RESUMEN
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic or chronically recurrent Inflammatory dermatosis associated with multiple triggers that has a complex pathophysiological mechanism. It is characterized by a heterogeneous clinical expression, signs, and symptoms. Its etiology and pathogenesis are complex and are influenced by multiple immune-mediated factors. Treatment of AD can also be complex, given the high number of available drugs and multiple therapeutic targets. In this review, we summarize current literature on the efficacy and safety of topical and systemic drugs to treat moderate-to-severe AD. We begin with topical treatments such as corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors and subsequently address the latest systemic treatments, such as Janus kinase inhibitors (upadacitinib, baricitinib, abrocitinib, gusacitinib) and interleukin (IL) inhibitors, which have proven efficacious in AD, namely, dupilumab (IL-4 and IL-13), tralokinumab (IL-13), lebrikizumab (IL-13), and nemolizumab (IL-31). Given the large number of drugs available, we summarize the pivotal clinical trials for each drug, evaluate recent real-world experience in terms of safety and efficacy for purposes of compilation, and provide evidence to guide the optimal choice of therapy.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Humanos , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Interleucina-13 , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The advent of biosimilar drugs and their use in routine clinical practice has revolutionized the management of moderate to severe psoriasis and led to changes in the positioning of the existing molecules used to control this condition. Evidence from clinical trials complemented by real-world experience has helped to clarify concepts and has significantly changed the use and positioning of biologic agents in this setting. The present document is an update on the position of the Spanish Psoriasis Working Group regarding the use of biosimilar drugs, which takes into account this new situation.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Psoriasis , Humanos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Attention has been focused on new ways to understand and manage urticaria ever since the recent addition of novel drugs to the therapeutic arsenal, the updating of clinical practice guidelines, and the publication of pathophysiologic insights. The Andalusian Section of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) has developed a clinical pathway that defines quality-of-care characteristics and makes recommendations on decision-making affecting patients with urticaria. We present a patient-centered approach to care, in which the patient's clinical pathway through the health care system includes links between primary and hospital care to ensure continuity-a key feature of quality.
Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas , Urticaria/diagnóstico , Urticaria/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Enfermedad Crónica , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is an autosomal dominant neurocutaneous disorder characterized by the development of multisystem hamartomatous tumours. Facial angiofibroma appears in up to 80% of patients and has a considerable psychological impact. Various invasive procedures have been used, although they show limited effectiveness and potential adverse effects. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sustained clinical benefits and safety profile of topical sirolimus applied to treat facial angiofibromas. METHODS: This study was a non-blinded, uncontrolled case-series comprising 10 patients with TSC-associated facial angiofibroma that was treated with 0.4% sirolimus ointment 3 times a week for 9 months. Patients were clinically evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks. Plasma levels of sirolimus were determined. RESULTS: A sustained improvement was observed in erythema and in the size and extension of the lesions as early as the first weeks of treatment. Sirolimus plasma levels remained below detection limits (0.3 ng/mL) in all cases. The formula was well-tolerated with no local or systemic adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Topical sirolimus seems to be an effective and safe medical alternative to surgery or laser-based treatments in patients with TSC-associated facial angiofibromas.
Asunto(s)
Angiofibroma/etiología , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Esclerosis Tuberosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Tópica , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Cara , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Esclerosis Tuberosa/complicaciones , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Exostosis/etiología , Deformidades Adquiridas del Pie/etiología , Enfermedades de la Uña/etiología , Osteocondroma/diagnóstico por imagen , Dedos del Pie/patología , Adolescente , Neoplasias Óseas/complicaciones , Exostosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Osteocondroma/complicaciones , Dedos del Pie/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Secukinumab, an immunoglobulin G1/κ monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin 17a, is used to treat moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults who are eligible for systemic treatment. Indirect comparisons of the efficacy of secukinumab, ustekinumab, and anti-tumor necrosis factor agents have found lower drug survival rates for patients on secukinumab, in spite of that biologic's rapid onset of action and efficacy as demonstrated by the large number of patients reaching a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index of 90 or 100. We present data from a retrospective study of 171 patients treated with doses of 300mg or 150mg of secukinumab every 4 weeks in 5 hospitals in the Spanish autonomous community of Andalusia. Eighty-seven percent continued on treatment at 132 weeks, contrasting with reports from previously published case series.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Teledermatology is now fully incorporated into our clinical practice. However, after reviewing current legislation on the ethical aspects of teledermatology (data confidentiality, quality of care, patient autonomy, and privacy) as well as insurance and professional responsibility, we observed that a specific regulatory framework is still lacking and related legal aspects are still at a preliminary stage of development. Safeguarding confidentiality and patient autonomy and ensuring secure storage and transfer of data are essential aspects of telemedicine. One of the main topics of debate has been the responsibilities of the physicians involved in the process, with the concept of designating a single responsible clinician emerging as a determining factor in the allocation of responsibility in this setting. A specific legal and regulatory framework must be put in place to ensure the safe practice of teledermatology for medical professionals and their patients.
Asunto(s)
Confidencialidad , Dermatología , Telemedicina , COVID-19/epidemiología , Seguridad Computacional/ética , Seguridad Computacional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Confidencialidad/ética , Confidencialidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Dermatología/ética , Dermatología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Urgencias Médicas , Unión Europea , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguro de Responsabilidad Civil/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pandemias , Autonomía Personal , SARS-CoV-2 , España , Telemedicina/ética , Telemedicina/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
Although in most majority the psoriasis presents/displays a clinical cutaneous today fundamentally we know that it can be associated to other diseases extracutaneous, as much you will articular, digestive, metabolic, cardiovascular and even psychic. We reviewed in this article the atiopathogenics bases and the risks that the psoriáasics patients must to suffer these comorbidities.
Asunto(s)
Psoriasis/complicaciones , Artritis Psoriásica/etiología , Depresión/etiología , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/etiología , Síndrome Metabólico/etiología , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
Chronic urticaria is a difficult-to-treat skin disorder that has a major impact on patient quality of life. The latest update of the European guideline on the management of urticaria was published in 2018. In this consensus statement, produced in the autonomous community of Andalusia, Spain, we describe a multidisciplinary approach for applying the new treatment algorithm proposed by the European guideline in our region.
Asunto(s)
Urticaria Crónica , Urticaria , Consenso , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , España , Urticaria/diagnósticoAsunto(s)
Alopecia/etiología , Cejas , Neoplasias Cutáneas/complicaciones , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
T cells play an important role in the immune system and in the inflammatory response that determines the development and maintenance of psoriasis plaques. Better understanding of the pathophysiology of this disease has led to the development of specific biological treatments aimed at patients with extensive psoriasis. Traditionally, psoriasis has been treated with drugs which, in spite of their efficacy, have a toxicity associated to their long-term use. Thus, they cannot be used safely, comfortably or efficiently in many patients. Efalizumab, a biological agent specifically and selectively directed towards blocking the key steps in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, has been shown to be effective and safe in the short and long term in the treatment of psoriasis in more than 15 phase I, II and III clinical trials. In this article, the results of efficacy at 12 weeks, 6 months and three years are reviewed. Efalizumab arises as an important addition to the dermatological pharmacopoeia for the long-term treatment of psoriasis.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Psoriasis/terapia , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Productos Biológicos/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Humanos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is currently little information available on the management of patients with psoriasis in the daily clinical practice of dermatologists in Spain. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to survey a group of Spanish dermatologists with particular expertise in the management of psoriasis to determine their opinions on the protocols used in routine clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study based on an online survey about the management of psoriasis sent to 75 dermatologists. The survey, which was specifically designed for the study, included 12questions on different aspects of clinical practice in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. RESULTS: The response rate was 96% (n=72). Biologics were the most widely used monotherapy option. In total, 64.3% of respondents reported that their patients used conventional systemic therapies for 1 to 2years before switching to a biologic drug and that the main reason for the switch was unstable control of disease activity. Overall, 85.7% assigned a "high" or "very high" importance to the use of a Psoriasis Area Severity Index score of <3 as a treatment goal. The drugs of choice among the respondents were etanercept for pediatric patients (78.6%), adalimumab and etanercept for patients with psoriatic arthritis (64.3%), and ustekinumab in patients frequently away from home (78.6%) and patients with a history of multiple sclerosis, demyelinating diseases (64.3%), or poor adherence to treatment (71.4%). CONCLUSION: This study provides a unique overview of the opinions of a representative sample of expert dermatologists on the current use of biologics for the treatment of psoriasis in Spain.