Finger doses due to68Ga-labelled pharmaceuticals in PET departments-results of a multi-centre pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Although the use of68Ga has increased substantially in nuclear medicine over the last decade, there is limited information available on occupational exposure due to68Ga. The purpose of this study is to determine the occupational extremity exposure during the preparation, dispensing and administration of68Ga-labelled radiopharmaceuticals. METHOD: Workers in eight centres wore a ring dosimeter for all tasks involving68Ga-labelled radiopharmaceuticals for a minimum of one month. Additionally, the fingertip dose was monitored in two centres and the hand with the highest ring dose during68Ga procedures was also identified in one centre. RESULTS: The median normalised ring dose for68Ga procedures was found to be 0.25 mSv GBq-1(range 0.01-3.34). The normalised68Ga ring doses recorded in this study are similar to that found in the literature for18F. This study is consistent with previous findings that the highest extremity dose is found on the non-dominant hand. A limited sub study in two of the centres showed a median fingertip to base of the finger dose ratio of 4.3. Based on this median ratio, the extrapolated annual68Ga fingertip dose for 94% of the workers monitored in this study would be below Category B dose limit (150 mSv) and no worker would exceed Category A dose limit (500 mSv). CONCLUSION: When appropriate shielding and radiation protection practices are employed, the extremity dose due to68Ga is comparable to that of18F and is expected to be well below the regulatory limits for the majority of workers.

Sub-endocardial and sub-epicardial measurement of myocardial blood flow using 13NH3 PET in man.

BACKGROUND: This study examined whether measuring myocardial blood flow (MBF) in the sub-endocardial (SEN) and sub-epicardial (SEP) layers of the left ventricular myocardium using 13NH3 positron emission tomography (PET) and an automated procedure gives reasonable results in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Resting and stress 13NH3 dynamic PET were performed in 70 patients. Using ≥ 70% diameter stenosis in invasive coronary angiography (ICA) to identify significant CAD, we examined the diagnostic value of SEN- and SEP-MBF, and coronary flow reserve (CFR) vs. the corresponding conventional data averaged on the whole wall thickness. RESULTS: ICA demonstrated 36 patients with significant CAD. Their global stress average [1.61 (1.26, 1.87) mL·min-1·g-1], SEN [1.39 (1.2, 1.59) mL·min-1·g-1] and SEP [1.22 (0.96, 1.44) mL·min-1·g-1] MBF were significantly lower than in the 34 no-CAD patients: 2.05 (1.76, 2.52), 1.72 (1.53, 1.89) and 1.46 (1.23, 1.89) mL·min-1·g-1, respectively, all P < .005. In the 60 CAD vs. the 150 non-CAD territories, stress average MBF was 1.52 (1.10, 1.83) vs. 2.06 (1.69, 2.48) mL·min-1·g-1, SEN-MBF 1.33 (1.02, 1.58) vs. 1.66 (1.35, 1.93) mL·min-1·g-1, and SEP-MBF 1.07 (0.80, 1.29) vs. 1.40 (1.12, 1.69) mL·min-1·g-1, respectively, all P < .05. Using receiver operating characteristics analysis for the presence of significant CAD, the areas under the curve (AUC) were all significant (P < .0001 vs. AUC = 0.5) and similar: stress average MBF = 0.79, SEN-MBF = 0.75, and SEP-MBF = 0.73. AUC was 0.77 for the average CFR, 0.75 for SEN, and 0.70 for SEP CFR. The stress transmural perfusion gradient (TPG) AUC (0.51) was not significant. However, stress TPG was significantly lower in segments subtended by totally occluded arteries vs. those subtended by sub-total stenoses: 1.10 (0.86, 1.33) vs. 1.24 (0.98, 1.56), respectively, P < .005. CONCLUSION: Automatic assessment of SEN- and SEP-MBF (and CFR) using 13NH3 PET gives reasonable results that are in good agreement with the conventional average whole wall thickness data. Further studies are needed to examine the utility of layer measurements such as in patients with hibernating myocardium or microvascular disease.

Management of pregnant or potentially pregnant patients undergoing diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures: Investigation of clinical routine practice.

It is well known that foetuses are highly sensitive to ionising radiation and special attention to justification and optimisation of radiological procedures involving a pregnant patient is required. A task to review, validate and compare different approaches to managing the pregnant patient and to estimating the associated foetal doses arising from a diagnostic or interventional radiology (DIR) procedure was designed in the framework of EURADOS working group 12. As a first step, a survey of radiation protection practice including dosimetry considerations among EURADOS members was performed using online questionnaire. Then, to evaluate the possible differences in the estimated foetal doses, a comparison of assessed dose values was made for three cases of pregnant patients that underwent different CT procedures. More than 120 professionals from 108 institutions and 17 countries that are involved in managing pregnant patients undergoing DIR procedures answered the questionnaire. Most of the respondents use national or hospital guidelines on the management of pregnant patients undergoing DIR procedures. However, the guidelines differ considerably among respondents. Comparison of foetal dose assessments performed by dosimetry experts showed the variety of methods used as well as large variability of estimated foetal doses in all three cases. Although European and International commission on radiation protection guidelines already exist, they are more than 20 years old and, in some aspects, they are obsolete. This paper shows that there is a need to revise and update these guidelines.