Cas9 Allosteric Inhibition by the Anti-CRISPR Protein AcrIIA6.

In the arms race against bacteria, bacteriophages have evolved diverse anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) that block CRISPR-Cas immunity. Acrs play key roles in the molecular coevolution of bacteria with their predators, use a variety of mechanisms of action, and provide tools to regulate Cas-based genome manipulation. Here, we present structural and functional analyses of AcrIIA6, an Acr from virulent phages, exploring its unique anti-CRISPR action. Our cryo-EM structures and functional data of AcrIIA6 binding to Streptococcus thermophilus Cas9 (St1Cas9) show that AcrIIA6 acts as an allosteric inhibitor and induces St1Cas9 dimerization. AcrIIA6 reduces St1Cas9 binding affinity for DNA and prevents DNA binding within cells. The PAM and AcrIIA6 recognition sites are structurally close and allosterically linked. Mechanistically, AcrIIA6 affects the St1Cas9 conformational dynamics associated with PAM binding. Finally, we identify a natural St1Cas9 variant resistant to AcrIIA6 illustrating Acr-driven mutational escape and molecular diversification of Cas9 proteins.

Structural and functional analyses of the Porphyromonas gingivalis type IX secretion system PorN protein.

Porphyromonas gingivalis, the major human pathogen bacterium associated with periodontal diseases, secretes virulence factors through the Bacteroidetes-specific type IX secretion system (T9SS). Effector proteins of the T9SS are recognized by the complex via their conserved C-terminal domains (CTDs). Among the 18 proteins essential for T9SS function in P. gingivalis, PorN is a periplasmic protein that forms large ring-shaped structures in association with the PorK outer membrane lipoprotein. PorN also mediates contacts with the PorM subunit of the PorLM energetic module, and with the effector's CTD. However, no information is available on the PorN structure and on the implication of PorN domains for T9SS assembly and effector recognition. Here we present the crystal structure of PorN at 2.0-Å resolution, which represents a novel fold with no significant similarity to any known structure. In agreement with in silico analyses, we also found that the N- and C-terminal regions of PorN are intrinsically disordered. Our functional studies showed that the N-terminal disordered region is involved in PorN dimerization while the C-terminal disordered region is involved in the interaction with PorK. Finally, we determined that the folded PorN central domain is involved in the interaction with PorM, as well as with the effector's CTD. Altogether, these results lay the foundations for a more comprehensive model of T9SS architecture and effector transport.

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 unfolds structured mRNAs onto the ribosome for active translation initiation.

Regulation of translation initiation is well appropriate to adapt cell growth in response to stress and environmental changes. Many bacterial mRNAs adopt structures in their 5' untranslated regions that modulate the accessibility of the 30S ribosomal subunit. Structured mRNAs interact with the 30S in a two-step process where the docking of a folded mRNA precedes an accommodation step. Here, we used a combination of experimental approaches in vitro (kinetic of mRNA unfolding and binding experiments to analyze mRNA-protein or mRNA-ribosome complexes, toeprinting assays to follow the formation of ribosomal initiation complexes) and in vivo (genetic) to monitor the action of ribosomal protein S1 on the initiation of structured and regulated mRNAs. We demonstrate that r-protein S1 endows the 30S with an RNA chaperone activity that is essential for the docking and the unfolding of structured mRNAs, and for the correct positioning of the initiation codon inside the decoding channel. The first three OB-fold domains of S1 retain all its activities (mRNA and 30S binding, RNA melting activity) on the 30S subunit. S1 is not required for all mRNAs and acts differently on mRNAs according to the signals present at their 5' ends. This work shows that S1 confers to the ribosome dynamic properties to initiate translation of a large set of mRNAs with diverse structural features.

Traditional Chemical Mapping of RNA Structure In Vitro and In Vivo.

Chemical probing is often used to gain knowledge on the secondary and tertiary structures of RNA molecules either free or engaged in complexes with ligands. The method monitors the reactivity of each nucleotide towards chemicals of various specificities reflecting the hydrogen bonding environment of each nucleotide within the RNA molecule. In addition, information can be obtained on the binding site of a ligand (noncoding RNAs, protein, metabolites), and on RNA conformational changes that accompanied ligand binding or perturbation of the environmental cues. The detection of the modifications can be obtained either by using end-labeled RNA molecules or by primer extension using reverse transcriptase. The goal of this chapter is to provide the reader with an experimental guide to probe the structure of RNA in vitro and in vivo with the most suitable chemical probes.

Structural insights into protein-only RNase P complexed with tRNA.

RNase P is the essential activity removing 5'-leader sequences from transfer RNA precursors. RNase P was always associated with ribonucleoprotein complexes before the discovery of protein-only RNase P enzymes called PRORPs (PROteinaceous RNase P) in eukaryotes. Here we provide biophysical and functional data to understand the mode of action of PRORP enzymes. Activity assays and footprinting experiments show that the anticodon domain of transfer RNA is dispensable, whereas individual residues in D and TψC loops are essential for PRORP function. PRORP proteins are characterized in solution and a molecular envelope is derived from small-angle X-ray scattering. Conserved residues are shown to be involved in the binding of one zinc atom to PRORP. These results facilitate the elaboration of a model of the PRORP/transfer RNA interaction. The comparison with the ribonucleoprotein RNase P/transfer RNA complex suggests that transfer RNA recognition by PRORP proteins is similar to that by ribonucleoprotein RNase P.