedure and confidence in decisions between both phases were compared for the same surgeon. Concordance between surgeons was also evaluated. Results: A total of 462 reviews were included in the analysis (231 in each phase). In 64% (95% CI: 58-70%) of reviews, surgeons reported that IRIS achieved a better spatial orientation, understanding of the anatomy, and offered additional information compared with 2D CT alone. IRIS impacted the planned procedure in 20% of the reviews (3.5% changed decision from PN to RN and 16.5% changed from RN to PN). In the remaining 80% of reviews, surgeons' confidence increased from 78% (95% CI: 72-84%) with 2D CT, to 87% (95% CI: 82-92%) with IRIS (p = 0.02); this confidence change was more pronounced in cases with a high RENAL score (p = 0.009). In 99% of the reviews, surgeons rated that the IRIS accurately represented the anatomical details of all kidney components. Conclusion: Application of IRIS 3D models could influence the surgical decision-making process and improve surgeons' confidence, especially for robot-assisted management of complex renal tumors.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Humanos , Riñón , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Modelos Anatómicos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
20.
Urology ; 158: 150-155, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34496263

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of 3D computed aided designs and 3D-printed models as pre-operative planning tools for urologists, in addition to radiologist interpreted mp-MRIS, prior to radical prostatectomy procedures. METHODS: Ten patients with biopsy-positive lesions detected on mp-MRI were retrospectively selected. Radiologists identified lesion locations using a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) map and segmented the prostate, lesion(s), and surrounding anatomy to create 3D-CADs and 3D-printed models for each patient. 6 uro-oncologists randomly reviewed three modalities (mp-MRI, 3D-CAD, and 3D-printed models) for each patient and identified lesion locations which were graded for accuracy against the radiologists' answers. Questionnaires assessed decision confidence, ease-of-interpretation, and usefulness for preoperative planning for each modality. RESULTS: Using 3D-CADs and 3D-printed models compared to mp-MRI, urologists were 2.4x and 2.8x more accurate at identifying the lesion(s), 2.7x and 3.2x faster, 1.6x and 1.63x more confident, and reported it was 1.6x and 1.7x easier to interpret. 3D-CADs and 3D-printed models were reported significantly more useful for overall pre-operative planning, identifying lesion location(s), determining degree of nerve sparing, obtaining negative margins, and patient counseling. Sub-analysis showed 3D-printed models demonstrated significant improvements in ease-of-interpretation, speed, usefulness for obtaining negative margins, and patient counseling compared to 3D-CADs. CONCLUSION: 3D-CADs and 3D-printed models are useful adjuncts to mp-MRI in providing urologists with more practical, accurate, and efficient pre-operative planning.


Asunto(s)
Diseño Asistido por Computadora , Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Impresión Tridimensional , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Prostatectomía , Simulación por Computador , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Masculino , Modelos Anatómicos , Proyectos Piloto , Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA